On January 11th, 2022, According to the White House Press Briefing, White House condemns the DPRK’s ballistic missile launch. While the administration assessed that this event did not pose an immediate threat to U.S. personnel or territory or to our allies, the launch highlights the destabilizing impact of the DPRK’s illicit weapons program. The launch is in violation of multiple U.N. Security Council resolutions. It poses a threat to the DPRK’s neighbors and the international community. We call on the DPRK to refrain from further provocations and engage in sustained and substantive dialogue. And we are consulting closely with our allies and partners on this.
There’s a report it led to a ground stop yesterday on the West Coast, at American airports. The FAA who has put out a statement 15-minute ground stop.
According to Arirang News,
Before the missile launch, Pyeongyang vowed to take strong and resolute action if the Washington keeps up what the regime called confrontational attitude.
This was a response to sanctions announced a day earlier by the U.S. following the North's missile test on Tuesday.
Kim Dami has the details: North Korea has warned that Pyeongyang will be forced into a (quote) "stronger and certain reaction" if Washington continues to take a confrontational stance against the regime.
In a statement issued by the North's state media on Friday, a spokesperson for the foreign ministry said the North's recent development of a new type of weapon was part of efforts to modernize its national defense capability.
A reiteration of the North's long stance it will not give up on its (quote) "right to self-defense."
But experts note it's a burden for both Pyeongyang and Washington to continue in the current situation amid such tension.
"The U.S. is already having confrontational relations with China and Russia. As North Korea announced at the key party meeting, it will focus on improving people's livelihoods amid economic difficulties due to the pandemic border closure."
Pyeongyang also toned down the warning slightly by issuing the statement from a foreign ministry spokesperson.
While pledging to keep close tabs on Pyeongyang, South Korea's unification ministry on Friday called on the North to return to dialogue.
"We once again urge the North to respond to Seoul's efforts to create peace through dialogue at a time when securing stability on the Korean Peninsula is crucial."
The North's warning on Friday came just a day after Washington slapped sanctions on six North Koreans for their roles in procuring equipment and technology for the regime's missile programs, the Biden administration's first to specifically target the North's ballistic missile tests.
U.S. ambassador to the UN, Linda Thomas-Greenfield, also proposed UN sanctions following the North's six ballistic missile launches since September 2021.
Regarding North Korea's missile launch on Tuesday, South Korea's Defense Ministry stressed today that it is capable of detecting and intercepting such threats.
Officials explained further that South Korea's military is continuously reinforcing its response systems.
They also reaffirmed previous assessments by South Korea and the United States... that it was not a hypersonic missile, but an ordinary ballistic missile based on the observation that it reached its maximum speed of Mach ten only during ascent, and not when moving laterally.
In the meantime, South Korean and U.S. intelligence authorities continue to analyze the missile's specifications in detail.
---------
January 12th, 2022, Rodong News stated that DPRK Leader Kim Jong Un watched the test fire hypersonic missile on Tuesday.
.
Sources: Arirang News, CNN, ABC,CBSN, MSNBC, Wion, Reuther,Sun, ChoSun, Fox News, Youtube,Rodong, and wikipedia January 15 Rev. January 16, 2022
Catch4all.com, Sandra Englund
N. Korea's ballistic missiles fired on Wednesday, September 15, 2021 “New Type Long-Range Cruise Missile”
According to Arirang News,
North Korea this afternoon... test-fired two short-range ballistic missiles... toward the East Sea.
Just last weekend, it launched cruise missiles, which are not banned by sanctions,... but these ballistic missiles are.
For more, we have defense ministry correspondent Kim Dami on the line.
Dami, this seems like an escalation by the North.
South Korea's Joint Chiefs of Staff said the missiles have been fired at 12:34 and 12:39 this afternoon from North Korea's Yangduk , Pyeongannam-do Province.
They flew some 800 kilometers... and reached an altitude of some 60 kilometers.
Since they're launched from inland rather than in a coastal area... it's highly likely the weapons have been test-fired before... and today's launch is aimed at showing off the North's confidence in its missile capabilities and to test an increase in flight distance of pre-existing weapons.
Just looking at the flight distance and maximum height... an expert said there's the possibility that today's test-fire could be the modified version of the KN-23 missile that was fired on March 25th... using transporter erected launchers. Some pundits say this is an escalation of tensions from North Korea. It held a scaled-down military parade last Thursday to mark the 73rd anniversary of its founding, and followed that with the North's report of cruise missile tests and now this, the firing of ballistic missiles... in which unlike the cruise missiles are a violation of United Nations sanctions.
The latest missile launch is the fifth provocation by North Korea this year.
The Blue House said President Moon Jae-in had been immediately notified of the recent North Korean launch... he's expected to be briefed in more detail after an emergency National Security Council meeting this afternoon.
Meanwhile, Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga called the launch an outrage... and stated the missiles are presumed to have landed outside Japan's Exclusive Economic Zone.
For Impact on efforts to revive the denuclearization talks for U.S., The U.S. has called the launch destabilizing. We'll have to wait and see on the results of the NSC meeting to see whether South Korea will strongly denounce the latest firings... as well as whether officials will reveal their assessment of the security situation on the Korean peninsula.
But the latest provocation further puts a dent in the high level of optimism of the South Korean government, which had argued the North had a strong willingness to denuclearize and that the momentum for dialogue could be revived.
We'll also waiting to see how Washington will respond to the latest missile launch... and whether the latest launch will serve as a tipping point in its policies directed toward North Korea.
------------------------
According to Wikipedia, On 11–12 September 2021, North Korea carried out tests of a new long-range cruise missile, according to the Korean Central News Agency (KCNA). The missiles flew for 1,500 kilometres and successfully hit their target in North Korea's waters, and were meant for a "strategic role" according to the news agency, which analyst Ankit Panda stated was a common euphemism for a missile capable of carrying nuclear warheads. On 15 September, North Korea fired two ballistic missiles off of its coast according to the South Korean military.
On September 17th, 2021, According to 38North.org, report stated that the Initial Evaluation of North Korea’s Rail-Mobile Missile Launches which The significance of the September 15 SRBM tests is not the missiles It’s the Launcher, Not the Missile
38 North: The significance of the September 15 SRBM tests is not the missiles, which are along the lines of existing types, but the use of a rail-mobile launcher, which has little added value for the North’s already road-mobile SRBM force but important implications for its ICBMs. ICBMs, which are harder to make road-mobile than smaller missiles, would benefit from rail mobility much more than smaller systems. While rail-mobility is inferior to road-mobility in terms of promoting survivability, rail-mobile systems are significantly more survivable than fixed-base ones. More details.
Sources:Youtube, Yahoo, AFP,
KRTKCTV, Reuters, KCNA, SCMP , South
China Morning PostThe Sun, The Straits
Times, ABC News BBC News, Arirang News, Hindustain Times,Yonhap News, Korea
Now,CNA, Fox,38North, WION, and wikipedia
Catch4all.com,
Sandra Englund, September 20, Rev September 25th, 2021
President Kim Jong-un, the highest-ranking leader of the Party, State, and Armed Forces, the chairman of the Chosun Workers' Party, the chairman of the State Council of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, and the Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, visited the pursuit raids under the western aerospace and anti-air divisions.
Dear Vice Chairman of the Central Committee of the Chosun Workers 'Party, Dear Cheol-dong, Deputy Chief of Staff of the Chosun People's Army, Park Chung-cheon, and the Chosun Workers' Party Central Committee executives.
The dear leader of the Korean Air Force, the commander of the Air Force, Kim Gwang-hyuk and the commander of the Pursuit and Squadron, met with the commander of the Korean Air and Anti-Air Force Commander.
Dear Vice Chairman of the Central Committee of the Chosun Workers 'Party, Dear Cheol-dong, Deputy Chief of Staff of the Chosun People's Army, Park Chung-cheon, and the Chosun Workers' Party Central Committee executives.
The dear leader of the Korean Air Force, the commander of the Air Force, Kim Gwang-hyuk and the commander of the Pursuit and Squadron, met with the commander of the Korean Air and Anti-Air Force Commander.
The dearest leader of the Grand Order of the Republic of Korea, while rekindling the enthusiasm that his country's commanders are left entirely to his companions, the fighters are prepared for the party and the country, and they are armed with the Juche method that our Party has revealed to make it more powerful and fly training. He complained about strengthening the fight and to vigorously fight for a higher combat flight and fighting power.
Dear Mr. Choi, the oldest governor, along with the accompanying executives, watched the flight training of the chasing and training team.
The excitement of astronauts who showed their combat flight techniques in front of the enemy who wanted to see even in their dreams reached the end of the blue sky.
When the commander of the Korean Air and Anti-Air Force Command ordered the scramble, the fighters screamed loudly, spurred the ground, and climbed the sky.
First, the fighters pass through the command post over the commanding station of the highest-ranking autonomous region, and fly through the super-low flight, taking the heart of the allegiance of all aviation and anti-aircraft soldiers, and taking the path of strengthening the military for the safety of our country and the well-being of the people. The greatest honor and salute was given to the enemy who walked and walked away.
Subsequently, the pursuit and raid training team conducted air combat training to chase and seize the air targets.
Dear Mr. Choe-Ryeong-do, he watched the courageous air and combat behaviors of the fighter-fighters of the pursuit and raid team with the accompanying executives, expressing great satisfaction, and applauding.
The dear Supreme Leader Autonomous magazine showed that even today's training showed that our party's reliable skymen are ready to scramble at any time. He said that he showed his intention to defend the command of the air by demonstrating his ability to perform missions. He said to convey.
The chasing raid team with the dearest oldest autonomous territory has full-fledged bombs instead of the refueling forces that will return if the enemy's battle order comes back, and pierces even the thunderous spirits and fires in the clouds. Righteousness and full morale simmered.
All chase raid combat fighter and soldiers endlessly thank the comrade Kim Jong-un, a respected senior leader, who loves and loves the aviators endlessly and embraces and leads them with faith and affection.
Headquarters Politics
(sources: Rodong Sinmun and Google)
The Historic Moment of DMZ SUMMIT
JUNE 30TH, 2019
;
Remarks by President Trump and Chairman Kim Jong Un of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea in 1:1 Meeting
FOREIGN POLICY
Issued on: June 30, 2019
Panmunjom
Inter-Korean House of Freedom
3:57 P.M. KST
CHAIRMAN KIM: (In progress.) (As interpreted.) It’s always special and I want to thank you (inaudible) for having me.
PRESIDENT TRUMP: I want to thank you. Because (inaudible.) It was great. Look, I mean, the world is watching, and it’s very important for the world.
CHAIRMAN KIM: (As interpreted.) And also, the place of our meeting is special. That is why it rose the occasion of so many people.
Some people think as if this meeting was prearranged through the letters you have sent me. But myself was surprised yesterday morning when you expressed a willingness to meet with me here, and also when we got the official confirmation late yesterday afternoon.
And also, (inaudible) to meet with you again. And this place of our meeting is a symbol of the separation between the North and South, and also a reminder of unfortunate past. And as the two countries, we share a long unfortunate past, meeting at such place shows that we are willing to put an end to the unfortunate past and also open a new future and provide positive opportunities in the future.
If it was not for our excellent relation between the two of us, it would not have been possible to have this kind of opportunity. So I would like to use this strong relation to create more good news, which nobody expects (inaudible), and also to propel the good relations between our countries (inaudible).
PRESIDENT TRUMP: Well, I want to thank you, Chairman. You hear the power of that voice. Nobody has heard that voice before. He doesn’t do news conferences, in case you haven’t heard. And this was a special moment. This is, I think, really — as President Moon said, this is a historic moment, the fact that we’re meeting.
And I want to thank Chairman Kim for something else. When I put out the social media notification, if he didn’t show up, the press was going to make me look very bad. So you made us both look good, and I appreciate it.
But we’ve developed a great relationship. I really think that, if you go back two and half years, and you look at what was going on prior to my becoming President, it was a very, very bad situation — a very dangerous situation for South Korea, for North Korea, for the world.
And I think the relationship that we’ve developed has meant so much to so many people. And it’s just an honor to be with you, and it was an honor that you asked me to step over that line. And I was proud to step over the line. I thought you might do that; I wasn’t sure. But I was ready to do it. And I want to thank you. It’s been great. It’s been great.
A very historic meeting. We were just saying — one of the folks from the media was saying this could to be a very historic moment, and I guess that’s what it is. But I enjoyed being with you, and thank you very much.
END
4:01 P.M. KST
Moon of the Republic of Korea Before Restricted Bilateral Meeting
FOREIGN POLICY
Issued on: June 30, 2019
lue House
Seoul, Republic of Korea
11:14 A.M. KST
PRESIDENT MOON: (As interpreted.) Mr. President, I’d like to thank you for taking the time to visit Korea again after the G20 Summit — as well as your summit meetings with various other leaders, including China — in spite of a plethora of issues that demand you attention, both at home and abroad. But on behalf of the Korean people, I would like to send a warm welcome to you.
Yesterday, through the tweets that you sent, you actually presented a big hope to everyone, in particular a big hope to the Korean people here. And when I was looking at that tweet, I could really feel that the flower of peace was truly blossoming on the Korean Peninsula.
If you — Mr. President, if you could meet Chairman Kim at the military demarcation line and have a handshake with him, I believe that that picture, in itself, would represent a historic event. And also, this would be a significant milestone, in terms of the peace process on the Korean Peninsula that we are — the peace process that we are trying to achieve: complete denuclearization and permanent peace.
So I will be of course accompanying you to the DMZ, but today, that is, a focus of the dialogue will be of course between you and Chairman Kim. So I do — I hope that you will be able to achieve great progress in the dialogue with Chairman Kim.
PRESIDENT TRUMP: Thank you. Well, I’d just like to thank President Moon for the beautiful evening last night. We celebrated our friendship and we celebrated the new trade deal that we made very recently that went into effect on January 1st, which is a great testament to the relationship of the United States and South Korea.
I also want to thank your First Lady. She has a tremendous spirit and vitality, and a tremendous love for your country. I said that to the President. First thing I said was how impressive the First Lady was, and — a great woman. A great woman. So I just hope you tell her that.
I just had a meeting with the business leaders of South Korea. And these are not only business leaders here, they’re business leaders throughout the world. They are among the greatest businesspeople anywhere in the world. We went through a lot — Lotte, Samsung — so many that are so — Hyundai — so many that are so respected.
And we talked and we had a fairly short meeting, unfortunately. I wish it could have been longer. But these are very, very highly respected — no matter where you go in the world, they’re among the greatest in the world. And you have them right here in South Korea.
I think I could say, with great confidence, that our relationship with South Korea has never been stronger or better. We have a — just a very good feeling. There’s a good chemistry between the leaders of both countries. And Secretary Pompeo is here — Secretary of State. Mike Bolton — John Bolton is here. And John was very instrumental in some of the things we did yesterday — some of the meetings we had. And I want to thank you for that. And, Mike, I want to thank you for that.
And Mr. Ambassador, Harry, you love this country and that’s so evident, and that’s a great thing. So thank you very much for being here. We appreciate it.
So, as most of you know — I assume all of you know, otherwise I guess you wouldn’t be doing what you do — we left Japan yesterday; we were at the G20. Prime Minister Abe did a fantastic job. President Moon was there also. And they really did a great job. And a lot of the leaders got together. I was with many leaders from different countries. I have great relationships with all.
The very interesting meeting, I think, was with China. And we’re moving along toward a reciprocal but a good trade deal — a fair trade deal. And we’ll see where that goes, but we had a very, very — good feelings with President Xi and myself.
So we got here late last night, and we’ve been working from that time forward. And I will say, the treatment that we’ve been given by President Moon and the First Lady has been absolutely fantastic. And, as you know, a long-planned visit to the DMZ — I’ll be doing that in a little while. And I look forward to that.
And there’s a possibility that we’ll be meeting Kim Jong Un. And there’s a possibility that — it’s going to be very interesting. I don’t know — they want to do it. Chairman Kim wants to do it. I’d like to do it. It’s very complicated, from the standpoint of logistics and security and lots of other reasons. But both teams are working very hard. And South Korea is working also on trying to implement it. But I think it would be good.
Kim Jong Un has been somebody that we’ve gotten along with. When I first became President, what was happening during our previous — the previous administration was very bad for South Korea and very bad for North Korea, frankly. There was a lot of bad things happening. And it’s changed very, very rapidly. And it’s very positive. There are a lot of positive things going on right now.
And just in finishing up, I think I can say with great conviction that North Korea and South Korea are both in much better places right now than they were two and half years ago when I became President. There was tremendous danger. Tremendous danger. You people know it well. You know it better than I do because you had to suffer through it for a long time. A lot of progress has been made. I watched some of the news — fake news; it’s only fake news — and they said, “Well, what’s been done.” Well, it’s like the difference between day and night.
Our ambassador, Harry, was saying on the way in that, when you first got here, there were sirens going off and tests being made, and everybody was practicing for, obviously, a horrible event, and it was really scary. And he said the difference is so great.
So when I hear, you know, some of these fakers — some of these people that aren’t honest reporters — say, “Well, what has Trump done?” We’ve done a lot. We’re a lot safer today. And South Korea is a lot safer and North Korea is a lot safer; it’s good for both. And it’s really — maybe, just as important — it’s good for the world.
So we’re very proud of what we’ve done. And I have plenty of time and we’re in no rush, but it’s a lot different than it was two and a half years ago. It’s a difference like few people can even imagine.
So it’s an honor to have helped. It’s a great country. I want to thank, again, President Moon. And, really, we’re very proud of all of the things we’ve done together, and — both on the military and peace, but also on trade and other things. The relationship has never been stronger.
Thank you very much.
END
11:28 A.M. KST
According Arirang News, dated on Jun 30, 2019 Reporter, Lee Ji-won: There were several historic firsts at today's meeting at the DMZ: For the first time ever, a U.S. President stepped into North Korea, and the leaders of the two sides held a summit at the DMZ, not to mention the leaders of the two Koreas also meeting all together with the leader of the U.S.
The historic and impromptu meeting between North Korean leader Kim Jong-un and U.S. President Donald Trump took place at the truce village of Panmunjeom on Sunday.
After touring the Demilitarized Zone with President Moon Jae-in, President Trump walked to the military demarcation line that divides the two Koreas. There, just like during the 1st inter-Korean summit in April 2018, Kim Jong-un greeted Trump at the border, saying how he never expected to see President Trump there.
Kim then took Trump to the Northern side, making him the first U.S. president to set foot on North Korean soil.
After a brief photo shoot, the two crossed over to the South Korean side, exchanging brief comments on the surprise meeting.
"In crossing the border, I think President Trump showed extraordinary determination to move beyond the troubled past and into a better future."
"I just want to say this is my honor I didn't really expect it. We were in Japan for the G20. We came over and said I’m over here, I want to meet Chairman Kim. And we got to meet and stepping across that line was a great honor. A lot of progress has been made."
President Trump also said they liked each other from day one, and that he would invite Kim to the White House right now.
The two leaders were then joined by South Korean President Moon Jae-in, and this marked another historic moment, as the three leaders finally all met together. Though the details could not be heard, the leaders got to enjoy about 4 minutes of three-way talks, standing at the symbolic place of peace.
The leaders of North Korea and the U.S. then moved to the Freedom House on the South Korean side to hold their de facto third bilateral meeting, which lasted for 53 minutes.
"Some people think this meeting was arranged before through letters, but I only knew yesterday morning that President Trump would be here. And I want to meet again, and I believe that by meeting here, which is a symbol of division, the symbol of a hostile past, I believe that by two countries that have a hostile past meeting here, I think we are showcasing to the world that we have a new present, and this is showcasing to the world that we will have positive meetings going forward."
At a quick briefing after the meeting, President Trump said both sides agreed to resume working-level talks soon.
"So we have agreed to have teams set up, we're going to have United States will have teams, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, pick it, we already know the gentlemen, good luck Steve.
Having said that he hopes the focus of Sunday's visit to the DMZ goes to Kim and Trump, South Korean President said the day's events gave hope to not just the Koreans on both sides, but to the world as well.
"With today's encounter we overcame another big hill in establishing lasting peace and complete denuclearization on the Korean Peninsula. // I believe the agreement to resume their working-level talks has brought us a step closer to a good outcome."
2019 DMZ Summit
June 30, 2019: Koreas–United States DMZ Summit: President Donald Trump met with DPRK Chairman, Kim Jong Un along with ROK President Moon Jae-in at the DMZ (Demilitarized Zone) and briefly crossed into the North Korean side of the DMZ, making him the first sitting U.S. president; historic moment to enter North Korea; former US Presidents Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton had previously visited North Korea after they left office. After crossing into North Korea, Trump and Kim, who stated in English "its good to see you again", "I never expected to meet you at this place" and "you are the first US President to cross the border," met and shook their hands. Both U.S. President Trump and DPRK Chairman, Kim then briefly crossed the larger border line before crossing into South Korea. During their meeting, President Trump also invited Kim to the White House, although later acknowledged that it probably wouldn't happen in the near term.
It was also revealed that Trump's daughter Ivanka and her husband Jared Kushner had visited North Korea to meet with Kim beforehand and acted as lead American diplomats during the summit. Footage of Ivanka meeting with Kim was broadcast by the North Korean media. Ivanka also described her visit to North Korea as "surreal."
History:
The 38th parallel north—which divides the Korean Peninsula roughly in half—was the original boundary between the United States and Soviet Union's brief administration areas of Korea at the end of World War II. Upon the creation of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK, informally "North Korea") and the Republic of Korea (ROK, informally "South Korea") in 1948, it became a de facto international border and one of the most tense fronts in the Cold War.
Both the North and the South remained dependent on their sponsor states from 1948 to the outbreak of the Korean War. That conflict, which claimed over three million lives and divided the Korean Peninsula along ideological lines, commenced on 25 June 1950, with a full-front DPRK invasion across the 38th parallel, and ended in 1953 after international intervention pushed the front of the war back to near the 38th parallel.
In the Armistice Agreement of 27 July 1953, the DMZ was created as each side agreed to move their troops back 2,000 m (1.2 miles) from the front line, creating a buffer zone 4 km (2.5 mi) wide. The Military Demarcation Line (MDL) goes through the center of the DMZ and indicates where the front was when the agreement was signed.
Owing to this theoretical stalemate, and genuine hostility between the North and the South, large numbers of troops are stationed along both sides of the line, each side guarding against potential aggression from the other side, even 65 years after its establishment. The armistice agreement explains exactly how many military personnel and what kind of weapons are allowed in the DMZ. Soldiers from both sides may patrol inside the DMZ, but they may not cross the MDL. However, heavily armed ROK soldiers patrol under the aegis of military police, and have memorized each line of the armistice. Sporadic outbreaks of violence have killed over 500 South Korean soldiers, 50 US soldiers and 250 soldiers from DPRK along the DMZ between 1953 and 1999.
Daeseong-dong (also written Tae Sung Dong) and Kijong-dong (also known as the "Peace Village") are the only settlements allowed by the armistice committee to remain within the boundaries of the DMZ. Residents of Tae Sung Dong are governed and protected by the United Nations Command and are generally required to spend at least 240 nights per year in the village to maintain their residency. In 2008, the village had a population of 218 people. The villagers of Tae Sung Dong are direct descendants of people who owned the land before the 1950–53 Korean War.
To continue to deter North Korean incursion, in 2014 the United States government exempted the Korean DMZ from its pledge to eliminate anti-personnel landmines. On 1 October 2018, however, a 20-day process began to remove landmines from both sides of the DMZ.
North Korea and weapons of mass destruction
North Korea has a militarynuclear weapons program and, as of early 2019, is estimated to have an arsenal of approximately 20–30 nuclear weapons and sufficient fissile material for an additional 30–60 nuclear weapons. North Korea has also stockpiled a significant quantity of chemical and biological weapons. In 2003, North Korea withdrew from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). Since 2006, the country has conducting a series of six nuclear tests at increasing levels of expertise, prompting the country to come under sanctions.
Stockpile estimates and projections
Defense Intelligence Agency
On August 8, 2017, the Washington Post reported recent analysis completed the previous month by the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency which concluded that North Korea had successfully produced a miniaturized nuclear warhead that can fit in missiles and could have up to 60 nuclear warheads in its inventory.
Siegfried S. Hecker
On August 7, 2017, Siegfried S. Hecker, former director of the Los Alamos National Laboratory who has visited North Korea nuclear facilities many times on behalf of the U.S., estimated that North Korea's stockpile of plutonium and highly enriched uranium was probably sufficient for 20 to 25 nuclear weapons. He assessed that North Korea had developed a miniaturized warhead suitable for medium-range missiles, but would need further tests and development to produce a smaller and more robust warhead suitable for an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) and re-entry into the atmosphere. He considered the warhead as the least developed part of North Korea's plans for an ICBM.
Institute for Science and International Security
For 2013, the Institute for Science and International Security gave a mid-range estimate of 12 to 27 "nuclear weapon equivalents", including plutonium and uranium stockpiles. By 2016, North Korea was projected to have 14 to 48 nuclear weapon equivalents.[156] The estimate was dropped to 13 to 30 nuclear weapon equivalents in 2017, but was increased to as much as 60 equivalents later in August of the same year. (For uranium weapons, each weapon is assumed to contain 20 kilograms of weapons-grade uranium.)
FAS
As of 2012, the Federation of American Scientists estimated North Korea had fewer than 10 plutonium warheads.
SIPRI
As of January 2013, the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute estimated North Korea had 6 to 8 warheads.
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
As of 8 January 2018, Hans M. Kristensen and Robert S. Norris of the Federation of American Scientists published in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists that they "cautiously estimate that North Korea may have produced enough fissile material to build between 30 and 60 nuclear weapons, and that it might possibly have assembled 10 to 20.".
Operational delivery systems
Estimated maximum range of some North Korean missiles
There is evidence that North Korea has been able to miniaturize a nuclear warhead for use on a ballistic missile. Whether North Korea has technology to protect their missiles upon re-entry is unknown. Some analysts suggest North Korea's new missiles are fakes.[180] Various North Korean rocket tests continued into the 2010s, for example in 2013, in 2014, and in 2016. North Korea performed no tests of medium-range missiles sufficiently powerful to reach Japan in 2015, but South Korea's Yonhap news agency believes that at least one missile fired during North Korea's March 2016 missile tests is likely a medium-range Rodong missile.[181] North Korea appeared to launch a missile test from a submarine on April 23, 2016; while the missile only traveled 30 km, one U.S. analyst noted that "North Korea's sub launch capability has gone from a joke to something very serious". An August 2016 North Korean missile test of a Rodong missile that flew 1,000 kilometres (620 mi) landed about 250 kilometres (160 mi) west of Japan's Oga Peninsula, in international waters but inside Japan's exclusive economic zone, prompting Japan to condemn the "unforgivable act of violence toward Japan's security".
