Catch4all.com Home Page


Office of the United States Trade Representative:
Executive Office of the President:
U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk
Announces U.S. Challenge to Europe in Aircraft Trade Dispute
March 30, 2012

Washington, D.C. – United States Trade Representative Ron Kirk announced today that the United States is requesting the establishment of a World Trade Organization (WTO) compliance panel to address the European Union’s (EU) failure to remove WTO-inconsistent subsidies to Airbus.

“We refuse to stand by while American businesses and workers are disadvantaged,” Ambassador Kirk said. “The European Union’s aircraft subsidies have cost American aerospace companies tens of billions of dollars in lost revenue, which has cost American workers their jobs and hurt their families and communities. By taking this action today, we are reiterating the Obama Administration’s commitment to ensuring that every one of our trading partners plays by the rules, and that American companies can compete on a level playing field. The United States remains prepared to engage with the EU in any meaningful efforts that will lead to the goal of ending subsidized financing at the earliest possible date.”

In June 2011, the WTO ruled that the EU and four of its member States conferred more than $18 billion in subsidized financing to Airbus, and that European government launch aid had been used to support the creation of every model of large civil aircraft produced by Airbus. The WTO found that these subsidies caused Boeing to lose sales of more than 300 aircraft and to lose market share throughout the world. In fact, in looking at the effect of the EU subsidies, the Appellate Body confirmed the Panel’s finding that, among the most plausible scenarios was that “[w]ithout the subsidies, Airbus would not have existed… and there would be no Airbus aircraft on the market. None of the sales that the subsidized Airbus made would have occurred.” In contrast, the WTO rejected the EU assertion that U.S. subsidies were responsible for the viability of Boeing’s large civil aircraft production.

In December 2011, the EU claimed to have removed the WTO inconsistencies, but provided no evidence to support its claims. However, the EU has not removed its WTO-inconsistent subsidies and has even provided new ones. To provide the EU with an additional opportunity to explain its claims, the United States held consultations with the EU in January 2012. The EU was unable or unwilling to substantiate its claims to have addressed the WTO inconsistencies, and the consultations failed to resolve the dispute.

The United States has asked for a meeting of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body on April 13, 2012, to address this issue. Pursuant to an agreement between the United States and the EU, a panel will be established at that meeting.

The Boeing Company is the only American producer of large civil aircraft and is the largest single U.S. exporter. Boeing is headquartered in Chicago, IL, and has major facilities around the country, including in Washington, South Carolina and Kansas. The company employs more than 157,000 people and sold $31.8 billion worth of commercial aircraft in 2010. Boeing is the largest American manufacturer of commercial jetliners and military aircraft, with additional capabilities in helicopters, electronic and defense systems, missiles, satellites and advanced information and communications systems.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

In addtion, on Feb. 21st, 2012, U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk  reported on White House report that-Boeing, like other American companies, knows from experience the importance of strong trade enforcement. For many years, the EU and its various member states provided Airbus, Boeing’s main global competitor, with more than $18 billion in subsidies. As a result, Boeing has been competing on an un-level playing field – losing market share and possible job-creating opportunities.

U.S. Trade Rep. Rond Kirk included that last year the Obama Administration secured a victory against EU subsidies to Airbus. It was the largest verdict in the history of the World Trade Organization. USTR is currently working to ensure that the EU implements the necessary changes and stops the illegal subsidies. Once implemented, this decision will lead to a more level playing field for Boeing and its many suppliers across America who support well-paying jobs for tens of thousands of hard-working Americans.

Meanwhile WTO adopted Boeing reports on 23 March 2012 for dispute settlement.  The Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) adopted the panel and Appellate Body reports which examined United States’ subsidies to its civil aircraft industry. It elected Ambassador Shahid Bashir of Pakistan as the new chair of the DSB for a one-year term.

catch4all.com, Sandra Englund, April 1st, 2012.  

Souces: WTO, White House, and Office of the United States Trade Representative.

