THE WHITE HOUSE Office of the Press Secretary ________________________________________________________________

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
November 2nd, 2010

Readout of the President's Call with President Lee of the Republic of Korea

President Lee called the President yesterday evening to discuss the forthcoming G20 Summit that will be held in Seoul on November 11 - 12.   They also discussed the bilateral aspect of the President’s upcoming visit and economic and trade issues, including the KORUS Free Trade Agreement.  The President underscored that we hope to use the next week to make progress toward an agreement.  If we can reach a satisfactory agreement on the key issues for American workers, we will have a deal.

Source: The White House.

President Obama has promised earlier in June, 2010 although United States Trade Representative Ron Kirk and Korean Trade Minister Kim Jong-hoon have concluded their meeting to discuss the U.S.-Korea trade agreement in San Francisco. They have agreed to meet again in the leadup to the G-20 Leaders' Meeting at a time and venue to be determined as of October 27, 2010.

"Korea is a crucial ally of the United States and an important trading partner," Ambassador Kirk said.

"The U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement has the potential to bring significant economic and strategic benefits to both countries, while demonstrating the U.S. commitment to expanding our economic engagement and leadership in Asia. "I brought Minister Kim up to date on our review of the FTA and how we plan to consult with Congress and stakeholders regarding their concerns. I look forward to working closely with the Minister to address such concerns, while also taking into account Korea's interests, so that we can best determine how to move this important Agreement forward," said Ambassador Kirk.

"Both Korea and the United States also have a tremendous stake in an open international trading system, and I look forward to continued close cooperation between Korea and the United States in working to achieve progress in the Doha negotiations," Ambassador Kirk concluded.

Korea is the United States' seventh-largest trading partner, with two-way trade in goods reaching $83 billion in 2008. The U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement is the most commercially significant FTA the United States has negotiated in 16 years. The International Trade Commission estimates that implementation of the FTA would increase annual U.S. goods exports to Korea by $10-11 billion and increase U.S. GDP by $10-12 billion annually.  However, concerns remain with the Agreement, particularly with respect to autos and the need for further progress on reopening Korea's market to U.S. beef.  The Administration is undertaking a thorough review of the FTA and will be consulting extensively with Congress and other stakeholders to understand fully the exact nature of those concerns and how they can be addressed, so that the Agreement can be submitted for Congressional approval.

The United States has free trade agreements (FTAs) in effect with 17 countries: Australia, Bahrain, Canada, Chile, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Israel, Jordan, Mexico, Morocco, Nicaragua, Oman, and Peru.

These FTAs build on the foundation of the WTO Agreement, with more comprehensive and stronger disciplines than the WTO Agreement. Many of U.S FTAs are bilateral agreements between two governments. But some, like the North American Free Trade Agreement and the Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement, are multilateral agreements among several parties.

Currently, The United States has signed free trade agreements with Colombia, Korea, and Panama, but Congress must enact legislation to approve and implement each individual agreement in order for them to go into effect. The United States is also in renegotiations of a regional, Asia-Pacific trade agreement, known as the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Agreement with the objective of shaping a high-standard, broad-based regional pact. (1)

The U.S.-Korea business Council reported that 345,000 jobs will loose if the FTA U.S-Korea is not implemented while Korea's other trading partners do.

It is potential possible that 250,000 Jobs would create when the FTA U.S. -Korea is implemented which will boosting U.S. exports by more than $10 billion and increasing the U.S. share of exports to Asia by 1 percent.

Korea is the 15th largest economy in the world which is America's 7th largest trading partner and 8th largest export market. For every $1 billion in exports, 6,250 manufacturing jobs are created or supported, according to U.S. Department of Commerce Secretary Gary Locke.  President Obama has stated that increasing the U.S. share of exports to Asia by 1 percent would create 250,000 well-paying jobs in the United States. According to the U.S. International Trade Commission, the U.S.-Korea FTA would boost U.S. exports by more than $10 billion, raising U.S. exports to Asia in 2009 by 4 percent and easily increasing the U.S. share of exports to Asia by more than 1 percent.

Trade and investment between the United States and Korea support tens of thousands of American jobs across the agricultural, manufacturing, and services sectors.  By increasing U.S. exports and drawing new investment into the United States, the agreement would help expand American jobs across every sector of the economy.