As of 2016, North Korea is known to have approximately 300 Rodong missiles whose maximum range is 1,300 km (800 mi).[184]
Operational or successfully tested
Operational or successfully tested
• Hwasong-5 – initial Scud modification. Road-mobile, liquid-fueled missile, with an estimated range of 330 km. It has been tested successfully. It is believed that North Korea has deployed some 150–200 such missiles on mobile launchers.
• Hwasong-6 – later Scud modification. Similar to the Hwasong-5, yet with an increased range (550–700 km) and a smaller warhead (600–750 kg). Apparently this is the most widely deployed North Korean missile, with at least 400 missiles in use.
• Hwasong-7 – larger and more advanced Scud modification. Liquid-fueled, road-mobile missile with a 650 kg warhead. First production variants had inertial guidance, later variants featured GPS guidance, which improves CEP accuracy to 190–250 m. Range is estimated to be between 1,300 and 1,600 km.
• Hwasong-9 is also known as Scud-ER in rest of the world is further development of Hwasong-6 with range of (1000–1000+ km) and is capable of hitting Japan.
• Hwasong-10 – believed to be a modified copy of the Soviet R-27 ZybSLBM. Originally believed to have been tested as the first or second stage of Unha, but debris analysis showed that the Unha used older technology than it is believed the Hwasong-10 uses. Also known under the names Nodong-B, Taepodong-X, Musudan and BM25, predicted to have a range of 2,500–4,000 km.[190] A DoD report puts BM25 strength at fewer than 50 launchers.
• Hwasong-11 – a short-range, solid-fueled, highly accurate mobile missile, modified copy of the Soviet OTR-21. Unknown number in service, apparently deployed either in the late 1990s or early 2000s (decade).
• Pukkuksong-1 – a long-range, solid-fueled, SLBM. Also called the KN-11 by the Defense Department. Possibly derived from the Chinese JL-1 SLBM.
• Pukkuksong-2 – a long-range, land based development of the solid fueled Pukkuksong-1. Also known as the KN-15.
• Hwasong-12 – a medium-range, liquid-fueled, mobile missile. First tested in May 2017. also known as KN-17 outside of Korea, South Korean experts estimate range of 5000 to 6000 km based on successful test conducted in May.
• Hwasong-14 – Also known as the KN-20, a long-range, road transportable ICBM, tested on July 4 and 29, 2017, estimated range is 6,700–10,000 km (4,200–6,200 mi) John Schilling estimates the current accuracy of the North's Hwasong-14 as poor at the mooted ranges which threaten US cities (which would require more testing[118][206] to prove its accuracy). Michael Elleman has pointed out that the NHK video which captured the descent of the reentry vehicle (RV) shows its failure to survive reentry. If the RV had survived reentry, the video would have shown a bright image all the way to impact in the sea. However a recent CIA assessment notes that North Korea’s ICBM reentry vehicles would likely perform adequately if flown on a normal trajectory to continental U.S. targets.
• Hwasong-15 - 13,000 km range, successfully tested on 28 November 2017.
Untested
KN-08 – Road-mobile ICBM. Also called the Hwasong-13 (HS-13). Maximum range >5,500 km (3,400 miles). The US Defense Department estimates at least 6 KN-08 launchers are in deployment. A modified version, the KN-14, was unveiled at a parade marking the 70th anniversary of the Workers Party of Korea. The missile development was halted due to engine problems.
Estimated maximum range of some North Korean missiles
Export partners
Several countries have bought North Korean ballistic missiles or have received assistance from North Korea to establish local missile production.
Egypt
Egypt has received technologies and assistance for manufacture of both the Hwasong-5 and Hwasong-6, and may have provided guidance systems or information on longer-range missiles to North Korea from the Condor/Badr program.
Iran
Iran was one of the first countries to buy North Korean missiles. Iran has established local production for the Hwasong-5 (Shahab-1), Hwasong-6 (Shahab-2) and the Rodong-1 (Shahab-3). Iran also possesses 19 land-based BM25 Musudan missiles, according to a leaked, classified U.S. State Department cable,
Iran designated the Musudan as Khorramshahr (missile). This nuclear-capable missile is currently under development and failed its two known flight tests.
Pakistan
North Korean entities continued to provide assistance to Pakistan's ballistic missile program during the first half of 1999 in return for nuclear weapons technology.
Ghauri MRBM, which is based on North Korea's Nodong missile. Also in April 1998, the United States imposed sanctions against Pakistani and North Korean entities for their role in transferring Missile Technology Control Regime Category I ballistic missile-related technology.
Syria
Syria originally obtained the SCUD-B from North Korea. North Korea may have assisted Syria in development of the SCUD-C and/or the SCUD-D. As of 2013, Syria relies on foreign assistance from multiple countries, including North Korea, for advanced missile components and technologies.
In 2018, a United Nations report alleged that North Korea had been sending technicians and material to Syria to assist in its chemical weapons program, including acid-resistant tiles, valves, and thermometers.
United Arab Emirates
25 Hwasong-5s were purchased from North Korea in 1989. The UAE Union Defence Force were not satisfied with the quality of the missiles, and they were kept in storage.
Vietnam
Vietnam reportedly ordered Hwasong-5/6 missiles in 1998-99, but it is unclear if this deal was fulfilled.[230]
Yemen
Yemen is known to have bought Scud missiles from the DPRK in the 1990s—a total of 15 missiles, conventional warheads and fuel oxidizer.
Former export partners
Libya
Libya during the rule of Muammar Gaddafi had been known to receive technological assistance, blueprints and missile parts from North Korea.
Rejection by a potential export partner
Nigeria
In January 2004, the Nigerian government announced that North Korea had agreed to sell its missile technology, but a month later Nigeria rejected the agreement under U.S. pressure.
International responses
See also: Sanctions against North Korea, List of United Nations Security Council resolutions concerning North Korea, Agreed Framework, and Six-party talks
In the 1990s, the United States negotiated the Agreed Framework to freeze North Korea's nuclear weapons program while pursuing the denuclearization of the Korean peninsula. This broke down when North Korea's clandestine uranium enrichment program came to light in 2002, after which China convened the Six-party talks to negotiate a step-by-step process to denuclearization. The Six-party talks stalled after multiple North Korean nuclear and missile tests, leading to increased international Sanctions against North Korea, including a series of sanctions resolutions imposed by the United Nations Security Council. In 2018, Presidents Moon Jae-in of South Korea and Donald Trump of the United States held a series of summits with Kim Jong-un which led to declarations in favor of the denuclearization of the Korean peninsula.
International Inspections
aker Kim Min-ki of South Korea's ruling Democratic Party of Korea issued a statement revealing that officials from South Korea's National Intelligence Service had observed several of North Korea's nuclear and missile test sites and that they were now ready for the upcoming international inspections.
Kim also stated that the now inactive North Korean Punggye-ri Nuclear Test Site and the Sohae Satellite launching ground were included in these observations.
Kim Jung-Un agree to close Sohae and allow international experts to observe the dismantling of the missile engine testing site and a launch pad.
The international experts will also be allowed to witness the dismantling of other North Korean nuclear and missile test sites as well.
Yongbyon, the main nuclear facility in North Korea, has also been inactive during the past year as well, but has not yet completely closed.
Third N. Korea-U.S. summit will be held when conditions are created to make substantial progress
Arirang News, Apr 29, 2019: U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has reiterated that conditions must be created to make substantial progress before the leaders of the U.S. and North Korea can sit down for a third summit.
Arirang News repporter Kim Hyo-sun reported that he also believes continued economic pressure is what could lead the regime to denuclearization.
U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has commented on a possible third North Korea-U.S. summit, explaining it will be held when necessary conditions are created to make a big step forward.
Speaking with the American political newspaper, The Hill, for its News Maker Series, Pompeo said he couldn't specify the timing of a third meeting.
However, he reaffirmed that Washington hopes to create the conditions so that if President Trump and North Korea's Kim Jong-un get together, they can make substantial progress.
Pompeo also said progress was made in Hanoi, where the talks between the two leaders ended prematurely with no agreement.
He explained that the two sides came to a deeper understanding of their respective range of freedom . as well as the paths to take going forward.
While explaining that resolving the North's nuclear issue is a difficult challenge, Pompeo stressed that continued economic pressure on the regime would eventually bring another opportunity to unlock and get North Korea to denuclearize.
Stressing that Washington works closely with other countries, including Russia, China, Japan and South Korea, Pompeo said the U.S. is making efforts to build a coalition to continue with the sanctions and try to resolve the North's nuclear issue.
Trump and Abe discuss maintaining sanctions on N. Korea at summit
Arirang Evening News on Apr 28, 2019 : U.S. President Donald Trump and Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe wrapped up a two-day summit in Washington, Saturday local time.
The two leaders agreed to enhance the defense capabilities of their military alliance and reaffirmed their intention to maintain sanctions on North Korea.
Arirang News Kan Hyeong-woo reported that President Trump and Prime Minister Abe have once again vowed to maintain sanctions pressure on North Korea to achieve the regime's denuclearization according to U.S. Ambassador to Japan William Hagerty. "Again, Mr. Prime Minister, you're my friend and I very much appreciate the visit and I think we'll accomplish a lot. We'll also be talking about, by the way, North Korea where we're working together very closely with others and I think it's going pretty well. Thank you all very much." " the bond between Japan and the United States under our alliance will remain unwavering and also we will demonstrate our strong commitment to addressing various challenges that we see in the international community."
According to Reuters, citing a senior Japanse government official, the two leaders have agreed on the need for close coordination with each other and South Korea to achieve the fully verified denuclearization of Pyeongyang.
Japan's Kyodo News Agency reports that Trump pledged to support Tokyo in arranging a first summit between North Korean leader Kim Jong-un and Japanese leader Abe, as part of efforts to resolve the issue of Japanese abductees held captive by the North.
After discussing a number of issues such as establishing new trade relations, restricting Iranian oil imports and bolstering military ties, the two leaders wrapped up the summit by playing a round of golf on Saturday near Washington D.C.
--------
April 26, 2019, President Trump and Prime Minister Abe of Japan Before Bilateral Meeting:
Remarks by President Trump and Prime Minister Abe of Japan Before Bilateral Meeting
FOREIGN POLICY
Issued on: April 26, 2019
Oval Office
4:35 P.M. EDT
PRESIDENT TRUMP: Thank you very much. It’s an honor to have my friend, Prime Minister Abe — Japan. We have many things to discuss, including trade, including some of the numbers that just came out this morning. We had a very big number at 3.2 GDP for the first quarter — usually the worst quarter. That also included the little bit of a dispute we had during the quarter. So 3.2 is far above expectation. I guess many people were thinking it would be in the ones, maybe between one and two. And 3.2 is great.
Knowing that first quarter seems to always be the lowest, we’re off to a very good start for the year. If we had the previous administration’s low interest rates and quantitative easing, meaning pouring money into the system, that 3.2 could have been 5. Could have been a lot higher, but it could have been five. So it’s really quite a — I wouldn’t like to say “surprise,” but for a lot of people, it was a big surprise. Very big number.
The Prime Minister just, two moments ago, said to me that “congratulations on your number.” The 3.2 number was even a surprise to Japan.
I just returned from Indiana, the big NRA conference, which was really terrific. And the weather was very rough. They said we might have to circle for an hour. And I said, “I hope you don’t have to do that, because we can’t keep this great gentleman waiting.” And we have the greatest pilots in the world, and we have awfully good equipment in Air Force One, so he landed it beautifully. No problem.
And tonight, the Prime Minister and the great First Lady of Japan will be having dinner with us. We’re celebrating our First Lady’s birthday. It’s her birthday. So I said to Melania, “Would you like to have Mr. and Mrs. Prime Minister and Mrs. Abe join us for your birthday? And she said, “I can’t think of anybody I’d rather have.”
So we’ll be having dinner tonight at the White House. And we’ll be actually, right after this meeting, having our representatives with us in the Oval and then a larger group of representatives in the Cabinet Room. And I think a lot will be accomplished.
We’re talking about a lot on trade. It’s gotten very complex with what’s happened to Brexit and what’s happened with various other trade deals throughout the world. We’re doing very well in our negotiations with China. Some of our people are leaving for China on Monday. And we’re getting there. It could be very interesting. We’ll see. I don’t like to talk about things, and I won’t talk about things because who knows what happens. Lots of strange things can happen for better or worse.
But we are doing very well in those trade negotiations. And actually, we have a very big trade negotiation going on right now with Japan, which is, I would imagine, the primary reason that the Prime Minister is here.
And the other thing we’ll be discussing is trade, as it relates to our two countries. Japan is buying a tremendous amount of military equipment and other equipment from the United States. We make the greatest jet fighters in the world, and missiles and rockets and everything else. We make the best in the world, by far.
And we’ll be discussing that. We’ll be discussing, very strongly, agriculture. Because, as the Prime Minister knows, Japan puts very massive tariffs on agriculture — our agriculture — going for many years, going into Japan. And we want to get rid of those tariffs. Because we don’t tariff their cars, so I think that that will — something we’ll work out. But this should have been done by previous administrations. Many previous administrations. It’s been a long time, but I’m sure we’ll be able to work that out.
And, ultimately, we have a chance to make a very good and long-term trade deal with Japan.
And tomorrow we’ll be very early leaving for a quick round of golf on a beautiful place on the Potomac River. I won’t name the place, but it’s beautiful. And so we’re going to play a quick round of golf.
And then I’m going to Wisconsin tomorrow. And we have a tremendous crowd tomorrow night for a speech and rally, and whatever you want to call it. It’s very big. A lot of people. We had 69,000 people sign up. And I think the arena holds about 10 [thousand]. So it’ll be interesting. But it’s always that way.
And there’s a lot of great spirit in our country. Again, we had some great numbers released this morning. And our country is doing very, very well economically. Doing very well with the military. Our military is being rebuilt — all being built from within. All jobs within the United States. And our country is — they’re very proud right now, what’s happening.
So, thank you very much for being here. And we’re going to have a lot of fun. Thank you.
Please.
PRIME MINISTER ABE: (As interpreted.) So, at the outset, I’d like to express my deep appreciation for the great hospitality that you extended to me, again, here at the White House.
And also, as you mentioned, we are going to celebrate Madam First Lady’s birthday today, together with my wife, Akie. And I do look forward to celebrating this special day with you.
PRESIDENT TRUMP: Thank you.
PRIME MINISTER ABE: (As interpreted.) On the first of May, his Imperial Highness, the Crown Prince, accedes to the Imperial Throne. And Japan will enter a new era named “Reiwa,” under the new emperor.
Under the new era of Reiwa, President Trump and Madam First Lady will be the very first state guests that we will invite. And it is a great pleasure and honor for us to welcome you and Madam First Lady.
And also, this state visit will show, both inside and outside, that still under the new era of Reiwa, the bond between Japan and the United States, under our alliance, will remain unwavering. And also, we will demonstrate our strong commitment to addressing various challenges that we see in the international community.
And also, as you touched on earlier, I would like to congratulate you for your great performance, as well as achievements, namely the 3.2 percent of the GDP growth in the first quarter of this year, as well as the quite — the excellent condition that you see in the job status in the United States.
Since President Trump took office, Japanese business community has additionally announced a total of 23 billion U.S. dollar investment to the United States, which will create 43,000 jobs in the United States.
Japan is ranked number one for its investment to the United States, as well as the number of jobs it creates in the United States.
So in order for us to see further development of the economies of both Japan and the United States, and also realize how those economies, which will become mutually beneficial for both of the nations. I look forward to having a discussion with you also on the trade deal that we’re now negotiating with each other.
With regard to the tariffs on autos, Japan has put no tariffs on American autos. But, in contrast, the United States has put on the 2.5 percent tariff on the Japanese autos. But, in any case, we would like to proceed with the further negotiation that we are now having for that. We’ll see a mutually beneficial outcome for both of our countries.
And also, I’m going to host the G20 Osaka Summit in the month of June this year. And in order for us to bring this summit to a successful conclusion, I would like to reaffirm our close collaboration, as well as partnership, at today’s meeting.
PRESIDENT TRUMP: Good.
PRIME MINISTER ABE: (As interpreted.) And I cannot wait to play another round of golf with you tomorrow.
PRESIDENT TRUMP: Good.
PRIME MINISTER ABE: (As interpreted.) And I hope that certainly tomorrow will be a sunny day.
PRESIDENT TRUMP: And it will be. It will be beautiful. It’s always beautiful.
Well, I want to thank you. The fact is that Japanese car companies are coming in at a level that we haven’t seen in many decades. Toyota is investing $14 billion over a short period of time, and others too. They’re going to Michigan. They’re going to Ohio, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, South Carolina, Kentucky.
We’re going — we’re really getting a lot of business from Japan. I appreciate that. We’re trying to bring some balance to the surplus that they have with the United States for many, many years. But it’ll all work out. It’s all working out. But they’re making the biggest investments they’ve ever made in the United States and, in particular, car companies. They’re really coming in. A lot of that has to do with our new agreements that we’ve been making, and some will have to do with the trade agreement that we’re in the process of making. That should even increase that number. So I very much look forward to discussing that today.
As far as your very big event — and that’s a very big event — and when we were in Japan together, we were talking about it and the invitation was made. And I said, “Gee, I don’t know if I can make it. Let me ask you a question: How big is that event compared to the Superbowl for the Japanese?” And the Prime Minister said, “It’s about 100 times bigger.” (Laughter.) I said, “I’ll be there. If that’s the case, I’ll be there.”
So it really is. It’s many years. Isn’t it 130 some-odd years that it’s happened? It’s a very unusual — it’s a very unusual thing. And you’re talking about reigning through blood for over 3,000 years — the longest in the world. So it’s a very, very big event. And maybe you could explain the event because it’s very exciting, actually.
PRIME MINISTER ABE: (As interpreted.) So, for Japan and the entire Japanese people, having the new Emperor itself means a lot. And this will be a historic event and also a tremendous event for everyone in Japan.
What I would like to underscore here is that we will have the abdication of the living Emperor leading to the succession of the Crown Prince to the Emperor. And this will happen for the first time in approximately 200 years.
And under such a historic situation, and also under the new Emperor, President Trump and Madam First Lady will be the very first state guests. And that is why I do look forward welcoming you to Japan.
PRESIDENT TRUMP: That’s really nice. Well, that’s really nice. And that’s an honor on behalf of our country, not just the First Lady and myself. So we really do look forward to that.
And I think, on a little bit lighter note, we will also be going, perhaps, to a sumo wrestling match. I’ve always found that fascinating. So, in fact, we’re having a trophy made in this country. We’re going to give the trophy to the winner of the championship. So that should be good. And I’m sure the media will like that. But I think something I’ll enjoy very much. So we may very well be doing that. We’ll see what the time is.
But again, Mr. Prime Minister, you’re my friend and I really very much appreciate the visit. And I think we will accomplish a lot. We’ll also be talking about, by the way, North Korea, where we’re working together very closely with others. And I think it’s going pretty well.
Thank you all very much. Thank you.
Q What’s your timeframe for a new Japan trade deal? Is it possible to get it done by May?
PRESIDENT TRUMP: I think it can go quickly. Yeah. I think it can go fairly quickly. Maybe by the time I’m over there. Maybe we sign it over there. But it’s moving along very nicely, and we’ll see what happens.
Q Mr. President, is there a situation where you could see where Don McGahn is charged with perjury? You seem to be contradicting what he is saying.
PRESIDENT TRUMP: Well, I don’t want to talk about that now. We have other things that we’re talking about. But I’ll respond to that question at a later date, okay? Thank you.
Q And just to follow up on your comments early today and last night about — you said there was an attempted coup to topple your presidency.
PRESIDENT TRUMP: Oh, I think absolutely. If you look at — yeah, if you look at —
Q What do you mean by a “coup”? Is it — was there actually a coup?
PRESIDENT TRUMP: If you look at what’s been happening and all of the things you’ve been seeing with the insurance policy statement from two agents that are now gone; if you look at many of the elements of intrigue — and, frankly, we’re going to be seeing a lot over the next couple of weeks, things that a lot of people haven’t seen.
What took place here was a very, very terrible situation. How this whole ridiculous 35-million-dollar unlimited personnel — how this all started, I think you will find of great interest. Most of you know the answer to it anyway. The fair press, the good press, the — really, the people that know what they’re doing or the people that are indeed fair, they know the answer to it.
So we’re going to see. It’s going to be very interesting. But what took place over the last period of almost two years — and really, before that; it was really much before that. In all fairness to Robert Mueller, things happened long before he even started. And what took place is a disgrace to our country and it hurt our country. And a lot of people have been let go. And I don’t mean by mean by me. They’ve been dismissed. They’ve been fired. They’ve left in disgrace. And it really is a sad moment for the country. But I think ultimately it’s going to be very good. It’s going to be a healing factor.
Thank you all very much.
END 4:59 P.M. EDT
On April 22, 2019 Secretary Pompeo Addressed Terrorist Attacks in Sri Lanka and Iranian Oil Imports
Secretary Pompeo Addresses Terrorist Attacks in Sri Lanka and Iranian Oil Imports
U.S. Department of State
Decision on Imports of Iranian Oil
Statement
Michael R. Pompeo
Secretary of State
Washington, DC
April 22, 2019
Today we are announcing the United States will not issue any additional Significant Reduction Exceptions to existing importers of Iranian oil. The Trump Administration has taken Iran’s oil exports to historic lows, and we are dramatically accelerating our pressure campaign in a calibrated way that meets our national security objectives while maintaining well supplied global oil markets. We stand by our allies and partners as they transition away from Iranian crude to other alternatives. We have had extensive and productive discussions with Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and other major producers to ease this transition and ensure sufficient supply. This, in addition to increasing U.S. production, underscores our confidence that energy markets will remain well supplied.
Today’s announcement builds on the already significant successes of our pressure campaign. We will continue to apply maximum pressure on the Iranian regime until its leaders change their destructive behavior, respect the rights of the Iranian people, and return to the negotiating table.
This Week at State: April 26, 2019
U.S. Department of State.
According to U.S. Department of State, NATO: 70 Years of Unity, Strength, and Prosperity in the World’s Most Successful Political-Military Alliance
While the threats we face have evolved, our commitment to address those challenges have remained the same. Whether the risks stem from conventional attack, cyber attacks, or hybrid threats, NATO will continue to protect its members.
NATO membership remains an integral component of U.S. security and is central to our own national defense. The United States has consistently affirmed its support for NATO, including the principle of collective defense enshrined in Article 5 of NATO’s founding document, the North Atlantic Treaty. The President, Vice President, Secretaries of State and Defense, and other senior U.S. officials have all underscored this. The United States is better able to address -- militarily and politically -- global threats to our interests because of NATO. During the last 70 years, the only instance when the Alliance invoked Article 5 action has been in support of the United States following the 9/11 attacks. The Alliance remains the cornerstone of U.S. national security. It remains fundamental to U.S. military operations in the transatlantic region and in strategically critical regions like the Middle East and South Asia.
Pompeo calls for N. Korea to carry out denuclearization before end of 2019
Arirang News on Apr 15, 2019: 폼페이오, 3차회담언급긍정평"연말보다빨리" 비핵화촉구: U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo is calling for North Korea to carry out its denuclearization pledge before the end of the year.
Such remark is seen as a response to North Korean leader Kim Jong-un's speech last week, during which he said Pyeongyang will wait until the end of 2019 for Washington to come up with a courageous decision.
Speaking in Texas on Monday, Pompeo praised Kim's mentioning of a possible third summit between the two sides.
He stressed dialogue is happening all the time with the North, without going into details."
Remarks by President Trump and
President Moon Jae-in of the Republic of Korea
Before Bilateral Meeting
FOREIGN POLICY
Oval Office Issued on: April 11, 2019
PRESIDENT TRUMP: Thank you very much. It’s a great honor to have President Moon of South Korea with us and a very, very great privilege to have Mrs. Kim. Thank you very much. Very much. We hope you enjoy your stay.
We are discussing many, many important things, including, obviously, North Korea, the relationships with North Korea. I had, in many respects, a very good meeting. We did not fulfill what we wanted to, but in many ways, we — certain things were agreed to.
My relationship is very good with, as you know, Chairman Kim. And I think that it will go on that way. We’ll see. We’ll probably know. But we’ll be discussing that. We’ll be discussing trade, military, military purchases. South Korea buys a great deal of equipment from us, especially military equipment.
(Speaks to interpreter.) Please, go ahead.
We’ve just recently completed a new and very, very large trade deal with South Korea, and it’s just now going into effect. And it will very much increase trade both ways between our two countries. It’s a very important transaction and something we’ve been working on for quite a while. I know that, for years, they’ve been working on trying to redo it. And we have a new deal and it’s been, I think, very, very good for both our countries. Big difference.
President Moon and South Korea have agreed to purchase a tremendous amount of our military equipment, from jet fighters to missiles, to lots of other things. And we make the finest equipment in the world by far, and we appreciate the purchase. It’s a very large purchase. And we always appreciate that. close. Our First Ladies, likewise — extremely close. And I think that that will continue to for a long time into the future — forever.
So we’ll be having individual meetings later on and all throughout the day with different people from different departments and representatives. The President and myself will be meeting right now in the Oval Office. Then we’ll meet with our groups in the Cabinet Room, as you know. And I think it’ll be very productive. It’s going to be a very productive day.
I just do want to tell you that great progress has been made and a great relationship has been made in North Korea too. Kim Jong Un has been, really, somebody that I’ve gotten to know very well and respect, and hopefully — and I really believe that, over a period of time, a lot of tremendous things will happen.
I think North Korea has a tremendous potential, and I believe that President Moon agrees with that. And we will be discussing that and even potential meetings, further meetings, with North Korea and Kim Jong Un.
So I want to extend my warmest wishes to the people of South Korea, and I think indirectly I can truly say I want to extend my warmest wishes to Kim Jong Un and the people of North Korea. I think the relationship has become far different and far better than it was when I first took office or at the end, certainly, of the Obama administration.
And it’s a great honor to be with you, Mr. President. And thank you very much.
PRESIDENT MOON: (As interpreted.) Mr. President, I would like to thank you for inviting our couple to the White House and also warmly welcoming us. In particular, last night at the Blue House, I saw the flowers — the beautiful flowers that you had sent — with a personally signed card. I was really moved by your meticulous care, and especially my wife was moved.
In particular, I have two accounts on which I would like to express my gratitude to the United States. First, recently, there was a big forest fire in Korea, in the province of Gangwon. At the time, the USFK supported us through the provision of many helicopters, and this really helped us put out the fire. And lots of Korean people were very grateful for this.
PRESIDENT TRUMP: Thank you.