 

  Boeing Supports U.S. Action Against Illegal Airbus Subsidies

CHICAGO, Dec. 9, 2011 /PRNewswire/ -- Boeing (NYSE: BA) issued the following statement today after the U.S. Trade Representative continued its efforts to ensure European Union compliance with last June's WTO ruling regarding illegal subsidies to Airbus.

"Boeing is disappointed that EADS/Airbus and European governments have failed to comply with the WTO's landmark ruling against launch aid and other forms of illegal government subsidies that Airbus has received for more than 40 years. Boeing strongly supports all the efforts by the U.S. Trade Representative to seek full compliance with the removal of all the illegal government subsidies to Airbus -- particularly market-distorting launch aid, the most pernicious form of subsidy Airbus was found to have received. There can be no compliance with the WTO's ruling that ignores any non-commercial launch aid that Airbus is currently receiving for the A350. Despite the very clear WTO ruling, EADS/Airbus and European governments have failed to remove outstanding subsidies. This illegal subsidization of Airbus products - plane after plane – is unsustainable and must stop now."

Contact: Tim Neale, 703-465-3220

SOURCE Boeing

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

The world should know better what is the market driving around the world.   Market is already distorting and still not working which is making worst ever and ever….. We all know that recovery action is in working from all over around the world.  Unfair subsidies are already proven by the WTO and this build up has been going too far….still distoring.  Turists, suppliers, and partners are not going to remain as is what is helping to distoring the global economic,  it is hurting for global circlation.  Financial crisies.  The panel considered that Airbus' market presence during the period 2001-2006, as reflected in its share of the EC and certain third country markets and the sales it won at Boeing's expense, was clearly an effect of the subsidies in this dispute.  For 2011 isn't any different what continued unfair EU subsidies by Airbus.

It is not fair for the Boeing Company.

You can see the clear message by these two metrix why the global is not going well and huge differences although EU claims that their market is not going well.

The following is Boeing vs. Airbus by illegal category orders subsidies for  2011. You can see the deepest crisis and finance institution crisis in global and why it's hurting the global market.  Airbus reported that with November’s  Airbus’ total backlog stood at a new record of 4,453:

 

At its meeting on 1 June 2011, the DSB adopted the Appellate Body report and the panel report, as modified by the Appellate Body report.

On 1 April 2011, the European Union notified the DSB of its decision to appeal to the Appellate Body certain issues of law covered in the panel report and certain legal interpretations developed by the Panel. On 28 April 2011, the United States notified the DSB of its decision to appeal to the Appellate Body certain issues of law covered in the panel report and certain legal interpretations developed by the Panel. On 4 July 2011, the Chair of the Appellate Body informed the DSB that due to the considerable size of the record and complexity of the appeal, the need to hold multiple sessions of the oral hearing, and taking into account the current overall workload of the Appellate Body, the Appellate Body would not be able to circulate its report within 60 days. The Appellate Body will hold a first session of the oral hearing in August and a second session in October 2011. Thereafter, the Appellate Body will provide an estimate for the circulation of its report.

The Appellate Body is responsible for hearing appeals of WTO panel reports. It is composed of seven members, each appointed for a four-year term, with a possibility to be reappointed once. The members of the Appellate Body are appointed by the Dispute Settlement Body. From its establishment in 1995 up to the end of 2011, the Appellate Body will have circulated 107 Appellate Body reports. Last September 12, 2011, STO had new member, Mr Thomas R. Graham being sworn-in as a new member of the Appellate Body.


U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk announced
that the United States is claiming to have fully complied with the World Trade Organization (WTO) ruling that subsidization of Airbus aircraft is contrary to WTO rules. The amount of the countermeasures would vary annually, but in a recent period would have been in the range of $7-10 billion.

