KC-X
Eventually
the KC-135s will retire along the way by 3 stages
Replacing the entire tanker fleet over 40 years
Will be The
Best Choice with The KC-767/777
Advanced Tanker
King of The Tankers in the Sky
Aerial Refueling, Survivability, Airlift,
and Operational Utility
The World Best and First Choice Value
The Lowest Risk (With
your choice: KC-767 or KC-777)
Boeing
Company The most Advanced in aerial-refueling technology,
integrated systems, and aircraft manufacturing and modification CAN YOU BIT THAT MORE THAN 75 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE?
KC-X.....Soon
to be announced by the DOD..
____________________________________
TAX PAYERS COMMENT:
"There is only One Company During the 75 years, the most
experienced for the Sky Fuel Tankers in the sky and the Airport
both, It is The Boeing company. The Boeing Tankers have the experiences,
designed, built, tested, feed the fuels technically right angle
in the sky even during the days and night in the dark and have
been flying anywhere anyplace when they need any circumstances......
that is the Boeing KC-X Tankers coming soon...... KC-767/777.....
WE
THE TAX PAYERS UNITED AND STAND TOGETHER"
____________________________
By the USFA article :
KC-X RFP: Key Developments
USAF
articles take pains to emphasize that ”...the department has gone
through a rigorous review process for KC-X and has validated that
the RFP accurately reflects the requirements as laid out by the
warfighter… The RFP includes specific factors for assessing the
capability contribution of each offeror” along a set of 9 weighted
performance
Eventually
the KC-135s will retire along the way by 3 stages Replacing
the entire tanker fleet over 40 years
The
Air Force plan to replace its elderly KC-135 tanker fleet comprises
three increments: KC-X, followed by Y and Z, with each representing
about one-third of the overall buy of some 479 aircraft. The service
expects to make a contract award announcement for the KC-X portion,
giving the total contract for 179 tankers to either Boeing or
the Northrop Grumman-EADS team. The entire replacement program
would extend to 2051 at the expected rate of purchase of only
up to 18 aircraft per year.
John A. Tirpak described that the ABCs
of Tanker XYZs: The Air Force does plan to buy replacement tankers
in three increments which will be the KC-X contract award. This
will cover the first increment of 179 tankers, replacing the very
oldest KC-135s in the fleet. Lt. Gen. Donald Hoffman, USAF's military
acquisition deputy, explained the three-stage approach in a closed
door briefing before the House Armed Services AirLand Subcommittee
last week. About 2023, the Air Force plans to contract for a second
batch of tankers, dubbed KC-Y, and in 2033, it goes for the third
or KC-Z batch, ultimately retiring all KC-135s along the way.
At no time are tanker purchases expected to exceed $3 billion
a year in current dollars; that’s all the Air Force expects to
be able to spend (see above). For that money, the service expects
to be able to buy between 12 and 18 per year, replacing the entire
tanker fleet over 40 years.
Countdown
According
to Michael
Sirak, a
senior Air Force official told lawmakers yesterday that the announcement
of the winner in the multi-billion-dollar KC-X tanker recapitalization
contest might indeed come in February which
is today "The last day of February."
The Tax payers, the global partners and suppliers
include travelers are waiting to be announced ASAP......for KC-X
which waited too long......
Reported
by Catch4all.com, Sandra Englund, February 29, 2008
Boeing
has the 75
years of experience for
designing,
building, modifying and supporting the tankers
Boeing KC-767-200
Long Range Freighter (LRF)
The world's newest and most advanced tanker
Boeing's
facilities in Everett
The
tanker will be an advanced derivative of the future 767-200 Long
Range Freighter and will be produced at Boeing's facilities in Everett
Finishing
center
in Wichita, Kan.
On the existing commercial line where 1,000 highly reliable and
maintainable 767s have been built. Installation of military refueling
systems and flight test activities will take place at the company's
finishing center in Wichita, Kan. (1)(2)
Boeing's
KC-767 Advanced Tanker Global
Tanker Team:
Nationwide,
44,000 Americans and 300 suppliers will design, build and support
the Boeing KC-767 Advanced Tanker include: Smiths Aerospace, Rockwell
Collins, Vought Aircraft Industries, Pratt & Whitney, Smiths Aerospace,
Honeywell, Spirit AeroSystems, Delta TechOps, and the newest member
-- Spirit AeroSystems. The team has proven expertise in aerial
refueling systems, network centric operations, integrated avionics
solutions and lean manufacturing concepts. (1) (2)
They
are the partners and suppliers that they have proven expertise
in aerial refueling systems, network centric operations, integrated
avionics solutions and lean manufacturing concepts, which will
offer the Air Force high levels of reliability and unique technical
advancements.