PRESIDENT MOON: (As interpreted.) And today is a meaningful day for all the Korean people because it marks the centenary anniversary of the establishment of the provisional government of Korea. And I heard that both at the Senate and at the House, they introduced a resolution celebrating this momentous day. So I would like to thank you for that also.
PRESIDENT TRUMP: Thank you.
PRESIDENT MOON: (As interpreted.) And after you had met Chairman Kim in Singapore on June 12th, last year, we have witnessed a dramatic turnaround regarding the political situation on the Korean Peninsula. Previously, because of the repeated nuclear and missile test from North Korea, we saw that the military tension at the time had been at its greatest, and we were in a very precarious situation.
However, since you met Chairman Kim and you initiated personal diplomacy with him, we saw the dramatic, significant reduction of military tension on the Korean Peninsula, and now peace has prevailed.
And also, in terms of North Korean nuclear problem, all Korean people have now — now we believe that you will be able to solve this problem through a dialogue. So I have to say that this dramatic turnaround that we have witnessed is solely down to your strong leadership.
PRESIDENT TRUMP: Thank you very much.
PRESIDENT MOON: (As interpreted.) Well, in this sense, I believe that the Hanoi Summit is not actually — was not a source of disappointment, but it is actually the part of a bigger process that will lead us to a bigger agreement.
So the important task that I face right now is to maintain the momentum of dialogue and also express the positive outlook, regarding the third U.S.-North Korea Summit, to the international community that this will be held in the near future.
So, in this regard, I’d like to express my high regard for how you have continued to express your trust towards Chairman Kim. And also, you have made sure that North Korea does not deviate from the dialogue track. I would like to express my gratitude for this.
And let me reiterate that the Republic of Korea is absolutely on the same page when it comes to the end state of the complete denuclearization of North Korea. And I can reassure you that we will remain in such great collaboration with the United States. There will be no daylight until we achieve our ultimate goal.
PRESIDENT TRUMP: Thank you very much. I have to go just one step further and I want to thank China, who’s really helped us a lot at the border. I also want to thank Russia because they have helped us, and they’ve helped us quite a bit more than people think, at the border. So both China and Russia have really been quite good. That doesn’t mean they can’t get better, but they’ve been quite good at the border. And I just want to thank both of those countries.
As we’ve said, a lot of progress has been made. We will have further dialogue and I look forward to it. My relationship with Kim Jong Un has been a very strong relationship. I’ve had some very strong relationships with others, but I have a very, very good relationship with Kim Jong Un, and I think you see that.
And we’ll see what happens. Hopefully, it will end up in a great solution for everybody, and ultimately a great solution for the world. Because it is about the world. It’s more than just this area. It’s about the world. And, frankly, the world is watching.
I want to thank you for your leadership. Your leadership has been outstanding. And I look forward to talking about other things also, and in particular, all of that equipment that you’re buying. We like that in the United States. We like that you buy our great equipment. So again, thank you very much. And thank you for your leadership.
Q Mr. President, on economic projects for South Korea and North Korea, are you willing to allow some leeway in relaxing sanctions so that South Korea can pursue some more economic projects with North Korea?
PRESIDENT TRUMP: Well, we are discussing certain humanitarian things right now, and I’m okay with that, to be honest. I think you have to be okay with that. And South Korea is doing certain things to help out with food and various other things for North Korea. And we’ll be discussing different things inside.
Again, the relationship is a much different relationship than it was two years ago — you remember what that was all about — and certainly during the Obama administration, where nuclear weapons were being tested often, where rockets and missiles were being sent up, in many cases, over Japan. And we are in a much different situation right now.
So we’ll be discussing that very much, actually.
Q Mr. President, do you still love WikiLeaks?
PRESIDENT TRUMP: I know nothing about WikiLeaks. It’s not my thing. And I know there is something having to do with Julian Assange. I’ve been seeing what’s happened with Assange. And that will be a determination, I would imagine, mostly by the Attorney General, who’s doing an excellent job.
So he’ll be making a determination. I know nothing really about him. It’s not my — it’s not my deal in life.
Q What would you like to see happen? What is it that your Attorney General —
PRESIDENT TRUMP: I don’t really have any opinion. I know the Attorney General will be involved in that and he’ll make a decision, okay?
Q Mr. President, are you pleased that your Attorney General yesterday said that there was spying into your campaign in 2016?
PRESIDENT TRUMP: Yes, I am. I think what he said was absolutely true. There was absolutely spying into my campaign. I’ll go a step further: In my opinion, it was illegal spying, unprecedented spying, and something that should never be allowed to happen in our country again. And I think his answer was actually a very accurate one. And a lot of people saw that, and a lot of people understand — many, many people understand the situation and want to be open to that situation. Hard to believe it could have happened, but it did. There was spying in my campaign. And his answer was a very accurate one.
Q Mr. President, do you have the third summit with North Korea’s Chairman in mind? And does that also include —
PRESIDENT TRUMP: It could happen. A third summit could happen. And it’s step by step. It’s not a fast process; I’ve never said it would be. It’s step by step.
I enjoy the summits. I enjoy being with the Chairman. I think it’s been very productive. And it really is — it’s a step by step. It’s not going to go fast. I’ve been telling you that for a long time. If it goes fast, it’s not going to be the proper deal.
Q Is a three-way summit with the leaders of the two Koreas also (inaudible)?
PRESIDENT TRUMP: Well, that could happen also. I think that would be largely dependent on Chairman Kim, because President Moon will do what’s necessary. I know President Moon has been fighting this battle for a long time. He’s done an excellent job. I consider him a great ally.
And a lot of good things are happening. A lot of good things are happening in the world. Our economy is the best it’s ever been. Our employment numbers — unemployment and employment — are the best they’ve ever been. We have more people working right now in the United States than we’ve ever had before — almost 160 million people. And likewise, South Korea is doing very well. Their economy is doing very well, and I think our trade deal has helped that process.
So, we’re sitting on two great countries right now, and we’re leading two great countries. And we think that — I can speak for myself, and I think I can speak for President Moon: We think that North Korea has tremendous potential and, really, potential under the leadership of Kim Jong Un. Let’s see how it all works out.
Q Mr. President, have you communicated with Kim Jong Un in the last few weeks since you told us —
PRESIDENT TRUMP: I don’t want to comment on that. But we have a very good relationship.
Q Mr. President, on the Mueller report, are you concerned that Barr said that he’s not going to redact that report to protect your reputation?
PRESIDENT TRUMP: No, I’m not concerned about anything because, frankly, there was no collusion and there was no obstruction.
And we never did anything wrong. The people that did something wrong were the other side — the dirty cops. And a lot of the problems that were caused, it’s a disgrace what happened. And, again, it should never happen to a President again. You’re just lucky I happen to be the President, because a lot of other Presidents would have reacted much differently than I reacted. You’re very lucky I was the President during this scam — during the Russian hoax, as I call it.
So, no, I’m not concerned at all. The bottom line: The result is no collusion, no obstruction. And that’s the way it is. And I know a lot of people were very disappointed, but they knew the real answer.
You know, when the Democrats go behind the scenes and they go into a room backstage and they sit and they talk, they laugh because they know it’s all a big scam, a big hoax.
And it’s called politics, but this is dirty politics and this is actually treason. This is a very bad thing that people have done. And I just hope that law enforcement takes it up. Because if they don’t take it up, they’re doing a great disservice to our country.
Yes, go ahead.
Q Yes. Shared defense cost with South Korea — are you thinking a long-term agreement instead of year by year?
PRESIDENT TRUMP: No, we’re talking about long term, and we always talk about long term. We want to have long term. Our relationship South Korea is extraordinary, and we only think in terms of long term with South Korea. Okay?
Q (As interpreted.) How much do you support my President’s push for economic concessions, which include the resumption of the joint inter-Korean industrial complex and perhaps even the (inaudible)?
PRESIDENT TRUMP: Well, at the right time, I would have great support. This isn’t the right time. But at the right time, I’d have great support with North Korea. Great support. I think that South Korea, and I think Japan, and I think that the U.S. — I think a lot of countries will be helping. China, I really believe, will help. I think that Russia will help. I think a lot of countries will help.
When the right deal is made, and when the nuclear weapons are gone, I just think that North Korea has potential as great as anything I’ve ever seen in terms of potential. They have an unbelievable location — surrounded by sea on two sides, and on the other side, Russia, China, and over here, South Korea. You just can’t do better than that. And they have magnificent land. It has tremendous potential.
Q (As interpreted.) If North Korea actually submits a roadmap regarding complete denuclearization, are you two — are the two Presidents — will you be discussing this issue at the summit meeting today?
PRESIDENT TRUMP: Yes, we will. We will be discussing it, certainly. That’s a very prime topic for our meeting today. And we hope that’s going to happen.
Yes?
Q Is your position still that sanctions should stay in place on North Korea until there is denuclearization? Or are you willing to consider easing sanctions to keep the talks going?
PRESIDENT TRUMP: No, we want sanctions to remain in place. And frankly, I had the option of significantly increasing them. I didn’t want to do that because of my relationship with Kim Jong Un. I did not want to do that. I didn’t think it was necessary. As you know, a couple of weeks ago, I held it back. But I think that sanctions are, right now, at a level that’s a fair level. And I really believe something very significant is going to happen. We could always increase them, but I didn’t want to do that at this time.
Q Mr. President, would you accept smaller deals to “keep the process going,” as President Moon called it?
PRESIDENT TRUMP: I’d have to see what the deal is. There are various smaller deals that maybe could happen. Things could happen. You can work out, step by step, pieces.
But, at this moment, we’re talking about the big deal. The big deal is we have to get rid of the nuclear weapons.
Thank you very much, everybody. Thank you.
Q Sir, a golf question: Who do you like in the Masters? Who do you think will win the Masters?
PRESIDENT TRUMP: You know, there are 15 players capable of winning. And I guess you could say there are a lot more than that. They’re great players.
I don’t think a field for the Masters has ever been this deep. I was watching late last night, and they were going over the different players. I think the field has never been so deep.
But always Phil and Tiger and Dustin. I mean, you have so many great players. But they were just saying they’re younger, they’re stronger, they’ve never hit the ball this long. They’ve never hit the ball this accurately. They’ve never putted better than they do now.
You know, the whole thing is pretty incredible. But the field is very, very deep. I think it’s going to be a great Masters. I hope so.
Thank you very much, everybody.
END
12:45 P.M. EDT
FACT SHEETS
President Donald J. Trump Is Working Closely with Our Ally and Friend the Republic of Korea
FOREIGN POLICY
Issued on: April 11, 2019
I know that the Republic of Korea, which has become a tremendously successful nation, will be a faithful ally of the United States very long into the future.
President Donald J. Trump
STRENGTHENING OUR VITAL ALLIANCE: President Donald J. Trump is welcoming President Moon Jae-in of the Republic of Korea (ROK) to the White House.
President Trump and President Moon Jae-in will discuss a range of matters, including the latest developments regarding North Korea.
The ROK stands as one of the United States closest and most vital allies and friends.
Together, our two countries have built an ironclad alliance based on shared values of democracy, human rights, and the rule of law.
Our alliance remains the linchpin of peace and security not just on the Korean Peninsula, but across the region.
Under President Trump, the United States and the ROK have worked to further economic ties and jointly pursue peace on the Korean Peninsula.
Today’s visit will help strengthen the friendship and alliance between the United States and the ROK.
WORKING IN CLOSE COORDINATION: President Trump is working closely with President Moon to advance peace and denuclearize North Korea.
Under President Trump, coordination and cooperation between the United States and the ROK on North Korea are stronger than ever.
President Trump and President Moon have made clear that North Korea should follow through on its commitment to final, fully verified denuclearization.
The ROK has been a vital partner in developing negotiations with Chairman Kim Jong Un.
The United States and the ROK have been prepared to explore economic development options for North Korea should the right conditions be met.
IMPROVING OUR TRADING PARTNERSHIP: Trade and investment with the ROK have improved under President Trump’s leadership.
President Trump has worked diligently to improve and balance the trade relationship between the United States and the ROK.
Last year, President Trump and President Moon welcomed significant improvements to the United States–Korea Free Trade Agreement.
The updated deal secured key improvements that preserve and grow jobs in America’s auto industry.
The ROK is one of the United States closest trading partners, with more than $130 billion in two-way goods trade and nearly $37 billion in services in 2018 alone.
The goods and services trade deficit with the ROK dropped by more than 40 percent in 2018.
United States exports of autos, agricultural products, fuel, and chemicals to the ROK grew last year.
During President Trump’s visit in 2017, dozens of ROK companies announced billions of dollars in investment projects that created thousands of jobs in the United States, as well as planned purchases of American goods.
ROK firms have directly invested more than $50 billion in the United States, as of 2017.
Arirang News, April 11th, 2019: The expectation is President Moon's latest trip to the White House will be similar to his last when the South Korean leader took the role of "mediator," providing fresh momentum for nuclear talks between North Korean leader Kim Jong-un and U.S. President Donald Trump.
President Moon is back in the U.S. capitol for another crisis management session with Trump -- this time seeking to find a way for the U.S. and North Korea to give and take to achieve their stated goals of making a nuclear-free Korean Peninsula a reality.
During his brief stay in Washington, President Moon will also sit down separately with Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, National Security Advisor John Bolton and Vice President Mike Pence, all of whom like President Trump is strong proponents of North Korea's FFVD, meaning the regime's final, fully and verified denuclearization.
For Presidents Moon and Trump, their summit is the fulfilment of a promise made by President Trump shortly after the second North Korea-U.S. summit collapsed in February.
Trump's decision to pull the plug on that summit dealt a huge blow to President Moon who had staked enormous political capital on it being a success.
It's also a chance to reaffirm the strength of their alliance despite some mixed messages since the Hanoi summit,.. and perhaps time to find middle ground between Trump's 'all-or-nothing' strategy and Kim's 'small-deal' approach.
It remains to be seen if President Trump will be tempted by Seoul's proposal of North Korea steadily abandoning its nuclear weapons while the U.S. slowly eases sanctions as part of a gradual process towards complete denuclearization.
President Moon has said all along that he's on the "same page" as his American counterpart on the need to reach the 'end-state' of denuclearization.
"It's hoped President Moon's trip to Washington will set off a domino effect of rapid-fire summits between the relevant parties.
The Moon-Trump summit could be the spark for yet another inter-Korean summit and possibly even a third summit between leaders Kim Jong-un and President Trump, taking the peninsula a few steps closer to a complete denuclearization deal.
Shin Se-min, Arirang News, Washington."
Sources: White House, Arirang News, and Youtube April 11, 2019 Rev. April, 14tg 2019
Catch4all.com, Sandra Englund
President Moon says N. Korea, U.S. determined to continue dialogue on denuclearization
President Moon is scheduled to hold summit talks with President Trump in Washington on April 11th, 2019.
Arirang News dated March 31st, 2019: President Moon Jae-in has stressed the parties involved in the North Korea denuclearization talks are determined to continue their diplomatic efforts to find a solution despite the lack of progress at the recent Hanoi summit.
Speaking to his top aides on Monday, President Moon said he and U.S. President Donald Trump will discuss ways at their upcoming summit to get Washington and Pyeongyang back to the table at an early date.
He said the focus is on going forward, not backwards.
Take a listen.
"We will never go back to the past, and we cannot go back. I will seek ways with President Trump for the people of Korea and the world who desire peace and prosperity on the Korean Peninsula. If the path is blocked, we will pierce through it, and if we need to build it, we will build that path.
He added the peace process is a journey to be taken by the two Koreas and the U.S.and it would be strange if there weren't ups and down along the way.
President Moon noted the countries have achieved much more in less than a year than anyone has over the past 70 years, referring back to the first inter-Korean summit in April last year.
President Moon is scheduled to hold summit talks with President Trump in Washington on April 11th, 2019.
--
According to DW Documentary: Dated March 30th, 2019: North Korea is one of the poorest countries in the world, but its leader Kim Jong Un has still found the money he needs to finance a nuclear weapons program, despite the country's fundamental poverty and international economic sanctions.
This documentary looks at how, and introduces the men who have helped Kim Jong Un keep his dreams of reaching nuclear power status alive. North Korea has not reined in its nuclear program, despite a number of UN resolutions that have tried to force it to do so. So how has the isolated country kept the program going despite sanctions? Every year Pyongyang sends millions of North Korean workers abroad, selling their services to over 40 countries around the world. And their salaries flow directly into Kim’s treasury. The only ones who know exactly how the system works are the men who have helped the North Korean government carry through the program for years. A film team spent years researching these men and their secrets - from bankers and diplomats to the laborers and specialists who worked abroad and whose wages flowed into the regime's coffers. Come and meet all the dictator’s men.
-----------------------------
STATEMENTS & RELEASES
Statement by the Press Secretary on the Visit of President Moon Jae-in of the Republic of Korea and First Lady Kim Jung-sook
FOREIGN POLICY
Issued on: March 28, 2019
President Donald J. Trump and First Lady Melania Trump will welcome President Moon Jae-in and First Lady Kim Jung-sook of the Republic of Korea to the White House on April 11, 2019. President Trump and President Moon will discuss the latest developments regarding the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea as well as bilateral matters.
The alliance between the United States and the Republic of Korea remains the linchpin of peace and security on the Korean Peninsula and in the region. This visit will strengthen this alliance and the friendship between the two countries.
Sources:White House, Arirang News, Yourube, catch4all.com,
Sandra Englund, March 28th, 2019, March 31st, 2019
N. Korea, U.S. will not return to where they were before nuclear talks began
Ariring News 3-17-2019: Shin Se-min reports. The presidential office's view of the 'no-deal' Hanoi Summit is that the parties involved in the denuclearization talks do all they can to avoid returning to square one.
Speaking on the condition of anonymity a high-ranking official at South Korea's top office said North Korea and the U.S. never want to go back to the days of conflict and confrontation as both have moved forward too much to return.
The official suggested a more practical solution to the nuclear talks saying one-stop denuclearization is an unrealistic goal.
The Blue House official said the 'All or Nothing' strategy needs to be reconsidered-- and called for North Korea and the U.S. to reach an agreement on their blueprint first and then move on to phased denuclearization.
The official also stressed there needs to be a roadmap that lays out how to achieve that goal.
Such a view, however, seems to be at odds with the Trump administration's "big deal" drive in the talks-- while the North has been pushing for a phased and simultaneous approach in giving up its nukes.
It's thought Seoul again plans to take on the role of mediator and a coordinator between North Korea and the U.S. while proposing to both sides what it sees as its own solutions.
The South Korean official's remarks come as uncertainty has grown over the past week after Pyeongyang appeared to suggest it might drop its talks with Washington after the Hanoi summit ended prematurely with no deal.
The official emphasized it's time for the two Koreas to talk, adding the ball is now in South Korea's court perhaps signaling that a fourth summit between President Moon Jae-in and Kim Jong-un could happen soon to help break the impasse between Pyeongyang and Washington.
S. Korea and U.S. decide to revise springtime exercises to back diplomacy with N. Korea
Arirang News Mar 3, 2019: Despite the sudden end of the Hanoi summit, South Korea and the U.S. remain commited in facilitating dialogue with North Korea for denuclearization and lasting peace.
To that effort, the two sides announced that their joint annual military exercises will be much reduced in scale moving forward.
Arirang News Won Jung-hwan reported that S. Korea-U.S. joint military exercises will be replaced with scaled-down new ones... to back diplomacy for denuclearization and long-lasting peace on the Korean Peninsula.
According to the two countries' defense authorities on Sunday,… Seoul and Washington have decided to revise their joint annual drills known as Key Resolve and Foal Eagle.
The decision was made after a 45-minute telephone conversation the day before,… between Seoul's Defense Minister, Jeong Kyeong-doo, and acting U.S. Defense Secretary (Acting), Patrick Shanahan.
It's a decision that reflects their will to maintain dialogue with Pyongyang, despite the breakdown in negotiations at the second North Korea-U.S. summit.
Following close coordination, both sides decided to introduce changes to the Key Resolve and Foal Eagle exercises, which are held every springtime.
The command and control Key Resolve exercise could be replaced by a new drill named 'Dong Maeng,' which means alliance in English.
The nine-day simulated war games are scheduled to kick off on Monday.
The two nations will also downsize Foal Eagle's field drills to battalion-level maneuvers, and conduct smaller, but more frequent field training throughout the year.
Despite the reduction in scale,the allies pledged to maintain a high level of combat readiness through more missions-specific training programs. The two sides made it clear that their decision was in support of diplomatic efforts to achieve complete denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.
Last year, Seoul and Washington downsized a number of major joint exercises, including Ulchi Freedom Guardian and Vigilant Ace... in the midst of warming ties with North Korea.
The 2nd Summit US-DPRK President Trump Participates in a Press Conference
White House: On North Korea, President Trump held firm on America's terms: Nothing short of progress toward complete, verifiable denuclearization will result in sanction relief.
"I think our relationship is very strong. "President Trump said of Chairman Kim. "I think, actually , It was a very productive two days. But sometimes you have to walk, and this was just one of those times. "Secretary of State Mike Pompeo added that "we didn't get to [a deal] that ultimately made sense for the United State of America.....I hope we'll do so in the weeks ahead."
REMARKS
Remarks by President Trump in Press Conference | Hanoi, Vietnam
FOREIGN POLICY
Issued on: February 28, 2019
Hanoi, Vietnam
2:15 P.M. ICT
THE PRESIDENT: Well, thank you very much. I want to begin by thanking the Prime Minister and President of Vietnam. We’re in Hanoi. It’s an incredible city. What’s happened over the last 25 years has been incredible for the people of Vietnam, the job they’ve done — economic development. Really something special. So I want to thank all of the people of Vietnam for having treated us so well.
We have, I think, reasonably attractive news from Pakistan and India. They’ve been going at it, and we’ve been involved in trying to have them stop. And we have some reasonably decent news. I think, hopefully, that’s going to be coming to an end. It’s been going on for a long time — decades and decades. There’s a lot of dislike, unfortunately. So we’ve been in the middle, trying to help them both out and see if we can get some organization and some peace. And I think, probably, that’s going to be happening.
We have — Venezuela, as you know, has been very much in the news, and we’re sending supplies. Supplies are getting through a little bit more. It’s not easy. It’s hard to believe somebody would say “let’s not do it.” What difference would that make, except it’s great for its people to let it get through. But we’re sending a lot of supplies down to Venezuela. People are starving to death, and you would really think that the man in charge, currently, would let those supplies get through. We are getting them into some of the cities and some of the areas that need them the most. And it’s not an easy job. It’s very difficult, actually.
On North Korea, we just left Chairman Kim. We had a really, I think, a very productive time. We thought, and I thought, and Secretary Pompeo felt that it wasn’t a good thing to be signing anything. I’m going to let Mike speak about it.
But we literally just left. We spent pretty much all day with Kim Jong Un, who is — he’s quite a guy and quite a character. And I think our relationship is very strong. But at this time — we had some options, and at this time we decided not to do any of the options. And we’ll see where that goes.
But it was a very interesting two days. And I think, actually, it was a very productive two days. But sometimes you have to walk, and this was just one of those times. And I’ll let Mike speak to that for a couple of minutes, please.
SECRETARY POMPEO: Thank you, Mr. President. We had been working, our teams — the team that I brought to bear, as well as the North Koreans — for weeks to try and develop a path forward so at the summit we could make a big step — a big step along the way towards what the two leaders had agreed to back in Singapore, in June of last year.
We made real progress. And indeed we made even more progress when the two leaders met over the last 24, 36 hours. Unfortunately, we didn’t get all the way. We didn’t get to something that ultimately made sense for the United States of America. I think Chairman Kim was hopeful that we would. We asked him to do more. He was unprepared to do that. But I’m still optimistic. I’m hopeful that the teams will get back together in the days and weeks ahead, and continue to work out what’s a very complex problem.
We have said, since the beginning, that this would take time. Our teams have gotten to know each other better. We know what the limits are. We know where some of the challenges are.
And I think as we continue to work on this in the days and weeks ahead, we can make progress so that we can ultimately achieve what it is that the world wants, which is to denuclearize North Korea, to reduce risk for the American people and the people all around the world.
I wish we could have gotten a little bit further, but I’m very optimistic that the progress that we made — both in the run-up to this summit, as well as the progress that the two leaders made over these past two days — put us in position to get a really good outcome.
And the President and Chairman Kim both felt good that they had made that progress but couldn’t quite get along the line any further to make a deal that would have been bigger at this point. I hope we’ll do so in the weeks ahead.
Thank you, Mr. President.
THE PRESIDENT: Thank you.
Q Mr. President —
THE PRESIDENT: All right, Major, please.
Q Has this process been more difficult than you thought? And was the North Korean demand for lifting of some sanctions the real sticking point here —
THE PRESIDENT: Yeah.
Q — in that you did not want to do that and they did? And will there be —
THE PRESIDENT: It was about the sanctions.
Q Will there be a third summit, Mr. President?
THE PRESIDENT: Basically, they wanted the sanctions lifted in their entirety, and we couldn’t do that. They were willing to denuke a large portion of the areas that we wanted, but we couldn’t give up all of the sanctions for that.
So we continue to work, and we’ll see. But we had to walk away from that particular suggestion. We had to walk away from that.
Q Will all the sanctions that are currently in existence remain, sir?
THE PRESIDENT: They’re in place. You know, I was watching as a lot of you folks over the weeks have said, “Oh, we’ve given up.” We haven’t given up anything. And frankly, I think we’ll end up being very good friends with Chairman Kim and with North Korea, and I think they have tremendous potential.
I’ve been telling everybody: They have tremendous potential. Unbelievable potential. But we’re going to see.
But it was about sanctions. I mean, they wanted sanctions lifted but they weren’t willing to do an area that we wanted. They were willing to give us areas but not the ones we wanted.
John?
Q As we know, I mean, there’s an incredibly complex set of issues that are at play here in terms of lifting the sanctions and what denuclearization is.
THE PRESIDENT: Right.
Q Did you get any distance toward sort of what Kim’s vision of denuclearization is?
THE PRESIDENT: Yes, we did. We did.
Q Because there is a lot — a line of thinking that he wants to keep some nukes.
THE PRESIDENT: Yeah.
Q I mean, would you allow him to do that? And if you can’t —
THE PRESIDENT: Well, I don’t — John, I don’t want to comment —
Q If you can’t get —
THE PRESIDENT: Excuse me, I don’t want to comment on that exactly, but he has a certain vision and it’s not exactly our vision, but it’s a lot closer than it was a year ago. And I think, you know, eventually we’ll get there.
But for this particular visit, we decided that we had to walk, and we’ll see what happens. Okay?
Oh, look, we have a gentleman nobody has ever heard of. Sean Hannity — what are you doing here, Sean Hannity? Should we let him do a question? I don’t know.
