FEBRUARY 24, 2023

    G7 Leaders’ Statement

    STATEMENTS AND RELEASES

     

    At the one-year mark of Russia’s brutal invasion of Ukraine, we, the Leaders of the Group of Seven (G7), met with Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to reaffirm our unwavering support for Ukraine for as long as it takes. Russia’s heinous attacks over the last 365 days have laid bare the cruelty of the ongoing aggression. We condemn Russia’s illegal, unjustifiable, and unprovoked war, disregard for the Charter of the United Nations (UN) and indifference to the impacts that its war is having on people worldwide. We salute the heroism of the Ukrainian people in their brave resistance. We commit to intensifying our diplomatic, financial and military support for Ukraine, to increasing the costs to Russia and those supporting its war effort, and to continuing to counter the negative impacts of the war on the rest of the world, particularly on the most vulnerable people.

    Russia started this war and Russia can end this war. We call on Russia to stop its ongoing aggression and to immediately, completely and unconditionally withdraw its troops from the entire internationally recognized territory of Ukraine. In the past year Russian forces have killed thousands of Ukrainians, caused millions to flee, and forcibly deported many thousands of Ukrainians, including children, to Russia. Russia has destroyed hospitals, schools, and energy and critical infrastructure, and left historic cities in ruins. In areas liberated from Russian forces, there is evidence of mass graves, sexual violence, torture and other atrocities. We strongly condemn all of Russia’s outrageous acts. Amidst Russia’s assault, Ukrainians are more united, proud and determined than ever.

    Russia’s war against Ukraine is also an attack on the fundamental principles of sovereignty of nations, territorial integrity of states and respect for human rights. We remain united and resolute in our support of the UN Charter. We reiterate our unequivocal condemnation and firm rejection of the attempted illegal annexation by Russia of Ukraine’s Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions. As in the case of Crimea and Sevastopol, we will never recognize these illegal annexation attempts.

    We reiterate that Russia’s irresponsible nuclear rhetoric is unacceptable, and any use of chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear weapons by Russia would be met with severe consequences. We recall the consensus achieved in Bali of all G20 members, including Russia, that the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons is inadmissible. We also recall the importance of the 77-year record of non-use of nuclear weapons. We deeply regret Russia’s decision to suspend the implementation of the new START treaty. We express our gravest concern over Russia’s continued occupation and control over the Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant. The situation can only be resolved by complete withdrawal of Russian troops and equipment from the premises. We support the International Atomic Energy Agency’s (IAEA) efforts to strengthen nuclear safety and security in Ukraine, including through the continuous presence of IAEA experts and the cessation of all combat operations in and around the plant and surrounding infrastructure.

    We welcome the resolution A/ES-11/L.7 titled “Principles of the Charter of the United Nations underlying a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in Ukraine” resolution which was adopted with the broad support of the international community at the Emergency Special Session of the UN General Assembly yesterday. We remain committed to diplomacy and welcome and support President Zelenskyy’s earnest efforts to promote a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in line with the UN Charter by outlining basic principles in his Peace Formula. With a view to a viable post-war peace settlement, we remain ready to reach arrangements together with Ukraine as well as interested countries and institutions on sustained security and other commitments to help Ukraine defend itself, secure its free and democratic future, and deter future Russian aggression.

    We remain committed to coordinating efforts to meet Ukraine’s pressing military and defence equipment needs, with an immediate focus on air defence systems and capabilities, as well as necessary munitions and tanks.

    Building on the results achieved during the international conference held in Paris on 13 December, we also reaffirm our commitment to provide additional humanitarian assistance to the Ukrainian people, assistance to support Ukraine’s energy sector, and other assistance in Ukraine and neighbouring countries, including to ensure access to healthcare including mental health. We welcome the establishment of the Multi-agency Donor Coordination Platform to help advance Ukraine’s reform agenda, promote private sector led sustainable growth, and ensure close coordination among international donors to deliver assistance in a coherent, transparent and accountable manner.

    We will continue to help maintain Ukraine’s economic and financial stability, including addressing urgent short-term economic needs. In this context, we welcome the progress made by our Finance Ministers to increase our budget and economic support to 39 billion US dollars for 2023 and look forward to additional commitments. We ask Finance Ministers to continue engagement with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and Ukraine to deliver an ambitious program by the end of March 2023 and to continue working together, with the IMF and others for necessary budget support to Ukraine throughout and beyond 2023.

    We support Ukraine’s reconstruction efforts, including the recovery of infrastructure destroyed by Russia’s aggression. It is essential that this process continues to involve a wide range of actors, including Ukrainian subnational entities and civil society, international financial institutions and organizations, and the private sector. The Ukraine Recovery Conference to be held in London in June this year will offer a venue for Ukraine, international partners, private sector and civil society to further promote momentum behind Ukraine’s recovery. At the same time, we will continue to support the determination of Ukraine to build a society free from corruption. We support the Ukrainian government’s efforts to advance necessary institution-building in line with Ukraine’s European path, including in the judicial sector and promotion of the rule of law by empowering the independent Ukrainian anti-corruption institutions. In this regard, we reiterate our full confidence in the role of the G7 Ambassadors Group in supporting the implementation of the reform agenda.

    We reaffirm our commitment to strengthening the unprecedented and coordinated sanctions and other economic measures the G7 and partner countries have taken to date to further counter Russia’s capacity to wage its illegal aggression. We remain committed to presenting a united front through the imposition of new coordinated economic actions against Russia in the days and weeks ahead. Specifically, we are taking the following new measures, consistent with our respective legal authorities and processes and international law:

     

    (i) We will maintain, fully implement and expand the economic measures we have already imposed, including by preventing and responding to evasion and circumvention through the establishment of an Enforcement Coordination Mechanism to bolster compliance and enforcement of our measures and deny Russia the benefits of G7 economies. We call on third-countries or other international actors who seek to evade or undermine our measures to cease providing material support to Russia’s war, or face severe costs. To deter this activity around the world, we are taking actions against third-country actors materially supporting Russia’s war in Ukraine. We also commit to further aligning measures, such as transit or services bans, including to prevent Russian circumvention.

     

    (ii) We are committed to preventing Russia from finding new ways to acquire advanced materials, technology, and military and industrial equipment from our jurisdictions that it can use to develop its industrial sectors and further its violations of international law. To this end, we will adopt further measures to prevent Russia from accessing inputs that support its military and manufacturing sectors, including, among others, industrial machinery, tools, construction equipment, and other technology Russia is exploiting to rebuild its war machine.

     

    (iii) We will continue to reduce Russia’s revenue to finance its illegal aggression by taking appropriate steps to limit Russia’s energy revenue and future extractive capabilities, building on the measures we have taken so far, including export bans and the price cap for seaborne Russian-origin crude oil and refined oil products. We commit to taking action in a way that mitigates spillover effects for energy security, in particular for the most vulnerable and affected countries.

     

    (iv) Given the significant revenues that Russia extracts from the export of diamonds, we will work collectively on further measures on Russian diamonds, including rough and polished ones, working closely to engage key partners.

     

    (v) We are taking additional measures in relation to Russia’s financial sector to further undermine Russia’s capacity to wage its illegal aggression. While coordinating to preserve financial channels for essential transactions, we will target additional Russian financial institutions to prevent circumvention of our measures.

     

    (vi) We continue to impose targeted sanctions, including on those responsible for war crimes or human rights violations and abuses, exercising illegitimate authority in Ukraine, or who otherwise are profiting from the war.

    We will continue our efforts to ensure Russia pays for Ukraine’s long-term reconstruction. Russia bears full responsibility for the war and the damage it has caused, including to Ukraine’s critical infrastructure. We collectively reaffirm the need for an international mechanism to register the damages Russia has inflicted. We are determined, consistent with our respective legal systems, that Russia’s sovereign assets in our jurisdictions will remain immobilized until there is a resolution to the conflict that addresses Russia’s violation of Ukraine’s sovereignty and integrity. Any resolution to the conflict must ensure Russia pays for the damage it has caused. We will work with partners beyond the G7 which hold those Russian sovereign assets to build the broadest coalition possible to advance these objectives.

    We are united in our determination to hold President Putin and those responsible to account, consistent with international law. We support investigations by the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, the Prosecutor-General of Ukraine, and other national prosecutors who are able to establish jurisdiction under national law. In this regard, we support exploring efforts to develop an international centre for the prosecution of the crime of aggression against Ukraine (ICPA) which is linked to the existing Joint Investigation Team supported by Eurojust.

    We deplore that many countries in the world have been severely affected by the repercussions of Russia’s war of aggression. Russia’s weaponisation of food has caused global economic hardship and a rise in global food prices, increasing the cost of living of people, compounding the economic vulnerabilities of developing countries, and exacerbating already dire humanitarian crises and food insecurity around the world. We reiterate the G7’s united will to continue to provide rapid assistance, including food-related aid, to countries in need and affected populations and we will continue to design our restrictive measures to shield such populations from unintended consequences by ensuring food and fertilisers are carved out. We will continue to support food security and the availability and sustainable use of fertilisers to vulnerable countries in need of assistance and welcome the related work undertaken by the UN World Food Programme (WFP) and other relevant agencies. We recognize the importance of the EU-Ukraine Solidarity Lanes, President Zelenskyy’s Grain from Ukraine Initiative and the UN and Türkiye- brokered Black Sea Grain Initiative (BSGI). In this context, we stress the importance of the automatic extension of the BSGI by 18 March and its expansion.

    We also express our profound sympathy for all those affected by the horrifying earthquakes in Türkiye and Syria. We stand in solidarity with the people of Türkiye and Syria and pledge our continued support to tackling the consequences of this catastrophe. It is vital that humanitarian aid reaches all those who require it as efficiently as possible. We welcome the expansion of cross- border aid for an initial period of three months, and underscore that the humanitarian needs of those in northwest Syria should continue to be met. We also welcome the EU initiative to host a donor conference in support of the people in Türkiye and Syria in March.

    Above all, our solidarity will never waver in standing with Ukraine, in supporting countries and people in need, and in upholding the international order based on the rule of law.

    ###

    ----------------------------------------------------------------

     

    Russia vs USA: Military Comparison 2023

    RvU_23 (1).jpeg RvU_23 (11).jpeg RvU_23 (12).jpeg RvU_23 (13).jpeg RvU_23 (14).jpeg
    RvU_23 (15).jpeg RvU_23 (16).jpeg RvU_23 (17).jpeg RvU_23 (18).jpeg RvU_23 (19).jpeg
    RvU_23 (1a).jpeg RvU_23 (2).jpeg RvU_23 (20).jpeg RvU_23 (22).jpeg RvU_23 (23).jpeg
    RvU_23 (24).jpeg RvU_23 (25).jpeg RvU_23 (26).jpeg RvU_23 (27).jpeg RvU_23 (23).jpeg
    RvU_23 (3).jpeg

    cRvU_23 (30).jpeg

    RvU_23 (31).jpeg RvU_23 (32).jpeg RvU_23 (33).jpeg
    RvU_23 (34).jpeg RvU_23 (4).jpeg RvU_23 (5).jpeg RvU_23 (6).jpeg RvU_23 (7).jpeg
    RvU_23 (8).jpeg RvU_23 (9).jpeg      

     

     

     

     

     

    FEBRUARY 20, 2023

    On-the-Record Press Call by Senior Administration Officials on
    President Biden’s Trip to Ukraine

    STATEMENTS AND RELEASES

    Via Teleconference

     

    7:42 A.M. EST

     

    MS. WATSON:  Good morning, everyone.  Thanks for joining our call on short notice.  This is Adrienne Watson with the NSC.

     

    To kick things off, we just want to go over the ground rules really quickly.  This call is on the record.  The contents of the call are embargoed until the call ends.  To ask a question, just raise your hand.

     

    Our speakers today are White House Communications Director Kate Bedingfield, National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan, and Principal Deputy National Security Advisor Jon Finer.

     

    With that, that I’ll turn it over to Kate.