Korea is a huge market for U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises, which made up 89 percent of U.S. businesses exporting to Korea in 2007 and accounted for $18 billion in U.S. exports to Korea that year.

See below for 2005 to 2009 U.S. Exports to Korea in Billions of Dollars:

U.S.- Korea Free Trade Agreement will be able to create new opportunities for U.S. businesses by leveling the playing field for U.S. Workers, manufacturers, and farmers in the Korean Market.  U.S. exports to Korea currently face an average tariff of 12.2 percent (49 percent for agricultural products and 6.6 percent for nonagricultural products), which is far higher than the United States imposes, as well as a wide range of nontariff barriers.

This agreement will be able to remove significant market access barriers in Korea to U.S. goods, services, and investment.  It includes strong provisions on transparency, intellectual property rights, competition, and other rules, particularly in the services sector, that would make U.S. businesses competitive in Korea.

This agreement also will give U.S. exporters and investors a competitive edge in one of Asia's most powerful markets- enhancing the capability of American workers to compete in Asia's dynamic regional economy.

This agreement will give strengthen the stronger partnership which the Korea is a close U.S. ally and a strong partner in advancing global security and in fighting economic isolationism.  Also this will give strategic partnership by deepening the links between two countries as U.S and Korea as working together to promote shared goals and values around the world.  You may visit www.uskoreafta.org to see more detail info, this site shows the all of the U.S. -Korea FTA benefits that you may want to see.  As you can know.  U.S.-Korea FTA agreement will give both countries to fast and rapid global economic crisis recovery.  

Sooner U.S.-Korea agreement ;for FTA better they can get like the packages are already there.....many citizens and many respectful Corporates and businesses as well as cross-section of the Coalition which currently consists of nearly 900 members representing every sector of the U.S. economy. It is only fitting that in addition to key companies like Boeing, Chevron, Citigroup and Goldman Sachs, the delegation includes represenatatives from the American Farm Bureau Federation, Coalition of Service Industries (CSI) and National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) and many others (2) are making this a great deal of requesting to hurry and action as soon as possible for US - Korea FTA to pass.

Many key stakeholders in the Korean government and business community to share updates on the Coalition's efforts to build support for the FTA in Washington and across the United States, and learn more about the economic and business enviornment in Korea. The Representative delegations are already aware of that they have to emphasize regarding autos and beef in order tothe FTA to move forward smooth for both countries.(2) You can see enthusiasic and the momentum everywhere so the agreement can be finalized and submitted to Congress as soon as possible. The Many are disappointed by the delay of the KORUS FTA due to URGENCY TO PASS THE US-KOREA FTA to pass before the EU-Korea FTA Signing Creates New Urgency for Action on KORUS FTA .

The following statements are from the US- Korea FTA Business Coalition, and Business Council and the U.S. chamber of Commerce:

Tami Overby, president of the U.S.-Korea Business Council and vice president for Asia, U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

"The U.S.-Korea FTA is not just a trade agreement—it is a job creation and competitiveness agreement,"

 "It will lay the foundation for achieving the president's goal of doubling U.S. exports over the next five years." In his State of the Union address, President Obama called for doubling U.S. exports over the next five years, which he said would support two million U.S. jobs. He cautioned that "if America sits on the sidelines while other nations sign trade deals, we will lose the chance to create jobs on our shores," and pledged to "strengthen our trade relations in Asia and with key partners like South Korea."

"Our leaders recognize that the U.S.-Korea FTA is part of the solution to U.S. job creation and our economic recovery," said Bill Rhodes, chairman of the U.S.-Korea Business Council. "By removing barriers to trade and investment facing U.S. manufacturers, farmers, and services providers, the agreement will generate new demand in Korea for U.S. goods and services and create new American jobs."

Rhodes, a senior advisor for Citi, said: "The signing of the EU-Korea FTA should be a wake-up call that time is of the essence on KORUS. By next July, U.S. workers and companies could be at a huge competitive disadvantage in one of our most important export markets if the EU-Korea FTA enters into effect without KORUS already in place."

"We are encouraged that President Obama has put forward a clear timetable for resolving the issues that have held up ratification of the KORUS FTA by the G-20 Summit in November, when he will meet with Korean President Lee. It is essential that the two governments meet this deadline, and that KORUS move forward for Congressional approval."