Yeah, John, go ahead.
Q If I could just follow up.
THE PRESIDENT: Yeah.
Q So if he wants the sanctions completely off, and you want more on denuclearization, how can you bridge that gap between now and the next time you might sit down with him?
THE PRESIDENT: With time. It’ll be bridged, I think, at a certain point. But there is a gap. We have to have sanctions. And he wants to denuke, but he wants to just do areas that are less important than the areas that we want. We know that — we know the country very well, believe it or not. We know every inch of that country. And we have to get what we have to get, because that’s a big — that’s a big give.
Yeah, Sean. Please.
Q I work in radio and TV. The mic is on.
Mr. President, thank you. Mr. Secretary, good to see you. Mr. President, if you could elaborate a little bit more. We have some history. President Reagan walked away in Reykjavik. A lot of condemnation at the time. And it ended up working out very well in the end for the United States.
Was this mostly your decision? Or — and what message would you want to send Chairman Kim, as he’s listening to this press conference, about the future and your relationship?
THE PRESIDENT: Well, Sean, I don’t want to say it was my decision, because what purpose is that? I want to keep the relationship, and we will keep the relationship. We’ll see what happens over the next period of time.
But, as you know, we got our hostages back. There’s no more testing. And one of the things, importantly, that Chairman Kim promised me last night is, regardless, he’s not going to do testing of rockets and nuclear. Not going to do testing. So, you know, I trust him, and I take him at his word. I hope that’s true.
But, in the meantime, we’ll be talking. Mike will be speaking with his people. He’s also developed a very good relationship with the people — really, the people representing North Korea. I haven’t spoken to Prime Minister Abe yet. I haven’t spoken to President Moon of South Korea. But we will, and we’ll tell them it’s a process and it’s moving along. But we just felt it wasn’t appropriate to sign an agreement today. We could have. I just felt it wasn’t very appropriate.
Yeah, Jonathan.
Q Thank you, Mr. President.
THE PRESIDENT: Thank you.
Q Two questions, if I may. First, did you learn anything new about Chairman Kim, through this meeting?
And secondly, of course, while this was going on, the drama back in Washington, your former lawyer, Michael Cohen — who worked for you for 10 years; his office right next to yours, right by yours at Trump Tower — he called you a liar, a conman, a racist. What’s your response to Michael Cohen?
THE PRESIDENT: Well, it’s incorrect. And, you know, it’s very interesting, because I tried to watch as much as I could. I wasn’t able to watch too much because I’ve been a little bit busy. But I think having a fake hearing like that, and having it in the middle of this very important summit is really a terrible thing. They could’ve made it two days later or next week, and it would’ve been even better. They would’ve had more time.
But having it during this very important summit is sort of incredible. And he lied a lot, but it was very interesting because he didn’t lie about one thing. He said no collusion with the Russian hoax. And I said, “I wonder why he didn’t just lie about that, too, like he did about everything else?”
I mean, he lied about so many different things, and I was actually impressed that he didn’t say, “Well, I think there was collusion for this reason or that.” He didn’t say that. He said, “No collusion.” And I was, you know, a little impressed by that, frankly. Could’ve — he could’ve gone all out. He only went about 95 percent instead of 100 percent.
But the fact is, there is no collusion. And I call it the “witch hunt.” This should never happen to another President. This is so bad for our country. So bad.
You look at this whole hoax — I call it the Russian witch hunt. I now add the word “hoax.” It’s a very, very bad thing for our country. But I was impressed with the fact that he — when — you know, because the most important question up there was the one on collusion. And he said he saw no collusion.
So we’ll see what happens. But it was pretty shameful, I think.
Yes, ma’am. Please. Please.
Q President Trump —
Q President Trump —
THE PRESIDENT: How about one of you, instead of three?
Q Well, actually, I do have the microphone. I guess, so — well —
THE PRESIDENT: Excuse me. Excuse me. Person in the front. Go ahead.
Q Thank you, President Trump, for —
THE PRESIDENT: No, no. No, not you. Excuse me. Yeah, we’ll get to you.
Thank you.
Q Thank you, President Trump. Jane Tung (ph) from (inaudible) Television. What was the atmosphere like when you walked away from the negotiation table? And —
THE PRESIDENT: I think it was very good, very friendly. This wasn’t a walk away, like you get up and walk out. No, this was very friendly. We shook hands. You know, there’s a warmth that we have, and I hope that stays. I think it will.
But we are — you know, we’re positioned to do something very special. This has been going on for many decades. This isn’t me. You know, this was — this should’ve been solved during many presidential runs. And, you know, people talked about it; they never did anything. I get a kick out of so many people from past administrations telling me how to negotiate when they were there, in some cases, for eight years; they did nothing.
But I think the relationship was very warm, and when we walked away it was a very friendly walk. Mike, you might want to speak to that for a second.
SECRETARY POMPEO: No, I agree. I talked with my counterparts as well. But we hope we can do more, but everyone is very focused on how we continue to build on this.
We are certainly closer today than we were 36 hours ago. And we were closer then than we were a month or two before that. So real progress was made.
I think everyone had hoped we could do it just a little bit better. But the departure was with an agreement that we would continue to work on what has been an incredibly difficult problem. Both sides are resolved to achieve it, and everyone walked away in that spirit.
Q And may I add: You and Chairman Kim are from very different political systems. You are from different generations. And what do you find —
THE PRESIDENT: It’s a very different system. I would say that’s true.
Q How do you find, you guys, in common? Because we saw the atmosphere —
THE PRESIDENT: We just like each other. I mean, we have a good relationship. Yeah. It’s a totally different system, to put it mildly. But we like each other. A good relationship.
Go ahead. In the back. Go ahead.
Q Mr. President, do you think it was premature to have held the summit when all these things had not been tied down? I mean, in the White House schedule last night, it said signing agreement today. And I wonder whether — as a follow-up question, whether you could sketch out what the next few months look like. Thank you.
THE PRESIDENT: You always have to be prepared to walk. I could’ve signed an agreement today, and then you people would’ve said, “Oh, what a terrible deal. What a terrible thing he did.” No, you have be prepared to walk. And, you know, there was a potential we could’ve signed something today. I could’ve 100 percent signed something today. We actually had papers ready to be signed, but it just wasn’t appropriate. I want to do it right. I’d much rather do it right than do it fast.
Yes, please. Go ahead. Go ahead. Go. First. Go. Yeah.
Q (Inaudible.)
THE PRESIDENT: You have to speak up.
Q I’m a reporter from South Korea, and I appreciate your effort to advance denuclearization in Korean Peninsula. And could you elaborate on the options and the various ways that you discussed with Chairman Kim to advance denuclearization? Could you specify?
THE PRESIDENT: We discussed many ways. And the denuclearization is a very important — it’s a very important word. Become a very well used word. And a lot of people don’t know what it means, but to me it’s pretty obvious: We have to get rid of the nukes.
I think he’s got a chance to have one of the most successful countries — rapidly, too — on Earth. Incredible country, incredible location. You’re right between — if you think of it, you have, on one side, Russia and China, and on the other you have South Korea, and you’re surrounded by water and among the most beautiful shorelines in the world.
There is tremendous potential in North Korea, and I think he’s going to lead it to a very important thing, economically. I think it’s going to be an absolute economic power.
Yes. Go ahead. Please. Go ahead. Yeah.
Q Mr. President, David Sanger from the New York Times.
THE PRESIDENT: I know, David.
Q Six months ago, when you spoke — or eight months ago, in Singapore, you said, if you didn’t have something in six months, we should come back and ask you about it. In that time, you have seen Chairman Kim increase the number of missiles he’s produced and continue to produce more nuclear material. And that’s been a pressure point on you, because he’s showing you the arsenals getting larger while this is going on.
THE PRESIDENT: Well, some people, David, are saying that, and some people are denying that. They have shots from above — way above — and some people are saying that and some people aren’t.
But I could’ve taken that out today, but I think you and others would’ve said we didn’t get enough for what we’d be giving up. So — and, you know, don’t forget, we’re partners with a lot of countries on this, if you think about it, with the sanctions. We have a whole big partnership with the United Nations and many countries, including Russia, China, and others. And then, of course, South Korea is very important to this whole thing, and Japan.
I don’t want to do something that is going to violate the trust that we’ve built up. We have a very strong partnership.
Q So can you just give us a little more detail? Did you get into the question of actually dismantling the Yongbyon complex?
THE PRESIDENT: I did. Yes. Absolutely.
Q And does he seem willing, ultimately —
THE PRESIDENT: Totally.
Q — to take all of that out?
THE PRESIDENT: Sure. Totally.
Q He does? He just wants all the sanctions off first?
THE PRESIDENT: He would do that, but he wants the sanctions for that. And as you know, there’s plenty left after that. And I just I felt it wasn’t good. Mike and I spent a long time negotiating and talking about it to ourselves. And just — I felt that that particular, as you know, that facility, while very big, it wasn’t enough to do what we were doing.
Q So he was willing to Yongbyon, but you wanted more than that? I assume —
THE PRESIDENT: We had to have more than that, yeah. We had to have more than that because there are other things that you haven’t talked about, that you haven’t written about, that we found. And we have to have — that was done a long time ago, but the people didn’t know about.
Q Including the uranium —
THE PRESIDENT: And we brought — yeah.
Q Including the second uranium enrichment plant?
THE PRESIDENT: Exactly. And we brought many, many points up that I think they were surprised that we knew. But we had to do more than just the one level. Because if we did the one level, and we gave up all of that leverage that’s been taking a long time to build. And I want to tell you, by the way —
Q So he was not willing to take out that second —
THE PRESIDENT: David, I want to take off the sanctions so badly, because I want that country to grow. That country has got such potential, but they have to give up, or we could’ve done that deal.
Mike, you want to speak to that?
SECRETARY POMPEO: Only, David, there are also timing and sequencing issues that were associated with that as well, which we didn’t quite get across the finish line as well. But remember, too, even that facility, even the Yongbyon facility and all of its scope — which is important, for sure — still leaves missiles, still leaves warheads and weapons systems. So there’s a lot of other elements that we just couldn’t get to.
Q And the listing of all of them.
SECRETARY POMPEO: Yes, sir. And a declaration. So, all of those things, we couldn’t quite get there today.
THE PRESIDENT: That’s right. Go ahead.
Q Thank you, Mr. President.
THE PRESIDENT: Thank you.
Q I just wanted to clarify, when you talk about what you would willing to give up all of the sanctions for, are you still thinking that you want North Korea to give up everything to do complete, verifiable denuclearization —
THE PRESIDENT: Well, I don’t want to say that to you —
Q — before you lift sanctions?
THE PRESIDENT: Yeah. Yeah. It’s a good question. I don’t want to say that to you because I don’t want to put myself in that position, from the standpoint of negotiation. But, you know, we want a lot to be given up. And we’re giving up.
And we’ll have to — you know, we’ll be helping them along economically, us and other — many other countries are going to be helping. They’re going to be in there. They’re prepared to help. I can tell you: Japan, South Korea, I think China. So many.
And speaking of China, we’re very well on our way to doing something special, but we’ll see. I mean, I am always prepared to walk. I’m never afraid to walk from a deal. And I would do that with China, too, if it didn’t work out.
Q Are you concerned, if you’re not able to reach an agreement, that the testing will start again? Or that while all of this time is happening by —
THE PRESIDENT: Well, he said the testing — yeah.
Q — they are continuing to develop their program?
THE PRESIDENT: He said the testing will not start. He said that he’s not going to do testing of rockets or missiles or anything having to do with nuclear. And all I can tell you is that’s what he said. And we’ll see.
Yes, go ahead. Please. Go ahead, please. In the back. Red. In the red.
Q Thank you. Thank you, Mr. President.
THE PRESIDENT: Yes, thank you.
Q Jessica Stone from CGTN. I have a question about China, as you were talking about. You talk about China being willing, potentially, to help economically. And the fact that you’ve talked — or will talk to Presidents Moon and Prime Minister Abe, how would you describe China’s role in facilitating the engagement that’s happened, so far, between Pyongyang and Washington?
THE PRESIDENT: I think China has been a big help. Bigger than most people know. On the border, as you know, 93 percent of the goods coming into North Korea come through China. So there’s a great power there. At the same time, I believe — I happen to believe that North Korea is calling its own shots. They’re not taking orders from anybody. He’s a very strong guy. And they’re able to do things that are pretty amazing. But 93 percent still come in from China. China has an influence, and China has been a big help.
And Russia has been a big help too. As you know, there’s a pretty small part of the border, but nevertheless significant — about 28 miles. And things can happen there too. And they’ve been a help.
Yes, go ahead, please.
Q Thanks, President. Jen Chen with Shenzhen Media Group of China. In your meeting with Chairman Kim this morning and yesterday, did the topic of China come up? If so, what can you share with us today? And you probably will have the (inaudible) of Mar-a-Lago summit in March with Chinese President Xi Jinping. What would you like accomplished with your agenda regarding China at that time? Thank you.
THE PRESIDENT: We did talk about China today a lot. And he’s getting along with China and so are we. And we are — you know, we’re — we’re, right now, you look at what’s happened to our country; we’ve picked up trillions and trillions of dollars of net worth. Our stock market is almost at its all-time high. Our economy is incredible. Our unemployment numbers are among the best we’ve ever had in our history.
Individual groups like African American, women — you just take a look at any group; Hispanic, you saw that just came out — the best in history; African American, best in history. So many different numbers are coming out so good. So we have the strongest economy, probably, possibly that we’ve ever had.
Fiat Chrysler just announced that they’re going to spend $4.5 billion right next to Detroit, in Michigan. They’re building a tremendous plant. It’s actually an expansion of another plant. It’s going to be — it’s going to double up their jobs, and even more than that. A lot of great things are happening.
And with China, they’re having some difficulty, as you know. But I think that a lot of the difficulty is because of the tariffs that they’re having. And in addition to that, we’re putting a tremendous amount of money; you saw trade deficits went down last month. Everybody was trying to find out why. Well, we’re taking in a lot of tariff money, and it’s going right to the bottom line and it has reduced the trade deficits.
So we’ll see what happens with China. I think we have a very good chance. Their numbers are down. But I don’t want that. I want their numbers — I want them to do great. But we’ve been losing anywhere from $300- to $500 billion a year with China for many, many years.
And again, like other things, many Presidents should have done this before me, and nobody did. So we’re doing it.
Go ahead. Go ahead, please. Right here. This gentleman.
Q Chad O’Carroll from NK News, (inaudible) with North Korea News. What’s your message for President Moon, who has effectively reached the glass ceiling, as far inter-Korean cooperation is concerned, due to sanctions? And what’s next for U.S.-ROK military drills?
THE PRESIDENT: Well, I like President Moon very much. We have a great relationship. Believe it or not, I have a great relationship with almost every leader. A lot of people find that hard to understand, but I do. But some take advantage of our country like you wouldn’t believe. And when they know I know it — which I know in every case — maybe it sort of freezes them up a little bit. But we do; we have a lot of good relationships.
We’ll be calling President Moon very soon, as soon as I get by the phone, on the plane. And he’ll be one of the first calls. I’ll be calling Prime Minister Abe of Japan, telling him about where we are and what we’re doing. But I’ll be making those calls.
No, he’s working very hard. President Moon is working very hard. He’d love to see a deal and he’s been very helpful.
Okay? Thank you. Go ahead, please.
Q Thank you, Mr. President. I’m (inaudible), reporter from Global Times China. I would like to ask you, what are you expecting China to do in the next step to mediate your relationship with North Korea? Thank you.
THE PRESIDENT: To use China?
Q Yeah, from China.
THE PRESIDENT: Well, we do. I mean, China has been very helpful. President Xi is a great leader. He’s a highly respected leader all over the world and especially in Asia. And he’s helped us — Mike, I would say he’s helped us a lot, right?
SECRETARY POMPEO: He has.
THE PRESIDENT: We’ve — I actually called him just recently to say, “Hey, you know, whatever you can do on this.” But he has been very helpful at the border, and he’s been very, very helpful with, I think, North Korea generally. Could he be a little more helpful? Probably. But he’s been excellent.
Go ahead, please. No — yeah, please.
Q (Laughs.) (Inaudible) next.
THE PRESIDENT: That’s okay. You’re friends.
Q Thanks, Mr. President. Could you — did you commit with Chairman Kim to a next summit during your term?
THE PRESIDENT: No, we haven’t — no.
Q Okay.
THE PRESIDENT: We’ll see. If it happens, it happens. I have not committed.
Q They are, at this point, some would say, a nuclear power. Do you accept North Korea as a nuclear-armed state, at least for the time being? And are you thinking about re-imposing the military exercises with South Korea, or will you keep it a freeze-for-freeze?
THE PRESIDENT: Well, you know, the military exercises, I gave that up quite a while ago because it costs us $100 million every time we do it. We fly these massive bombers in from Guam. And when I first started, a certain general said, “Oh, yes, sir, we fly them in from Guam. It’s right next door.” Well, right next door is seven hours away. And then they come and they drop millions of dollars of bombs, and then they go back and —
But we would spend — I mean, we spent hundreds of millions of dollars on those exercises, and I hated to see it. I thought it was unfair.
And, frankly, I was, sort of, of the opinion that South Korea should help us with that. You know, we’re protecting South Korea. I think they should help us with that.
So those exercises are very expensive. And I was telling the generals — I said: Look, you know, exercising is fun and it’s nice and they play the war games. And I’m not saying it’s not necessary, because at some levels it is, but at other levels it’s not. But it’s a very, very expensive thing. And you know, we do have to think about that too.
But when they spend hundreds of millions of dollars on those exercises and we don’t get reimbursed — we’re spending a tremendous amount of money on many countries, protecting countries that are very rich that can certainly afford to pay us and then some.
And those countries — by the way, and those countries know that it’s not right, but nobody has ever asked them before. But I’ve asked them and we’re doing — we’re gaining a lot of money. We’ve picked up over a $100 billion just in NATO over the last two years. A hundred billion dollars more has come in. And we’re doing that with a lot of countries. You’ll be seeing that a lot.
Yes, sir. Please.
Q Mr. President, sir —
THE PRESIDENT: Yeah, one second, please.
Q Yes, thank you, Mr. President. You have a personal relationship — and I believe Vice President Pence does — with the family of Otto Warmbier.
THE PRESIDENT: I do.
Q I’m wondering — you’ve talked about, this week, about Kim Jong Un being “my friend” — you called him on Twitter. You said you have a great relationship. Have you, in Singapore or here, confronted Kim Jong Un about Otto Warmbier’s death —
THE PRESIDENT: I have. I have.
Q — and asked him to take responsibility? And what did he say to you? And why do you call him your friend?
THE PRESIDENT: I have. And I have, and we have talked about it. And I really don’t think it was in his interest at all. I know the Warmbier family very well. I think they’re an incredible family. What happened is horrible. I really believe something very bad happened to him, and I don’t think that the top leadership knew about it.
And when they had to send him home — by the way, I got the prisoners back. I got the hostages back. And Otto was one of the hostages, but Otto came back in shape that was not even to be talked about. I find it — I thought it was horrible. Now, the others came back extremely healthy. But Otto came back in a condition that was just — just terrible.
And I will — I did speak about it, and I don’t believe that he would’ve allowed that to happen. Just wasn’t to his advantage to allow that to happen. Those prisons are rough. They’re rough places. And bad things happened. But I really don’t believe that he was — I don’t believe he knew about it.
Q Did he say — did he tell you that he did not — did Kim Jong Un tell you —
THE PRESIDENT: He felt badly about it. I did speak to him. He felt very badly. But he knew the case very well, but he knew it later. And, you know, you got a lot of people. A big country. A lot of people. And in those prisons and those camps, you have a lot of people. And some really bad things happened to Otto. Some really, really bad things.
But he tells me —
Q Why are you (inaudible) —
THE PRESIDENT: He tells me that he didn’t know about it, and I will take him at his word.
Yes, ma’am. Go ahead. Please. Please. Go ahead. In the back.
Q Me?
THE PRESIDENT: No, in the back. Behind you. Thank you.
Q Mr. President, (inaudible), Sputnik News Agency. Have you discussed the issue of possible inspections to North Korea’s nuclear sites during your negotiations?
THE PRESIDENT: You’re going to have to speak a little louder. And where are you from? Where are you from?
Q Russia’s Sputnik News Agency. Have you discussed the issue of possible inspections to North Korea’s nuclear sites during your talks with the Chairman?
THE PRESIDENT: Why don’t you answer that, Mike?
I can’t —
Q Inspections.
THE PRESIDENT: Good.
Q Inspections. Inspections of nuclear sites.
THE PRESIDENT: I was worried about my hearing.
Q Inspections, sir.
THE PRESIDENT: Oh, inspections.
Q International inspections. Yes.
THE PRESIDENT: Oh, inspections. Inspections on North Korea? Oh, we’d be able — yeah.
Q Yeah. Inspections to the nuclear sites.
THE PRESIDENT: We’d be able to do that very easily. We have that set up, so we would be able to do that very easily.
The inspections on North Korea will take place and we’ll — if we do something with them — we have a schedule set up that is very good. We know things that, as David was asking about certain places and certain sites — there are sites that people don’t know about that we know about. We would be able to do inspections, we think, very, very successfully.
Yes, ma’am. Please. Please. Yes, go ahead. Please. Yes.
Q Thank you, Mr. President.
THE PRESIDENT: A lot of people here, by the way. A big group of people.
Q Yes.
THE PRESIDENT: Go ahead.
Q Kann News Israel, Mr. President.
THE PRESIDENT: Good. Good.
Q Following this engagement with North Korea, you are trying to bring peace to the Middle East.
THE PRESIDENT: Right.
Q The peace plan is about to be introduced in the near future. And as you have mentioned before —
THE PRESIDENT: Well, we hope. We hope. We’re working hard on the peace plan and we hope it will be (inaudible).
Q I believe you do. But as you mentioned before, it will require Israel to make compromises to the Palestinians. As far as you know, is Prime Minister Netanyahu willing to make these compromises which are very much needed?
And a second question: Mr. Netanyahu is about to indicted today with corruption allegations. Do you wish to tell him something on this occasion?
THE PRESIDENT: Well, I just think he’s been a great prime minister. And I don’t know about his difficulty, but you’re telling me something that, you know, the people have been hearing about. But I don’t know about that.
I can say this: that he’s done a great job as prime minister. He’s tough, he’s smart, he’s strong. He is very defensive. His military has been built up a lot. They buy a lot of equipment from the United States and they pay for it. Of course, we give them tremendous, as you know, subsidy, also. Four billion dollars is a lot each year. But they are — they’ve been very good. They’ve been incredible, actually, in many ways. But there is a chance for peace between Israel and the Palestinians.
And, you know, it’s interesting — all of my life, I’ve heard that the toughest of all deals — when they talk about tough deals; we all like deals — but the toughest of all deals would be peace between Israel and Palestinians. They say it’s like the impossible deal. I’d love to be able to produce it. We’ll see what happens.
You know, we were paying the Palestinians a lot of money. And I ended that about two years ago because they weren’t saying the right things. And I said, why would we pay somebody that’s not saying nice things about us, and not really wanting to go to the peace table? And they’ve been much better. And we’ll see what happens.
Q But has Mr. Netanyahu made concessions?
THE PRESIDENT: But I think we really — I think we have, actually, a good shot at peace between Israel and the Palestinians.
Q Has Netanyahu made concessions?
THE PRESIDENT: Yeah, go ahead. Please. Sir.
Q Mr. President, I’m from China. My question is: Do you still believe it is possible that the North Korea and U.S. relation could be like the U.S. and the Vietnam relation in the future?
THE PRESIDENT: You have to go again.
Q Do you believe — do you still believe that is it is possible that the relation between U.S. and North Korea, in the future, could be like the relation between U.S. and Vietnam?
THE PRESIDENT: Yeah. I think we’re going have — yeah. I mean, we have very, very good relations. And, by the way, speaking of — you mentioned Japan — we have a lot of good things happening Japan. We have trade talks started. For years, Japan has been sending millions and millions of cars in, and as you know, it’s not been a very fair situation for the United States.
We’re starting trade talks with Japan. They actually started about three months ago, and I think we’ll have a very good deal for the United States. But that’s been a very unfair situation. Prime Minister Abe understands that, and that’s fine.
Yes, sir. Please. Back there.
Q Thank you, Mr. President. I’m (inaudible) with Shanghai Media Group. Do you think the next meeting could be soon, or might take some time?
THE PRESIDENT: Well, I can’t tell you. I mean, it might be soon. It might not be for a long time. I can’t tell you. I would hope it would be soon. But it may not be for a long time.
I could’ve done — I could’ve done a deal today, but it would’ve been a deal that wouldn’t have been a deal that — it would’ve been something that I wouldn’t have been happy about, Mike would not have been happy about. We had some pretty big options. But we just felt it wasn’t appropriate, and we really want to do it right.
Yes, in the back. In the back. Yes, ma’am. Please.
Q Debi Edward, ITV News. At which point did it become clear to you that you wouldn’t be getting a deal here in Hanoi? The language from yourself and Kim Jong Un was very positive last night and even this morning. And therefore, was it a mistake to come here?
THE PRESIDENT: No, I think the language was good all throughout. The language has been good even now. But, you know, I don’t go by language, because we had probably the toughest language in the history of diplomacy — if you call it diplomacy — at the beginning, and yet, we became very friendly. I don’t believe there was any tougher language ever than that.
But, again, this was something that should’ve been handled by other Presidents long before me and long before they had the kind of power that they have. But it wasn’t. It should’ve been done by many — I’m not just blaming the Obama administration, which, by the way, it did nothing. Nothing. Did absolutely on North Korea. It allowed things that happened, and to happen, that were very inappropriate. But I’m not blaming the Obama administration. I’m blaming many administrations. Something should’ve happened.
But I don’t think the rhetoric has been bad at all. Initially, it was horrible, but now it’s been very good.
All right, one more. How about you? Go ahead. Please. Please. Go ahead.
Q (Inaudible) from South Korea, (inaudible) South Korean media outlet here. I’d like to ask you: You said that we do not particularly know when there will be — North Korean leader will be willing to come to the table and take the actions that’s been required. If that’s the case, would the U.S. be willing to strengthen the sanctions and perhaps put the pressure on North Korea to move forward?
THE PRESIDENT: I don’t want to comment on that. I can just tell you this: that we have very strong sanctions. I don’t want to talk about increasing sanctions. They’re strong. They have a lot of great people in North Korea that have to live also. And that’s important to me.
And I would say this: My whole attitude changed a lot because I got to know, as you know, Chairman Kim very well. And they have a point of view also.