     

    MS. BEDINGFIELD:  Great.  Thanks, Adrienne.  Hi, everyone.  Thanks for jumping on, on short notice.  So I just wanted to do a little table set at the top here, and then I’ll turn it over to Jake and Jon for some additional points.

     

    But, you know, so this trip today was a bold and strong move on President Biden’s part in the face of extreme difficulty, the extreme difficulty of making this trip as President of the United States.  It was logistically complicated and difficult, and it sends an incredibly powerful message that President Biden has faith in the Ukrainian people and is unwavering in his commitment to stand by them.

     

    You know, a visit from a U.S. President to an active warzone like this is historic and unprecedented and, as I say, required a great deal of careful planning.

     

    Unlike previous visits from Presidents to warzones, like Iraq and Afghanistan, the U.S. obviously does not have a military presence on the ground in Ukraine, which made a visit from a sitting President all the more challenging.

     

    But this was a risk that Joe Biden wanted to take.  It’s important to him to show up, even when it’s hard, and he directed his team to make it happen, no matter how challenging the logistics.  He wanted to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with President Zelenskyy and remind the world, as we approach the one-year anniversary of the invasion, that Kyiv still stands and the United States will not be deterred from standing with Ukraine.  And he wanted to demonstrate the strength of his commitment to his strategy of holding the West together in a united front against Putin.

     

    So it was bold, it was risky, and it should leave no doubt in anyone’s mind that Joe Biden is a leader who takes commitment seriously, and the U.S. is committed to continuing to support Ukraine for as long as it takes.

     

    So with that, I’m going to turn it over to Jake Sullivan for some additional thoughts.

     

    MR. SULLIVAN:  Thanks, Kate.  And hi, everybody.  And I hope I’m able to stay on the call for as long as I can, given access to cell service.

     

    Let me just start by reiterating something Kate said, which is that this was a historic visit, unprecedented in modern times, to have the President of the United States visit the capital of a country at war where the United States military does not control the critical infrastructure.

     

    And that required a security, operational, and logistical effort from professionals across the U.S. government to take what was an inherently risky undertaking and make it a manageable level of risk.

     

    But, of course, there was still risk and is still risk in an endeavor like this.  And President Biden felt that it was important to make this trip because of the critical juncture that we find ourselves at as we approach the one-year anniversary of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

     

    And what he wanted to do in Kyiv was to send a clear, unmistakable message of enduring American support for Ukraine; a clear, unmistakable message of the unity of the West and (inaudible) international community in standing behind Ukraine and standing up to Russian aggression; and also to be able to stand there next to President Zelenskyy in a free Kyiv to not just tell but to show the world, through a powerful demonstration, that Ukraine is successfully resisting Russian aggression and Russia is suffering strategic failure in Ukraine.

     

    And as I said, though, the impending one-year anniversary of Russia’s invasion really presented a crucial moment to do this.  One year ago this week, as the President said in his remarks in Kyiv, he spoke with President Zelenskyy as Russian forces were moving across the border, and President Zelenskyy said to him, “I’m not sure when we’re going to be able to speak again.”

     

    So, one year later, the two men were face-to-face standing together in Kyiv, in a free and independent city, in a free and independent country.  And President Biden made clear in his remarks that there will be difficult times ahead, that a portion of Ukraine is under Russian occupation, that Russia continues to brutalize civilian populations across the country.

     

    And so this was not a celebration but an affirmation of commitment of the resilience of the Ukrainian people, of the courage and bravery they’ve shown, and also an affirmation of the fact that the United States and our allies and partners have mobilized unprecedented levels of military, economic, and humanitarian support to provide the Ukrainian people with the tools that they’ve needed to defend their country, their sovereignty, their territorial integrity, and their independence.

     

    In Kyiv, President Biden had the opportunity to meet the President and the First Lady, and then to sit in an extended session with President Zelenskyy to talk about all aspects of the ongoing war.  They spent time talking about the coming months, in terms of the battlefield, and what Ukraine will need in terms of capabilities to be able to succeed on the battlefield.

     

    They talked about Ukraine’s needs in terms of energy, infrastructure, economic support, humanitarian needs.  And they also talked about the political side of this, including the upcoming U.N. General Assembly session on Ukraine, as well as Ukraine’s Peace Formula and Ukraine’s efforts to rally international support for a just and sustainable and durable peace built on the principles of the U.N. Charter, chief among them sovereignty and territorial integrity.

     

    President Biden also had the chance to get briefed by a number of members of President Zelenskyy’s team and, you know, to have a detailed discussion of the types of steps that are going to be required in the weeks and months ahead from the United States and from our international partners in the G7 and NATO and elsewhere to ensure Ukraine has what it needs to sustain the level of effort going forward that we have seen over the course of the past year, and then some.

     

    And President Biden also had the opportunity to pay his respects to the fallen, to those who have given their lives and paid the ultimate sacrifice in service of defending Ukraine.  He also had the chance to stand, as I said, next to President Zelenskyy and send a clear message that the United States will be with Ukraine for as long as it takes and the United States will continue to hold the international community and, in particular, this large and diverse coalition of countries together that has been supporting Ukraine for these past many months.

     

    Finally, President Biden really reinforced a point that he will make again when he speaks in Warsaw tomorrow, which is that President Putin thought that Ukraine would cower and that the West would be divided, indeed that the West would be weak.  And he got the opposite of that across the board.

     

    And this visit today was really an effort, again, as I said before, to show and not just tell that we will continue to stand up and stand strong and that we will do so, as I said, for as long as it takes.

     

    So with that, let me — let me turn it over to Jon, and we’d be happy to take your questions.

     

    MR. FINER:  Thanks, Jake.  Jake and Kate really said it all, but I’ll just make a few quick additional points.

     

    They each talked about some of the unusual and maybe unprecedented aspects of this visit, but I’ll mention a couple of others, which is — which are: In addition to, obviously, lack of military footprint in Ukraine, the United States also has a very light embassy footprint compared to the massive operations in Afghanistan and Iraq during wartime visits by Presidents to those places.

     

    And the traveling party accompanying the President was extremely small, as well, consisting basically of a handful of his closest aides, small medical team, photographer, and the security package.

     

    So this entire operation, which was meticulously planned — and I’ll say a bit more about that in a second — was done just at much smaller scale than previous such visits by Presidents to these places, just given the constraints of operating in Kyiv and in the rest of Ukraine during conflict.

     

    In terms of the planning, again, this visit was meticulously planned over a period of months, involving several offices in the White House — of course, the Chief of Staff’s office, the NSC, and White House Military Office — as well as a small number of colleagues from the Pentagon, the Secret Service, and of course, the intelligence community, which offered threat assessments on the visit.

     

    Only a handful of people in each of these buildings was involved in the planning for operational security.  The President was fully briefed on each stage of the plan and any potential contingencies, and then made the final “go” or “no go” decision after a huddle in the Oval Office and by phone with some key members of his national security cabinet on Friday.

     

    Obviously, this was all worked very closely between the White House and the highest levels of the Ukrainian government, who have become quite adept at hosting high-level visitors, although not one quite like this, and with our embassy in Kyiv, which, again, is small but highly capable, playing a key role as an intermediary.

     

    And with that, I’ll turn it back to Adrienne.

     

    MS. WATSON:  Thanks, Jon.  We have a couple of minutes for questions.  First question, Nancy Cordes with CBS.  Your line should be unmuted.

     

    Q    Sorry, I had to unmute manually.  Okay, so my question is — thank you so much for doing this.  I’m wondering if you gave the Russians any kind of heads up that the President was going to be in Kyiv.  And if not, what was your level of concern about the fact that they would try to act in some way while you were there, either with aggression in Kyiv or elsewhere in the country?  Were you operating under the assumption, if you didn’t give them a heads up, that they knew that you were there?

     

    MR. SULLIVAN:  Nancy, it’s Jake.  We did notify the Russians that President Biden would be traveling to Kyiv.  We did so some hours before his departure for de-confliction purposes.

     

    And because of the sensitive nature of those communications, I won’t get into how they responded or what the precise nature of our message was, but I can confirm that we provided that notification.

     

    MS. WATSON:  Thanks, Nancy.  Next question to Aamer with the AP.  Aamer, your line is unmuted.

     

    Q    Thank you.  On the logistical aspect, could you confirm if — how — offer a little bit more detail on how the President and the package got there?  Was there trains or helicopters?  Or what was used to get there?

     

    And then, secondly, substantively on Ukraine’s future needs, were ATACMS and F-16s or fighter jets discussed?  And was there any resolution on Zelenskyy’s desire to get those?  Thank you.

     

    MS. BEDINGFIELD:  So, on the logistics, just quickly, I’ll say I anticipate that we’ll have more detail and that the print pooler, who was traveling with the President, will have more detail in the coming days.

     

    But given that we’re allowing the trip to play out and finish out, we are holding back on some of those trans- — modes of — mode of transportation details and other specific logistical details until the trip is fully complete.

     

    So I would anticipate that we will have more color for you on that in the coming days, when it’s safe to do so, Aamer.

     

    MR. SULLIVAN:  Aamer, it’s Jake.  The two presidents had a detailed discussion of the battlefield situation, of Ukraine’s objectives, of the military support and assistance we’ve already provided, and of capabilities going forward.

     

    I’m not going to get into the specifics of those because we’re not announcing new capabilities today.  But what I will say is that there was a good discussion on the subject.  I think the two presidents both laid out their perspectives on a number of different capabilities that have been thrown around in the press, both recently and over the course of several months.  And I will leave it at that.

     

    MS. WATSON:  And then one more question to Jeremy Diamond with CNN.  Jeremy, you should be unmuted.

     

    Q    Hey, thanks so much for doing this.  I’m wondering if you can tell us a little bit more about the deliberations about getting the President to Kyiv.  Was Secret Service and the Pentagon — were they all on board with the plan for the President to go to Kyiv?  Or did the President have to overrule security officials in any way?  Was there a consideration of going to somewhere closer to the border, like Lviv, for example?  If you could get into that.

     

    And then, Jake, I’m just wondering if you can paint a picture for us a little bit about what it was like being on the plane with the President for this very secretive trip and also what type of plane was used to get the President out of Washington.

     

    MR. SULLIVAN:  I’ll take the second one first.  So as Kate said, we’ll hold off on going into real detail on the various elements of the trip and modalities and modes of transport and the like until, basically, we get the green light from the security folks to be able to share all of that.  We will share it, but we just want to make sure that we do so once, you know, we feel that it’s operationally safe to do so.

     

    I can say that, coming over, the President was very focused on making sure that he made the most of his time on the ground, which he knew was going to be limited.  So he was quite focused on how he was going to approach his conversation with President Zelenskyy and, in part, how the two of them were really going to look out over the course of 2023 and try to come to a common understanding of what the objectives are, where Ukraine is trying to get and how the United States can most effectively support them alongside our allies and partners in getting to where it wants to get.

     

    He was excited about making the trip.  I think he felt it was really important to stand up next to President Zelenskyy and speak the way that he did today and convey the messages that you heard from him and that, you know, I’ve just put in some context.

     

    So, frankly, the trip from Washington was a trip filled with real anticipation, that this was an important moment and that the President was rising to the moment and felt he had an important mission to undertake, and he was eager to do it.

     

    But he wanted to do it, characteristically, by delving into the details, by knowing the specifics of — by being sure that he was going to make the most of every moment.

     

    And, you know, what I will say is that, on the question of deliberations, the President proceeded with the confidence that his security team was able to bring risk to a manageable level, and that was what ultimately led him to make the call to go.

     

    And I am not going to get into the specifics of who said what to him in the Oval, particularly on things as sensitive as his security.  I will just say that he got a full presentation of a very good and very effective operational security plan.  He heard that presentation.  He was satisfied that the risk was manageable.  And he ultimately made the determination (inaudible).

     

    MS. WATSON:  All right.  Thank you so much to everybody for joining the call this morning.  I know that there are more questions.  You have our contact info for follow-up.  And then we will get in touch as soon as possible with more information as well.  The embargo on the call is lifted now.  Thank you very much.