Thomas J. Donohue, President and CEO. U.S. Chamber of Commerce:  "By securing a more open and competitive Korean market, the U.S.-Korea FTA will boost U.S. exports to and investment in Korea-generating new jobs and economic growth in the United States.  The U.S. chamber is working vigorously to rally the U.S. business community and to ensure the agreement's swift approval when it goes to Congress."


The U.S.-Korea FTA Business Coalition is a broad-based group of U.S. companies, industry organizations, trade associations, and state and local chambers of commerce that strongly support Congressional approval of the U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement (FTA). You may see more detail with the following website :
www.uskoreafta.org .

The U.S.-Korea FTA would contribute significantly to job growth by increasing exports to one of the United States' largest trading partners. According to a recent study by the U.S. Chamber, 345,000 jobs in the United States are at risk if the agreement is not implemented.

The U.S. International Trade Commission has estimated that the reduction of tariff and non-tariff barriers to U.S. manufactured and agricultural goods under the agreement would increase U.S. exports to Korea by $10 billion to $11 billion.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is the world's largest business federation representing the interests of more than 3 million businesses of all sizes, sectors, and regions, as well as state and local chambers and industry associations.

U.S. President Obama is hoping to use the next week to make progress toward an agreement while he is special trip to G-20 Summit  November 11 - 12, 2010 and discuss further about the U.S and Korea Free Trade issues.

Sources:
1) U.S. Trade Agreement

2) Chamber Post (US-Korea FTA Business Coalition in Seoul)

Korus FTA: Roundtable Discussion with
Ambassador, Han Duk Soo

2010 G20 Summit Agenda

U.S. - Korea Business Council

U.S.-KOREA BUSINESS COUNCIL
AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
IN KOREA 2005 Policy Pape
r

White House

Reported by catch4all.com, Sandra Englund, November 3rd, 2010. Rev. November 6th, 2010

--------------------------------------------------------------

THE WHITE HOUSE Office of the Press Secretary ________________________________________________________________

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Nov 19, 2009

Remarks by President Barack Obama and President Lee Myung-Bak of Republic of Korea in Joint Press Conference

Blue House, Seoul, South Korea

12:35 P.M. KST

PRESIDENT LEE:  (As translated.)  We have beautiful weather today.  I know that yesterday we had sub-zero cold.  And President Obama brought with him very nice weather.  On behalf of the people of the Republic of Korea, I wish to extend our warmest welcome and greetings to President Obama and his delegation. 

We know how much President Obama appreciates and understands the value of Korean and Asian cultures.  I believe that President Obama's global leadership, a leadership that is based on mutual respect and mutual goals, will help usher in an era of hope and renewal to the United States and better serve peace and prosperity throughout the world. 

Having held three summit meetings with him, and having met many times in various multilateral settings over the past 10 months, I think I can say that we have indeed become very close friends.  In particular, I think our discussions today have been particularly in depth and very fruitful, very honest talks.  The relationship between our two countries is excellent and stands stronger than ever.  President Obama and I believe that it can become even stronger.  So we will continue to consult on specific ways to move our relationship forward. 

President Obama and I reaffirmed the solid ROK-U.S. defense posture, including the extended deterrence.  We also agreed to further develop our partnership so that it can become an example of what a strategic alliance of the 21st century should be by faithfully implementing the joint vision for the alliance adopted at our last meeting in June.

As part of these efforts, we agreed to have our foreign and defense ministers to meet and discuss specific ways to develop our alliance to the future sometime next year, which marks the 60th anniversary of the outbreak of the Korean War.

President Obama and I expressed our shared satisfaction that Korea and the United States are working closely together with regards to our approach vis-à-vis North Korea and the nuclear issue.  We also reaffirmed our commitment to the complete and verifiable denuclearization of North Korea through the six-party talks.  We fully share the view that the North Korean nuclear issue requires a definite and comprehensive resolution, as I described in our grand bargain, and agreed to closely consult on how to elaborate and implement this approach. 

It is my hope that North Korea would accept our proposal so that we can usher in a new era in which North Korea can be assured of its security and its people can enjoy real improvements in their quality of life.  We agreed to work closely together with the other countries in the six-party process to bring North Korea back to the six-party talks at an early date, and make sure that North Korea takes substantive measures towards its denuclearization.

Moreover, we noted our shared concern for North Korean humanitarian issues and agreed to work together to bring improvements in this area. 