The European Union report shows that they have done unfair subsidies they will take any bring its measure fully into conformity with its WTO obligations and to comply with the DSB’s recommendations and rulings.  The European Union has addressed all categories of subsidy covered by the DSB’s recommendations and rulings:  Member State Financing (MSF) loans, capital contributions,  loans, capital contributions, infrastructure support and regional aid.  Amongst others, the European Union has secured repayment of MSF loan and terminated MSF agreements, increased fees and lease payments on infrastructure support to accord with market principles, and ensured that capital contributions and regional aid subsidies have, in the appellate Body’s words, “come to an end” and are no longer capable of causing adverse effects.  In addition, the course of action adopted by the European Union affects Airbus’ A300, A310, A320, A330,  A340 and A380 aircraft, as well as derivatives thereof, as implicated by the DSB’s recommendations and rulings.  Finally, as a result of these steps and other intervening market events, the European Union has addressed the forms of adverse effects covered by the DSB’s rulings. 

EU stated that they will take the WTO obligations, as required by Article 7.8 of the SCM Agreement and Article 19.1 of the DSU, the European Union has ensured full implementation of the DSB’s recommendations and rulings.

Overall markets distort increased U.S. public debt by As of December 8, 2011 the gross debt was $15.05 trillion, of which $10.39 trillion was held by the public and $4.66 trillion was intra governmental holdings.  The public debt has increased by over $500 billion each year since (FY) 2003.  Over 40 years of unfair subsidies certainly increased U.S.A. Debt and world banks. Of course, the Boeing is the major company has been suffered by it.

Because of all of these years 40 years of unfair EU subsidies' suffering, the result has been distorted global economic and hurt the global market.   Increased un-employees, closing the many banks, closed many small businesses, and corporate buildings and bankruptcy, in western area, eastern, deep into the Europe area.  The main thing, The Boeing and other companies had to lay off so many people and hurt their production.  Repaying the late dues and so on… all of these calculations should be compensated by EU unfair subsidies what has been gained to Airbus and their bank for 40 years.  That payment should be able to start Boeing’s recovery and U.S.A economic as hiring back suppliers, unemployees, partners for manufacturing. The point is that the main global point area U.S.A is completely distorted by it: the financial, credit line, and bank institutions, real estes are all scraped by financial crash and global distoration.

Meanwhile, Washington state is creating new ideas in addition to giving charities and voluteer work organization to organization to creating better environment see Stratolaunch Systems, A Paul G. Allen Project which Powered by six 747 engines, the new craft should also be far more fuel efficient than traditional shuttle launches, since it will bypass the standard supply of expensive rocket fuel needed to propel a shuttle up from the ground.
You can watch a computer simulation of a Stratolaunch mission here:


Pretty soon there will be the Eighth Ministerial Conference which will be held in Geneva, Switzerland, from 15 to 17 December 2011. In parallel to the Plenary Session, where Ministers will make prepared statements, three Working Sessions will take place with the following themes: “Importance of the Multilateral Trading System and the WTO”, “Trade and Development” and “Doha Development Agenda”. The Conference will also take up the accessions of Russia, Samoa and Montenegro. In the final session, Ministers will adopt a number of decisions and the Chair will make a concluding statement.

The World Trade Organization (WTO) deals with the rules of trade between nations at a global or near-global level. But there is more to it than that.   There are 153 WTO members as of July 2008.(Included the membership satart date).

catch4all.com, Sandra Englund, December 12th, 2011.  

Souces: Boeing, Airbus, WTO, EU, and Office of the United States Trade Representative.

December 9th, 2011, U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk announced that the United States is claiming to have fully complied with the World Trade Organization (WTO) ruling that subsidization of Airbus aircraft is contrary to WTO rules. The United States has reviewed carefully the limited information in that notification. It appears to show that the EU has not withdrawn the subsidies in question and has, in fact, granted new subsidies to Airbus’ development and production of large civil aircraft.

The United States is also requesting authorization from the WTO Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) in Geneva to impose countermeasures annually in response to the EU’s claim that it fully complied with the ruling in this case. The amount of the countermeasures would vary annually, but in a recent period would have been in the range of $7-10 billion. This step will preserve U.S. rights, but any actual imposition of countermeasures would not occur until after further WTO proceedings.