So I don’t really want to talk about that. I just think that, hopefully, for the sake of South Korea, for the sake of Japan, and frankly, for the sake of China — I was talking to President Xi, who really is a man that gets the respect of a lot of people — I say, “You can’t love having a nuclear state right next to China.” And he doesn’t. He really doesn’t. I will tell you, he would like to see that problem solved, too. So that’s it.
Well, ladies and gentleman, I’m about to get on a plane and fly back to a wonderful place called Washington, D.C. So, thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you, fellas. Thank you very much.
END
2:53 P.M. ICT
President Trump Participates in a 1:1 Conversation with the Chairman of the State Affairs Commission
REMARKS
Remarks by President Trump and Chairman Kim Jong Un of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea in a 1:1 Conversation
FOREIGN POLICY
Issued on: February 27, 2019
Sofitel Legend Metropole Hanoi
Hanoi, Vietnam
CHAIRMAN KIM: (As interpreted.) So it’s exactly 261 days since we met last time in Singapore, in June, last year.
PRESIDENT TRUMP: Yes.
CHAIRMAN KIM: (As interpreted.) And I truly believe that this successful and great meeting that we are having today is thanks to the courageous decision — political decision that your team, Mr. President, reached.
So, during that 261 days since we last met, there have been some misunderstandings. There have been all these eyes from the world who are misunderstanding the situation. But — and there was some hostility that still remains from the very, very past period that — from the outside.
PRESIDENT TRUMP: Right.
CHAIRMAN KIM: (As interpreted.) But, however, we have been able to overcome all the obstacles, and here we are today after 261 days, in Hanoi.
I actually believe that those 261 days were the days which were — and during which a lot of painstaking efforts were necessary and also a lot of patience were needed.
But here we are today, sitting next to each other, and that gives us a hope that we will be successful with time. And I will really try to make that happen.
PRESIDENT TRUMP: Thank you very much. That’s really nice.
Well, I want to just say it’s an honor to be with Chairman Kim. It’s an honor to be together in, really, a country, Vietnam, where they’ve really rolled out the red carpet and they’ve — they’re very honored to have us. And it’s great to be with you.
We had a very successful first summit. I felt it was very successful, and some people would like to see it go quicker. I’m satisfied; you’re satisfied. We want to be happy with what we’re doing. But I thought the first summit was a great success. And I think this one, hopefully, will be equal or greater than the first. And we made a lot progress, and I think the biggest progress was our relationship is really a good one.
And as I’ve said many times — and I say it to the press, I say it to anybody that wants to listen: I think that your country has tremendous economic potential. Unbelievable. Unlimited. And I think that you will have a tremendous future with your country — a great leader. And I look forward to watching it happen and helping it to happen. And we will help it to happen.
Thank you all very much. We appreciate it. And we’re going to go have dinner, and then we have some big meetings scheduled for tomorrow. And we’ll see you, I guess, at a news conference at some point during the day. Thank you very much.
Q Mr. President, do you have any reaction to Michael Cohen and his testimony?
PRESIDENT TRUMP: (Shakes head.)
END
;
President Trump Participates in a Working Lunch with the Prime Minister of the SRV
President Trump UNBELIEVABLE Trade Deals just Made the US Millions
Golden State Times: Feb 26, 2019
President Trump meets Vietnamese officials to witness Trade Deals made by the US and Vietnam making the Country Millions
U.S. President Donald Trump is meeting with his Vietnamese counterpart hours before he is set to sit down with North Korea’s Kim Jong Un.
Trump is greeting Vietnamese President Nguyen Phu Trong, whose country is hosting the second summit between the leaders of the two technically-warring nations.
The two leaders presided over a signing ceremony of several commercial trade deals between their two airline industries.
President Trump Attends the Governors' Ball
China Trade Issue is getting Better Trump Anticipating the 2nd Summit US-DPRK in Hanoi, Vietnam
Issued on: February 24, 2019
REMARKS
Remarks by President Trump at 2019 Governors’ Ball
Issued on: February 24, 2019
State Floor
7:42 P.M. EST
THE PRESIDENT: Thank you very much, everybody. This is an honor. Fifty-nine governors. Think of that. But we actually have — we added a few from the islands, so we broke it down to 49. But we love to exaggerate just a little bit. (Laughter.)
This has been a — really, a great couple of days. We’ve had a lot of fun together. And it’s been, you know, very special. We’ve gotten to know each other. We’ve gotten to like each other, in almost all cases. Let’s see — one or two cases. Every case, I would say. (Laughter.) Every single case.
I just want to thank Vice President Mike Pence and our Second Lady, Karen. (Applause.) Thank you very much. Thank you, Mike, very much. And I especially want to thank our really great Cabinet for being here. We have most members of the Cabinet, and our great new Attorney General. And, Bill Barr and Mrs. Barr, thank you very much. (Applause.) Thank you.
I could say this: Our country is doing very, very well. We are doing record business. We’re doing record employment. Right now, we have the most people working in our country than ever in the history of our country. Close to 160 million people. (Applause.) And that’s a big — that’s a big thing.
And I’ll give you a little advance information. I see Steve Mnuchin is here, and Ambassador Lighthizer. We just left a big meeting with China, and we just put out a statement, and we’re doing very well with China. It was a long weekend. They decided to stay for two and a half more days. They’ll probably be leaving late tonight; they’re going back. And if all works well, we’re going to have some very big news over the next week or two.
And it’s really been terrific, I tell you. That whole relationship has been outstanding. We put ourselves into a position of strength for the first time in about 35 years, or probably a lot more than that.
But China has been terrific. We want to make a deal that’s great for both countries. And that’s really what we’re going to be doing. And I think it’s going to — as governors — most of you, or many of you are governors, and doing an incredible job. And so many have come up and said, “How are you doing with China?” Which is a very unusual question for people to come and ask — almost every one. “Sir, how are you doing with China?” Because it affects your state so much. China is everywhere. And I think you’ll be very — really amazed with what you see. Maybe. Let’s see what happens. We still have a little ways to go. Would you say that’s correct, Mr. Ambassador? We have a little bit.
But I want to thank you, Bob. You’ve been working 24 hours around the clock. And I will say this publicly: When I was able to be lucky enough to win the presidency, I called Bob Lighthizer because, for years, people have known he’s the greatest trader that we have on this type of trade. We have many different types of trade. And I really understand now why. Thank you very much. Fantastic job. (Applause.) And Steve. Thank you.
And also, I was going to leave very early tomorrow, but now I’m going to do it a little bit later. I had an option to do it at six in the morning or eleven. (Laughter.) And I chose 11. This way we can spend a little bit of time with you tomorrow morning, because you’re having a breakfast. And I’ll come to the breakfast. But literally, I said, “What kind of an option is that? I can leave at six in the morning or eleven?” They said, “You can leave at six or anywhere between eleven and twelve.” I said, “I’ll take eleven to twelve.” (Laughter.) But you’re having a breakfast tomorrow, so I’ll be with you at the breakfast.
But we’ll be leaving for Hanoi, Vietnam, and we’ll be meeting with Kim Jong Un. It’s a very interesting thing to say, but I’ve developed a very, very good relationship. We’ll see what that means. But he’s never had a relationship with anybody from this country, and hasn’t had lots of relationships anywhere. And I always say — you know, the media sometimes will say, “Well, what have they given up?” We’ve given up nothing. The sanctions are on. Everything is on. But we have a special feeling, and I think it’s going to lead to something very good, and maybe not. I think ultimately it will, but maybe not.
And I’m not pushing for speed, but we’re not removing the sanctions. And we’re going to have, I think, a very interesting two and a half days in Vietnam. And we have a chance for the total denuclearization of an area of the world that was very dangerous.
When I first came in, or, really, more particularly, at the end of the last administration, there were rockets going up, there were missiles going up. There were bombs going off. There were massive cannons being tested. If you ever saw the picture of the beach, I’ve never seen anything like it, where you had, literally, thousands of cannons on the beach, shooting out into the waters. And there was nuclear testing. In fact, they thought it was earthquakes. They said they were massive earthquakes, and then they realized it was North Korea. They said, “Wow, I think it’s maybe not an earthquake.” Now there’s no testing, there’s no rockets. There’s no nuclear testing. And we get along well. Very well.
So it’ll be very interesting to see. And as I tell Chairman Kim, he has a chance to have a country that is so vibrant, economically. Maybe one of the most in the world. He’s got a location that’s unbelievable. As a real-estate person, I’ve always done very well with location. But he’s right between China, Russia, and then on the other side, South Korea. So they can’t touch each other unless they go through North Korea.
And I say, “You have one of the greatest locations.” They have incredible people. Hardworking people. Smart, energetic. And I think it can be, really, one of the great — one of the great financial and economic countries anywhere in the world. So I tell him that. I said, “But you can’t do that if you’re going to keep nuclear. If you do nuclear, that can’t ever happen.”
And we see eye to eye, I believe. But you’ll be seeing it more and more over the next couple of days, one way or the other. What’s going to happen? I can’t tell you. I think eventually it would, but I can’t tell you. And I’m not in a rush. I don’t want to rush anybody. I just don’t want testing. As long as there’s no testing, we’re happy.
And so we’ve done really something, I think, very special with respect to North Korea. And it’s a long flight, and I’ll be back at the end of the week. But we have two very interesting days planned, and I think it’s a very important — it’s a very important thing.
Prime Minister Abe of Japan said he can’t believe what’s happened in such a short period of time, because rockets were being fired over Japan — rockets and missiles. Both. And now that hasn’t happened in a long time — 16 months, 17 months. No more testing. No more rockets. No more checking to see whether or not this stuff works.
So you’ll be seeing it, and I think it’s going to be very interesting for people to see. But there’s a chance to do something very, very special. It’s very exciting. And likewise, if we can do the great economic deal, it would be the largest trade deal ever made, by far, if you look at it — our deal with China. And we truly are very close.
So those are a couple of very interesting things.
But our country is doing incredibly well, economically. We’ve picked up, in terms of value — worth — $18 trillion. Now, China — and I don’t want this — but China has lost about $24 trillion. So they were catching us, catching us, catching us. And now we’ve zoomed out. And I can say this: As long as I’m President, they’re not going to catch us, and they’re going to do well. But I want them to do well, but they’re not going to catch us.
So I just want to give a toast to the incredible people in this room and to our unbelievable country. We have a very, very special country. I want to thank our First Lady for having done — this is a such a beautiful job. So, Melania, I just want to thank you very much. (Applause.) I want to thank you.
And I would like to ask Governor Bullock to come up please, from a very special place that I like very much, for the obvious reason. And perhaps you could give a toast. Please. Thank you, Governor. Thank you very much.
END
7:51 P.M. EST
Anticipating the 2nd Summit US-DPRK in Hanoi, Vietnam: Trump Signs Historic Moment for U.S. Space Forces
Remarks by President Trump at Signing Ceremony for Space Policy Directive-4
NATIONAL SECURITY DEFENSE
Issued on: February 19, 2019
Oval Office
2:11 P.M. EST
THE PRESIDENT: Okay, thank you very much. I had a great conversation this morning with President Moon of South Korea. And we obviously discussed the upcoming trip next week, where we’re going Hanoi, in Vietnam. And I look forward to be with Chairman Kim, and I think a lot of things will come out of it.
We had a tremendous first summit. That was really breaking the ice, but a lot of things came from that, including good relationships. And we’re looking forward to having a very good meeting. And President Moon and I discussed, I think, probably every aspect of the meeting; it was a good conversation. I’ll be speaking tomorrow with Prime Minister Abe of Japan, and we’ll be having a similar conversation. So I think next week is going to be very exciting.
It’s going to be the second summit. I think a lot can come from it — at least, I hope so — the denuclearization, ultimately. I’m in no particular rush. The sanctions are on, the relationships are very strong, and a lot of good things have happened.
We’ve gotten our hostages back. The remains are coming back. Vice President Pence was in Hawaii when the first large number, actually, had come. And now, certain have been identified. Their families members have found out exactly what’s going on, and they’ve had ceremonies that are absolutely beautiful. That was an incredible event.
In fact, when we were campaigning, so many people would say — even though it was many years ago, they would say, “Is it possible to get the remains back from North Korea?” So we’ve done that. And as you know, there’s been no testing of rockets, missiles, or nuclear.
So we’re in no rush. A lot of the media would like to say, “Oh, what’s going on? Speed, speed, speed.” No rush whatsoever. We are going to have our meeting; we’ll see what happens. And I think, ultimately, we’re going to be very, very successful.
When I became President, the relationship with North Korea was a very dangerous one for the world, and I think now it’s far less dangerous. And there’s a lot of sanity, a lot of really sane thinking.
So he looks forward to it; I look forward to it. And the talk with President Moon, and tomorrow with Prime Minister Abe, I think will be very helpful.
Today, I’m thrilled to sign a new order taking the next step to create the United States Space Force. So important, when you look at defense, when you look at all of the other aspects of where the world will be someday. I mean, this is the beginning. This is a very important process.
First, I want to recognize our wonderful Vice President, Mike Pence, who serves as the Chairman of the National Space Council. Thank you, Mike. Great job. I know you feel the same way I do.
I also want to thank Acting Secretary of Defense Patrick Shanahan, who is with us; Secretary of the Air Force Heather Wilson; Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Paul Selva; and the Executive Secretary of the Space Council, Dr. Scott Pace for being here today.
They’ve all worked very hard on the Space Force. They all believe in it very strongly, as I do. It’s the future. It’s where we’re going. I suspect, whether we like it or not, that’s where we’re going. It’s space. That’s the next step, and we have to be prepared.
Our adversaries and — whether we get along with them or not, they’re up in space. And they’re doing it, and we’re doing it. And that’s going to be a very big part of where the defense of our nation — and you could say “offense” — but let’s just be nice about it and let’s say the defense of our nation is going to be.
America must be fully equipped to defend our vital interests. Our adversaries are training forces and developing technology to undermine our security in space, and they’re working very hard at that.
That’s why my administration has recognized space as a warfighting domain and made the creation of the Space Force a national security priority. I think we’ll have great support from Congress, because they do support something when we’re talking about such importance. And a lot of the generals, a lot of the people involved have been speaking to Congress. And we have some very interesting dialogue going on.
We’re investing in new space capabilities to project military power and safeguard our nation’s interests, especially when it comes to safety and defense.
This directive calls on the Secretary of Defense to develop a legislative proposal that will establish the structure and authority of the Space Force as the sixth branch of the United States Armed Forces. That would mean a high-ranking — the highest-ranking person there would go on to the Joint Chiefs of Staff. So it’s a very, very important deal.
The Space Force will organize, equip, and train the next generation of warriors to deter aggression and defend the nation, our allies, and American interests against hostile actions in the form of space and taking place in space.
So we have a lot of things on the books. We have a lot of new defensive weapons and offensive weapons designed specifically for this, and now we’re going to start taking advantage of. This is something they could have done sooner but they decided to wait. And here I am, and we’re going to do it. And I’m very proud that, during my administration, we’re doing so much in space. We need it.
We’ve already taken historic action to create the United States Space Command, as you know, within the Department of Defense to oversee the nation’s military space operations.
Now, in the face of these threats all around the world, American leadership in space is more important than it ever has been. Before, it used to be something that we’d aspire to, we’d talk about, but we wouldn’t do anything. Now we have to do something because that’s where it’s at.
With today’s action, we will ensure that our people are secure, our interests are protected, and our power continues to be unmatched. There will be nobody that can come close to matching us. It won’t be close.
What we have on the books are things that you wouldn’t even believe. You wouldn’t even believe. It’s going to mean the safety of our nation for many, many decades and many, many generations, and that’s what I’m here for. I guess when you get right down to it, more importantly than anything else, that’s why I’m here.
So I just want to thank everybody. The Space Force is a very important part of my administration and it’s a very important part of this nation. And it’s an honor to be with you all. And I’ll sign and we will then maybe take a few questions and ask a few. You may want to say something. In fact, Mike, why don’t you start off? You’ve been — you and I have been working on this very hard. Why don’t you say a few words? Please.
THE VICE PRESIDENT: We have. Thank you, Mr. President. From the first days of this administration, President Trump has made national security a priority. We’ve secured historic investments in our national defense.
But from very early on, the President also said that America needed to be as dominant in space as we are on the Earth. And now, with this fourth Space Policy Directive, America is leading in space once again.
But in this respect, the President is calling on the Department of Defense to fashion what we have literally been working on for months, consulting with members of Congress and military experts. It will be a legislative proposal that will establish the United States Space Force as the sixth branch of our armed forces.
It will build on the President’s leadership of a United States Space Command, a joint combatant command that we’ve already organized at the President’s direction. But this is now the foundation of ensuring that even as we are dominant in space today, now we’ll begin to bring all of our resources together under U.S. Space Command, which will operate under the Department of the Air Force. And in so doing, we’ll ensure that we bring the best resources and the best minds together to protect the American people and advance our interests.
And, Mr. President, all the members of the National Space Council and the agencies that are a part of it are gathered behind you today —
THE PRESIDENT: That’s right.
THE VICE PRESIDENT: — and we thank you for your leadership and your support in this effort.
THE PRESIDENT: Some great talent, I will say that. Would you like to say something? You’ve helped us so much. Please, Paul.
GENERAL SELVA: Sir, you’ve been incredibly supportive in bringing space to the fore as not only a domain of potential warfare, but also recognizing it as a place where a large amount of our economic power comes from. And so our job to protect our national security includes protecting our economy as well. And so, as your Vice Chairman, the Joint Chiefs endorse all this effort to make sure that we get the right emphasis on defending our interests and our assets in space.
THE PRESIDENT: Thank you very much, Paul. Patrick? How about you?
ACTING SECRETARY SHANAHAN: Yes, sir.
THE PRESIDENT: Mr. Secretary.
ACTING SECRETARY SHANAHAN: This is a historic moment. The dawn of a new service. I’d like to thank you for your leadership and, most importantly, the resources so that we can do our job.
Mr. Vice President, thank you for pushing us. We’ve come quite a distance in a very short period of time.
And then to my counterparts here, thank you for all the remarkable teamwork. We will deliver the capability better, sooner, faster so we can sustain our margin of dominance.
Thank you.
THE PRESIDENT: Thank you very much.
Maybe John Bolton — you’ve been very much involved and I know how you feel about it.
AMBASSADOR BOLTON: Well, this is a visionary project, Mr. President — your leadership, the Vice President, and really everybody on the Space Council. This is not something for the next year or two, or even the next six years. This is on into the century. A place where, as President Kennedy once said, “I believe space is a new ocean and the United States must sail upon it.” And you’re taking the steps to make sure that, from the national security perspective, the United States will be dominant on that new ocean.
THE PRESIDENT: And we will be. Okay, thank you.
Anybody have anything to say? Huh? Would anybody like to say? Fine? No? Good. We’re all (inaudible). (Laughter.) Right? We’ve said enough. Let’s sign. Let’s sign. It’s very exciting.
(The directive is signed.)
So how about we give this one to Paul? Mike, do you want to do that? Okay. Come on, Paul. That’s a big deal. (Applause.)
It’s very important. Thank you very much. Thank you very much, everybody. Thank you.
Q Mr. President, there’s another round of trade talks starting this week here in Washington.
THE PRESIDENT: That’s right.
Q How confident are you that it will be finished by March 1? Or are you considering extending that deadline?
THE PRESIDENT: Well, they are very complex talks. They’re going very well. We’re asking for everything that anybody has ever even suggested. These are not just, you know, “let’s sell corn or let’s do this.” It’s going to be selling corn but a lot of it — a lot more than anyone thought possible. And I think the talks are going very well — with China, you’re referring to?
Q Yes.
THE PRESIDENT: And the talks are going very well.
Our group just came back and now they’re coming here. I can’t tell you exactly about timing, but the date is not a magical date. A lot of things can happen.
The real question will be: Will we raise the tariffs? Because they automatically kick in to 25 percent as of — on $200 billion worth of goods that they send. So I know that China would like not for that to happen. So I think they’re trying to move fast so that doesn’t happen. But it’s — we’ll see what happens.
I can only say that the talks with China on trade have gone very, very well. In the meantime, our economy is very strong. We’re doing well.
I don’t know if you noticed, but deficits seem to be coming down. And last month it was reported, and everybody was surprised, but I wasn’t surprised. We’re taking in a lot of money coming into our Treasury from tariffs and various things, including the steel dumping. And our steel companies are doing really well. Aluminum companies also. So we’re very happy about that.
I think that it’s — they’ll be coming very shortly. They’re going to have very detailed discussions on subjects that have never really been even discussed by people that sat in this chair and they should have been. Very important subjects. And I think we’re doing very well. Okay?
Q (Inaudible) terrorists from Pakistan have been — struck, inside India, 40 security persons last week. How do you see this issue? What’s the message to Pakistan?
THE PRESIDENT: I’ve seen it. I’ve watched. I’ve gotten a lot of reports on it. We’ll have a comment at the appropriate time. It would be wonderful if they got along. It seems like that was a horrible situation. But we’re getting reports. We’ll have a statement to put out. Okay? Thank you very much.
Q Mr. President, did you ask Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker to change the leadership of the investigation into your former personal attorney, Michael Cohen?
THE PRESIDENT: No. Not at all. I don’t know who gave you that. Just more fake news. A lot of — there’s a lot of fake —
Q (Inaudible) story in the New York Times.
THE PRESIDENT: — there’s a lot of fake news out there. No, I didn’t.
Q What is the current status of your relationship with Mr. Whitaker?
THE PRESIDENT: Very good. I have a lot of respect for Mr. Whitaker. I think he’s done a great job. He’s a very, very straight shooter. I watched him during the hearing — some of it. I thought he was exceptional. He’s a very fine man and he should be given a lot of thanks by our nation.
Okay. Thank you very much.
Q Mr. President, what’s your reaction to the lawsuits yesterday filed by the states against your executive order?
THE PRESIDENT: Well, I think I called it exactly, right? Including the fact that they would put them in through the Ninth Circuit. That’s where they put them in. And I think we’ll do very well.
We have absolute right to do that. I have an absolute right to call a national security. We need strong borders. We have to stop drugs and crime and criminals and human trafficking. And we have to stop all of those things that a strong wall will stop. I could call it a barrier, but I think I don’t have to do that so much anymore. We’ll call it whatever we want.
But the point is that we have to have a stoppage. Billions and billions of dollars of illicit things are pouring through our border. And, you know, we talk about points of entry, and one of the things that we do have is a lot of money now from points of entry, because everything was given. The money was given — so much that you almost don’t know what to do with it — by Congress. But when it came to the wall, they wanted to hold back because it was politics. That’s all it is.
In fact, I hear the Democrats want to take down all walls along the southern border. And if they do that, you’re going to have a very different country. But they’re not going to do that. They wouldn’t. First of all, they won’t do it because they know it’s wrong. They know walls are necessary, maybe more than we do. But they’re playing a political game. And their new game is, “Let’s take down all walls.” I saw where Beto wanted to take down walls. I said — they asked me, “What do you think?” I said, “Well, I think that’s probably the end of his political career.”
We’re doing very well on the wall. We’re building a lot of wall right now. You know that. In the valley, we’re doing tremendous work in a very important area. We have a lot more under negotiation right now. We’re working with the Army Corps of Engineers. They’re fantastic. And a lot of great things are happening.
I think, in the end, we’re going to be very successful with the lawsuit. So it was filed — it was filed in the Ninth Circuit. And I actually think we might do very well, even in the Ninth Circuit, because it’s an open and closed case.
I was put here for security — whether it’s Space Force, which we’re doing today, or whether it’s borders. Because if our nation doesn’t have borders, we don’t have too much of a nation, especially when drugs and all of the things that — you know better than anybody what’s happening at the border. It’s a bad situation. So I think we’re going to do very well with the lawsuit.
Okay?
Q Just one more on Vietnam. You said — you referred earlier to your meetings in Vietnam. What do you want to achieve during that summit?
THE PRESIDENT: Well, I’d just like to see, ultimately, denuclearization of North Korea. I think we will see that ultimately. I have no pressing time schedule. And I think a lot of people would like to see it go very quickly from the other side.
I really believe that North Korea can be a tremendous economic power when this is solved. Their location between Russia, China, and South Korea is unbelievable. I think that North Korea and Chairman Kim have some very positive things in mind, and we’ll soon find out. But I’m in no rush. There’s no testing. As long as there’s not testing, I’m in no rush. If there’s testing, that’s another deal. But there has been no testing.
If you look at the end of the Obama administration, it was a disaster what was going on. You don’t have that right now; it’s a much different feeling. I think people have — there’s always danger, but I think people have a much different feeling.
So I hope that very positive things are going to happen. I think that it will be a very exciting couple of days.
Thank you all very much.
Q Your reaction to Bernie Sanders running for President?
THE PRESIDENT: Oh, Bernie Sanders is running. Yeah, that’s right. Personally, I think he missed his time. But I like Bernie because he’s — he is one person that, you know, on trade, he sort of would agree on trade. I’m being very tough on trade. He was tough on trade. The problem is he doesn’t know what to do about it. We’re doing something very spectacular on trade.
But I wish Bernie well. It will be interesting to see how he does. I think what happened to Bernie maybe was not so nice. I think he was taken advantage of. He ran great four years ago, and he was not treated with respect by Clinton. And that was too bad. I thought what happened to Bernie Sanders four years ago was quite sad as it pertains to our country. So we’ll see how he does.
You’ve got a lot of people running, but only one person is going to win. I hope you know who that person is.
Goodbye, everybody.
END
2:31 P.M. EST
Vietnam, exemplary case of economic development for N. Korea
According to Arirang News, Dated Feb. 19th, 2019, Reporter Oh Jung-hee explains.
Vietnam is geographically close enough to North Korea that the North Korean leader can fly there.
And it has diplomatic ties with both Pyeongyang and Washington.
These are the reasons why the Southeast Asian country was chosen as the venue for the second Kim-Trump summit -- but there is another reason why Hanoi was an attractive choice.
The U.S.-Vietnam history plays a part here.
Vietnam and the U.S. fought in a war from 1965 until 1975.
But their hostile relations came to an end as they established diplomatic relations in 1995, 10 years after Vietnam started its Doi Moi economic reforms.
In 2000, Vietnam and the U.S. signed a bilateral trade agreement, which expanded Hanoi's overseas trade.
Hanoi succeeded in developing a free market economy, while keeping a single-party communist system.
Hanoi has been willing to share its development experience with North Korea -- and Pyeongyang sent its foreign minister last year to study the Vietnamese model.
Meanwhile, U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has said that... Pyeongyang could replicate Hanoi's path to normal relations with the U.S. and to prosperity.
Kim and Trump's choice of Vietnam shows that they're willing to end their hostilities and start a new relationship.
But more importantly, Trump is making another promise that once Pyeongyang follows through on its commitment to denuclearize, what's to come next is the 'economic bright future' that Kim Jong-un desires.