     

    8:01 A.M. EST

     

    ----------------------------------------------------------------

     

    UKR_US1.jpg

    UKR_US10.jpg

    UKR_US2.jpg

    UKR_US3.jpg

    UKR_US4.jpg

    UKR_US5.jpg

    UKR_US6.jpg

    UKR_US7.jpg

    UKR_US8.jpg

    UKR_US9.jpg

    EVAN VUCCI, JOHN LEICESTER and ZEKE MILLER

    Mon, February 20, 2023 at 7:45 AM PST

     

    KYIV, Ukraine (AP) — President Joe Biden’s motorcade slipped out of the White House around 3:30 a.m. Sunday. No big, flashy Air Force One for this trip -– the president vanished into the darkness on an Air Force C-32, a modified Boeing 757 normally used for domestic trips to smaller airports.

     

    The next time he turned up — 20 hours later — it was in downtown Kyiv, Ukraine.

     

    Biden’s surprise visit to Ukraine on Monday was the first time in modern history that a U.S. leader visited a warzone outside the aegis of the U.S. military — a feat the White House said carried some risk even though Moscow was given a heads-up.

     

    Over the next five hours, the president made multiple stops around town — ferried about in a black SUV rather than the presidential limousine — without any announcement to the Ukrainian public that he was there. But all that activity attracted enough attention that word of his presence leaked out well before he could get back to Poland, which was the original plan. Aides at the White House were surprised the secret held as long as it did.

     

    But Russia knew what the Ukrainian public did not. U.S. officials had given Moscow notice of Biden's trip.

     

    The president had been itching since last year to join the parade of other Western officials who have visited Kyiv to pledge support standing shoulder to shoulder with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in the capital.

     

    Biden's planned trip to Warsaw, Poland, and the Presidents' Day holiday provided an obvious opening to tack on a stop in Kyiv. A small group of senior officials at the White House and across U.S. national security agencies set about working in secret for months to make it happen, national security adviser Jake Sullivan said on Monday. Biden only gave the final sign-off on Friday.

     

    Sullivan said the trip “required a security, operational, and logistical effort from professionals across the U.S. government to take what was an inherently risky undertaking and make it a manageable risk.”

     

    Once Biden was secreted aboard the Air Force jet, the call sign “SAM060,” for Special Air Mission, was used for the plane instead of the usual “Air Force One.” It took off from Joint Base Andrews at 4:15 a.m. Eastern time.

     

    After a refueling stop in Germany, Biden’s aircraft switched off its transponder for the roughly hour-long flight to Rzeszow, Poland, the airport that has served as the gateway for billions of dollars in Western arms and VIP visitors into Ukraine.

     

    He arrived in Kyiv at 8 a.m. Monday and was greeted by Ambassador Bridget Brink and entered his motorcade for the drive to Mariinsky Palace. Even while he was on the ground in Ukraine, flights transporting military equipment and other goods were continuing unabated to Rzeszow from Western cities.

     

    Meanwhile, in Kyiv, many main streets and central blocks were cordoned off without explanation. People started sharing videos of long motorcades of cars speeding along streets where access was restricted — the first clues that Biden had arrived.

     

    Biden traveled with a far smaller than usual retinue: Sullivan, deputy chief of staff Jen O’Malley Dillon and the director of Oval Office operations, Annie Tomasini. They were joined by his Secret Service detail, the military aide carrying the so-called “nuclear football,” a small medical team and the official White House photographer.

     

    Only two journalists were on board instead of the usual complement of 13. Their electronic devices were powered off and turned over to the White House for the duration of the trip into Ukraine. A small number of journalists based in Ukraine were summoned to a downtown hotel on Monday morning to join them, not informed that Biden was visiting until shortly before his arrival.

     

    Even with Western surface-to-air missile systems bolstering Ukraine’s defenses, it was rare for a U.S. leader to travel to a conflict zone where the U.S. or its allies did not have control over the airspace.

     

    The U.S. military does not have a presence in Ukraine other than a small detachment of Marines guarding the embassy in Kyiv, making Biden’s visit more complicated than visits by prior U.S. leaders to war zones.

     

    “We did notify the Russians that President Biden will be traveling to Kyiv,” Sullivan told reporters. “We did so some hours before his departure for deconfliction purposes.” He declined to specify the exact message or to whom it was delivered but said the heads-up was to avoid any miscalculation that could bring the two nuclear-armed nations into direct conflict.

     

    While Biden was in Kyiv, U.S. surveillance planes, including E-3 Sentry airborne radar and an electronic RC-135W Rivet Joint aircraft, were keeping watch over Kyiv from Polish airspace.

     

    The sealing off of Kyiv roads that are usually humming with traffic brought an eerie calm to the center of the capital. It was so quiet that crows could be heard cawing as Biden and Zelenskyy walked from their motorcade to the gold-domed St. Michael’s Cathedral under skies as blue as the outer walls of the cathedral itself.

     

    “Let’s walk in and take a look,” Biden said, wearing his trademark aviator sunglasses against the glare. The presidents disappeared inside as heavily armed soldiers stood guard outside.

     

    Cathedral bells chirped at the stroke of 11:30 a.m. followed shortly by air raid alarms, at 11:34 a.m., just before the men reemerged. The sirens were first a distant howl rising over the city, followed seconds later by alarms from mobile phone apps wailing from people’s pockets.

     

    Those alarms are voiced by “Star Wars” actor Mark Hamill, and his Luke Skywalker voice urged people to take cover, warning: “Don’t be careless. Your overconfidence is your weakness.”

     

    The two leaders walked at a measured pace with no outward signs of concern through the cathedral's arched front gate onto the square in front, where the rusting hulks of destroyed Russian tanks and other armored vehicles have been stationed as grim reminders of the war.

     

    When the square isn’t blocked off, as it was during the leaders’ visit, people come to look at the vehicles, many taking selfies.

     

    Biden appeared to pay the hulks no mind as he and Zelenskyy followed behind honor guards carrying two wreaths to the wall of remembrance honoring Ukrainian soldiers killed since 2014, the year Russia annexed Ukraine’s Crimean peninsula and Russian-backed fighting erupted in eastern Ukraine.

     

    It was only then that the first images of Biden in the capital popped up on Ukrainian social media and the secret visit became global news.

     

    The all-clear notice, also voiced by Hamill, sounded at 1:07 p.m., long after Biden had headed to the U.S. Embassy for a brief stop before departing the country.

     

    “The air alert is over," Hamill said. “May the force be with you.”

     

    ___

     

    Associated Press photographer Evan Vucci reported from aboard Biden's aircraft and in Kyiv. Miller reported from Washington. Associated Press writer Aamer Madhani contributed from Washington.

     

 

     

    FEBRUARY 20, 2023

    Statement from President Joe Biden on
    Travel to Kyiv, Ukraine

     

    BRIEFING ROOM

    STATEMENTS AND RELEASES

     

As the world prepares to mark the one-year anniversary of Russia’s brutal invasion of Ukraine, I am in Kyiv today to meet with President Zelenskyy and reaffirm our unwavering and unflagging commitment to Ukraine’s democracy, sovereignty, and territorial integrity.

 

When Putin launched his invasion nearly one year ago, he thought Ukraine was weak and the West was divided. He thought he could outlast us. But he was dead wrong.

 

Today, in Kyiv, I am meeting with President Zelenskyy and his team for an extended discussion on our support for Ukraine. I will announce another delivery of critical equipment, including artillery ammunition, anti-armor systems, and air surveillance radars to help protect the Ukrainian people from aerial bombardments. And I will share that later this week, we will announce additional sanctions against elites and companies that are trying to evade or backfill Russia’s war machine. Over the last year, the United States has built a coalition of nations from the Atlantic to the Pacific to help defend Ukraine with unprecedented military, economic, and humanitarian support – and that support will endure.

 

I also look forward to traveling on to Poland to meet President Duda and the leaders of our Eastern Flank Allies, as well as deliver remarks on how the United States will continue to rally the world to support the people of Ukraine and the core values of human rights and dignity in the UN Charter that unite us worldwide.

 

###

--------------------

 

Kyiv emerged as the most pro-Western region of Ukraine; parties advocating tighter integration with the European Union dominate during elections after the collapse of the Soviet Union and Ukrainian independence in 1991, Kyiv remained Ukraine's capital and experienced a steady influx of ethnic Ukrainian migrants from other regions of the country.  During the country's transformation to a market economy and electoral democracy, Kyiv has continued to be Ukraine's largest and wealthiest city. Its armament-dependent industrial output fell after the Soviet collapse, adversely affecting science and technology, but new sectors of the economy such as services and finance facilitated Kyiv's growth in salaries and investment, as well as providing continuous funding for the development of housing and urban infrastructure.

 

 

 

 

 

     

 

NATO Secretary General pre-ministerial press conference,
13 FEB 2023

NATO Defence Ministers are meeting in Brussels this week (14-15 February 2023) to strengthen the Alliance’s deterrence and defence, and step up and sustain for Ukraine. Previewing the meeting on Monday (13 February 2023), NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg noted the urgency of delivering key capabilities to Ukraine before Russia can seize the initiative on the battlefield.

 

 NATO Secretary General:  Good afternoon.

 

Our thoughts remain with the Turkish people following last week's devastating earthquakes.

Thousands of emergency response personnel from NATO Allies have been supporting the relief efforts. Including with search and rescue teams, firefighters, medical personnel and seismic experts. Moreover, NATO Allies and NATO has agreed to deploy shelter facilities to help accommodate people displaced by the earthquakes.

We stand in strong solidarity with our Ally Türkiye.

 

NATO Defence Ministers will meet this week at an important moment for transatlantic security.

We will take decisions to strengthen NATO’s deterrence and defence.

We will address our industrial capacity, and increase the protection of our critical undersea infrastructure. And we will step up and sustain our support for Ukraine.

 

Almost one year since the invasion, President Putin is not preparing for peace.

He is launching new offensives. So we must continue to provide Ukraine with what it needs to win.

And to achieve a just and sustainable peace.

 

Ukraine’s Defence Minister, Oleksii Reznikov, will join us tomorrow.

Both for the US-led Contact Group for Ukraine and for a meeting with NATO Ministers.

 

Together, we will address Ukraine’s urgent needs. It is clear that we are in a race of logistics.

Key capabilities like ammunition, fuel, and spare parts must reach Ukraine before Russia can seize the initiative on the battlefield. Speed will save lives.

 

If Putin wins in Ukraine, the message to him and other authoritarian regimes is that force is rewarded. That would make the world more dangerous. And all of us more vulnerable.

 

So I welcome the recent announcements by Allies on new tanks, heavy weaponry, and training for Ukraine. And I look forward to further deliveries.

 

Our message is clear. NATO stands with Ukraine. For as long as it takes.

 

Ministers will also address how to step up our practical support for Bosnia and Herzegovina, Georgia and Moldova. Three valued NATO partners, which face Russian threats.

 

On Wednesday, Allies will take decisions to further strengthen our deterrence and defence.

We have already done a lot. Placing 40,000 troops under NATO command in the eastern part of the Alliance. Backed by major air and naval power. And doubling the number of battlegroups from four to eight.

Now we need to ensure we have the right forces and capabilities for the longer-term.

So I expect Allies will agree new guidance for NATO defence planning.

This will be a key driver of capability changes. And ensure credible deterrence and defence in the years to come. Ministers will also focus on ways to increase our defence industrial capacity and replenish stockpiles. The war in Ukraine is consuming an enormous amount of munitions, and depleting Allied stockpiles.

The current rate of Ukraine’s ammunition expenditure is many times higher than our current rate of production. This puts our defence industries under strain. For example, the waiting time for large-calibre ammunition has increased from 12 to 28 months. Orders placed today would only be delivered two-and-a-half years later.