“The WTO clearly found that every single grant of launch aid to Airbus, for every single aircraft that company produced, was a WTO-inconsistent subsidy that caused unfair adverse effects to U.S. industry and jobs,” said Ambassador Kirk. “Our action today underscores what we have said all along – that the United States cannot accept anything less than an end to this subsidized financing. The United States remains prepared to engage in any meaningful efforts, through formal consultations and otherwise, that will lead to the goal of ending subsidized financing at the earliest possible date.”

Background:

The United States initiated this WTO dispute in October 2004 to end decades of launch aid and other subsidies provided to Airbus. The DSB ultimately found that European government launch aid had been used to support the creation of every model of large civil aircraft produced by Airbus. The DSB also found that launch aid and the other challenged subsidies to Airbus have significantly distorted the global market for large civil aircraft, and that those subsidies have directly resulted in Boeing losing sales and market share, in particular that launch aid and other challenged subsidies to Airbus have directly resulted in Boeing losing sales involving purchases of Airbus aircraft by easyJet, Air Berlin, Czech Airlines, Air Asia, Iberia, South African Airways, Thai Airways International, Singapore Airlines, Emirates Airlines, and Qantas – and lost market share, with Airbus gaining market share in the European Union and in third country markets, including China and Korea at the expense of Boeing.

The DSB recommended that the EU and the EU member States that financially support Airbus take appropriate steps to withdraw the subsidies or remove the adverse effects within six months. That period ended on December 1, 2011. Under WTO rules, the United States has the option of challenging the EU’s claims to have withdrawn any subsidies or eliminated their adverse effects, which is the step being taken in Geneva today.

CHICAGO, Dec. 1, 2011 /PRNewswire/ -- Boeing issued the following statement regarding EU compliance obligations stemming from the ruling last June by the World Trade Organization against $18 billion of illegal European government subsidies to Airbus:

Today marks the deadline for European governments and EADS/Airbus to comply with the WTO's landmark ruling against launch aid and other forms of illegal government subsidies that Airbus has been receiving for more than 40 years. EU officials earlier today publicly acknowledged their compliance obligation. In the days ahead Boeing will work with the U.S. Trade Representative to ensure that all of the illegal subsidies have indeed been removed and that full compliance has been achieved. We expect Airbus and its government sponsors to demonstrate that the practice of market-distorting launch aid – the most pernicious form of subsidy Airbus was found to have received – has ended.

Contact:
Tim Neale, 703 465 3220

Statement by U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk in Response to
EU Compliance Offer in WTO Airbus Ruling

December 1st, 2011, Washington, D.C. – Today, United States Trade Representative Ron Kirk issued the following statement regarding the deadline for the European Union (EU) to comply with the World Trade Organization (WTO) ruling on Airbus and the EU’s subsequent response:

“We have received the EU’s compliance notice today and will review it carefully before announcing our next step,” said Ambassador Kirk. “We will base our next steps on a careful evaluation of that announcement, and whether it demonstrates that the EU has in fact taken the steps necessary to bring itself into full compliance with the WTO decision. The WTO ruling on Airbus requires that the EU withdraw its subsidies or remove their adverse effects. The continued success of the American aerospace industry, and the jobs of hundreds of thousands of Americans who work in this highly competitive sector depend on the ability to compete on a level playing field – the level playing field assured to them by our WTO agreements. The United States intends to ensure that our valued trading partner, the EU, keeps its commitments in this and all other trade matters.”

Background:

The United States initiated this WTO dispute in October 2004 to end decades of launch aid and other subsidies provided to Airbus. A panel was established to examine the matter in May 2005. The Panel issued its report on June 30, 2010, finding that European government launch aid had been used to support the creation of every model of large civil aircraft produced by Airbus. The Panel also found that launch aid and the other challenged subsidies to Airbus have significantly distorted the global market for large civil aircraft, and that those subsidies have directly resulted in Boeing losing sales and market share.