Kim's aim of developing the North's economy could be even more evident during his state visit to Vietnam, where he'll be touring key industrial facilities near the capital, while strengthening relations with the Vietnamese government.
Meanwhile, Arirang News reported also North Korea continuing to develop, experiment with nuclear and ballistic weapons: Report With the countdown on to the second Kim-Trump summit, a major news outlet in Japan is reporting that North Korea is still violating UN sanctions.
Tokyo-based Kyodo News Agency on Sunday quoted a panel of experts on sanctions on North Korea,. as saying the regime has continued to develop and experiment with nuclear and ballistic weapons using non-military facilities, such as private airports and factories.
It added that North Korea continues to smuggle petroleum products through illegal transfers at sea, and are smuggling more coal.
North Korea Nuclear Disaster: 200 Dead at Missile Testing Facility
Published on Oct 31, 2017
North Korea’s Punggye-ri facility has suffered a devastating collapse, leaving around 200 people dead.
Around 100 people were killed when an unfinished tunnel collapsed at Kim Jong-un’s main nuclear testing site.
Another 100 people subsequently died while attempting to rescue the first group of entombed workers.
;
Published on Mar 18, 2017
5 Declassified Nuclear Explosions Caught on Film
Dark5 presents incredible HD footage and the stories behind the newly declassified nuclear test videos released by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
Dark5
Location set: second Pyeongyang-Washington summit to be held in Hanoi, Vietnam
Arirang News dated Feb 9th, 2019 Oh Jung-hee reported that The venue for the second North Korea-U.S. summit has been set.
It will be held in the Vietnamese capital of Hanoi later this month.
The announcement was made by President Donald Trump this morning who said he looks forward to the meeting and that North Korea could become a great economic powerhouse.
Our Unification Ministry correspondent Oh Jung-hee starts us off. The location is finally set.
The second Kim-Trump summit is to be held in Hanoi, the Vietnamese capital, for two days from February 27th to 28th.
That was revealed through U.S. President Donald Trump's tweet on Saturday.
Hanoi has been much preferred by the North Korean side.
First of all, it has the North Korean embassy.
And second, late former North Korean leader Kim Il-sung, grandfather of Kim Jong-un, visited the city two times in 1958 and 1964.
It's also known that the Vietnamese government recommended Hanoi for the summit.
As it will be the first time in over 50 years that a North Korean leader travels to the country, it's possible that Kim could make a state visit to Vietnam.
The venue announcement comes after the U.S. Special Representative for North Korea made a three-day visit to Pyeongyang this week.
On Saturday, Stephen Biegun stopped by at Seoul's foreign ministry to brief his South Korean counterpart Lee Do-hoon and South Korean Foreign Minister Kang Kyung-wha on the results of his meetings with the North. "We are in the midst of a conversation with the North and our discussions were productive. We have some hard work to do with the DPRK between now and then and I am confident that both sides stay committed we can make real progress."
From Wednesday to Friday, Biegun met with his North Korean counterpart Kim Hyok-chol, whom the U.S. State Department confirmed as Pyeongyang's Special Representative for U.S. Affairs.
Kim Hyok-chol and Biegun sealed the location of the upcoming summit.
But, according to Washington, they also discussed advancing the commitments made at the Singapore summit which means, the two sides talked about some specific actions they should take in terms of denuclearizing and rewarding.
Watchers believe Washington is demanding that the North dismantle additional sites and allow access and verification by American experts.
And in return, it's likely that Washington is considering offering some type of assistance for the North's economic development.
Through Twitter on Saturday, Trump stressed that North Korea will become a 'great economic powerhouse,' again encouraging the regime to denuclearize.
With the second Pyeongyang-Washington summit only three weeks away, the envoys from the two sides Stephen Biegun and Kim Hyok-chol are to meet again to fine tune the details of the summit.
Kim Jong-un has chance to make N. Korea economic powerhouse: Trump
Arirang News February 4, 2019 Kan Hyeong-woo, reported that
with the second summit between North Korea and the United States set for late February, President Trump is sounding optimistic about the prospects for a deal on denuclearization.
Trump says Kim Jong-un has a chance to make North Korea an economic power house but warns it can't be done if Kim keeps his nuclear weapons.
Kan Hyeong-woo reports.
U.S. President Donald Trump says there is a "very good chance" that he and Kim Jong-un will reach a denuclearization deal at their upcoming second summit.
Trump was speaking to U.S. broadcaster CBS in an interview aired Sunday, local time. He also said that Kim Jong-un has an opportunity to make North Korea a "tremendous economic behemoth," but that won't happen, he said, with nuclear weapons.
Citing his experience in real estate, Trump pointed to North Korea's location... between South Korea, China and Russia as why he thinks it could become an economic powerhouse.
Trump added that he thinks Kim Jong-un wants to make a deal on denuclearization because Kim is tired of going through what he's going through, referring to the international sanctions on the regime.
It's widely believed, but not confirmed, that the second summit will happen in Vietnam.
Trump did not say exactly when and where it'll be but hinted that the date and venue might be revealed in his State of the Union address slated for Tuesday, local time in Washington D.C.
When asked about the possibility of pulling out the U.S. forces stationed in South Korea, Trump said it's expensive to keep them on the Peninsula, but there are no plans to remove them, and claimed he has never discussed such an option.
Lee Ji-won, Arirang News dated on Nov 12, 2018, North Korea's undeclared missile operating bases identified, found running: CSIS while the on-and-off again denuclearization talks with North Korea gradually shuffle along, a report has een released that could potentially derail the efforts made by South Korea and the U.S.
The report, put together by a U.S.based think tank, suggests the regime is still pushing ahead with its nuclear weapons program.
A U.S. think tank appears to have identified at least 13 of an estimated 20 undeclared missile operating bases inside North Korea.
This is according to a report by the Center for Strategic and International Studies on Monday, which analyzed satellite images showing many of the sites scattered in remote, mountainous areas across the North.
The report also said maintenance and minor infrastructure improvements have been observed at some of the sites.
It says the sites could be used to house ballistic missiles of various ranges, including ICBMs, which could target the U.S. mainland, and be subject to declaration and verification in the denuclearization process.
Of them, Sakkanmol, the site closest to the border with South Korea, appears to be "active and being reasonably well maintained."
This comes just five months after North Korea and the U.S. had their historic first summit in Singapore, agreeing to jointly achieve Pyeongyang's denuclearization and security guarantee.
U.S. President Donald Trump has been touting his progress so far, saying the North has ceased its provocations and nuclear threats for months now.
The U.S. State Department, when asked about the report, said North Korean leader Kim Jong-un made a commitment to denuclearize and end its missile programs during his summit with President Trump.
Radio Free Asia reported Tuesday that a State Department official said President Trump made clear that the North has a brighter future should Kim make good on his commitments.
But Democrats in Washington think differently.
Senator Edward Markey, a Democratic member of the Foreign Relations Committee, said on Monday that "President Trump is getting played by Kim Jong-un".
He added Washington cannot have another summit with Pyeongyang, unless the regime takes "concrete, tangible actions" to halt and roll back its nuclear and missile programs.
With the North and the U.S. in a stalemate again, it remains to be seen how the latest report will affect their talks and possibly the planned second North Korea-U.S. summit slated for early next year.
However, UN sanctions have been imposed to pressure Kim Jong-un's government over its nuclear weapons programme.
Reality Check investigates how North Korea tries to evade these sanctions. Motion graphics by Jacqueline Galvin. BBC Published on Oct. 16, 2018 via Youtube.
STATEMENTS RELEASES
Statement from the President Regarding the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty
FOREIGN POLICY
Issued on: February 1, 2019
For far too long, Russia has violated the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty with impunity, covertly developing and fielding a prohibited missile system that poses a direct threat to our allies and troops abroad. Tomorrow, the United States will suspend its obligations under the INF Treaty and begin the process of withdrawing from the INF Treaty, which will be completed in 6 months unless Russia comes back into compliance by destroying all of its violating missiles, launchers, and associated equipment. Our NATO Allies fully support us, because they understand the threat posed by Russia’s violation and the risks to arms control posed by ignoring treaty violations.
The United States has fully adhered to the INF Treaty for more than 30 years, but we will not remain constrained by its terms while Russia misrepresents its actions. We cannot be the only country in the world unilaterally bound by this treaty, or any other. We will move forward with developing our own military response options and will work with NATO and our other allies and partners to deny Russia any military advantage from its unlawful conduct.
My Administration remains committed to effective arms control that advances United States, allied, and partner security, is verifiable and enforceable, and includes partners that fulfill their obligations. For arms control to effectively contribute to national security, all parties must faithfully implement their obligations. We stand ready to engage with Russia on arms control negotiations that meet these criteria, and, importantly, once that is done, develop, perhaps for the first time ever, an outstanding relationship on economic, trade, political, and military levels. This would be a fantastic thing for Russia and the United States, and would also be great for the world.
The Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF Treaty, formally Treaty Between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Elimination of Their Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles) was a 1987 arms control agreement between the United States and the Soviet Union (and later its successor state the Russian Federation). Signed in Washington, D.C. by President Ronald Reagan and General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev on 8 December 1987, the treaty was approved by the United States Senate on 27 May 1988 and ratified by Reagan and Gorbachev on 1 June 1988.
The INF Treaty eliminated all land-based ballistic and cruise missiles, as well as their launchers, with ranges of 500–1,000 kilometers (310–620 mi) (short medium-range) and 1,000–5,500 km (620–3,420 mi) (intermediate-range). The treaty did not cover air- or sea-launched missiles. By May 1991, 2,692 missiles were eliminated, followed by 10 years of on-site verification inspections.
On 20 October 2018, the United States declared its intention to withdraw from the treaty.Donald Trump mentioned at a campaign rally that the reason for the pullout was because they've [Russia has] been violating it for many years. This prompted Putin to state that Russia would not launch first in a nuclear conflict but would annihilate any adversary. Russians killed in such a conflict will go to heaven as martyrs .
The Chinese Foreign Ministry said a unilateral U.S. withdrawal would have a negative impact and urged the United States to think thrice before acting. John R. Bolton said on Echo of Moscow that recent Chinese statements suggest it wanted Washington to stay in the treaty. Saying Why not have the Americans bound, and the Chinese not bound?
Reuters reported that on 25 October 2018 European members of NATO urged the United States on Thursday to try to bring Russia back into compliance with the treaty rather than quit it, seeking to avoid a split in the alliance that Moscow could exploit.
The former Soviet General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev criticized U.S. plans to withdraw from the treaty, saying the move is not the work of a great mind. Gorbachev also said that all agreements aimed at nuclear disarmament and the limitation of nuclear weapons must be preserved for the sake of life on Earth.
On 26 October 2018, Russia called but lost a vote to get the U.N. General Assembly to consider calling on Washington and Moscow to preserve and strengthen the treaty. Russia had proposed a draft resolution in the 193-member General Assembly's disarmament committee, but missed the 18 October submission deadline so it instead called for a vote on whether the committee should be allowed to consider the draft. On the same day, John R. Bolton said in an interview with Reuters the INF treaty was a cold war relic and he wanted to hold strategic talks with Russia about Chinese missile capabilities.
On 30 October 2018, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg called on Russia to comply with the treaty at a news conference in Norway saying The problem is the deployment of new Russian missiles.
Russian president Vladimir Putin announced on 20 November 2018 that the Kremlin was prepared to discuss INF with Washington but would retaliate if the United States withdrew.
On 4 December 2018, the United States gave Russia 60 days to comply with the treaty. On 5 December 2018, Russia responded by revealing their Peresvet combat laser, stating they had been deployed to Russia armed forces as early as 2017 as part of the state procurement program.
On 23 January 2019, Russia presented the 9M729 (SSC-8) missile and its technical parameters to foreign military attaches at a military briefing held in what it said was an exercise in transparency it hoped would persuade Washington to stay in the treaty. The Russian Defence Ministry said diplomats from the United States, Britain, France and Germany had been invited to attend the static display of the missile, but they declined to attend. The United States had previously rejected a Russian offer to do so because it said such an exercise would not allow it to verify the true range of its warheads.
On 30 January 2019, the summit between US and Russia failed to find a way to save the treaty.
On 1 February 2019, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced that it is intention of the United States to announce the withdraw from the INF Treaty on Saturday, 2 February, 2019 with a six-month timeline for full withdrawal and INF treaty termination if the Russian Federation does not come back into compliance within those six months.
On 2 February 2019, Russian President Vladimir Putin announced that Russia had also suspended the INF Treaty in a 'mirror response' to President Donald Trump's decision to suspend the Treaty, effective that day.
On 3 February 2019, Russia started work on new, hypersonic missiles, and adopted a policy to avoid initiating disarmament talks with the USA.
Secretary Pompeo Delivers Remarks to the Press
U.S. Department of State
February 1, 2019
Remarks to the Press
Remarks
Michael R. Pompeo
Secretary of State
Press Briefing Room
Washington, DC
February 1, 2019
SECRETARY POMPEO: Good morning, everyone. At the core of President Trump’s foreign policy are a few very, very simple truths. The security of the American people must be our greatest consideration, the agreements into which we enter must serve American interests, and countries must be held accountable when they break the rules. For years, Russia has violated the terms of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty without remorse. To this day, Russia remains in material breach of its treaty obligations not to produce, possess, or flight-test a ground-launched intermediate-range cruise missile system with a range between 500 and 5,500 kilometers. In spite of this violation, for almost six years the United States has gone to tremendous lengths to preserve this agreement and to ensure security for our people, our allies, and our partners. We have raised Russia’s noncompliance with Russian officials, including at the highest levels of government, more than 30 times, yet Russia continues to deny that its missile system is noncompliant and violates the treaty.
Russia’s violation puts millions of Europeans and Americans at greater risk. It aims to put the United States at a military disadvantage, and it undercuts the chances of moving our bilateral relationship in a better direction. It’s our duty to respond appropriately. When an agreement is so brazenly disregarded and our security is so openly threatened, we must respond. We did that last December when the United States, with strong support from all of our NATO allies, formally declared Russia in material breach of the treaty. I also then provided notice that unless Russia returned to full and verifiable compliance within 60 days, we would suspend our obligation under that treaty. We provided Russia an ample window of time to mend its ways and for Russia to honor its commitment. Tomorrow that time runs out. Russia has refused to take any steps to return real and verifiable compliance over these 60 days.
The United States will therefore suspend its obligations under the INF Treaty effective February 2nd. We will provide Russia and the other treaty parties with formal notice that the United States is withdrawing from the INF Treaty effective in six months, pursuant to Article 15 of the treaty.
Russia has jeopardized the United States security interest, and we can no longer be restricted by the treaty while Russia shamelessly violates it. If Russia does not return to full and verifiable compliance with the treaty within this six-month period by verifiably destroying its INF-violating missiles, their launchers, and associated equipment, the treaty will terminate.
Before I close, I want to give a special thanks to our NATO allies who have stood with us in our mission to uphold the rule of law and protect our people. Their solidarity reflects the historical strength and unity of the NATO alliance. Their support is good for our shared security, it’s good for trans-Atlantic unity, and it’s good for international peace and security. President Trump is grateful for all that you have done.
The United States is hopeful that we can put our relationship with Russia back on a better footing, but the onus is on Russia to change course from a pattern of destabilizing activity, not just on this issue but on many others as well. The United States stands ready to engage with Russia on arms control negotiations that advance U.S. and allied and partners’ security, and are verifiable and enforceable. It must also include all the partners that must all responsibly comply with their obligations. As we remain hopeful of a fundamental shift in Russia’s posture, the United States will continue to do what is best for our people and those of our allies.
I’m happy to take a couple of questions this morning.
MR PALLADINO: Reuters, Lesley Wroughton.
QUESTION: Thank you. Good morning, Mr. Secretary.
SECRETARY POMPEO: Hi, Lesley.
QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, one of the big things that everyone is worried about is that this could eventually spark an arms race. What are you doing to prevent that? How concerned are you that Russia will not engage in that six months and that it could see this posture as a threat and take it on?
SECRETARY POMPEO: Well, the very risk that you identified is the one that we are suffering from today. The Russians are in violation of the agreement. That is, their commitment – this agreement that’s been in place for an awfully long time – the Russians have been violating. That is, they have begun to move towards what it is – that risk you actually have just identified. And you heard me this morning: We’ll continue to have conversations with them. We hope they’ll come back into compliance. We’ve had conversations at every level, at the senior levels, at technical levels, conversations about the nature of these systems. There’s no mistaking that the Russians have chosen to not comply with this treaty and present the risk of continued arms growth in a way that they had committed to back when they signed this treaty that they would not do, and if you just have one party to a treaty complying, you’re down the path that you describe.
We will continue to work with the Russians to achieve an outcome that gets us to a place. President Trump very much wants to have an agreement that is verifiable and enforceable on these systems and I hope we can convince the Russians it’s in their best interest as well. We certainly think that it is.
MR PALLADINO: One more question. Michael Gordon, Wall Street Journal.
SECRETARY POMPEO: Sir.
QUESTION: Sir, the Trump administration has withdrawn from agreements it doesn’t like, the JCPOA, and now you’ve indicated your intentions on INF because of the Russian alleged violation, but the question is whether – what new agreements can be worked out to take their place. The Russians have said they’re prepared to discuss a New START extension. The treaty expires in two years, which is not a lot of time if the administration plans to take a new approach. When will the United States be prepared to discuss the future of strategic arms control, and what is your vision of how to go about eliminating or reducing the world’s most dangerous arms?
SECRETARY POMPEO: Yeah, these are incredibly important questions. I would wager to say that President Trump has put this risk of proliferation as his highest American national security interest, and we’re endeavoring to do everything we can to ensure that the risks of proliferation that increase in these massively destructive weapons systems is diminished. But, Michael, it does no good to sign an agreement if a party’s not going to comply with it. The piece of paper, if it’s not being complied with, is – doesn’t reduce the risk, it doesn’t take down that threat. To the people around the world, the INF document today is being violated by the Russians. That is, the very agreement that they signed up for. We didn’t force them into the agreement; they decided this was in their best interest. They’ve now decided it’s not in their best interest to comply with that agreement.
So we are prepared to enter into negotiations on these complex arms control issues all around the world, including conversations about the renewal of other arms control agreements as we move forward. But make no mistake about President Trump’s mission set. President Trump’s mission set is to make sure that any agreement that we entered into has America’s best interest – that is, it protects the American people, protects our allies around the world as well, and has provisions that other countries are both capable and willing to comply with, and allow us to verify that they have complied with those agreements. Absent that, it’s just sitting around a table talking. It is incredibly important that we make sure that the provisions of these agreements are enforceable and verifiable, and that’s our aim. That’s our aim in every set of important arms control discussions that this administration will engage in.
Thank you all. Have a great day.
U.S. Efforts Towards D.P.R.K. Denuclearization U.S. Department of State
January 31, 2019.
Special Representative for North Korea Stephen Biegun gives remarks at Stanford University’s Walter Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center on U.S. efforts towards the final, fully verified denuclearization of the D.P.R.K. on January 31, 2019.
Economic prosperity in North Korea is part of U.S. diplomatic vision, says U.S. Special Representative for North Korea at Stanford event
Stephen Biegun, the U.S. Special Representative for North Korea, spoke at Stanford University Thursday on opportunities and challenges toward the final, fully verified denuclearization of North Korea.
BY MELISSA DE WITTE
Should North Korea follow through on its commitment to complete denuclearization, the United States is prepared to explore ways to advance economic opportunities, said Stephen Biegun, the U.S. Special Representative for North Korea, in a talk delivered today at Stanford University.
Biegun, who was appointed by Secretary of State Michael Pompeo in August 2018 to direct U.S. policy on North Korea, described the importance of looking at the opportunities that abound in a denuclearized future.
“With the completion of denuclearization, we are prepared to explore with North Korea and many other countries the best way to mobilize investment, improve infrastructure, enhance food security and drive a level of economic engagement that will allow the North Korean people to fully share in the rich future of their Asian neighbors. This prosperity, along with the denuclearization and peace, lies at the core of President Trump’s vision for U.S.-North Korea relations,” said Biegun.
When Trump met with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un at the June 2018 summit in Singapore, he showed him a vision of what robust economic development would mean. This introduced an added dimension to advance relations toward a peaceful peninsula, said Biegun in a conversation that followed his remarks with Robert Carlin, a specialist on U.S.-North Korea relations and a visiting scholar at Stanford’s Center for International Security and Cooperation.
“President Trump and Chairman Kim have decided to pursue a top-down approach with a breadth of actions that – if successful – will fundamentally transform relations between our two countries,” said Biegun.
Recent advancements
Biegun acknowledged that there are still many challenges ahead and there is more work to do than there is progress to date.
But advancements have been made since last year’s summit, Biegun said. He pointed out there are no longer American citizens detained in North Korea. He also noted the significance of North Korea’s efforts to return the human remains of fallen soldiers from the Korean War.
“It’s every bit as important that we heal the wound of that war as part of the process of resolving the larger dispute on the Korean Peninsula,” said Biegun.
Biegun said there are also visible changes on the Korean Peninsula. He recently traveled to the Demilitarized Zone – the border that divides North and South Korea established by the 1953 Korean Armistice agreement – and said he did not see any weapons.
“For the first time in my lifetime the Demilitarized Zone is actually being demilitarized,” said Biegun.
Biegun said North Korea has taken preliminary steps to dismantle and destroy test sites.
“While these sites are not critical parts of the current North Korean missile or nuclear programs, after an interlude of 10 years in which no international inspections of any kind have occurred, they represent a step in the right direction for our two countries to renew cooperation on the steps necessary to give confidence to the process of denuclearization,” he said.
Working toward a second summit
Biegun’s remarks came hours after the State Department announced that he will travel to Seoul, South Korea, on Feb. 3 for continued negotiations with his North Korean counterparts.
One important issue that Biegun said he plans to discuss are measures toward dismantling uranium and plutonium enrichment programs. “From our side, we are prepared to discuss many actions that could help build trust between our two countries and advance further progress in parallel on the Singapore summit objectives of transforming relations, establishing a permanent peace regime on the peninsula and complete denuclearization,” he said.
The U.S. is planning a second summit between Trump and Kim at the end of February, which Beigun expects to happen; however, he also acknowledged that it is a complicated process to get there.
“The president very much wants a second summit,” said Biegun.
The event was hosted by Stanford University’s Walter H. Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center, part of the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies.
On October 7, 2018, Mike Pompeo travelled to Pyongyang to negotiate with Chairman Kim Jong-un. Both agreed to a second US-North Korea summit. While discussions are still ongoing to determine the timing and location of this second summit, South Korea's presidential office stated that it would take place as soon as possible . Pompeo also issued a statement where he claimed that his latest trip to Pyongyang was another step forward to denuclearization in the Korean peninsula and he also had a good, productive conversation with Kim, though there was still more work which needed to be done. The same day, Pompeo travelled to the South Korean capital of Seoul, where he held talks with Moon. Pompeo afterwards stated that details of his meeting with Kim were revealed to Moon, but that they were currently classified so that the South Korean government would be the only third party with firsthand knowledge. He also stated that the summit would happen soon .
On 13 January 2019, Pompeo said details were being worked out for a second U.S.-DPRK summit On January 14, 2019 the South Korean newspaper Chosun Ilbo reported that Pompeo would hold talks with North Korea January 17 or 18. On January 18, 2019 According to the Wall Street Journal, The White House announced that President Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong-un will meet for the second time in February. On January 30, 2019 Secretary of State Mike Pompeo says team is heading to Asia for 2nd Trump-Kim Summit. North Korea and the United States reportedly to hold working talks at Panmunjom around February 4th. On January 31, 2019 President Trump says time and location for summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un has been set, and said they would be announced next week
Regarding the release from Bloomberg and the South Korean newspaper: Munhwa Ilbo anticipated the location of the second Trump-Kim Summit as Vietnam's capital city Hanoi because of Vietnam is a long-standing partner of DPRK, and there is also an excellent foreign relationship between the US and Vietnam. US scouts Bangkok, Hanoi and Hawaii as possible locations for Kim-Trump summit. President Trump reportedly offered to meet Kim in Vietnam in mid-February. According to Channel NewsAsia, the location of next summit with Kim has been decided, as stated by Trump.
President Donald J. Trump of the United States of America and Chairman Kim Jong Un of the State Affairs Commission of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) held a first, historic summit in Singapore on June 12, 2018.
President Trump and Chairman Kim Jong Un conducted a comprehensive, in-depth, and sincere exchange of opinions on the issues related to the establishment of new U.S.–DPRK relations and the building of a lasting and robust peace regime on the Korean Peninsula. President Trump committed to provide security guarantees to the DPRK, and Chairman Kim Jong Un reaffirmed his firm and unwavering commitment to complete denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.
Convinced that the establishment of new U.S.–DPRK relations will contribute to the peace and prosperity of the Korean Peninsula and of the world, and recognizing that mutual confidence building can promote the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, President Trump and Chairman Kim Jong Un state the following:
The United States and the DPRK commit to establish new U.S.–DPRK relations in accordance with the desire of the peoples of the two countries for peace and prosperity.
The United States and the DPRK will join their efforts to build a lasting and stable peace regime on the Korean Peninsula.
Reaffirming the April 27, 2018 Panmunjom Declaration, the DPRK commits to work toward complete denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.
The United States and the DPRK commit to recovering POW/MIA remains, including the immediate repatriation of those already identified.
Having acknowledged that the U.S.–DPRK summit—the first in history—was an epochal event of great significance in overcoming decades of tensions and hostilities between the two countries and for the opening up of a new future, President Trump and Chairman Kim Jong Un commit to implement the stipulations in this joint statement fully and expeditiously. The United States and the DPRK commit to hold follow-on negotiations, led by the U.S. Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo, and a relevant high-level DPRK official, at the earliest possible date, to implement the outcomes of the U.S.–DPRK summit.
President Donald J. Trump of the United States of America and Chairman Kim Jong Un of the State Affairs Commission of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea have committed to cooperate for the development of new U.S.–DPRK relations and for the promotion of peace, prosperity, and security of the Korean Peninsula and of the world.
DONALD J. TRUMP
President of the United States of America
KIM JONG UN
Chairman of the State Affairs Commission of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea
June 12, 2018
Sentosa Island
Singapore
Upon returning to the United States the following day, President Trump declared that North Korea was no longer a nuclear threat. On June 22, 2018, Trump provided a Notice Regarding the Continuation of the National Emergency with Respect to North Korea, which extended the Executive Order 13466 of 2008 by one year, reaffirming the current existence and risk of the proliferation of weapons-usable fissile material on the Korean Peninsula constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States, and I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with that threat.