 

So we need to ramp up production. And invest in our production capacity. NATO has just completed an extraordinary survey of our munitions stockpiles. And we plan to increase our targets for munitions stockpiles through the NATO Defence Planning Process. The good news is that several Allies, including the United States and France, have already signed new multi-year contracts with the defence industry. Enabling them to invest in increased production capacity. I look forward to further progress. This is essential to ensure we can keep supporting Ukraine, while protecting every inch of Allied territory.

 

More details are available via

https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_211689.htm

 

     

 

Secretary Antony J. Blinken And NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg At a Joint Press Availability

REMARKS

ANTONY J. BLINKEN, SECRETARY OF STATE

BENJAMIN FRANKLIN ROOM 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

FEBRUARY 8, 2023

SECRETARY BLINKEN:  Good afternoon, everyone.  It is as always a great pleasure to welcome the secretary general back to Washington, back to the State Department.  Jens, so good to be with you.

 

Before I begin and with your permission, I just want to briefly update everyone on our efforts to assist Türkiye and Syria in the aftermath of Monday’s earthquakes.  The loss of life has been truly staggering, shocking.  We, I think along with people around the world, are mourning those who have been lost, and also our thoughts are so with those who have lost loved ones.

 

So far, we have deployed more than 150 search and rescue personnel to Türkiye.  We have U.S. helicopters that are helping to reach areas that would otherwise be difficult to access.  In Syria, we have NGO partners that we’ve funded over the years that are providing life-saving assistance to those in need.  Across both countries, we’ve deployed experienced emergency managers, hazardous materials technicians, engineers, logisticians, paramedics, planners, others, along with about 170,000 pounds of specialized tools and equipment.

 

So, that’s been the initial response.  In the days ahead, we’ll have more to say about how we’ll continue to support both the Turkish and Syrian people as they work to recover from this devastation.

 

Turning back to today, the secretary general and I were last together in November for the NATO foreign ministers meeting.  The members of our Alliance left that meeting in Bucharest even more unified, more resolute and more committed in our support for Ukraine; which is in large part due to the remarkable leadership that Secretary General Stoltenberg has engaged in over the last year.  During what has been a decisive time for NATO and for the world, his strong and steady hand has helped steer our Alliance in the right direction.

 

Now, as we approach the one-year mark since President Putin launched his brutal war against Ukraine, it’s critical that we maintain and increase that support.  President Putin’s war continues to be a strategic failure.  He’s failed to overthrow the democratically elected government of Ukraine, to subsume Ukraine into Russia, or to break the will of its people.  He’s lost the battles for Kyiv, for Kharkiv, for Kherson.  His military is suffering staggering losses on the battlefield, and he’s failed to weaken our Alliance and what it stands for.  In fact, that alliance – NATO – is stronger and more united than it’s ever been.

 

Today, we focused on steps that we can take to ensure that Ukraine has the security assistance that it needs to defend its territory against Russian aggression.  And we’ll continue that conversation this afternoon when we’re joined by the Secretary of Defense, Lloyd Austin, and the National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan, here at the State Department.

 

We’ve calibrated our assistance to meet Ukraine’s changing needs from the outset of the Russian invasion, and that’s exactly what we’ll continue to do.  Two weeks ago, President Biden announced that the United States would send Abrams tanks to Ukraine.  Germany committed to send its Leopard tanks and authorized other partners to do the same.  This followed the earlier announcement by the United Kingdom that it would be sending Challenger 2 tanks to Ukraine’s defenders.

 

Last week, we also announced two new assistance packages which will provide critical air defense and counter-drone capabilities to help Ukraine defend its people, including against the threat posed by UAVs supplied by Iran, which shares Russia’s authoritarian vision and is increasingly aiding and abetting its aggression.  We’re also providing armored infantry vehicles and more of the equipment that Ukraine is using so effectively, like Javelin anti-tank missiles, artillery ammunition, and rockets for U.S.-provided HIMARS.

 

In total, the United States has committed nearly $30 billion since the beginning of Russia’s invasion.  And our allies and partners have provided more than $13 billion in military assistance over the past year and tens of billions more in humanitarian and economic support.  The contributions that Europe writ large has made to this effort are very significant, and making a profound difference.

 

As President Zelenskyy has said, diplomacy is the only way to definitively end Russia’s war of aggression and to create a path to peace that is both just and durable.  Clearly, President Putin has no genuine interest in diplomacy right now.  Here’s what he said just a few weeks ago:  Unless and until Ukraine accepts “the new territorial realities” – in quotation marks – there is nothing to even talk about.  In other words, Ukraine and the world must somehow acquiesce to President Putin’s land grab.  That should be a non-starter for every country in the world that cares about the UN charter, and preserving international peace and security.

 

The best way to hasten prospects for real diplomacy is to keep tilting the battlefield in Ukraine’s favor.  This will help ensure that Ukraine has the strongest possible hand to play at a negotiating table when one emerges.

 

We also discussed the systemic and tactical challenges that China presents to the Alliance and the broader international system.  Last week, Beijing violated international law and U.S. sovereignty with the presence of a Chinese surveillance balloon in U.S. airspace.  This was an irresponsible act, in response to which we acted responsibly and prudently to protect our interests.

 

There is an ongoing operation to recover the balloon’s components.  We’re analyzing them to learn more about the surveillance program.  We will pair that with what we learn from the balloon – what we learn from the balloon itself with what we’ve gleaned based on our careful observation of the system when it was in our airspace, as the President directed his team to do.

 

We’ll also share relevant findings with Congress as well as with our allies and partners around the world.  Senior administration officials are on the Hill this week, and we’ve already shared information with dozens of countries around the world both from Washington and through our embassies.  We’re doing so because the United States was not the only target of this broader program which has violated the sovereignty of countries across five continents.  In our engagements, we are again hearing from our partners that the world expects China and the United States to manage our relationship responsibly.  That’s precisely what we’ve set out to do.  We continue to urge China to do the same.

 

We’re also continuing to strengthen and broaden NATO’s partnerships, and weave them together in new ways.  The United States welcomed the Secretary General’s visit to South Korea and Japan last week as an extension of those efforts, demonstrating the growing synergy between our Atlantic and Pacific alliances.  And of course, we’re very focused on the accession of Sweden and Finland to NATO.  These countries are ready to bring their strengths to bear on our Alliance.  They’re capable, they’re trusted partners, they’re strong democracies that are dedicated to the values that underpin the Alliance.  We’ll continue to push for the completion of this process as we head towards the Vilnius Summit in July.

 

And as we look to Vilnius, our Alliance is working to operationalize the strategic concept to make sure that NATO is fit for the future, including on challenges like emerging technologies, cyber defense, climate, and energy security.  These were all significant achievements under the leadership of Secretary General Stoltenberg in bringing forward and having approved a new strategic concept for the Alliance to reflect the realities of the moment we’re living in and to project what we need to do into the future.

 

So, it’s a busy time, but we’re confident about what our Alliance could achieve – confident because of the great unity that we’ve shown again and again over the last year, and confident because of the shared purpose we bring to the year and the years ahead.

 

With that, Jens, over to you.

 

SECRETARY GENERAL STOLTENBERG:  Secretary Blinken, dear Tony, it’s great to be back in Washington and to be together with you again.  I would like to start by commending President Biden and the United States for providing such a strong leadership at a time when we face the most serious security crisis in a generation.  And thank you, Tony, for your personal commitment and your leadership on every issue related to NATO and the vital bond between America and Europe.  Unwavering American leadership and bipartisan support have ensured that NATO Allies are united like never before.  And our unity makes a real difference.

 

President Putin launched his illegal war of aggression almost a year ago.  Since then, NATO Allies have provided unprecedented support for Ukraine – around $120 billion in military, humanitarian and financial assistance.  As the biggest Ally, the United States is playing an indispensable role in supporting Ukraine.  European NATO Allies and Canada have stepped up as well, contributing over half of the overall assistance, including tanks, advanced air defense systems, and other military equipment.  Europeans have also welcomed almost 5 million refugees from Ukraine, applied unprecedented sanctions, and decoupled from Russian gas and Russian oil.  This shows how much we can do when Europe and North American stand together.

 

Today, we discussed the situation in Ukraine.  Putin started this war of aggression, and he can end this war today by withdrawing his troops from Ukraine and coming to the negotiating table.  But regrettably, we see no sign that Russia is preparing for peace.  On the contrary, Moscow is preparing for new military offensives, so we must continue to provide Ukraine with the weapons it needs to retake territory and prevail as a sovereign, independent nation.

 

If Putin wins, it will be a tragedy for Ukraine, but it will also be dangerous for all of us.  It will send a clear message not just to Putin but also to other authoritarian regimes that when they use force, they can achieve their goals.  That will make the world more dangerous, and all of us more vulnerable.

 

Beijing is watching closely and learning lessons that may influence its future decisions.  So, what happens in Europe today could happen in Asia tomorrow.  China is substantially building up its military forces, including nuclear weapons without any transparency.  It is attempting to assert control over the South China Sea and threatening Taiwan, trying to take control of critical infrastructure, including in NATO countries, repressing its own citizens and tramping on human rights, and deepening its strategic partnership with Moscow.  So, NATO Allies had real concerns which we discussed today.

 

In this more dangerous and more competitive world, we must continue to strengthen our deterrence and defense, and further increase defense spending; and that is what we are doing.  In 2014, under the Obama-Biden administration, all NATO Allies agreed the Defense Investment Pledge.  Since then, we have seen eight consecutive years of increased defense spending across Europe and Canada – with an additional 350 million extra U.S. dollars spent. [1]  More countries are now spending at least 2 percent of GDP on defense, and I expect that trend to continue.

 

Today, we also discussed the importance of completing Finland and Sweden’s accession to NATO.  At the Madrid Summit, last July, all Allies made the historic decision to invite both countries to join NATO.  All Allies have signed the accession protocols, and 28 Allies have already ratified the agreement.  Finland and Sweden are now being integrated into the civilian and military structures of our Alliance.  This has only strengthened their security, and it is inconceivable that Allies would not act should Finland or Sweden come under pressure.  It is important that we conclude this membership process as soon as possible.  This will strengthen the security of all Allies.

 

So Secretary Blinken, dear Tony, thank you again for your strong personal commitment and for the extraordinary leadership of the United States as we face global challenges together.  Thank you.

 

MR PRICE:  We’ll now turn to questions.  We will start with Leon Bruneau of the AFP.

 

QUESTION:  Hi there, Mr. Secretary and Secretary General.  Thanks for doing this.  Mr. Secretary, you started the press conference speaking about the tragic earthquake in Türkiye and Syria, and actually that’s – my question is relevant to that.  Specifically, as you know, there’s – in one border crossing in the northwest of Syria, which is damaged by the earthquake and there are no other crossings, and so obviously it’s going to be difficult to get the aid there.  And you also said that – you were adamant in saying that all U.S. aid would go through local NGOs, U.S.-funded local NGOs.

 

And so, my question is this, is I was wondering if the administration has had any contact at any level with the Syrian Government?  And if there were a request through the Syrian Government, would the U.S., the administration, accede to that request to coordinate aid for the Syrian people?

 

And a question for the secretary general.  Since Türkiye is obviously a NATO member, could you provide us some detail on what NATO is actually doing to help the recovery efforts in Türkiye?  And also, tragically, would this tragedy in any way help to ease tensions with Türkiye on relevant issues that you mentioned on your agenda?  Thank you very much.

 

SECRETARY BLINKEN:  Leon, thank you very much.  With regard to Syria, I’m not aware of any contacts between the United States Government and the Syrian Government in recent days since the earthquake.  But here’s what we’ve been doing.  If you go back to 2011, we provided more than $15 billion in assistance to the Syrian people through NGO partners – international NGO partners, partners on the ground in Syria.  We’re a leading provider of humanitarian assistance to Syria, to the Syrian people, not to the government.  And working through these partners, we’ve tried to make sure that the assistance gets to where it’s needed, and that’s the people who are affected by the horrific war that Assad has waged on his own people, since 2011 – and now, in the case of the earthquake, to people affected by the earthquake.