The European Union commenced the appeal on July 21, 2010 and the Appellate Body issued its report on May 18, 2011.

The Appellate Body affirmed the WTO Panel’s central findings that European government launch aid had been used to support the creation of every model of large civil aircraft produced by Airbus. The Appellate Body also confirmed that launch aid and other challenged subsidies to Airbus have directly resulted in Boeing losing sales involving purchases of Airbus aircraft by easyJet, Air Berlin, Czech Airlines, Air Asia, Iberia, South African Airways, Thai Airways International, Singapore Airlines, Emirates Airlines, and Qantas – and lost market share, with Airbus gaining market share in the European Union and in third country markets, including China and Korea at the expense of Boeing. The Appellate Body also found that the Panel applied the wrong standard for evaluating whether subsidies are export subsidies, and that the Panel record did not have enough information to allow application of the correct standard.

Following adoption by the WTO Dispute Settlement Body, the WTO recommended that the EU and the EU member states that financially support Airbus take appropriate steps to withdraw the subsidies or remove the adverse effects within six months. That period ended today.

Under WTO rules, the United States has the option of challenging the EU’s claims to have withdrawn any subsidies or eliminated their adverse effects. The United States will be examining the EU’s claims over the coming days.

 

Boeing: WTO Affirms Landmark Decision That
European Subsidies To Airbus Are Illegal

-- Illegal European launch aid and non-launch aid subsidies must end

-- Appellate ruling concludes the WTO’s review, compliance must occur within 6 months

-- Ruling sets governing standards for the global aerospace industry, ensures a fair and level playing field for all companies and workers
 

CHICAGO, May 18, 2011 /PRNewswire/ -- The World Trade Organization’s Appellate Body today confirmed that Airbus received $18 billion in illegal “launch aid” and other subsidies from European governments.

“This is a clear, final win for fair trade that will level the playing field for America’s aerospace workers,” said Jim McNerney, Boeing chairman, president and chief executive officer.  “The WTO has concluded that launch aid and other illegal Airbus subsidies distorted the market, harmed U.S. industry and now must end.  The administration—particularly the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative—and the Congress are to be commended for their long-standing efforts in this case to enforce global trade rules.  We join them in calling for immediate compliance with this landmark ruling,” McNerney said.  

“The WTO has rendered its final verdict, and now Europe must comply within 6 months,” said Boeing Executive Vice President and General Counsel J. Michael Luttig.

Altogether, the WTO confirmed that Airbus received $18 billion in illegal subsidies (principle amounts only).  That includes $15 billion in launch aid, including $4 billion for the A380, without which Airbus could not have developed its fleet of airplanes.  It also includes $3 billion in non-launch aid subsidies, which alone exceeds the $2.7 billion of un-remedied U.S. subsidies to Boeing (mainly NASA R&D spending) that the WTO identified in a separate ruling in March and that currently is under appeal.

“Airbus and its government sponsors have tried to justify their illegal subsidy practices by claiming that Boeing benefitted equally from government R&D contracts,” Luttig said. “But the WTO in March categorically rejected that argument, dismissing 80% of the EU’s claims against the United States and confirming the huge competitive advantage Airbus has as a result of massive illegal government subsidies.”

Luttig stressed that Europe’s obligations resulting from today’s decision do not hinge on the ultimate WTO decision in the European case against the United States.

“Europe must end all practices held illegal by today’s decision—particularly launch aid; government loans for the A350 and future products must be on proven commercial terms,” he said.

Luttig also answered recent calls by Europe for a negotiated settlement.

“I understand why Airbus and its sponsor governments now want to negotiate. For 40 years they have relied on massive injections of launch aid, which today were confirmed to be illegal.  We’re not interested in a settlement that would allow a continuation of illegal launch aid—the most pernicious, market-distorting subsidy of all,” he said. “Airbus currently has more than $17 billion of cash on hand. It can well afford to bring itself into compliance with the WTO ruling and thereafter develop airplanes without illegal aid from European governments.”