Boeing has produced nearly 2,000 tankers in its history and currently
is building four KC-767 tankers each for Italy and Japan.
Boeing
has logged nearly 1,000 hours on the KC-767 Tanker for Italy and
Japan. Since the beginning of 2007, the company has demonstrated
its advanced refueling systems by transferring fuel through its
fifth-generation boom to multiple receiver aircraft, and extending
and retracting refueling hoses from the wing aerial refueling
pods and centerline Hose Drum Unit.
"Now
that we transferred fuel through our fifth-generation boom, extended
and retracted our Hose Drum Unit and demonstrated our WARP capability,
it's quite clear that we can deliver a proven, lowest-risk solution
for the U.S. Air Force's next-generation tanker," said Ron Marcotte,
vice president and general manager of Boeing Global Mobility Systems
in April 19, 2007 during the Boeing KC-767 Tanker Extends Wing
Refueling Hoses for First Time. "These highly advanced refueling
systems, created by Smiths Aerospace, are flying today and will
be key components on the KC-767 Advanced Tanker."
Specifications:
General
characteristics Crew:
2 pilots, 1 boom operator Length: 159 ft 2 in (48.5 m) Wingspan:
156 ft 1 in (47.6 m)
Height:
52 ft (15.8 m) Empty weight: 181,610 lb (82,377 kg) Max
takeoff weight: 395,000 lb (186,880 kg) Powerplant: 2× GE
CF6-80C2 turbofan, 60,200 lbf (268 kN) each * Maximum Fuel
Load: 160,660 lb (72,877 kg)
Performance
Maximum speed:
Mach 0.86 (570 mph, 915 km/h) Cruise speed:
Mach 0.80 (530 mph, 851 km/h) Service ceiling:
40,100 ft (12,200 m) For KC-767 Advanced Tanker:
Max takeoff weight: over 400,000 lb (181,000 kg) Maximum
Fuel Load: over 200,000 lb (90,700 kg)
Four main reasons for this selection of the KC-767 over the KC-330.
(3)
The
KC-330 increase in size does not bring with it a commensurate
increase in available air refueling offload,...
The KC-330 "..presents a higher-risk technical approach
and a less preferred financial arrangement." " the size
difference of the EADS-proposed
KC-330 results in an 81 percent larger ground footprint
compared to the KC-135E it would replace, whereas the
Boeing 767 is only 29 percent larger."
The KC-330 requires "..greater infrastructure investment
and dramatically limits the aircraft's ability to operate
effectively in worldwide deployment." (Summary by MAT
magazine) .
It
is the international Program:
Italy
selected the KC-767 and signed a contract in 2002 becoming the
launch customer.
In 2001, Japan selected the KC-767 over a tanker version of the
Airbus A310 and signed a contract in 2003. This version is named
the KC-767 Tanker Transport and is based on the 767-200ER.
The Italian Air Force and the Japan Self-Defense Forces (which
designated the aircraft KC-767J) have ordered four aircraft each.
Australia selected the A330 in April 2004 after competition with
the KC-767.
The
A330 MRTT is larger and significantly more expensive than the
KC-767, offering roughly twenty percent more fuel capacity but
much greater cargo capacity.
Varied
needs drive nations to select a particular tanker aircraft. Japan,
for instance already operated the E-767 AWACS with an established
maintenance infrastructure. The United States military already
has significant airlift capability and already under-utilizes
the significant cargo capacity of the KC-10.
The
Boeing KC-767 Tanker
made the historic moment on March 5, 2007 when it successfully extended
its fifth generation, fly-by-wire air refueling boom and transferred
fuel for the first time to another aircraft. The KC-767 aircrew
connected the new tanker's boom to a B-52 73 times.
Besides
the Partners and suppliers around the world and Everett, there are
many other benefit states with the KC-767 Tanker
Boeing
KC-767 Tanker Win Would Benefit in globally.
Economic
Benefit
The
economic activity
Estimated
California
4,000
direct and indirect jobs
$175
million annually
Connecticut
4,000
direct and indirect jobs
$185
million annually
Texas
3,000
direct and indirect jobs
$125
million annually.
Illinois
3,300
direct and indirect jobs
$140
million annually
Florida
1,100
direct and indirect jobs
$45
million annually.
Iowa
1,600
direct and indirect jobs
$60
million annually.
Georgia
600
direct and indirect jobs
$25
million annually.
Utah
600
direct and indirect jobs
$22
million annually.
Oklahoma
400
direct and indirect jobs
$15
million annually.
Arizona
1,100
direct and indirect jobs
$40
million annually.
Saves
$8.5 Billions AF over the next 25 years.