 

You’re exactly right that there is one crossing that allows assistance to get into Syria from the outside, and that was disrupted by the earthquake.  It’s exactly why we have been fighting every single year not only to preserve that crossing at the – it’s authorized, as you know, by the United Nations – but to get additional ones so that if a crossing was taken out of action, there would be other places that people could get humanitarian assistance in.  And of course, year after year, Russia has sought to block those crossings or to limit them, and that only compounds the tragedy that people in Syria are now experiencing.

 

SECRETARY GENERAL STOLTENBERG:  Just a couple of hours after the earthquake, we sent out a call from the NATO headquarters to all NATO Allies to provide immediate support, to help Türkiye with the consequence of a devastating earthquake.  And I welcome that Allies have stepped up and are now providing different types of support.  Of course, the U.S., Secretary Blinken mentioned, has already provided lot of support, but also other Allies are stepping up.  And that’s the continued message from NATO, is that we should support Türkiye, a valued and important NATO Ally, where we see human suffering and the devastating consequences of the earthquake.

 

And of course, Allies have also expressed their deepest condolences, and it is heartbreaking to see all the suffering, but also to see how people and Allies are now stepping up to provide as much help as possible.

 

MR PRICE:  Tove Bjørgaas, NRK.

 

QUESTION:  Question for Secretary Blinken.  How important is it for the Biden administration that Sweden is also allowed to join NATO, not just Finland?  And what is the U.S. doing to solve this argument with Erdogan and Türkiye?  What – how can the U.S. influence that Türkiye changes its position?

 

SECRETARY BLINKEN:  Thank you.  Well, first, this is not a bilateral issue between the United States and any other country.  This is an Alliance matter, and our view is very clear:  Both Finland and Sweden are ready to be NATO Allies, and the Alliance should welcome them as quickly as possible.  Their militaries already work seamlessly with Alliance forces.  As I said earlier, they’re strong, vibrant democracies.  We’re confident that NATO will formally welcome both countries, and that that will happen soon – and this will in turn enhance security across the entire Euro-Atlantic region.

 

As this process continues, we are fully committed to Finland and Sweden’s accession to the Alliance.  And again, I think you can see the strength of that support across the Alliance.  Nearly all countries took swift action.  Our Senate overwhelmingly, and on a bipartisan basis, voted for their membership, and the time is right now to finalize that accession process and to welcome as full members of NATO.

 

We support the work that both countries have been doing with Türkiye to address legitimate concerns that Türkiye has brought to the table about its security.  There’s an ongoing process there, but – as you know, both countries, Finland and Sweden, took significant steps to address concerns that Türkiye raised.  They made commitments under a memorandum of agreement that was signed in Madrid, and they are making good on the commitments that they’ve made.  Again, we acknowledge Türkiye’s longtime security concerns.  We appreciate the tangible actions that both countries, Finland and Sweden, have taken to address them.

 

MR PRICE:  Nick Schifrin of PBS.

 

QUESTION:  Thank you very much.  Mr. Secretary, forgive me, two questions for you, and then I’ll turn to the secretary general.

 

Today the British prime minister announced that the UK would provide fighter jet training, Western fighter jet training, to Ukrainian pilots and would examine the possibility of providing Western jets to Ukraine.  Why does the U.S. continue to oppose a step that the British Government now believes would be helpful to Ukraine long-term?

 

And on the balloon, you’ve described now the network of aerial surveillance conducted by China in five continents.  Do you believe that that network is run by the PLA air force, and do you believe Xi Jinping himself was aware of the balloon last week?

 

And Mr. Secretary General, U.S. officials have described that Chinese surveillance balloons have flown over at least one European country.  Is that something that NATO is aware of and are you concerned about?  Thank you.

 

SECRETARY BLINKEN:  Thanks, Nick, very much.  So first of all, with regard to the balloon, we will have more to say about that in the days ahead.  We are getting more information almost by the hour as we continue to work to salvage the balloon.  We’re learning from that, and, as well, we’re learning from what we saw and picked up as the balloon traversed the United States.

 

As to who’s responsible for that, China is, and it doesn’t matter on one level which individuals may or may not have been responsible.  The fact is China engaged in this irresponsible action, a violation of our sovereignty and territorial integrity and international law.  And as we’ve noted as well, we’re not alone in this.  Countries across five continents have also had surveillance balloons overfly their territory, which is why we’re sharing this information with others.  We continue to look to China to act responsibly; and as well to help us in managing this relationship responsibly.  That’s what we continue to look for.

 

And I’m sorry, the first part of your question —

 

QUESTION:  Fighter jets.

 

SECRETARY BLINKEN:  Oh, the fighter jets.  As we’ve said throughout this process, at every single turn, we will – working very closely with the Ukrainians as well as working with other partners and allies – work to make sure that Ukraine has what it needs when it needs it to effectively defend itself and to continue to take back the territory that’s been seized from it by Russian forces.  As the nature of the conflict, of the aggression has evolved, so too has the support that we’ve provided.

 

And what we did initially – in fact, before the Russian aggression itself, as we saw it coming and wanted to make sure that Ukraine had in its hands what it would need to defend itself – we did these very significant drawdowns a year – more – well more than a year – a year and a half ago, back in September before the aggression – Christmas before the aggression.  And as a result, they had things like Stingers and Javelins on hand when Russia went at Kyiv, and they were able to repel the attack and push it back.  At every step along the way, as needs have evolved, so too has what we have provided Ukraine; and that most recently took place with the decision to provide the Abrams tanks and – of course, Germany providing the Leopard tanks and other Europeans doing the same.

 

We’ve also been very clear all along that what’s vital is not just a particular weapon system or piece of equipment.  Equally important is the ability of Ukrainians to use it effectively, and that requires in some cases significant training.  Equally important is the ability to maintain it.  And then finally all of that has to be brought together in an actually – in a coherent strategy.  All of those elements are important.

 

It’s a long way of saying this is an evolving process, and we will continue to make judgments about what we think Ukraine needs and what it can be most effective in using.  We’ll do that in very close consultation with the Ukrainians and, of course, in consultation with our partners.

 

SECRETARY GENERAL STOLTENBERG:  The Chinese balloon over United States confirms a pattern of Chinese behavior, where we see that China over the last years has invested heavily in new military capabilities, including different types of surveillance and intelligence platforms.  And we’ve also seen increased Chinese intelligence activities in Europe – again, different platforms.  They use satellites, they use cyber, and as we’ve seen over the United States, also balloons.

 

So, we just have to be vigilant.  We need to be aware of the constant risk of Chinese intelligence, and then step up what we do to protect ourself.  And we need also to react in a prudent, responsible, and vigilant way, as we have seen the United States has reacted to this specific balloon over North America and United States.

 

I think it also highlights that security is not regional; security is global.  What happens in Asia matters for Europe, and what happens in Europe matters for Asia and also, of course, for North America.  This was a message that was very much confirmed during my visit to Japan and South Korea – East Asia – last week, where those close partners of NATO very much highlighted the importance of strengthening the cooperation between NATO and our partners in the Indo-Pacific to address the challenges that China poses to our security, to our values, and to our interests.  And I think that is – the balloon over North America just confirms that pattern.

 

MR PRICE:  We’ll take a final question from Karin Eriksson of ND.[1]

 

QUESTION:  Thank you very much.  So back to Türkiye, then, because Türkiye is now sending the signal that it might accept Finland but not Sweden into NATO, separating the processes.  I wanted to ask you both:  To what extent do you see this as a possible or viable path forward? Thank you.

 

SECRETARY GENERAL STOLTENBERG:  First of all, I think we have to remember that all Allies, also Türkiye, made an historic decision in July last year when all Allies at the NATO summit in Madrid invited both Finland and Sweden to become members of the Alliance.  Then all Allies – all 30 Allies – signed the Accession Protocols.  And so far – already, 28 out of 30 Allies have ratified the Accession Protocols.

 

These are historic decisions.  And so far, this has been one of the quickest accessions processes in NATO’s history and the quickest in NATO’s modern history, because we have to remember that Finland and Sweden applied in May last year, and only in July they were invited, and now 28 out of 30 have ratified the protocols.  They applied together, they were invited together, and 28 Allies have already signed both protocols.

 

I think it’s important that we recognize the importance both for Finland and Sweden, but also for the whole Alliance, that they become a member – that they will become members as quickly as possible.  As part of the decision in Madrid, Finland, Sweden, and Türkiye signed a joint memorandum on how to step up cooperation – not least in the fight against terrorism.  Finland and Sweden have delivered on their commitments under that memorandum.  I also expressed that view in my meetings with the Turkish leadership.  So, I’m confident that both will become a member, but I’m not ready to go into exactly when that will happen.

 

SECRETARY BLINKEN:  What he said.

 

MR PRICE:  Thank you, gentlemen.

 

SECRETARY BLINKEN:  Thank you.

 

Footnote:

 

[1]Correction: An additional $350 billion since 2014

 

 

     

M1A2a.jpg

M1A2Aaa.jpg

M1A2b.jpg

M1A2c.jpg

M1A2d.jpg

M1A2e.jpg

M1A2f.jpg

M1A2g.jpg

M1A2h.jpg

M1A2i.jpg

M1A2j.jpg

M1A2k.jpg

M1A2l.jpg

M1A2m.jpg

M1A2o.jpg

M1A2p.jpg

M1A2q.jpg

M1A2r.jpg

M1A2s.jpg

M1A2t.jpg

M1A2u.jpg

M1A2v.jpg

M1A2w.jpg

M1A2x.jpg

M1A2y.jpg

M1A2z.jpg

M1A2zz.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

January 26, 2023    

 

Readout of Inaugural Meeting of Ukraine Donor Coordination
Platform Steering Committee

 

Briefing Room  

Statements and Releases  

Today, Deputy National Security Advisor for International Economics Mike Pyle co-chaired the inaugural meeting of the Ukraine Multi-agency Donor Coordination Platform’s Steering Committee, delivering on G7 Leaders’ December 2022 commitment and exemplifying the Biden-Harris Administration’s unwavering support for Ukraine. Representatives from G7 countries, the Government of Ukraine, and the international financial institutions discussed how to better coordinate economic support for Ukraine’s immediate financing needs and future economic recovery and reconstruction efforts. They committed to work closely with Ukrainian authorities to define, prioritize, and sequence strategic economic needs; to further Ukraine’s reform ambitions; and to deliver economic assistance to stabilize Ukraine’s economy and underpin a sustainable and inclusive recovery. Pyle commended the Government of Ukraine’s adept management of its economy, despite incredibly difficult circumstances, and its vision for a broad-based economic reform agenda. He welcomed opening remarks from the Prime Minister of Ukraine, Denys Shmyhal, and appreciated working with his co-chairs, Finance Minister of Ukraine, Sergii Marchenko, and the European Commission Director General for Neighbourhood and Enlargement, Gert Jan Koopman, and in close consultation with Japan in its G7 Presidency role. Collaboration will continue in the coming weeks, and the Steering Committee will hold its next meeting in March.

--------------------------------------------------.

 

Russian invasion of Ukraine Time line:  From November 2022 to January 26th, 2023

14 November

The United Nations General Assembly has passed a resolution that holds Russia responsible for all damage caused to Ukraine by the invasion and demands reparations.

 

15 November

See also: October–November 2022 nationwide missile strikes on Ukraine

 

Fire after strike on an infrastructure facility in Kyiv Oblast

Russia launched about 85 to 100 missiles at a number of Ukrainian cities. The recent strategic bombing campaign has caused severe shortages of electricity and water at multiple cities.  According to the Ukrainian Air Force some 77 of 96 Russian missiles were shot down. A Pentagon official claims the Russian plan is to exhaust the Ukrainian air defences. At one stage some 50 missiles were in combat "within minutes" near the Polish border.

 

A missile crossed over Polish borders and struck the village of Przewodów, killing two civilians. Top leaders in Poland held an emergency meeting. Initial assessments by the United States found that the missile was likely to have been an air defence missile fired by Ukrainian forces at an incoming Russian missile.