“The WTO rules, combined with the ruling in this case, give clear guidance on what governments can and cannot do to support their respective aerospace industries. These rules will govern all market participants and help ensure that competitions are won or lost based on the merits of the respective product offerings rather than on government subsidies,” he said.

Source: Boeing

----------------------------------------------------

WTO (World Trade Organization), the Appellate Body on May 18th, 2011,  upheld the Panel's finding that certain subsidies provided by the European Union and certain Member state governments to Airbus are incompatible with Article 5(c) of the SCM Agreement because they have caused serious prejudice to the interests of the United States.  The principal subsidies covered by the ruling include financing arrangements (known as “Launch Aid” or “Member state financing”) provided by France, Germany, Spain, and the UK for the development of the A300, A310, A320, A330/A340, A330-200, A340-500/600, and A380 LCA projects.

The ruling also covers certain equity infusions provided by the French and German governments to companies that formed part of the Airbus consortium.  Additionally, it covers certain infrastructure measures provided to AirbusThe Appellate Body  found that the effect of the subsidies was to displace exports of Boeing single-aisle and twin-aisle LCA from the European Union, Chinese, and Korean markets and Boeing single-aisle LCA from the Australian market.  Moreover, the Appellate Body confirmed the Panel's determination that the subsidies caused Boeing to lose sales of LCA in the campaigns involving the A320  A340 and A380 aircraft.

However, different reasons, the Appellate Body excluded certain measures from the scope of the finding of serious prejudice those included the civil aircraft research and development and aeronautics research programmes which means they cannot finger pointing each other about the research programmes although the European Union's unfair subsidies for Boeing must  withdraw and  prohibited subsidies within 90 days.

All of these recall back in 2005, April 11 that Senate approved to Senators (96) included U.S. Senators Patty Murray and Maria Cantwell approved on the Senate floor in April 11, 2005 on a resolution that called on European governments to reject launch aid for Airbus and supports the President's authority to take any action necessary to protect American aerospace jobs. The Senate voted on the resolution in April 11, 2005 (96 to 0)The result came out positive.(6) (6.1).  After 6 years of all of these, finally WTO ruled and grant  the Boeing what it's needed. The following lists show that EU Launch Aid by Plane which the media explored over the years:

(1) European governments should reject Airbus' pending application for launch aid for the A350 and any future applications for launch aid ;

(2) the European Union, acting for itself and on behalf of its Member States, should renew its commitment to the terms agreed to on January 11, 2005;

(3) the United States Trade Representative should request the formation of a World Trade Organization dispute resolution panel at the earliest possible opportunity if there is no immediate agreement to eliminate launch aid for the A350 and all future models and no concrete progress toward a comprehensive bilateral agreement covering all government supports in the large aircraft sector; and

(4) the President should take any additional action the President considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States in fair competition in the large commercial aircraft market.

The following matrix show that the yearly orders for Boeing vs Airbus since 1989 to April/May for 2011.

The following matrix show that the yearly deliveries for Boeing vs Airbus since 1989 to April/May for 2011.

You can see the delivery trans has gone down since 2003 for Boeing.  


 

The recent Boeing News shows that 737 production will be 40 a month in Renton, WA in the future, however, the company, which now produces about 31 of the twin-engine planes monthly in Renton, already is committed to raising the pace to 35.
Speaking of 737 production, see below for 737 vs A320 differences which show the lighter plan for Boeing which would make more fuel efficiency and reliable to fly....