-------------------------------------------
Potential denuclearization process
During President Donald Trump's meeting with North Korea envoy, the former spy chief Kim Yong-chol at the White House, Trump said that he would choose the denuclearization process in North Korea. The nuclear warheads and the ICBMnuclear missiles completed in North Korea could be transferred outside of North Korea and economic sanctions on North Korea could be partly alleviated. The next step would be comprehensive inspections on North Korea's nuclear facilities and nuclear ICBM weapons program by IAEA.
On July 7, 2018, U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Japanese Foreign Minister Taro Kono and South Korean Foreign Minister Kang Kyung Wha met in Tokyo, where they reaffirmed their unity in urging North Korea to denuclearize as promised. The ministers stressed the need to call on North Korea to take concrete steps toward denuclearization and to keep existing U.N. economic sanctions in place. Ten days later, Donald Trump said there is no time limit for North Korea to denuclearise and that there is no need to rush the process.
---------------------------------------
*******A weapon of mass destruction (WMD) is a nuclear, radiological, chemical, biological, or any other weapon that can kill and bring significant harm to a large number of humans or cause great damage to human-made structures (e.g., buildings), natural structures (e.g., mountains), or the biosphere. The scope and usage of the term has evolved and been disputed, often signifying more politically than technically. Originally coined in reference to aerial bombing with chemical explosives during World War II, it has later come to refer to large-scale weaponry of other technologies, such as chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear.
********Nuclear proliferation is the spread of nuclear weapons, fissionable material, and weapons-applicable nuclear technology and information to nations not recognized as Nuclear Weapon States by the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), commonly known as the Non-Proliferation Treaty or NPT. Proliferation has been opposed by many nations with and without nuclear weapons, as governments fear that more countries with nuclear weapons will increase the possibility of nuclear warfare (up to and including the so-called countervalue targeting of civilians with nuclear weapons), de-stabilize international or regional relations, or infringe upon the national sovereignty of states.
Four countries besides the five recognized Nuclear Weapons States have acquired, or are presumed to have acquired, nuclear weapons: India, Pakistan, North Korea, and Israel. None of these four is a party to the NPT, although North Korea acceded to the NPT in 1985, then withdrew in 2003 and conducted announced nuclear tests in 2006, 2009, 2013, 2016, and 2017. One critique of the NPT is that the treaty is discriminatory in the sense that only those countries that tested nuclear weapons before 1968 are recognized as nuclear weapon states while all other states are treated as non-nuclear-weapon states who can only join the treaty if they forswear nuclear weapons.
Proliferation: Chemical Nuclear Missiles******Research into the development of nuclear weapons was initially undertaken during World War II by the United States (in cooperation with the United Kingdom and Canada), Germany, Japan, and the USSR. The United States was the first and is the only country to have used a nuclear weapon in war, when it used two bombs against Japan in August 1945. After surrendering to end the war, Germany and Japan ceased to be involved in any nuclear weapon research. In August 1949, the USSR tested a nuclear weapon, becoming the second country to detonate a nuclear bomb.[3] The United Kingdom first tested a nuclear weapon in October 1952. France first tested a nuclear weapon in 1960. The People's Republic of China detonated a nuclear weapon in 1964. India conducted its first nuclear test in 1974, which prompted Pakistan to develop its own nuclear program and, when India conducted a second series of nuclear tests in 1998, Pakistan followed with a series of tests of its own. In 2006, North Korea conducted its first nuclear test.
The Baruch Plan was a proposal by the United States government, written largely by Bernard Baruch but based on the Acheson–Lilienthal Report, to the United Nations Atomic Energy Commission (UNAEC) during its first meeting in June 1946. The United States, Great Britain and Canada called for an international organization to regulate atomic energy and President Truman responded by asking Undersecretary of State Dean Acheson and David E. Lilienthal to draw up a plan.
Non-proliferation efforts: Early efforts to prevent nuclear proliferation involved intense government secrecy, the wartime acquisition of known uranium stores (the Combined Development Trust), and at times even outright sabotage—such as the bombing of a heavy-water facility thought to be used for a German nuclear program. These efforts began immediately after the discovery of nuclear fission and its military potential. None of these efforts were explicitly public, because the weapon developments themselves were kept secret until the bombing of Hiroshima.
Earnest international efforts to promote nuclear non-proliferation began soon after World War II, when the Truman Administration proposed the Baruch Plan of 1946, named after Bernard Baruch, America's first representative to the United Nations Atomic Energy Commission. The Baruch Plan, which drew heavily from the Acheson–Lilienthal Report of 1946, proposed the verifiable dismantlement and destruction of the U.S. nuclear arsenal (which, at that time, was the only nuclear arsenal in the world) after all governments had cooperated successfully to accomplish two things: (1) the establishment of an international atomic development authority, which would actually own and control all military-applicable nuclear materials and activities, and (2) the creation of a system of automatic sanctions, which not even the U.N. Security Council could veto, and which would proportionately punish states attempting to acquire the capability to make nuclear weapons or fissile material.
Baruch's plea for the destruction of nuclear weapons invoked basic moral and religious intuitions.
In one part of his address to the UN, Baruch said, Behind the black portent of the new atomic age lies a hope which, seized upon with faith, can work out our salvation. If we fail, then we have damned every man to be the slave of Fear. Let us not deceive ourselves. We must elect World Peace or World Destruction.... We must answer the world's longing for peace and security. [6] With this remark, Baruch helped launch the field of nuclear ethics, to which many policy experts and scholars have contributed.
Although the Baruch Plan enjoyed wide international support, it failed to emerge from the UNAEC because the Soviet Union planned to veto it in the Security Council. Still, it remained official American policy until 1953, when President Eisenhower made his Atoms for Peace proposal before the U.N. General Assembly. Eisenhower's proposal led eventually to the creation of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in 1957.
Under the Atoms for Peace program thousands of scientists from around the world were educated in nuclear science and then dispatched home, where many later pursued secret weapons programs in their home country.
Efforts to conclude an international agreement to limit the spread of nuclear weapons did not begin until the early 1960s, after four nations (the United States, the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom and France) had acquired nuclear weapons (see List of states with nuclear weapons for more information).
Although these efforts stalled in the early 1960s, they renewed once again in 1964, after China detonated a nuclear weapon. In 1968, governments represented at the Eighteen Nation Disarmament Committee (ENDC) finished negotiations on the text of the NPT.
In June 1968, the U.N. General Assembly endorsed the NPT with General Assembly Resolution 2373 (XXII), and in July 1968, the NPT opened for signature in Washington, DC, London and Moscow. The NPT entered into force in March 1970.
******The Combined Development Agency (CDA), originally the Combined Development Trust (CDT), was a defense purchasing authority established in 1944 by the governments of the United States and the United Kingdom. Its role was to ensure adequate supplies of uranium for the respective countries weapons development programs.
The agency initiated a range of incentives to several countries to encourage exploration and a fast buildup of mineral reserves. The main countries targeted for the programs were the US, Canada, South Africa, and to a limited extent Australia.
The countries tried to monopolize on the resources of the territories they owned or that had hardly any claim. The Belgian Congo was an example of the third world place that was used for its resources.
In Australia, uranium ore from a number of mines was processed at the purpose built Port Pirie Uranium Treatment Complex which operated under contract to the CDA by the Government of South Australia between 1955 and 1962.
“The Soviet Union simply does not have enough precision industry, technical skill or scientific numerical strength to come even close to duplicating the magnificent achievement of the American industrialists, skilled labor, engineers and scientists who made the Manhattan Project a success. -General Leslie Groves in the Saturday Evening Post, 1948 (quoted in Dark Sun by Richard Rhodes, p. 211)
Murray Hill: Groves first had to ascertain what exactly the world supply of uranium ore was. He launched a secret intelligence program code-named the Murray Hill Area Project. Project employees reviewed tens of thousands of documents, most in foreign languages, about locations of uranium ore. Groves dispatched geologists to oil fields all over the world and compiled information on more than fifty countries. Through the CDT, Groves would apply this intelligence to lock down as much of the supply as possible. Purchasing mineral rights and running intelligence was extremely costly; to avoid congressional oversight and keep the money secret, the Manhattan Project transferred tens of millions of funds directly to Groves' personal bank account. Groves then channeled these funds to Murray Hill and the CDT's purchasing program.
*******
The Armed Forces Special Weapons Project (AFSWP) was a United States military agency responsible for those aspects of nuclear weapons remaining under military control after the Manhattan Project was succeeded by the Atomic Energy Commission on 1 January 1947.
These responsibilities included the maintenance, storage, surveillance, security and handling of nuclear weapons, as well as supporting nuclear testing. The AFSWP was a joint organization, staffed by the United States Army, United States Navy and United States Air Force; its chief was supported by deputies from the other two services. Major GeneralLeslie R. Groves, the former head of the Manhattan Project, was its first chief.
The early nuclear weapons were large, complex and cumbersome. They were stored as components rather than complete devices and required expert knowledge to assemble. The short life of their lead-acid batteries and modulated neutron initiators, and the heat generated by the fissile cores, precluded storing them assembled. The large quantity of conventional explosive in each weapon demanded special care be taken in handling. Groves hand-picked a team of regular Army officers, who were trained in the assembly and handling of the weapons. They in turn trained the enlisted soldiers, and the Army teams then trained teams from the Navy and Air Force.
As nuclear weapons development proceeded, the weapons became mass-produced, smaller, lighter, and easier to store, handle and maintain. They also required less effort to assemble. The AFSWP gradually shifted its emphasis away from training assembly teams, and became more involved in stockpile management and providing administrative, technical and logistical support. It supported nuclear weapons testing, although after Operation Sandstone in 1948, this was increasingly in a planning and training capacity rather than a field role. In 1958, the AFSWP became the Defense Atomic Support Agency (DASA), a field agency of the Department of Defense.
Major General Leslie Groves Jr.
1947-1948
*****General Leslie Groves was a United States General that was put in charge of assembling and maintaining the Manhattan Project. He was a major campaigner for the creation of the CDT because he saw the importance of not only obtaining an adequate amount of uranium to complete the needs of the Manhattan Project, but also to attempt to obtain the uranium so that the Soviet Union would have less access. The entire world's stockpile of uranium was unknown, but a joint effort was a good start to securing access to the most uranium possible. He first created a program, Murray Hill Area Project, that’s main goal was to seek locations of uranium ore and thorium ore based on reports from mostly foreign documents. He found that protecting the thorium could prove just as important because it could be converted into uranium. This meant that finding the locations was only half the battle and funneled money into the purchase of the varies mineral rights.
----------------------
Watch it with CHROME to have better quality options !!
Demonstration of the Cloudylabs cloud chamber with some low activity radioactive sources. It works with 8 thermoelectric modules with a closed loop liquid cooler, so it can display the first particles within 1 min.
A magnet is put inside the machine, under the interaction surface, so during the whole video, a magnetic field is present and deflect the lightly charged particles (electrons).
Sources: Reuters, Business Insider, wikipedia, youtube, rodong sinmoon, White House, standford University News, NTI, FoxNews, CNN, Atomic Heritage Foundation, Rodong Sinmoon: News, wikipedia, CBSN catch4all.com,
Sandra Englund, January 31st, and Rev. Feb. 1st, 2019
Remarks by President Trump on the Government Shutdown
IMMIGRATION
Issued on: January 25, 2019 Rose Garden
2:17 P.M. EST
THE PRESIDENT: Thank you very much. My fellow Americans, I am very proud to announce today that we have reached a deal to end the shutdown and re-open the federal government. (Applause.) As everyone knows, I have a very powerful alternative, but I didn’t want to use it at this time. Hopefully it will be unnecessary.
I want to thank all of the incredible federal workers, and their amazing families, who have shown such extraordinary devotion in the face of this recent hardship. You are fantastic people. You are incredible patriots. Many of you have suffered far greater than anyone, but your families would know or understand. And not only did you not complain, but in many cases you encouraged me to keep going because you care so much about our country and about its border security.
Again, I thank you. All Americans, I thank you. You are very, very special people. I am so proud that you are citizens of our country. When I say “Make America Great Again,” it could never be done without you. Great people.
In a short while, I will sign a bill to open our government for three weeks until February 15th. I will make sure that all employees receive their back pay very quickly, or as soon as possible. It’ll happen fast. I am asking Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell to put this proposal on the floor immediately.
After 36 days of spirited debate and dialogue, I have seen and heard from enough Democrats and Republicans that they are willing to put partisanship aside — I think — and put the security of the American people first. I do believe they’re going to do that. They have said they are for complete border security, and they have finally and fully acknowledged that having barriers, fencing, or walls — or whatever you want to call it — will be an important part of the solution.
A bipartisan Conference Committee of House and Senate lawmakers and leaders will immediately begin reviewing the requests of our Homeland Security experts — and experts they are — and also law enforcement professionals, who have worked with us so closely. We want to thank Border Patrol, ICE, and all law enforcement. Been incredible. (Applause.)
Based on operational guidance from the experts in the field, they will put together a Homeland Security package for me to shortly sign into law.
Over the next 21 days, I expect that both Democrats and Republicans will operate in good faith. This is an opportunity for all parties to work together for the benefit of our whole beautiful, wonderful nation.
If we make a fair deal, the American people will be proud of their government for proving that we can put country before party. We can show all Americans, and people all around the world, that both political parties are united when it comes to protecting our country and protecting our people.
Many disagree, but I really feel that, working with Democrats and Republicans, we can make a truly great and secure deal happen for everyone.
Walls should not be controversial. Our country has built 654 miles of barrier over the last 15 years, and every career Border Patrol agent I have spoken with has told me that walls work. They do work. No matter where you go, they work. Israel built a wall — 99.9 percent successful. Won’t be any different for us.
They keep criminals out. They save good people from attempting a very dangerous journey from other countries — thousands of miles — because they think they have a glimmer of hope of coming through. With a wall, they don’t have that hope. They keep drugs out, and they dramatically increase efficiency by allowing us to patrol far larger areas with far fewer people. It’s just common sense. Walls work.
That’s why most of the Democrats in Congress have voted in the past for bills that include walls and physical barriers and very powerful fences. The walls we are building are not medieval walls. They are smart walls designed to meet the needs of frontline border agents, and are operationally effective. These barriers are made of steel, have see-through visibility, which is very important, and are equipped with sensors, monitors, and cutting-edge technology, including state-of-the-art drones.
We do not need 2,000 miles of concrete wall from sea to shining sea — we never did; we never proposed that; we never wanted that — because we have barriers at the border where natural structures are as good as anything that we can build. They’re already there. They’ve been there for millions of years.
Our proposed structures will be in pre-determined high-risk locations that have been specifically identified by the Border Patrol to stop illicit flows of people and drugs. No border security plan can ever work without a physical barrier. Just doesn’t happen.
At the same time, we need to increase drug detection technology and manpower to modernize our ports of entry, which are obsolete. The equipment is obsolete. They’re old. They’re tired. This is something we have all come to agree on, and will allow for quicker and safer commerce. These critical investments will improve and facilitate legal trade and travel through our lawful ports of entry.
Our plan also includes desperately needed humanitarian assistance for those being exploited and abused by coyotes, smugglers, and the dangerous journey north.
The requests we have put before Congress are vital to ending the humanitarian and security crisis on our southern border. Absolutely vital. Will not work without it.
This crisis threatens the safety of our country and thousands of American lives. Criminal cartels, narco-terrorists, transnational gangs like MS-13, and human traffickers are brazenly violating U.S. laws and terrorizing innocent communities.
Human traffickers — the victims are women and children. Maybe to a lesser extent, believe or not, children. Women are tied up. They’re bound. Duct tape put around their faces, around their mouths. In many cases, they can’t even breathe. They’re put in the backs of cars or vans or trucks. They don’t go through your port of entry. They make a right turn going very quickly. They go into the desert areas, or whatever areas you can look at. And as soon as there’s no protection, they make a left or a right into the United States of America. There’s nobody to catch them. There’s nobody to find them.
They can’t come through the port, because if they come through the port, people will see four women sitting in a van with tape around their face and around their mouth. Can’t have that.
And that problem, because of the Internet, is the biggest problem — it’s never been like this before — that you can imagine. It’s at the worst level — human trafficking — in the history of the world. This is not a United States problem; this is a world problem. But they come through areas where they have no protection, where they have no steel barriers, where they have no walls. And we can stop almost 100 percent of that.
The profits reaped by these murderous organizations are used to fund their malign and destabilizing conduct throughout this hemisphere.
Last year alone, ICE officers removed 10,000 known or suspected gang members, like MS-13 and members as bad as them. Horrible people. Tough. Mean. Sadistic. In the last two years, ICE officers arrested a total of 266,000 criminal aliens inside of the United States, including those charged or convicted of nearly 100,000 assaults, 30,000 sex crimes, and 4,000 homicides or, as you would call them, violent, vicious killings. It can be stopped.
Vast quantities of lethal drugs — including meth, fentanyl, heroin, and cocaine — are smuggled across our southern border and into U.S. schools and communities. Drugs kill much more than 70,000 Americans a year and cost our society in excess of $700 billion.
The sheer volume of illegal immigration has overwhelmed federal authorities and stretched our immigration system beyond the breaking point. Nearly 50 migrants a day are being referred for medical assistance — they are very, very sick — making this a health crisis as well. It’s a very big health crisis. People have no idea how big it is, unless you’re there.
Our backlog in the immigration courts is now far greater than the 800,000 cases that you’ve been hearing about over the last couple of years. Think of that, though: 800,000 cases because our laws are obsolete. So obsolete. They’re the laughing stock all over the world. Our immigration laws, all over the world — they’ve been there for a long time — are the laughing stock, all over the world.
We do not have the necessary space or resources to detain, house, vet, screen, and safely process this tremendous influx of people. In short, we do not have control over who is entering our country, where they come from, who they are, or why they are coming.
The result, for many years, is a colossal danger to public safety. We’re going to straighten it out. It’s not hard. It’s easy, if given the resources.
Last month was the third straight month in a row with 60,000 apprehensions on our southern border. Think of that. we apprehended 60,000 people. That’s like a stadium full of people. A big stadium.
There are many criminals being apprehended, but vast numbers are coming because our economy is so strong. We have the strongest economy now in the entire world. You see what’s happening. We have nowhere left to house them and no way to promptly remove them. We can’t get them out because our laws are so obsolete, so antiquated, and so bad.
Without new resources from Congress, we will be forced to release these people into communities — something we don’t want to do — called catch-and-release. You catch them. Even if they are criminals, you then release them. And you can’t release them from where they came, so they go into our country and end up in places you would least suspect. And we do as little releasing as possible, by they’re coming by the hundreds of thousands.
I have had zero Democrat lawmakers volunteer to have them released into their districts or states. And I think they know that, and that’s what we’re going to be discussing over the next three weeks.
The painful reality is that the tremendous economic and financial burdens of illegal immigration fall on the shoulders of low-income Americans, including millions of wonderful, patriotic, law-abiding immigrants who enrich our nation.
As Commander-in-Chief, my highest priority is the defense of our great country. We cannot surrender operational control over the nation’s borders to foreign cartels, traffickers, and smugglers. We want future Americans to come to our country legally and through a system based on merit. We need people to come to our country. We have great companies moving back into the United States. And we have the lowest employment and the best employment numbers that we’ve ever had. There are more people working today in the United States than have ever worked in our country. We need people to come in to help us — the farms, and with all of these great companies that are moving back. Finally, they’re moving back. People said it couldn’t happen. It’s happening.
And we want them to enjoy the blessings of safety and liberty, and the rule of law. We cannot protect and deliver these blessings without a strong and secure border.
I believe that crime in this country can go down by a massive percentage if we have great security on our southern border. I believe drugs, large percentages of which come through the southern border, will be cut by a number that nobody will believe.
So let me be very clear: We really have no choice but to build a powerful wall or steel barrier. If we don’t get a fair deal from Congress, the government will either shut down on February 15th, again, or I will use the powers afforded to me under the laws and the Constitution of the United States to address this emergency. We will have great security.
And I want to thank you all very much. Thank you very much. (Applause.)
END 2:35 P.M. EST
ANTICIPATING The 2nd Summit US - DPRK
IN FEBRUARY Detail to be Announced
According to Arirang News dated January 20th, 2018, Kan Hyeong-woo reported North Korea and the United States have chosen a location for their leaders' second summit, according to President Trump on Saturday, but he said the details will be announced later. President Trump did say, however, that the two sides have made a lot of progress concerning North Korea's denuclearization.
North Korea and the United States have picked a country for their second summit, which will take place near the end of February. But President Trump says the location will be announced later.
It's been widely speculated that the venue will be in Vietnam. Earlier this month, CNN cited a source familiar with the planning process who said that a White House scouting team has visited Bangkok, Hawaii and the Vietnamese capital of Hanoi.
Trump received a letter on Friday from Kim Jong-un, which was delivered by the North's top negotiator, Kim Yong-chol.
Speaking the next day, Trump told reporters that Friday's meeting with the North Korean envoy was incredible and that both Kim Jong-un and Trump himself are very much looking forward to their next summit. We've made a lot of progress that has not been reported by the media but we have made a lot of progress as far as denuclearization is concerned. We're talking about a lot of different things but we've made tremendous progress that has not been reported unfortunately but it will be. Things are going very well with North Korea.
The focus is now on the follow-up negotitations, which have kicked off in Sweden. North Korea's Vice Foreign Minister Choe Son-hui and U.S. Special Representative for North Korea Stephen Biegun met on Saturday local time in Stockholm. They are expected to discuss the logistics of the next summit.
South Korea's nuclear envoy Lee Do-hoon has also joined them in the Swedish capital for three-way talks, which are likely to focus on setting a summit agenda. The three sides will continue their discussions until Tuesday.
-----
Fox News, January 18, 2019: The exact date and location of the second summit between President Trump and Kim Jong Un was not announced; State Department correspondent Rich Edson reports. #ShepSmith#FoxNews
THE WAR COULD HAVE BEEN BROKE OUT BUT, INSTEAD, DPRK NUCLEAR, BALLISTIC MISSILE TEST HAS BEEN STOP FOR 415 DAYS- DPRK FREE ZONE NUCLEAR MUST- VERIFIABLE, IRREVERSIBLE : PBS NewsHour Jan 18, 2019: President Trump plans to hold a second summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un toward the end of February, the White House announced after Trump met with North Korea’s chief negotiator. In his first interview since retiring, Gen. Vincent Brooks, former U.S. commander in South Korea, talks to Nick Schifrin about the summit, delayed U.S.-South Korea exercises and how close the U.S. came to war.
Boeing X-51 Waverider Sets World Record on Longest Hypersonic Flight
Boeing X-51 WaveRider Scramjet Engine Demonstrator
defenseupdate: The fourth and final flight of the Boeing X-51A Waverider test program has accomplished a breakthrough in the development of flight reaching Mach 5.1 over the Pacific Ocean May 1. The WaveRider unmanned hypersonic vehicle traveled more than 230 nautical miles in just over six minutes over the Point Mugu Naval Air Warfare Center Sea Range, Calif.
-----------------------------------
The Boeing X-51 Waverider is an unmanned research scramjetexperimental aircraft for hypersonic flight at Mach 5 (3,300 mph; 5,300 km/h) and an altitude of 70,000 feet (21,000 m). The aircraft was designated X-51 in 2005. It completed its first powered hypersonic flight on 26 May 2010. After two unsuccessful test flights, the X-51 completed a flight of over six minutes and reached speeds of over Mach 5 for 210 seconds on 1 May 2013 for the longest duration powered hypersonic flight.
Waverider refers in general to aircraft that take advantage of compression lift produced by their own shock waves. The X-51 program was a cooperative effort by the United States Air Force, DARPA, NASA, Boeing, and Pratt Whitney Rocketdyne. The program was managed by the Aerospace Systems Directorate within the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL).[2][3] X-51 technology is proposed for use in the High Speed Strike Weapon (HSSW), a Mach 5+ missile which could enter service in the mid-2020s.
Mission
The experimental X-51A Waverider is an unmanned, autonomous supersonic combustion ramjet-powered hypersonic flight test demonstrator for the U.S. Air Force.
Features
The X-51A is designed to be launched from an airborne B-52 Stratofortress bomber. The flight test vehicle stack is approximately 25 feet long and includes a modified solid rocket booster from an Army Tactical Missile, a connecting interstage, and the X-51A cruiser. The nearly wingless cruiser is designed to ride its own shockwave, thus the nickname, Waverider. The distinctive, shark-nosed cruiser has small controllable fins and houses the heart of the system, an SJY61 supersonic combustion ramjet or scramjet engine built by Pratt Whitney Rocketdyne designed to burn JP-7 jet fuel. Boeing's Phantom Works performed overall air vehicle design, assembly and testing for the X-51's various component systems.
The X-51 was made primarily using standard aerospace materials such as aluminum, steel, inconel, and titanium. Some carbon/carbon composites of the leading edges of fins and cowls are used. For thermal protection, the vehicle utilizes a Boeing designed silica-based thermal protection system as well as Boeing Reusable Insulation tiles, similar to those on board the NASA Space Shuttle Orbiters.
Four X-51As were built for the Air Force. The X-51A program is a technology demonstrator and was not designed to be a prototype for weapon system. It was designed to pave the way to future hypersonic weapons, hypersonic intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, and future access to space. Since scramjets are able to burn atmospheric oxygen, they don't need to carry large fuel tanks containing oxidizer like conventional rockets, and are being explored as a way to more efficiently launch payloads into orbit.
In addition to scalable scramjet propulsion, other key technologies that will be demonstrated by the X-51A include thermal protection systems materials, airframe and engine integration, and high-speed stability and control.
Background
The X-51A represents one of the service's most significant reinvestments in hypersonic flight since the rocket-powered X-15 program which flew 50 years earlier.
Air Force officials anticipate the X-51A program will provide a foundation of knowledge required to develop the game changing technologies needed for future access to space and hypersonic weapon applications. For example, hypersonic speeds on the order of flying 600 nautical miles in 10 minutes may provide the ability to accurately engage a long-distance target very rapidly.
The X-51A program is a collaborative effort of the Air Force Research Laboratory and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, with industry partners The Boeing Company and Pratt Whitney Rocketdyne. Program management is accomplished by the Air Force Research Laboratory Propulsion Directorate at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio.
Hypersonic flight, normally defined as beginning at Mach 5, five times the speed of sound, presents unique technical challenges with heat and pressure, which make conventional turbine engines impractical. Program officials said producing thrust with a scramjet has been compared to lighting a match in a hurricane and keeping it burning.