The
KC-767 Advanced Tanker also provides superior fuel efficiency and
lower life cycle, support and training costs that will save the
Air Force approximately $8.5 billion over the next 25 years."
New
contest opens up field for engine manufacturers:
In March 2004, Boeing originally selected Pratt & Whitney as the
"baseline engine source for 767 Global Tanker Transport Aircraft
Programs" and the airframer said the PW4062 engine "will be the
standard production engine offering for all future 767 Tanker Programs,
both domestic and international".
However, the new contest will pit P&W against General Electric's
CF6-80C2 for the KC-767, while P&W, GE and Rolls-Royce are all expected
to compete for the Northrop Grumman-led KC-30 option. It is believed
that the US Air Force is still to decide whether to purchase engines
separately, or allow the winning airframer to supply the propulsion
system as part of the overall package.
USAF wants more from tank: (4)
The US Air Force has made it clear that it expects more tactical
and strategic capability from its KC-135 replacement than simply
tanking.
USAF Air Mobility Command commander Gen Duncan McNabb says: We will
always think 'tanker' first, but if it is sitting on the ground
then it can be used for other things.
There will be an expandable net-ready backbone in the aircraft."
Referring to the fact the KC-135 has to stay out of range of potential
threats, he says the defensive system "will allow us to put the
KC-X over the fight, and reduce the target-to-tanker range.
It will have RF threat awareness, LAIRCM etc and will be able to
move if a threat comes up." USAF chief of staff Gen Michael Moseley
cautions, however, that tanking remains the main priority. "We want
to get iron on the ramp, and set minimum requirements to get the
aircraft. We see big things in the future, but not yet, as we don't
want to drive up the average unit cost." .
DH-4B
: June 27, 1929, First Refueling: The Army Air Service conducted
its first successful air refueling. Lieutenants Lowell Smith and
John Richter flew the receiver DH-48 over San Diego, California,
on a flight lasting 6 hours and 38 minutes. Their aircraft received
two hose refuelings from another de Havilland DH-4B flown by Lieutenants
Virgil Hine and Frank Seifert.
KB29
: June 1948, Enters Service Number and Type Made: 92KB-29M (Hose
refueler), 116KB-29P (boom refueler) Daete Retired: Phased out
with the development of the KC-97 Significant Fact: Boeing developed
and installed the "flying boom" on the KB-29P:. It proved to be
the most reliable refueling method and had the highest fuel-transfer
rate. The flying boom was later accepted throughout the U.S. air
Force as the preferred method of aerial refueling.
KB97
: 1950-KC-97 Tanker Introduced First Flight: Nov. 9, 1944 (as
the C-97 Stratofreighter). Number and Type Made: 811 total (219
KC-97E and F, 592 KC-97G) Date Retired: 1973 Significant Fact:
To refuel faster jet aircraft, the KC-97 performed a maneuver
called "tobogganing." The refueling connection would be made at
high altitude and then the tanker and jet flew "downhill" together
enabling the tanker to pick up more speed.
KC-135 : Aug. 31, 1956 -KC-135 First Flight Number Made: 732,
last one delivered in 1965 Date Retired: Still in service Significant
fact: The KC-135 averaged 240 tanker missions a day during the
Gulf War and flew more than 33,000 sorties, completing more than
78,000 refuelings and transferring 1 billion pounds of fuel.
KC-747
: 1974 KC-747 first flight Number made: 3 Date Retired: Still
in service Significant Fact: Outfitted with a KC-135 boom, the
first 747 ever made was modified as a test bed for proximity tests
and aerial refueling equipment integration. The Imperial Iranian
AF bought 12 used 747s to be modified for military applications,
three of which were configured as tankers.
KC-10
: July 12, 1980 - KC-10 First Flight Number Made: 60 Date retired:
Still in service Significant Fact: The KC-10 can transport up
to 75 people and nearly 170,000 pounds of cargo a distance of
about 4,400 miles or can carry more than 356,000 pounds of fuel
-almost twice as much as the KC-135 Stratotanker. All KC-10's,
apart from a signle aircraft that was destroyed in a fire on the
ground in Spetember 1987, are still in service.
KC
-767 : Spring 2005 - KC-767 First Flight Significant Fact: The
KC-767 utilizes a remote vision system consisting of an enhanced
stereoscopic image processor (cameras and head-mounted display
unit) for refueling. The boom is fly-by-wire with automatic load
alleviation and independent disconnect to reduce boom damage.
The wing pods and centerline hose drum unit are improved to increase
reliability and prevent damage to probe receivers. Main deck cargo
carriage allows for 19 cargo pallets (all cargo), 200 passengers
(all pax), or 10 pallets and 100 passengers (combi).