The World Trade Organization (WTO) deals with the rules of trade between nations at a global or near-global level. But there is more to it than that.   There are 153 WTO members as of July 2008.(Included the membership satart date) see below and click to see individual

1

Albania  8 September 2000

52

The Gambia    23 October 1996

103

Nicaragua  3 September 1995

2

Angola  23 November 1996

53

Georgia  14 June 2000

104

Niger  13 December 1996

3

Antigua and Barbuda  1 January 1995

54

Germany  1 January 1995

105

Nigeria  1 January 1995

4

Argentina  1 January 1995

55

Ghana  1 January 1995

106

Norway  1 January 1995

5

Armenia  5 February 2003

56

Greece  1 January 1995

107

Oman  9 November 2000

6

Australia  1 January 1995

57

Grenada  22 February 1996

108

Pakistan  1 January 1995

7

Austria  1 January 1995

58

Guatemala  21 July 1995

109

Panama  6 September 1997

8

Bahrain, Kingdom of  1 January 1995

59

Guinea  25 October 1995

110

Papua New Guinea  9 June 1996

9

Bangladesh  1 January 1995

60

Guinea Bissau  31 May 1995

111

Paraguay  1 January 1995

10

Barbados  1 January 1995

61

Guyana  1 January 1995

112

Peru  1 January 1995

11

Belgium  1 January 1995

62

Haiti  30 January 1996

113

Philippines  1 January 1995

12

Belize  1 January 1995

63

Honduras  1 January 1995

114

Poland  1 July 1995

13

Benin  22 February 1996

64

Hong Kong, China  1 January 1995

115

Portugal  1 January 1995

14

Bolivia, Plurinational State of  12 September 1995

65

Hungary  1 January 1995

116

Qatar  13 January 1996

15

Botswana  31 May 1995 

66

Iceland  1 January 1995

117

Romania  1 January 1995

16

Brazil  1 January 1995

67

India  1 January 1995

118

Rwanda  22 May 1996

17

Brunei Darussalam  1 January 1995

68

Indonesia  1 January 1995

119

Saint Kitts and Nevis  21 February 1996

18

Bulgaria  1 December 1996

69

Ireland  1 January 1995

120

Saint Lucia  1 January 1995

19

Burkina Faso  3 June 1995

70

Israel  21 April 1995

121

Saint Vincent & the Grenadines  1 January 1995

20

Burundi  23 July 1995

71

Italy  1 January 1995

122

Saudi Arabia, Kingdom of  11 December 2005

21

Cambodia 13 October 2004

72

Jamaica  9 March 1995

123

Senegal  1 January 1995

22

Cameroon  13 December 1995

73

Japan  1 January 1995

124

Sierra Leone  23 July 1995

23

Canada  1 January 1995

74

Jordan  11 April 2000

125

Singapore  1 January 1995

24

Cape Verde 23 July 2008

75

Kenya  1 January 1995

126

Slovak Republic  1 January 1995

25

Central African Republic  31 May 1995

76

Korea, Republic of  1 January 1995

127

Slovenia  30 July 1995

26

Chad  19 October 1996

77

Kuwait  1 January 1995

128

Solomon Islands  26 July 1996

27

Chile  1 January 1995

78

Kyrgyz Republic  20 December 1998

129

South Africa  1 January 1995

28

China  11 December 2001

79

Latvia  10 February 1999

130

Spain  1 January 1995

29

Colombia  30 April 1995

80

Lesotho  31 May 1995

131

Sri Lanka  1 January 1995

30

Congo  27 March 1997

81

Liechtenstein  1 September 1995

132

Suriname  1 January 1995

31

Costa Rica  1 January 1995

82

Lithuania  31 May 2001

133

Swaziland  1 January 1995

32

Côte d'Ivoire  1 January 1995

83

Luxembourg  1 January 1995

134

Sweden  1 January 1995

33

Croatia    30 November 2000

84

Macao, China  1 January 1995

135

Switzerland  1 July 1995

34

Cuba  20 April 1995

85

Madagascar  17 November 1995

136

Chinese Taipei 1 January 2002

35

Cyprus  30 July 1995

86

Malawi  31 May 1995

137

Tanzania  1 January 1995

36

Czech Republic  1 January 1995

87

Malaysia  1 January 1995

138

Thailand  1 January 1995

37

Democratic Republic of the Congo  1 January 1997

88

Maldives  31 May 1995

139

Togo  31 May 1995