 

According to Ukraine's Operational Command South, Ukrainian rocket and artillery units attacked Russian positions on the left bank of the Dnipro River and in the area of the Kinburn Spit.

 

17 November

After the missile strikes, more than 10 million people were without power by 17 November, but a day later Ukrainian officials reported that electricity had already been restored to "nearly 100%" of Ukraine.

 

According to Ukrainian officials, one of the wrecks of missiles found after a missile attack earlier that day is that of an "X-55/Kh-55" cruise missile. These missiles are apparently incapable of carrying a conventional warhead, but this specific missile had an "imitation block" (model for training) of a nuclear bomb. They believe that the missile was meant to help overwhelm Ukraine's missile defenses.

 

20 November

New Zealand Defence Minister Peeni Henare became the first NZ minister to visit Kyiv. He has indicated that New Zealand is prepared to consider more aid.[16]

 

23 November

 

Hospital in Vilniansk after missile strike on 23 November

The European Parliament declared Russia a "state sponsor of terrorism" for the way Russia has systematically attacked civilians and committed war crimes. This declaration is itself symbolic, but calls for more sanctions.

 

The Russian military has launched 65 to 70 missiles at civilian settlements and energy infrastructure, although 51 of those were said to have been shot down. The attack caused blackouts over much of Ukraine and forced several nuclear power plants to shut down. Much of Moldova was also experiencing blackouts due to the attack-related power grid failure in Ukraine.

 

25 November

According to U.S. and Ukrainian officials, about 1/3 of Western-supplied artillery is always out of action in Ukraine due to wear-related mechanical problems. The United States European Command is said to have a repair base in Poland, but it is problematic to transport the weapons there from the front.

 

28 November

The Russian army was actively pushing on both sides of Bakhmut, a city in the immediate vicinity of the front on the Ukrainian side. The Russians were trying to encircle the town, but according to observers, they were making very slow progress, so there was no immediate danger to the settlement and the Russians might not be able to encircle it at the current rate.

 

29 November

Jens Stoltenberg, the Secretary-General of NATO, made a speech at the meeting of NATO foreign ministers at Bucharest, in which he expressed alliance commitment to support Ukraine for as long as is required, because allowing Russia to win would only embolden Putin.[26] He also promised Ukraine that NATO would one day accept them as a member and that Putin cannot deny sovereign nations the right to make their own sovereign decisions that are not a threat to Russia. He also speculated that the main challenges to Putin are democracy and freedom.

 

30 November

Ursula von der Leyen, president of the European Commission, speaking in the name of the EU, suggested the creation of a UN court to investigate war crimes committed by Russia. Russia does not recognize the International Criminal Court, so the European Commission has proposed two possible alternative ways to hold Russia accountable: either to create a court that would be set up by international treaties, or to create an international court with a number of judges from several countries. She estimated the war-damage to Ukraine is about 600 billion Euros. She proposed a financial plan to help pay for this. She pointed out that the EU has frozen 300 billion Euros worth of Russian central bank reserves and 20 billion Euros worth of money belonging to Russias oligarchs, which she suggested should be invested. The investments could be given to Ukraine when sanctions are lifted. The original statement by Ursula von der Leyen included a claim that 100,000 Ukrainian soldiers and 20,000 Ukrainian civilians have been killed so far in the war. This angered unspecified Ukrainian military officials, who are reported to have said that the death toll is classified information. In response, the European Commission edited the video of von der Leyen's speech to remove this information. Official publications of the text of the speech was also edited to omit the numbers.

 

December 2022

2 December

Ukrainian Presidential Advisor Mykhailo Podolyak claims that 10–13,000 Ukrainian soldiers have been killed since 24 February, with a figure last given in August of 9,000.[34]

 

5 December

Explosions were reported at two Russian airbases: the one at Engels-2 reportedly damaged two Tu-95s according to Baza; the other at the Dyagilevo military airbase near Ryazan, destroyed a fuel truck and killed three, injuring five. Russian Minisitry of Defence stated Ukraine attempted to strike Russia's long-range aviation bombers with Soviet-made jet drones, and that the drones were subsequently shot down at low altitude when approaching the air bases. The attack involved the use of Tu-141 drones that were taken out of storage. They appear to have been fitted with improvised explosives. While no significant damage or burn marks are visible on satellite images of the Engels-2 air base, at least one Tu-22M3 bomber was visually confirmed to be slightly damaged at the Dyagilevo air base.

 

Following the attacks, Russia launched a renewed wave of missile strikes against Ukraine, consisting of about 70 cruise misilles. Ukraine claimed 60 missiles have been shot down, Russia claimed 17 targets have been hit on the ground.  As a result, a missile fell again within the borders of Moldova, near the city of Briceni.

6 December

The Russian governor of Kursk, Roman Starovoyt, claimed that a Ukrainian drone attack destroyed an oil tank near an airbase. No reports of casualties and the fire was under control. No comment from Ukraine on these claims.

 

7 December

Gathered remains of Russian Uragan, Smerch, and S-300 rockets in Kharkiv. 52,000 explosive objects were disposed as of in the Kharkiv region as of 7 December 2022.

President Putin has acknowledged that the "special military operation" is taking longer than expected, however the Russian nuclear arsenal is preventing the conflict from escalating. As in June 2022, he made another reference to the expansion of the Russian Empire by Peter the Great.

 

9 December

Putin revealed that he is considering adopting the concept of the "preemptive strike" from the U.S. According to him, the U.S. openly discussed this policy some years ago, but currently Russia is only just thinking about it. A few hours after Putin's statement, Jens Stoltenberg, general secretary of NATO, warned that there's a real possibility of a major war between Russia and NATO.

 

Russia re-occupied the previously liberated Dnieper river island of Ostriv Velykyi Potomkin close to Kherson. This was confirmed by presidential advisor Oleksii Arestovych and Lieutenant Colonel Konstiantyn Mashovets, as well as some unofficial Russian sources. The General Staff of the Ukrainian Armed Forces claimed on 15 December that Russia had begun the process of forcibly deporting the island's civilian residents.

 

10 December

Russia used Iranian-made drones to hit two energy facilities in Odesa, leaving all non-critical infrastructure in the Ukrainian port without power and 1.5 million people without electricity.

 

Ukraine launched a missile attack on the Russian-occupied city of Melitopol including at a Russian military barracks; according to Melitopol's Russia-installed administrators, four missiles hit the city, killing two people. In addition, explosions were reported in Donetsk and Crimea.

 

11 December

Ukraine President Zelenskyy said that Russian forces have turned the city of Bakhmut into "burned ruins".

 

12 December

President Zelenskyy appealed to the G7 for tanks, artillery and long range weapons. In response, the G7 pledged to meet Ukraine's requirements.

 

Luhansk's exiled Governor Serhiy Haidai claimed that Ukraine's armed forces killed personnel from the Wagner Group, a private military company in the Luhansk Region.

 

The UK sanctioned Russian military commanders for missile attacks and Iranian businessmen for the production and supply of military drones. EU sanctioned 20 individuals and one entity of Iran over human rights abuse. Ministers of the European Union of Foreign Affairs have also claimed that they have proofs to support Iran supplying Shahed-136 drones to Russia despite denials from both countries.

 

13 December

Robert Magowan, a British lieutenant general and former commander of the Royal Marines, revealed that the Royal Marines have several times been involved in "secret operations" in Ukraine, in "extremely sensitive context", involving "a high level of political and military risk".

 

Denis Pushilin, Acting head of Donetsk's People of Republic claimed that half of the Donetsk region is under Russian control.

 

14 December

Three explosions were heard in the centre of Kyiv; President Zelenskyy claimed that Ukrainian air defence forces shot down 13 Iranian Shahed drones.

 

Reports emerged that U.S. officials were finalising and preparing to announce a plan to provide Ukraine with the sophisticated Patriot air defence system, agreeing to an urgent request from Ukrainian leaders amid increasing Russian missile attacks against Ukraine's infrastructure. Biden administration was reluctant to deploy the system for months, as a Patriot battery complex would need at least 90 trained troops to operate and maintain it, along with concerns that it would provoke Russia to escalate.

Ukrainian Parliament Commissioner for Human Rights Dmytro Lubinets claimed that a children's torture chamber had been uncovered in Kherson.

 

Andrii Yermak, Chief of Staff of the Office of the President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelenskyy, stated that they have released around 64 military personnel and a US Citizen during a prisoner swap deal with Russia.

 

15 December

Zelenskyy stated that Russia should start to withdraw their troops by Christmas as a step to end the conflict. Russia responded "No Christmas Ceasefire" until Ukraine accepts loss of territory.

 

The Kyiv School of Economics published a report estimating that, as of November 2022, Russia's invasion had caused $136 billion in direct damage to Ukraine's infrastructure. Energy infrastructure, industry, public, and private enterprises were impacted the most.

 

USAID delivered four excavators and over 130 generators to Kyiv for use in "boiler houses and heat supply stations" according to mayor Vitali Klitschko.

 

The recently liberated city of Kherson was entirely without power following recent Russian shelling, which killed at least two people. The Kherson military administration stated that the city was hit 86 times with "artillery, MLRS, tanks, mortars and UAVs," in the past 24 hours.

 

In the Donbas, Ukrainian forces bombarded Donetsk city in the largest wave of shelling seen since 2014, according to mayor Alexey Kulemzin.

 

Volker Türk, the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, published a detailed summary of 441 killings including 8 girls during the conflict.

 

United States had expanded its training to 500 Ukrainians each month at Germany.

 

16 December

 

Civilians shelter in the Kyiv Metro during a Russian missile attack, 16 December

Russia launched around 76 missiles on Kyiv, Kharkiv, Poltava, and Kremenchuk, destroying infrastructure. Reports suggest at least four were killed in Kryvyi Rih.[78][79][80] These 76 missiles were fired at 9 power plants; Ukraine claims 60 were intercepted.

 

A Ukrainian strike on the village of Lantrativka, in Luhansk Oblast, officially kills 11 Russian trench diggers, but eyewitnesses claim the number is 84 killed.

 

17 December

Missiles were launched targeting infrastructure on Kyiv, Kharkiv, Kryvyi Rih and Zaporhizhzhia. Kyiv council member Ksenia Semenova stated that approximately 60% of residents were without power and 70% were without water.[83] Ukraine restored power and water to approximately 6 million residents in 24 hours.  37 out of the 40 missiles fired at Kyiv were intercepted.

Russia started a new campaign on TV to recruit more soldiers. In one advertisement, some men leave for Georgia. An old woman drops her groceries and men who have not left help her pick them up. She then says: "The boys have left, the men stayed."

 

18 December

The Russian government recruited musicians to boost morale. The so-called "front-line creative brigade" will be made up from mobilised soldiers and musicians who have volunteered.

 

19 December

 

Building of Kherson Oblast State Administration after Russian strike on 19 December

According to Ukrainian Air Force, Russia attacked Ukraine's infrastructure with 35 Iranian kamikaze drones, 30 of which are said to be shot down. 23 of the drones attacked Kyiv (according to the city officials, 18 of them were shot down). An infrastructure facility was damaged, leaving three areas in Kyiv without power supply.[88] Energy shortages caused interruptions in heat and water supply. Mykolaiv and Kherson regions were also attacked.[91] Building of Kherson Oblast State Administration was partially destroyed.

 

20 December

President Putin stated that the situation is "extremely difficult" in the four areas of Russia-annexed Ukraine. Putin ordered the Federal Security Services to step up surveillance at the country's borders to combat "emergence of new threats" from abroad and traitors.

 

President Zelenskyy visited the Bakhmut region.

 

Russian energy exporter Gazprom said that despite a fatal explosion at the Urengoy–Pomary–Uzhhorod pipeline they were able to supply gas to their customers using parallel pipelines without any shortages.

 

21 December

The United States is aiming to provide military aid of $1.8 billion USD including the Patriot missile system.