Meanwhile President Obama and I reaffirmed the economic and strategic importance of the Korea-U.S. free trade agreement.  We agreed to redouble our efforts to move the agreement forward.

Noting with satisfaction the achievements of the G20 summit meeting in Pittsburgh, President Obama and I agreed to continue cooperating on implementing a framework for ensuring a strong sustainable and balanced growth.  We also agreed to work together to ensure the success of next November's G20 summit to be held here in Korea.

At the same time, we share the view that such global challenges as climate change, green growth, nonproliferation, and counterterrorism requires a collective response. 

In particular I would like to commend President Obama's endeavor towards a world without nuclear weapons, and in this respect the Republic of Korea intends to participate in and do its part to ensure the success of next April's nuclear security summit in Washington, D.C.

I am very pleased that we were able to have candid discussions on important issues that confront us, and I'm happy that we produced fruitful outcomes. 

I also wish to once again congratulate President Obama on his very successful trip to Asia.  And let me once again join the Korean people in expressing to President Obama and his delegation our warmest sentiments of friendship.

Thank you.

PRESIDENT OBAMA:  Well, it's a great honor to be making my first trip to the Republic of Korea as President of the United States.  I want to thank my good friend, President Lee, and the Korean people, for their extraordinary hospitality.  And I have to say that the arrival ceremony for our state visit was as spectacular as any that we've seen.

I was privileged to host President Lee in Washington in June.  As he mentioned, we've seen each other in many multilateral forums, as well, and we've developed a strong working relationship and friendship.  And it's a great pleasure to visit this beautiful city.

The Republic of Korea is a close and valued friend and ally of the United States.  The strong bonds between our people were forged in the battles of the Korean War nearly 60 years ago.  Our alliance, which is grounded in shared interests and values, has provided peace and security on this peninsula and in the region for many decades.  And I'm pleased to say that our alliance has never been stronger than it is today.

The 60th anniversary of the outbreak of the Korean War presents an important opportunity to honor the service of our veterans, to reflect on the principles for which they fought, and to move forward in adapting our alliance to meet the challenges of the 21st century.  As part of this process, we agreed that Secretaries Clinton and Gates will meet with their Korean counterparts next year to work on realizing our shared vision for the alliance going forward.

The Republic of Korea has made extraordinary progress in the six decades since the Korean War.  Evidence of that progress can be seen in Korea's strong democracy, its vibrant economy, but it can also be seen in Korea's increasingly prominent role in global affairs.  Indeed, in just one generation, the Republic of Korea has gone from a recipient of aid to a donor nation and -- under the leadership of President Lee, a leader within the G20.

The United States has been proud to stand as a friend and ally of the Korean people throughout this period.   And later today, I'll also visit some of our servicemen and women, who represent America's unwavering commitment to the security of this country.  In going forward, I know that our two nations can strengthen our cooperation on a range of critical issues, including several that we discussed today.

On North Korea, our governments have maintained extraordinarily close cooperation, and President Lee and I are in full agreement on our common approach going forward.  I reaffirmed my commitment to continue working together in the six-party process to achieve a definitive and comprehensive resolution of the nuclear issue.  As a part of that effort, we will be sending Ambassador Bosworth to North Korea on December 8th to engage in direct talks with the North Koreans.

Our message is clear:  If North Korea is prepared to take concrete and irreversible steps to fulfill its obligations and eliminate its nuclear weapons program, the United States will support economic assistance and help promote its full integration into the community of nations.  That opportunity and respect will not come with threats -- North Korea must live up to its obligations.

The Republic of Korea is also, obviously, a close trading partner of the United States, and the relationship between our nations advance our common prosperity.  To strengthen those ties, President Lee and I discussed the U.S.-Korea free trade agreement, which holds out the promise of serving our mutual interests.  And together, we're committed to working together to move the agreement forward.

I also thanked President Lee for his leadership at the G20, as we continue our efforts to transition from rescuing the global economy to promoting balanced and sustainable growth.  In that effort, Korea will play a critical role as a host for the G20 next year.

We also discussed the importance of promoting security and stability in Afghanistan and Pakistan, and I welcomed President Lee's decision to establish a Provincial Reconstruction Team in Afghanistan.  This important contribution will help support the strengthening of Afghan capacity, which is essential to achieving our goals in Afghanistan.