38

Denmark  1 January 1995

89

Mali  31 May 1995

140

Tonga  27 July 2007

39

Djibouti  31 May 1995

90

Malta  1 January 1995

141

Trinidad and Tobago  1 March 1995

40

Dominica  1 January 1995

91

Mauritania  31 May 1995

142

Tunisia  29 March 1995

41

Dominican Republic  9 March 1995

92

Mauritius  1 January 1995

143

Turkey  26 March 1995

42

Ecuador  21 January 1996

93

Mexico  1 January 1995

144

Uganda  1 January 1995

43

Egypt  30 June 1995

94

Moldova  26 July 2001

145

Ukraine 16 May 2008

44

El Salvador  7 May 1995

95

Mongolia  29 January 1997

146

United Arab Emirates  10 April 1996

45

Estonia  13 November 1999

96

Morocco  1 January 1995

147

United Kingdom  1 January 1995

46

European Union (formerly European Communities)  1 January 1995

97

Mozambique  26 August 1995

148

United States of America  1 January 1995

47

Fiji  14 January 1996

98

Myanmar  1 January 1995

149

Uruguay  1 January 1995

48

Finland  1 January 1995

99

Namibia  1 January 1995

150

Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of  1 January 1995

49

Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM)  4 April 2003

100

Nepal  23 April 2004

151

Viet Nam  11 January 2007

50

France  1 January 1995

101

Netherlands — For the Kingdom in Europe and for the Netherlands Antilles  1 January 1995

152

Zambia  1 January 1995

51

Gabon  1 January 1995

102

New Zealand  1 January 1995

153

Zimbabwe  5 March 1995

The WTO has 153 members, representing more than 97% of the world's population,and 30 observers, most seeking membership.

The WTO is governed by a ministerial conference, meeting every two years; a general council, which implements the conference's policy decisions and is responsible for day-to-day administration; and a director-general, who is appointed by the ministerial conference. The WTO's headquarters is at the Centre William Rappard, Geneva, Switzerland.

After so many years and panels passes by, European Communities and Certain Member States — Measures Affecting Trade in Large Civil Aircraft  Appellate Body issues report on Airbus dispute was on 18 May 2011 Measures Affecting Trade in Large Civil Aircraft” (WT/DS316/AB/R).  A dispute arises when a member government believes another member government is violating an agreement or a commitment that it has made in the WTO. The authors of these agreements are the member governments themselves — the agreements are the outcome of negotiations among members. Ultimate responsibility for settling disputes also lies with member governments, through the Dispute Settlement Body.

Finally, it is victory win for Boeing which is a clear, final win for fair trade that will level the playing field for America’s aerospace workers,”  as what Jim McNerney, Boeing chairman, president and chief executive officer says....although some says, it may have benefited to forgiving for Airbus which made unhappy for others and all...but, EU is certainly should know that unfair EU subsidies for Boeing must withdraw and prohibited subsidies within 90 days.

 

WTO

Boeing

catch4all.com

wikipedia

catch4all.com, Sandra Englund, May 21st, 2011

Click to see 787 Dreamliner

787 DREAMLINER Accomplishes Major Mileston : POWER ON


The Longest
in the World

Boeing Airplane 747-8

You Will Never Forget Dreamliner 787

The Boeing Company Products

Boeing Outlook 2010 to 2029

Reliable and safe Sky Fuel Tanker
Boeing NewGenTanker


FUTURE OF FLIGHT


Catch4all.com is proud to provide positive websites for the communities and for
the positive viewers from all over the world.....

Positive Viewers' Menu
2003 to 2010



Thank you for visiting Catch4all.com. Please be sure bookmark our site.
Since 1999 ©Catch4all.com. All rights reserved.