 

Ukraine President Zelenskyy met United States President Biden during his 2022 visit and addressed a joint session of the US Congress after Speaker of the house Nancy Pelosi invited President Zelenskyy.

 

22 December

United States National Security Council spokesperson John Kirby estimated that the Wagner Group deployed 40,000 mercenaries of recruited convicts and 10,000 mercenaries of contractors. The North Korean Foreign ministry denied US claims that it was supplying "infantry rockets and missiles into Russia".

 

Speaking to reporters, President Putin referred to the conflict in Ukraine as a "war" and also said that the U.S. Patriot system is "old and does not work as well as the Russian S-300 missile system". Critics stated that referring to the conflict as a "war" is considered a crime under a censorship law signed in March 2022, with a penalty of up to 15 years in prison, and called for the prosecution of President Putin.

 

Ukrainian game developer Volodymyr Yezhov is killed defending Bakhmut

 

23 December

The Netherlands pledged up to 2.5 billion euros to help Ukraine in 2023. This aid will pay for military equipment and rebuilding critical infrastructure. President Zelenskyy thanked them for this pledge.

 

24 December

 

Kherson after the shelling

Russian forces shelled Kherson leaving 10 dead and 55 injured according to the Ukrainian President and officials.  President Zelenskyy stated that the shelling first hit a department store and then a market.

The Russian army has placed three battalions near the Ukraine border, inside Belarus. The Ukrainian military has made note of this and considered further securing the northern border.

 

Pavel Antov, a Russian billionaire and member of the United Russia party for a regional parliament, has died after a fall from a hotel in India. Describe as a "sausage magnate", Antov is about the 12th high-profile Russian businessman to have died due to suicide or an accident. Having previously made anti-war comments on WhatsApp, he claimed it was due to a "technical error". Another Russian, and friend of Antov's, Vladimir Budanov also died at the same hotel just two days before.

 

25 December

President Putin stated that Russia is ready for negotiation, but that Kyiv and its Western backers refused to engage in talks.[113] Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdoğan accused the West of only provoking the war in Ukraine, rather than mediating it. Erdogan cited the Black Sea Grain Initiative as an example of Turkey's role in mediating.

 

26 December

Russia claims to have shot down a Ukrainian drone near the Engels-2 (air base). The governor of the region, Roman Busargin, reported no damage to "civilian infrastructure". Three people from the "technical staff" were killed by falling drone wreckage. According to the Russian defence ministry, "a Ukrainian unmanned aerial vehicle was shot down at low altitude while approaching the Engels military airfield in the Saratov region." Ukrainian and Russian social media accounts report a number of bombers have been destroyed; however Reuters couldn't confirm these claims.

Russia's Federal Security Service (FSB) reported four Ukrainian saboteurs were killed by landmines during a failed cross-border operation into the Bryansk region. The Ukrainians were wearing winter camouflage and carrying German SIG Sauer firearms, navigation equipment, and four bombs.

 

Ukraine has asked the United Nations to expel Russia from the United Nations Security Council, claiming that Russia has illegally taken the seat of the USSR and is a hostile nation that wages illegal wars.

 

27 December

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov stated that Ukraine must accept Moscow's peace demands: "Our proposals for the demilitarisation and denazification of the territories controlled by the regime, the elimination of threats to Russia's security emanating from there, including our new lands, are well known to the enemy. The point is simple: Fulfil them for your own good. Otherwise, the issue will be decided by the Russian army."

 

Russia banned crude oil sales to price cap nations which includes G7, European Union, and Australia. President Putin issued a decree that ban will be effective from 1 February 2023 up to 5 months and stated that sale ban could be lifted to individuals through "specific reasons".

 

28 December

The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade confirmed the death of Sage O’Donnell, the fourth Australian to die fighting for Ukraine.

 

Russian health ministry will permit Russian soldiers who had been fighting in Ukraine to have their sperm frozen in cryobanks for free.

 

Chief of the Main Intelligence Directorate of Ukraine, Kyrylo Budanov said that at present, neither Ukraine nor Russian forces were able to advance.

 

29 December

The Indian Police launched a criminal investigation into the deaths of two Russians in India, including war critic and billionaire Pavel Antov.

 

Ukraine Presidential advisor Mykhailo Podolyak stated that over 120 missiles were launched at infrastructure facilities in Kyiv, Kharkiv, Lviv and other cities. Ukraine claimed that 54 of 69 missiles were shot down and three people died in Kyiv; 90% of Lviv and 40% of Kyiv were without power.

Belarus reported that they shot down an S-300 anti-aircraft missile that had been launched targeting rural Belarus.

 

The Russian regional governor, Roman Busargin, claimed that a Ukrainian drone was shot down near the Engels-2 Air Base with only slight damage to residential housing and no injuries. There were unverified reports on social media of air raid sirens and an explosion.

 

30 December

Ukrainian army claimed to have shot down 16 drones launched by Russian forces at Kyiv and other cities. Mayor of Kyiv Vitali Klitschko, stated that two were shot down outside Kyiv while five were shot down "over" Kyiv.

 

President Putin and President Xi Jinping held talks via video link in which the latter reassured the former that he would maintain an "objective and fair stance" regarding the situation, according to CCTV.

 

31 December

The head of Ukraine's armed forces, Valerii Zaluzhnyi, claimed that air defences had shot down 12 of 20 Russian cruise missiles. Vitaly Klitschko, the Mayor of Kyiv, stated that a series of explosions directed at infrastructure killed at least one person and wounded twenty, including a Japanese journalist. A drone strike on Khmelnytskyi injured two persons.

 

Russia announced that armed forces fighting in the regions of Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhia will have their income tax exempted.

 

January 2023

1 January

See also: Makiivka military quarters shelling

The Ukrainian military claimed to have killed 400 Russian soldiers with another 300 being wounded during a missile attack on Makiivka in occupied Donetsk. Daniil Bezsonov, a senior Russian-backed official, blamed the attack on the "American HIMARS", claiming that some 25 rockets were fired at the region. Russia's Ministry of Defence confirmed that a total of 63 Russian soldiers had died in the attack after 6 rockets had been fired.  The barracks was based next to an ammunition dump, according to Russian milbloggers, which may explain the large explosion. Bezsonov has called for the military officers responsible to be "punished". The General Staff of Ukraine claimed 10 vehicles destroyed.  On 3 January the Russian Ministry of Defence gave an updated figure of 89 dead.

 

Ukraine armed forces claimed that they had shot down 45 kamikaze drones.  The Russian attack came several hours after the Ukrainian attack on Makiivka. According to the Mayor of Kyiv, one man was injured by falling debris.

Russian Governor Alexander Bogomaz claimed that Ukraine launched a drone attack on an electrical facility in the Klimovsky District.

 

2 January

According to TASS, Russian forces shot down a Ukrainian drone near the city of Voronezh.

 

4 January

France announced that it would send AMX-10 RC and ACMAT Bastion to Ukraine.

 

5 January

Russian Orthodox Church Primate Patriarch Kirill called for a Christmas ceasefire so that people could attend Orthodox Christmas services on 6–7 January. Turkish President Erdogan also called for a "unilateral cease-fire"; afterwards, President Putin ordered Russian armed forces to hold a 36-hour cease-fire for the Russian Orthodox Christmas. Ukraine rejected Russia's cease-fire proposal. The UK MoD said that fighting had "continued at a routine level into the Orthodox Christmas period."

 

The first group of 24 prisoners recruited by PMC Wagner, fighting in Ukraine, have finished their six months contracts and have been released with full amnesty for their past crimes.

 

In a joint statement President Biden and Chancellor Scholz announced that the German government had decided to provide Ukraine with a Patriot missile system and 40 Marder Infantry Fighting Vehicles, while the United States government would provide around 50 Bradley Fighting Vehicles.

 

6 January

The United States Department of Defence awarded a $40 million contract to L3Harris to provide Ukraine with 4 VAMPIRE kits (vehicle-mountable light guided missile system) in mid 2023 and 10 by 2023 year-end.

 

8 January

The Russian ministry of defence claimed that more than 600 Ukrainian soldiers were killed during the attack on barracks in Kramatorsk.[156] Kramatorsk's Mayor Oleksandr Honcharenko stated that the attack only damaged two buildings and there was no evidence of casualties. A Finnish and more than one Reuters journalist visited the site and found out that an S-300 had struck an empty school building, with no signs of casualties.

 

9 January

Russia and Ukraine conducted their 36th prisoner swap of the conflict, with each side trading 50 POWs to the other.

 

Ukraine's Regional prosecutor office claimed that an S-300 fired from Belgorod Oblast hit a market in Shevchenkove, killing two women, wounding a child, and reportedly damaging a shopping centre.

 

A spokesperson stated that Germany has no plans to provide the Leopard 2 to Ukraine.

 

10 January

Ukrainian steel production was reduced by about 70% in 2022 as a result of the conflict.

 

US and Ukrainian officials stated that Russian artillery fire had declined nearly 75% in some places.

 

The UK says most of Soledar is under Russian control, whereas Wagner claims all.

 

11 January

Russian Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu appointed Valery Gerasimov in place of Sergey Surovikin as overall commander of the war against Ukraine. Surovikin will serve as Gerasimov's deputy.

 

Wagner Group claims around 500 Ukrainians were killed during the battle of Soledar.

 

12 January

Governor of Donetsk Pavlo Kyrylenko stated that around 100 Russian soldiers had been killed in the Soledar area.

 

13 January

The Russian Military stated that it captured Soledar, but Ukraine Defence minister Oleksii Reznikov denied that the city had been captured and stated the fighting was "very difficult". Governor of Donetsk Pavlo Kyrylenko stated that "559 civilians including 15 children" remained in Soledar and couldn't be evacuated.  President Zelenskyy and Ukrainian Deputy Defense Minister Hanna Maliar announced that pockets of resistance in the city center continues, and that the western portion of the settlement remains in Ukrainian hands. Chief of staff to the President of Ukraine Andriy Yermak stated that "Soledar is a scene of street battles, with neither side really in control of the town."  Geolocation based on photos suggested that Ukrainian troops were still defending the north western part of the city.

 

14 January

 

Destroyed apartment building in Dnipro

A new wave of Russian missile strikes on several regions of Ukraine. Kyiv's Military administration reported hitting of Kyiv's critical infrastructure. Kharkiv, Odesa and other cities were also hit.

 

A Russian missile strike partially destroyed an apartment building in Dnipro, killing at least 46 people and injuring 80.

 

The United Kingdom stated that it will provide Challenger 2 tanks and artillery systems to Ukraine.

 

15 January

Armin Papperger, the CEO of German arms manufacturer Rheinmetall, stated that the company would not be able to deliver battle-ready Leopard 2 tanks to Ukraine until 2024.

 

16 January

Ukraine admitted that they had lost Soledar.

 

German Defence Minister Christine Lambrecht resigned in part due to blunders over German support for Ukraine.

 

A grenade exploded in Tonenkoye village's community center, which was used to store ammunition and house Russian soldiers. TASS reported that the RGD-5 grenade explosion in Belgorod Oblast killed 3 soldiers and wounded 16. Eight soldiers are missing.

 

Russia had secured control of Soledar after capturing the last industrial zone near mine number 7 which was previously held by Ukrainian troops.

 

17 January

 

IAEA team visiting the Rivne Nuclear Power Plant, 17 January 2023

The US Military stated that Ukrainian soldiers are being trained in the United States on the Patriot Missile system.

 

Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic condemned PMC Wagner for running a social media campaign calling for Serbian recruits to fight in Ukraine.

 

18 January

Australian Defence minister Richard Marles stated that Australian Army soldiers will be deployed in the UK to train Ukrainian soldiers in "infantry tactics in an urban, wooded and basic infantry tactics".[193]

 

20 January

Ukraine Defence Minister Oleksii Reznikov stated that, despite the lack of agreement to export the tanks, Ukrainian soldiers would be trained on Leopard 2 tanks in Poland.