The Air Force currently plans to fly each X-51A on identical flight profiles. Like the X-15, the X-51A is designed to be carried aloft by a B-52 mother ship launched from the Air Force Flight Test Center at Edwards Air Force Base, Calif. It is released at approximately 50,000 feet over the Pacific Ocean Point Mugu Naval Air Warfare Center Sea Range. The solid rocket booster accelerates the X-51A for 30 seconds to approximately Mach 4.5, before being jettisoned. Then the cruiser's scramjet engine, remarkable because it has virtually no moving parts, ignites. The ignition sequence begins burning ethylene, transitioning over approximately 10 seconds to the same JP-7 jet fuel once used by the SR-71 Blackbird.
Powered by its scramjet engine, the X-51A will accelerate to approximately Mach 6 as it climbs to nearly 70,000 feet. Hypersonic combustion generates intense heat so routing of the engine's own JP-7 fuel will serve to both cool the engine and heat the fuel to optimum operating temperature for combustion. The fuel load and flight profile provides for a 240-second engine burn, transmitting vast amounts of telemetry data on its systems to orbiting aircraft and ground stations, before the vehicle exhausts its fuel supply, splashes down into the Pacific and is destroyed, as planned. Flight test vehicles are not recovered.
The X-51A development team elected from the outset not to build recovery systems in the flight test vehicles, in an effort to control costs and focus funding on the vehicle's fuel-cooled scramjet engine. A U.S. Navy P-3 Orion aids in transmitting telemetry data to engineers at both Naval Air Station Point Mugu and Vandenberg AFB, Calif., before it arrives at its final destination, the Ridley Mission Control Center at Edwards AFB.
Conceived in 2004, the X-51A made its first captive carry flight Dec. 9, 2009. The flight test verified the B-52's high-altitude performance and handling qualities with the X-51 attached and tested communications and telemetry systems, but the vehicle remained attached to the B-52s wing.
The X-51A made history during its first supersonic combustion ramjet-powered hypersonic flight May 26, 2010, off the southern California Pacific coast. Officials said the flight test vehicle flew as anticipated for nearly 200 seconds, with the scramjet accelerating the vehicle to approximately Mach 5, nearly 3,400 miles per hour. The fuel-cooled scramjet performed as planned transmitting normal telemetry for more than 140 seconds, then observing a decrease in thrust and acceleration for another 30 seconds. An anomaly then resulted in a loss of telemetry, and the test was terminated and vehicle was destroyed by flight controllers on command.
Despite the anomaly, the May 26 flight is considered the first use of a practical hydrocarbon fueled scramjet in flight. The longest previous hypersonic scramjet flight test performed by a NASA X-43 in 2004 was faster, but lasted only about 12 seconds and used less logistically supportable hydrogen fuel.
Following an extensive analysis of flight data from the X-51A's first hypersonic flight test, slight modifications are planned to strengthen the rear seal area near the engine exhaust nozzles for the three remaining X-51As.
The next two X-51A flights ended prematurely. The second vehicle was boosted by the rocket to just over Mach 5, separated and lit the scramjet on ethylene. When the vehicle attempted to transition to JP7 fuel operation, it experienced an inlet un-start. The hypersonic vehicle attempted to restart and oriented itself to optimize engine start conditions, but was unsuccessful. The vehicle continued in a controlled flight orientation until it flew into the ocean within the test range.
The third X-51A safely separated from the B-52, however after 16 seconds under the rocket booster, a fault was identified with one of the cruiser control fins. Once the X-51 separated from the rocket booster, approximately 15 seconds later, the cruiser was not able to maintain control due to the faulty control fin and was lost.
The final flight of the X-51A occurred May 1, 2013 and was the most successful in terms of meeting all the experiment objectives. The cruiser traveled more than 230 nautical miles in just over six minutes reaching a peak speed of Mach 5.1.
Overall the more than 9 minutes of data collected from the X-51A program was an unprecedented achievement proving the viability of air-breathing, high-speed scramjet propulsion using hydrocarbon fuel.
General Characteristics
Primary Function: Hypersonic scramjet-powered flight test demonstrator
Contractors: Boeing, Pratt Whitney Rocketdyne
Power Plant: JP-7 fueled/cooled SJY61 supersonic combustion ramjet
Inventory: Four purpose-built for flight test, not designed for recovery (one vehicle expended as of Feb. 1, 2011).
President Trump Participates in the Missile Defense Review Announcement
President of the United States of America Donald J. Trump Since January 20, 2017
Acting United States Secretary of Defense Patrick M. Shanahan Since January 1st 2019
Vice President of the United States, Mike Pence since January 20, 2017
Remarks by President Trump and Vice President Pence Announcing the Missile Defense Review
NATIONAL SECURITY DEFENSE
Issued on: January 17, 2019
The Pentagon
Arlington, Virginia The White House
11:25 A.M. EST
THE VICE PRESIDENT: Thank you, Acting Secretary Shanahan, Secretary Mark Esper, Secretary Wilson, distinguished members of Congress, members of the Joint Chiefs, the leadership of the Armed Forces of the United States, and to all of you who wear the uniform of the United States of America. It is my honor to be with you here today at the Pentagon as our President unveils his vision for our renewed commitment to American missile defense.
As Commander-in-Chief, President Trump has no higher priority than the safety and security of the American people. And it’s, frankly, the greatest honor of my life to serve as Vice President to a President who cares so deeply about the men and women of our Armed Forces and their families.
Today, along with all of you, our hearts and our prayers are with the families of the fallen American heroes who were lost in Syria yesterday, as well as those service members who were wounded.
We honor their service and we will honor the memory of the fallen. And their families and our Armed Forces should know their sacrifice will only steel our resolve; that as we begin to bring our troops home, we will do so in a way that ensures that the remnants of ISIS will never be able to reestablish their evil and murderous caliphate. (Applause.)
It’s in that same spirit of resolve that we gather here today. Since day one of this administration, President Trump has taken decisive action to make the strongest military in the history of the world stronger still.
Working with members of Congress in both parties, we’re rebuilding our military, restoring the arsenal of democracy. And last year, President Trump signed the largest investment in our national defense since the days of Ronald Reagan, including the largest military pay raise in nearly a decade. (Applause.)
At the President’s direction, we released a National Security Strategy that puts America first, pursued the modernization of our nuclear arsenal. And President Trump has taken decisive action to extend American dominance on land, at sea, in air, and in cyberspace, and even called for the establishment of a sixth branch of our Armed Forces to ensure American dominance in space.
In the last two years, our President has made great progress to provide for the common defense. And today, by unveiling our new strategy for missile defense, President Trump will take another critical step to ensure the safety and security of the American people and our very way of life.
This President knows that the American people believe that America First begins with peace through strength.
So now it is my high honor and distinct privilege to introduce your Commander-in-Chief, the 45th President of the United States of America, President Donald Trump. (Applause.)
THE PRESIDENT: Wow, that’s really nice. Thank you. You’re only doing that because I gave you the greatest and biggest budget in our history. (Laughter.) And I’ve now done it two times. (Applause.) And I hate to tell the rest of the world, but I’m about to do it three times. So — (applause) — so that’s the only reason you gave me such a nice welcome.
Thank you very much. And thank you to Vice President Pence for that wonderful introduction. It’s an honor to be at the Pentagon with so many distinguished military leaders, and I especially want to recognize our Acting Defense Secretary, Patrick Shanahan. He’s been fantastic — wherever you may be, Patrick. Thank you. (Applause.) Thank you.
We were talking just as I came on. I said, “Pat, I have to go now.” We’re talking defense and we’re also talking offense, you know? We can’t forget offense either, can we? We have the finest weapons in the world, and we’re ordering the finest weapons in the world. That, you can be sure of.
We’re here to present the results of my administration’s Missile Defense Review. Our goal is simple: to ensure that we can detect and destroy any missile launched against the United States — anywhere, anytime, anyplace.
As we all know, the best way to keep America safe is to keep America strong. And that’s what we’re doing. Stronger than ever.
Joining us for today’s presentation are great champions of missile defense in Congress: Senator Dan Sullivan, my friend. Thank you, Dan, very much. And Representative Mike Turner. Thank you, Mike. Thank you very much.
Also joining us from the Department of Defense are Acting Deputy Secretary of Defense David Norquist. David, thank you. Secretary Mark Esper. Secretary Heather Wilson. Thank you. Under Secretaries of Defense Michael Griffin, Ellen Lord, and John Rood. General Paul Selva. Thank you. Thank you, General. General Mark Milley. Thank you, Mark. Thank you. Thank you. And congratulations. Very importantly, congratulations. General Joseph Lengyel. And General James McConville. Thank you very much, everybody. Thank you.
Before presenting the results of our Missile Defense Review, I want to take a moment to express my deepest condolences to the families of the brave American heroes who laid down their lives yesterday in selfless service to our nation. These are great people. Great, great people. We will never forget their noble and immortal sacrifice.
This morning, I also would like to briefly address another matter of critical national security: the humanitarian and security crisis at our southern border.
Without a strong border, America is defenseless, vulnerable, and unprotected. I also want to thank the military for helping us out during the big caravan period. But now you have more caravans forming, and they’re on their way up. Thousands and thousands of people. We don’t know where they’re from, who they are — nothing.
We need strong borders. We need strong barriers and walls. Nothing else is going to work. Everyone knows it. Everybody is saying it now. It’s just a question of time. This should have been done many years ago. It should have been done by other — really, by other Presidents, and it wasn’t, just like many of the other things we’re doing that could have been done many years ago, whether it’s our negotiations with North Korea, moving the embassy to Jerusalem. So many things were supposed to have been done many years ago, and they weren’t. But we’re doing them. A wall has to be built.
We need security at our southern border. Drugs flow in. Tremendous percentages of the drugs coming into our country come from the southern border. We’re not going to allow it to happen. And that is why our Homeland Security professionals have asked Congress for a steel barrier between the ports of entry; to fund more agents, beds, medical supplies, and technology; and to close the ridiculous and dangerous immigration loopholes that no country in the world has but us.
The federal government remains shut down because Congressional Democrats refuse to approve border security. We’re going to have border security. It’s going to be tight. It’s going to be strong. We’re going to let people into our country gladly, but they’re going to come in legally. That includes for the farmers who need help and for others. But we are going to have powerful, strong border security.
While many Democrats in the House and Senate would like to make a deal, Speaker Pelosi will not let them negotiate. The Party has been hijacked by the open borders fringe within the Party. The radical left becoming the radical Democrats. Hopefully, Democrat lawmakers will step forward to do what is right for our country. And what’s right for our country is border security at the strongest level. Stop human hijacking. Stop drugs. Stop gangs. Stop criminals. That’s what we’re going to do. That was my pledge, and that’s what we’re going to do.
We’re gathered together to outline the steps that we must take to upgrade and modernize America’s missile defense. So important. In a time of rapidly evolving threats, we must be certain that our defensive capabilities are unrivaled and unmatched anywhere in the world.
All over, foreign adversaries, competitors, and rogue regimes are steadily enhancing their missile arsenals. All over. Their arsenals are getting bigger and stronger. And we’re getting bigger and stronger, in every way. They’re increasing their lethal strike capabilities, and they’re focused on developing long-range missiles that could reach targets within the United States.
As President, my first duty is the defense of our country. First duty: the defense of our country. And defense has many different definitions and covers a lot of territory. I will accept nothing less for our nation than the most effective, cutting-edge missile defense systems. We have the best anywhere in the world. It’s not even close.
Our new strategy calls for six major changes in missile defense policy:
First, we will prioritize the defense of the American people above all else. Our review calls for 20 new ground-based interceptors at Fort Greely, Alaska, and new radars and sensors to immediately detect foreign missiles launched against our great nation.
We are committed to establishing a missile defense program that can shield every city in the United States. And we will never negotiate away our right to do this.
Second, we will focus on developing new technology, not just investing more money into existing systems. The world is changing, and we’re going to change much faster than the rest of the world.
This past Tuesday, the Iranian regime tested a “space launch vehicle” — which failed — that will provide Iran with critical information — if it didn’t fail — that they could use to pursue intercontinental ballistic missile capability, and a capability, actually, of reaching the United States. We’re not going to have that happen.
The United States cannot simply build more of the same, or make only incremental improvements. What we’ve done to Iran since I’ve become President is rather miraculous. I ended the horrible, weak Iran Nuclear Deal. And I will tell you, Iran is a much different country today than it was two years ago. It’s not the same and it won’t be the same. And I do believe they want to talk.
It is not enough to merely keep pace with our adversaries; we must outpace them at every single turn. We must pursue the advanced technology and research to guarantee that the United States is always several steps ahead of those who would do us harm.
Third, we will protect the American people from all types of missile attacks. In the past, the United States lacked a comprehensive strategy for missile defense that extended beyond ballistic missiles.
Under our plan, that will change. The U.S. will now adjust its posture to also defend against any missile strikes, including cruise and hypersonic missiles. And we are, by the way, very advanced also on hypersonic technology and missiles. We will always be at the forefront of everything.
Fourth, we will recognize that space is a new warfighting domain, with the Space Force leading the way.
My upcoming budget will invest in a space-based missile defense layer. It’s new technology. It’s ultimately going to be a very, very big part of our defense and, obviously, of our offense. The system will be monitored, and we will terminate any missile launches from hostile powers, or even from powers that make a mistake. It won’t happen. Regardless of the missile type or the geographic origins of the attack, we will ensure that enemy missiles find no sanctuary on Earth or in the skies above.
This is the direction that I’m heading. We have some very bad players out there, and we’re a good player but we can be far worse than anybody, if need be. I’ve always known — and I’ve watched and I’ve seen — the stronger you are, the less you will need, whatever that strength may be.
Fifth, we will remove bureaucratic obstacles to dramatically speed up the acquisition and deployment of the new technology.
And sixth, we will insist on fair burden sharing with our allies.
I’ve made it clear we are protecting many, many wealthy, wealthy, wealthy, wealthy countries. One country, they said, has an unsustainable cash flow. In other words, they make so much money they don’t know what to do with it. I said, “Send it our way.” (Laughter.) “We’re protecting you. Send it our way.”
We protect all of these wealthy countries, which I’m very honored to do, but many of them are so wealthy they can easily pay us the cost of this protection.
So you’ll see big changes taking place. And we’ve had great talks with countries. Friendly talks. One of them said, “Mr. President, yes, we will work with you. But for 30 years, nobody has ever asked.” I said, “Now we’re asking.” It took a long time. I said, “Now we’re asking.” And that allows us to spend much more money than these incredible budgets, where it’s just money going out and not coming back.
So, wealthy, wealthy countries that we’re protecting are all under notice and all cooperating very nicely. I would say they probably liked other Presidents more than me, but that’s okay. I don’t blame them. I would too. (Laughter.) There was a recent poll in Europe. The original poll, when I first ran, I was one of the most popular people in the world. And now they said, “He’s not popular in Europe.” I shouldn’t be — because I’m asking them to step up. You have countries paying less than 1 percent in NATO.
Last year, I raised $44 billion more by saying, “I’m sorry, you have to step up.” The year before that, my first year — so I was just getting started — I raised $24 billion with one meeting. And until that, it was just going down. It was going down. For 15 years, it was just going down, the numbers going into NATO. And this year we’ll also have a good year. They’re starting to step up. Very unfair when Germany pays 1 percent and we’re paying 4.3 percent of a much larger GDP.
We cannot be the fools for others. We cannot be. We don’t want to be called that. And I will tell you, for many years, behind your backs, that’s what they were saying. So there’s a big difference. We’re going to be with NATO 100 percent. But as I told the countries, you have to step up. You have to pay minimum numbers, actually. The numbers should be much higher. They set a 2 percent goal. Very few pay that. But they should be much higher than that. If you look at what we pay, it’s massively higher than that.
So we have very good relationships, but countries are now stepping up, and they can well afford to.
In furtherance of this goal, our plan directs the Department of Defense to prioritize the sale of American missile defense and technology to our allies and to our partners. We want them to be able to defend. And they’re willing to pay for the finest missiles in the world. They’ve already done that. They’re stepping up like nobody has ever seen before, actually.
We will also leverage our network of partnerships to share early warning and tracking information, and detect missile launches as early as possible.
Today marks the beginning of a new era in our missile defense program. For too long, we have been held back by self-imposed limits while foreign competitors grow and they advance more than we have over the years. Part of the reason is we spend so much money on so many other places. Now that’s changing. We’re helping and we’re able to spend money on technology and new defense, and far beyond defense systems. So those days are history.
Our strategy is grounded in one overriding objective: to detect and destroy every type of missile attack against any American target, whether before or after launch.
When it comes to defending America, we will not take any chances. We will only take action.
There is no substitute for American military might. But when I took office — you know it better than anybody in the world — our military was very tired. It was very depleted. I won’t even tell you the things that some of our great generals were telling me. And now it’s being rebuilt at a rapid rate and, very shortly, will be more powerful than ever before. And that’s the way it has to be.
And as I said, the more powerful it is, the less likely it is that we’ll ever have to use it. But it will soon be more powerful than ever before.
Today, we reaffirm that a strong America remains the best way to prevent conflict, promote peace, preserve freedom, and protect our great people. Together, we unite behind a noble mission: to shield our country with the greatest missile defense systems anywhere on the face of the Earth.
I want to thank you again to the men and women of the American Armed Forces. Special, special people. And the citizens of our country know that and acknowledge that, far more so than you would ever know. We have the greatest military at any time soon in the history of the world.
I want to just finish my saying I appreciate your service. You’re incredible people. God bless you, and God bless America. Thank you very much. Thank you. (Applause.)
END 11:49 A.M. EST
Meanwhile, Arirang News dated January 18th, 2019, reported that N. Korea's top nuclear negotiator arrived in Washington with Kim. - 2019.01.18.
Sources: Arirang News, and Youtube , wikipedia, White House, CBS, Fox News, Defense Update, Boeing, Dateline Edwards News Brief, and Air Force, and PBS catch4all.com,
Sandra Englund, January 17th, and Rev. January 20th , 2019, Rev. January 22nd, 2019
DPRK, BRIGHTER DAYS TO COME WHEN IT'S COMEPLETED DENUCLEARIZATION COMPLETE: ACTION: DENUCLEARIZATION MEANS PEACE AND PROSPERITIES
DPRK Chairman Kim, Chinese President Xi reaffirm commitment toward denuclearization of Korean Peninsula
DPRK Chairman Kim, Chinese President Xi reaffirm commitment toward denuclearization of Korean Peninsula
On January 9th, 2019, Arirang News Park Hee-jun reported that The leaders of North Korea and China have reached a consensus on the issue of the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula during their summit this week.
And both North Korea and China's official news agencies reported on the meeting.
Our Park Hee-jun has the details. North Korean leader Kim Jong-un and Chinese President Xi Jinping have agreed on the need to resolve issues on the Korean Peninsula in a diplomatic manner.
According to China Central Television on Thursday, the two leaders, during their talks this week, reaffirmed their commitment toward the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.
Chairman Kim said he will continue his denuclearization commitments and his efforts to implement the agreements made at his first summit with President Donald Trump in Singapore.
He vowed to achieve a result that can be welcomed by the international community during his second meeting with Trump.
Meanwhile, President Xi expressed support for the improvement in inter-Korean relations and the second North Korea-U.S. summit.
Xi also emphasized that China will play a constructive role in the process towards denuclearization and peace on the Korean Peninsula.
He also called on relevant countries to positively respond to North Korea's reasonable concerns to achieve the anticipated resolution on the Korean Peninsula.
It was the fourth time the two leaders have had summit talks in the past year.
And apparently, there may be a fifth summit in the works.
The North's state media Korean Central News Agency reported that Kim extended an invitation to Xi to visit North Korea at a convenient date.
And Xi is said to have accepted Kim's invitation.
Jan 8, 2019 Pyongyang, January 8 (KCNA) -- Kim Jong Un, chairman of the Workers' Party of Korea and chairman of the State Affairs Commission of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, is to visit China on Jan. 7-10, Juche 108 (2019) at the invitation of Xi Jinping, general secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and president of the People's Republic of China.
On January 2nd, Trump says he received great letter from N. Korean leader Kim Jong-un
Arirang News: Kim has expressed his willingness to meet with Trump at any time:
Tweeter Donald J. Trump: 3:11 PM – 1st Jan 2019: “Kim Jong Un says North Korea will not make or test nuclear weapons, or give them to others - he is ready to meet President Trump aytime.” PBS News Hour. I also look forward to meeting with Chairman Kim who realizes so well that North Kroea possesses great economic potential!
Sources: Arirang News, and Youtube , Arirang News, KCNA, Rodong Sinmoon: News catch4all.com,
Sandra Englund, January 9th, and January 10th, 2018 Rev
U.S. in no hurry in negotiations with N. Korea
Arirang News December 15, 2018: denuclearization talks between Pyeongyang and Washington. Talks between the two appear to have stalled, but U.S. President Donald Trump on Friday once again reiterated that the U.S. is in no hurry over negotiations with North Korea, and also expressed faith in North Korean leader Kim Jong-un as a negotiating partner.
Arirang News Kan Hyeong-woo reported thatIn his latest tweet that directly mentions Kim Jong-un, President Trump said
many people have asked him how the U.S. is doing in its negotiations with North Korea on the denuclearization issue. His answer is that the U.S. is in no hurry.
He also said that North Korea has wonderful potential for great economic success and that Kim Jong-un sees it better than anyone and will take full advantage of it for his people.
Trump added that the U.S. and North Korea are doing just fine.
His message can be seen as showing people that the agreements signed at the Singapore summit in June are still valid and the two sides will continue to work towards carrying out those promises.
At the same time, Trump could be using the message to call for concrete action from North Korea. He said we are in no hurry when asked about the negotiations with Pyeongyang. This could be interpreted as suggesting the U.S. is in no rush as the sanctions put on North Korea will stay as they are.
But by saying North Korea has great potential for economic success, Trump showed his willingness to guarantee the security of the current regime.
As Trump's comments came at a time when talks between Pyeongyang and Washington do not seem to be making much progress, it remains to be seen whether they will actually lead to further talks between the two sides.
Kan Hyeong-woo, Arirang News
Meanwhile, Arirang Park Hee-jun, reported on December 13, 2018 that the Two Koreas to hold groundbreaking ceremony for railway, road project on Dec. 26
South and North Korea have agreed on a date to hold a groundbreaking ceremony for work to connect their railways and roads.
As it turns out, it will happen before the end of the year, as agreed by the leaders of thre two Korea in their September summit in Pyeongyang.
Park Hee-jun reports.
South and North Korea have agreed to hold the groundbreaking ceremony for their joint project to modernize and connect their railways and roads... on December 26th.
And it will take place at the North's Panmun Station, within the border village of Gaeseong.
This comes after the two sides held working-level talks on Thursday at the joint liaison office in Gaeseong.
And according to Seoul's Unification Ministry, it's been decided that around one hundred people from each side will attend the ceremony.
South and North Korea held talks today about the ceremony to start work on connecting railways and roads along the Gyeongui line and the Donghae line. We agreed to hold the ceremony on Wednesday, December 26th, at Panmun Station.
The ceremony will mark the official start of the two Koreas' joint transportation project.
The leaders of the two Koreas agreed at their Pyeongyang Summit in September,... to break ground on interconnected railways and roads within the year.
To make it happen, the two sides have been inspecting the North's railways since earlier this month.
They also completed a joint survey of roads along the western side of the peninsula, but have yet to fix a schedule for inspecting the ones in the east.
The ministry says the ceremony will show the two Koreas’ strong determination to push ahead with the project.
But there's still the question of whether the ceremony would violate U.S.-led sanctions.
If it would violate them, then Seoul will have to seek a sanctions waiver from Washington.
The South Korean government will continue to work with the U.S. to go ahead with the event in a way that does not raise concerns from the international community.
South and North Korea have agreed on a date to hold a groundbreaking ceremony for work to connect their railways and roads.
As it turns out, it will happen before the end of the year, as agreed by the leaders of thre two Korea in their September summit in Pyeongyang.
Park Hee-jun reports.
South and North Korea have agreed to hold the groundbreaking ceremony for their joint project to modernize and connect their railways and roads... on December 26th.
And it will take place at the North's Panmun Station, within the border village of Gaeseong.
This comes after the two sides held working-level talks on Thursday at the joint liaison office in Gaeseong.
And according to Seoul's Unification Ministry, it's been decided that around one hundred people from each side will attend the ceremony.
South and North Korea held talks today about the ceremony to start work on connecting railways and roads along the Gyeongui line and the Donghae line. We agreed to hold the ceremony on Wednesday, December 26th, at Panmun Station.
The ceremony will mark the official start of the two Koreas' joint transportation project.
The leaders of the two Koreas agreed at their Pyeongyang Summit in September,... to break ground on interconnected railways and roads within the year.
To make it happen, the two sides have been inspecting the North's railways since earlier this month.
They also completed a joint survey of roads along the western side of the peninsula, but have yet to fix a schedule for inspecting the ones in the east.
The ministry says the ceremony will show the two Koreas’ strong determination to push ahead with the project.
But there's still the question of whether the ceremony would violate U.S.-led sanctions.
If it would violate them, then Seoul will have to seek a sanctions waiver from Washington.
The South Korean government will continue to work with the U.S. to go ahead with the event in a way that does not raise concerns from the international community.
Arirang News Dated December 12th, 2018, ROK Blue house Correspondent Shin Se-min Reported that it is unlikely now that North Korean leader Kim Jong-un will be coming to Seoul by the end of the year. But the Blue House is keeping the door open for January.
Military teams from South and North Korea verify that both sides have removed the guard posts along the DMZ that they said they would take down. President Moon Jae-in says it's a landmark day for building trust and an example to the world.
Multiple local news outlets, citing anonymous officials at the top office, have also claimed that chances of Kim Jong-un coming south by year's end now seem slim.
A visit by the regime's supreme leader presents difficulties... believed to be related to security... and especially to the denuclearization talks with the U.S.
Plus it's already a busy month for Pyeongyang.
December 17th is the anniversary of the death of Kim Jong-un's father, the late former leader Kim Jong-il.
And the regime is believed to spend the last month of the year reviewing its accomplishments and prepping for the leader's New Year's speech.
In the meantime, Seoul has been in preparation mode, with a large mural still standing outside the Blue House showing the leaders of South and North holding hands.
With so much up in the air, President Moon, as host of what would be another historical event, has been reserved about it... seen as a signal to the North that the administration doesn't want to rush the regime.
At the same time, trying to keep things moving, Unification Minister Cho Myoung-gyon said Kim's visit to Seoul could be a stepping stone for the highly-anticipated next summit between Pyeongyang and Washington -- indicating that it might come before that high-stakes meeting.
With no confirmation yet from either side, the question remains what the timetable will look like in the weeks to come, with U.S. President Trump having already said that he plans on meeting North Korea's Kim Jong-un early next year.
Shin Se-min, Arirang News.
Sources: Arirang News, and Youtube catch4all.com,
Sandra Englund, December 12 Rev. December 16th, 2018