 

21 January

Russia claimed to conduct a new offensive in Zaporizhzhia Oblast.

 

22 January

German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock stated that Germany would not stand in the way if Poland or other countries provide Leopard 2 tanks.

 

Russian state media reported that Russia advanced into Orikhiv and Hulyaipol towns in Zaporizhia region.

23 January

Polish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki stated that Poland will provide 14 Leopard tanks to Ukraine regardless of Germany's approval;[198] the next day, Poland officially requested permission to export them. German Defence Minister Boris Pistorius encouraged other countries to provide training on the tanks for Ukrainian soldiers.

 

French President Emmanuel Macron stated that France would send Leclerc tanks to Ukraine.

 

Norwegian defence chief General Eirik Kristoffersen stated that around 180,000 Russian soldiers were dead or wounded and there were around 100,000 military casualties and 30,000 civilian dead from Ukraine.

24 January

Several senior and junior ministers resigned from positions in the Ukrainian government, including the deputy head of the President's Office, a deputy Defence Minister, the Deputy Prosecutor-General and the deputy infrastructure minister.

 

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz agreed to provide Leopard 2 tanks and allowed other countries to do the same. Ukraine senior officials stated that around 100 Leopard 2 tanks from twelve countries are ready to be transferred to Ukraine.

 

A missile hit a Turkish-owned cargo ship Tuzla and started a fire while at the Port of Kherson. There were no reported casualties.[a]

 

image icon Turkish-owned cargo ship targeted by missiles

25 January

The United States is expected to send 31 M1 Abrams tanks to Ukraine and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz agreed to provide 14 Leopard 2A6 tanks to Ukraine. Those tanks, along with the contributions of other nations, will total around 88 Leopard tanks.

 

26 January

According to Ukraine, 55 missiles were fired at targets in Ukraine, along with another 24 Shahed-136 drones. The Ukrainian Air Force claims to have shot down all of the drones and 47 of the missiles. Including in the attack was a Kh-47 Kinzhal hypersonic missile. Kyiv’s Mayor said one person had died and two were wounded when an apartment block was hit in the Holosiiv district. This is the 13th mass attack since the invasion began.

 

 

 

 

 

 

January 25, 2023 

Remarks by President Biden on Continued Support for Ukraine

THE PRESIDENT: Good almost morning. It’s exactly noon. Thank you for being here.

 

Yesterday marked 11 months since Russia’s brutal, full-scale invasion of Ukraine; 11 months in which the Ukrainian people have showed Putin and the world the full force of their courage and the indomitable determination to live free.

 

And through every single step of this horrific war, the American people have been strong and unwavering in their support.

 

And Democrats and Republicans in Congress have stood together. The United States has worked in lockstep with our Allies and partners around the world to make sure the Ukrainian people are in the strongest possible position to defend their nation, their families, and against the brutal — the truly brutal aggression of Russia. We haven’t seen the likes of this in a long time.

 

The United States and Europe are fully united.

 

This morning, I had a long conversation with our NATO Allies — German Chancellor Scholz, French President Macron, Prime Minister Sunak, and the Italian Prime Minister, Meloni — to continue our close coordination in our full support of Ukraine. Because you all know — I’ve been saying this a long time — the expectation on the part of Russia is we’re going to break up, we’re not going to stay united. But we are fully, thoroughly, totally united.

 

With spring approaching, the Ukrainian forces are working to defend the territory they hold and preparing for additional counter-offensives. To liberate their land, they need to be able to counter Russia’s evolving tactics and strategy on the battlefield in the very near term.

 

They need to improve their ability to maneuver in open terrain.

 

And they need an enduring capability to deter and defend against Russian aggression over the long term.

 

The Secretary of State and the Secretary of the — of the military are behind me. Are — they — they’ve been deeply, deeply involved in this — this whole effort.

 

Armored capability, as General Austin will tell you, spe- — is — has been — has been critical. And that’s why the United States has committed hundreds of armored fighting vehicles to date, including more than 500 as part of the assistance package we announced last Friday.

 

And today — today, I’m announcing that the United States will be sending 31 Abram tanks to Ukraine, the equivalent of one Ukrainian battalion.

 

Secretary Austin has recommended this step because it will enhance the Ukraine’s capacity to defend its territory and achieve its strategic objectives.

 

The Abrams tanks are the most capable tanks in the world. They’re also extremely complex to operate and maintain, so we’re also giving Ukraine the parts and equipment necessary to effectively sustain these tanks on the battlefield.

 

And we begi- — we’ll begin to train the Ukrainian troops on these issues of sustainment, logistics, and maintenance as soon as possible.

 

Delivering these tanks to the field is going to take time, time that we’ll see — we’ll use to make sure the Ukrainians are fully prepared to integrate the Abram tanks into their defenses.

 

We also closely coordinated this announcement with our Allies.

 

The American contribution will be joined by an additional announcement, including that will be — will be readily available and more easily integrated for use on the battlefield in the coming weeks and months from other countries.

 

I’m grateful to Chancellor Scholz for providing German Leopard 2 tanks and will lead an effort to organize the European contribution of two tank battalions for Ukraine.

 

I want to thank the Chancellor for his leadership and his steadfast commitment to our collective efforts to support Ukraine.

 

Germany has really stepped up, and the Chancellor has been a strong, strong voice for unity — a close friend — and for the level of effort we’re going to continue.

 

Supporting Ukraine’s ability to fight off Russian aggression to defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity is a worldwide commitment. Not just lo- — it’s worldwide commitment.

 

Last week, Germany — in Germany, Secretary Austin convened the Ukraine Defense Contact Group for the eighth time. This group is made up of some 50 nations — 50 nations — each making significant contributions of their own to Ukraine’s integrity, each fully committed to making Ukraine remain strong and independent and able to defend itself against Russian threats and violence.

 

I want to thank every member of that coalition for continuing to step up.

 

The UK — the United Kingdom — recently announced that it is donating Challenger 2 tanks to Ukraine. France is contributing AMX-10s, armored fighting vehicles.

 

In addition to the Leopard tanks that Germany, like the United States, is also — Germany is also sending a pat- — a Patriot missile battery. The Netherlands is donating a Patriot missile and launchers.

 

France, Canada, the UK, Slovakia, Norway, and others have all donated critical air defense systems to help secure Ukrainian skies and save the lives of innocent civilians who are literally the target — the target of Russia’s aggression.

 

Poland is sending armored vehicles. Sweden is donating infantry fighting vehicles. Italy is giving artillery. Denmark and Estonia are sending howitzers. Latvia is providing more Stinger missiles. Lithuania is providing anti-aircraft guns. And Finland recently announced its largest package of security assistance to date.

 

You may remember, when I was asked a while ago, what I think was going to happen. And I said — I let Putin know. He thought that he was going to have — end up with the Findalization [Finlandization] of Europe. Well, he’s got the NATOization of Finland. He’s gotten something that he never intended.

 

Together with our Allies and partners, we’ve sent more than 3,000 armored vehicles, more than 8,000 [800] artillery systems, more than 2 million rounds of artillery ammunition, and more than 50 advanced multi-launch rocket systems, anti-ship and air defense systems, all to help counter Ukraine’s [Ukraine counter] brutal aggression that is happening because of Russia.

 

And, look, today’s announcement builds on the hard work and commitment from countries around the world, led by the United States of America, to help Ukraine defend its sovereignty and its territorial integrity.

 

That’s what this is about: helping Ukraine defend and protect Ukrainian land. It is not an offensive threat to Russia. We are — there is no offensive threat to Russia.

 

If Russian troops returned to Russia, they’ll be there for — where they belong, and this war would be over today.

 

That’s what we all want: an end to this war in just and lasting terms.

 

You know, our teams do not permit one nation — we’re not going to allow one nation to steal a neighbor’s territory by force.

 

Our terms that preserve Russia’s sovereign — Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity and honor the U.N. Charter, that’s our — they’re the terms we’re working on.

 

And, you know, these are — these the terms we all signed up for and 143 nations voted for in the United Nations General Assembly last October.

 

So, the United States, standing shoulder-to-shoulder with

our Allies and partners, is going to continue to do all we can to support Ukraine.

 

Putin expected Europe and the United States to weaken our resolve. He expected our support for Ukraine to crumble with time. He was wrong. He was wrong. And he was wrong from the beginning, and he continues to be wrong.

 

We are united. America is united and so is the world.

 

And we approach the one-year mark — as we do — of the Russian full-scale invasion of Ukraine, we remain as united and determined as ever in our conviction and our cause.

 

These tanks are further evidence of our enduring and unflagging commitment to Ukraine and our confidence in the skill of the Ukrainian forces.

 

As I told President Zelenskyy when he was here — and today is his birthday, by the way — in December: We’re with you for as long as it takes, Mr. President.

 

Ukrainians are fighting an age-old battle against aggression and domination. It’s a battle Americans have fought proudly time and again, and it’s a battle we’re going to make sure the Ukrainians are well equipped to fight as well.

 

This is about freedom. Freedom for Ukraine, freedom everywhere. It’s about the kind of world we want to live in and the world we want to leave our children.

 

So, may God protect the brave Ukrainian defenders of their country who keep the flame of liberty burning brightly as we can.

 

Thank you.

 

Q Mr. President, why are you taking this decision now? Did Germany force you to change your mind on sending tanks?

 

THE PRESIDENT: (Laughs.) Germany didn’t force me to change my mind. We wanted to make sure we were all together. And that’s what we were going to do all along, and that’s what we’re doing right now.

 

Thank you.

 

12:10 P.M. EST

 

 

 

 HOT LINK

 

M1Abrams_1.jpg

M1Abrams_10.jpg

M1Abrams_11.jpg

M1Abrams_12.jpg

M1Abrams_13.jpg

M1Abrams_14.jpg

M1Abrams_15.jpg

M1Abrams_16.jpg

M1Abrams_17.jpg

M1Abrams_18.jpg

M1Abrams_19.jpg

M1Abrams_2.jpg

M1Abrams_20.jpg

M1Abrams_20a.jpg

M1Abrams_20b.jpg

M1Abrams_20c.jpg

M1Abrams_21.jpg

M1Abrams_21a.jpg

M1Abrams_21b.jpg

M1Abrams_21c.jpg

M1Abrams_21d.jpg

M1Abrams_21e.jpg

M1Abrams_21f.jpg

M1Abrams_21g.jpg

M1Abrams_21gg.jpg

M1Abrams_22.jpg

M1Abrams_23.jpg

M1Abrams_24.jpg

M1Abrams_25.jpg

M1Abrams_26.jpg

M1Abrams_27.jpg

M1Abrams_28.jpg

M1Abrams_29.jpg

M1Abrams_3.jpg

M1Abrams_30.jpg

M1Abrams_31.jpg

M1Abrams_32.jpg

M1Abrams_33.jpg

M1Abrams_34.jpg

M1Abrams_35.jpg

M1Abrams_36.jpg

M1Abrams_37.jpg

M1Abrams_38.jpg

M1Abrams_39.jpg

M1Abrams_4.jpg

M1Abrams_40.jpg

M1Abrams_41.jpg

M1Abrams_42.jpg

M1Abrams_43.jpg

M1Abrams_44.jpg

M1Abrams_5.jpg

M1Abrams_6.jpg

M1Abrams_7.jpg

M1Abrams_8.jpg

M1Abrams_9.jpg


 , C

Sources:Youtube, White House, Military News, wikipedia, DW , PBS

Jan 25th, 2023

Rev:  Military station,MIL3010, CNN News 18: January 27th, 2023

Rev: Feb 20, 2023, Yahoo, MSN, Youtube, AP, White House, wikipedia

HOT LINK

catch4all.com, Sandra Englund


Catch4all.com is proud to provide positive websites for the communities and for
the positive viewers from all over the world.....

Positive Viewers' Menu
2003 to 2023

Thank you for visiting Catch4all.com. Please be sure bookmark our site.
Since 1999 ©Catch4all.com. All rights reserved.rved.

 

> dy> body> body> enter> tml>