And finally, we agreed to coordinate our efforts to clean energy and climate change.  I told President Lee that Korea's recent announcement of an ambitious target for 2020 is a model for emerging economies.  And building on the progress that we made at APEC and in Beijing, I will continue to work closely with President Lee to help pave the way for a successful outcome in Copenhagen next month.

Once again, I want to thank President Lee and the Korean people for their warm hospitality.  I look forward to working with you, Mr. President, to strengthen a relationship that does so much to advance the mutual interests of our citizens.  And as a fan of Korean culture and Korean barbecue, I'm also very much looking forward to lunch that we'll be having in a few minutes.  So thank you very much.  Kamsa hamnida.

Q    First of all, welcome to Korea, Mr. President.  A question going out to President Lee regarding the North Korea nuclear issue.  Do you envisage any timeline between Korea and the United States in order to resolve the North Korean nuclear issue?  Do you have any deadlines about it?  And also regarding the grand bargain proposal that you proposed to North Korea, how do you think that the North Koreans will react to your grand bargain proposal?  And both of you mentioned the result of your talks, but what kind of things did you discuss regarding the KORUS FTA?

A question going out to President Obama on the KORUS FTA -- the KORUS FTA is regarded here within Korea as something that will further strengthen bilateral relationship between Korea and the United States, and many Korean people are hopeful or hoping for the early ratification of the KORUS FTA.  And I would just like to ask, Mr. President, of your strategic vision regarding the KORUS FTA?

And as for the grand bargain proposal, I would just like to ask you how much do you intend to cooperate with the South Koreans in implementing this?

PRESIDENT LEE:  I think we promised to ask one question to one leader, but I think you're asking many questions all at once. First of all, on North Korea nuclear issue and convincing North Korea to give up their nuclear weapons program, it is not a simple matter.  We know that for sure.  For the last 20 years or so, we've been dealing with the North Koreans and negotiating with the North Koreans.  We would take one step forward and two steps back, and that has taken 20 years, and still we do not have a full resolvement of this issue.

Now, with President Obama and the White House, we were successful in passing and adopting a U.N. Security Council resolution.  International cooperation is perfect in my opinion in terms of trying to resolve this issue peacefully, and I think we are entering into a new chapter in bringing this issue to an end. 

I do not put any deadline to resolving this North Korean nuclear issue.  Of course we would want to resolve this issue as soon as possible because that is critical for ensuring peace and stability of the region and the world.  And so this is why I proposed a grand bargain proposal.

And what's important is to really know whether North Korea has genuine intent to give up fully and verifiably their nuclear weapons program.  We must find out the intention of the North Koreans, and as soon as we find out, the better it is.  And the negotiations to convince North Korea to resolve their nuclear weapons issue, like I said, it is not going to be easy, but I believe it is possible that we can resolve this issue peacefully. So together with President Obama and the international community, we will work to resolve this issue.

About the grand bargain, the North Koreans haven't yet conveyed what they thought of the grand bargain, but in order for the North Koreans to ensure their stability, to improve the lives of the North Korean population, to have economic prosperity -- in short, for a better future the North Koreans -- it is my wish that the North Koreans will adopt the grand bargain proposal.

And as for the KORUS FTA, I'm sure President Obama will be making a comment, so I'll just listen.

PRESIDENT OBAMA:  Well, first of all, with respect to North Korea, there's going to be extraordinarily close coordination between our two countries, as there has been for many years. 

The thing I want to emphasize is that President Lee and I both agree on the need to break the pattern that has existed in the past in which North Korea behaves in a provocative fashion;  it then is willing to return to talks; it talks for a while and then leaves the talks seeking further concessions, and there's never actually any progress on the core issues.

I think President Lee is exactly right, and my administration is taking the same approach, which is the door is open to resolving these issues peacefully, for North Korea to see over time the reduction of sanctions and its increasing integration into the international community -- something that will be good for its people -- but it will only happen if North Korea is taking serious steps around the nuclear issue.  And we will not distracted by a whole host of other side items that end up generating a lot of meetings but not concrete action.

Now, with respect to the free trade agreement, I am a strong believer that both countries can benefit from expanding our trade ties.  And so I have told President Lee and his team that I am committed to seeing the two countries work together to move this agreement forward.  There are still issues that are being discussed and worked on and we have put our teams in place to make sure that we are covering all the issues that might be a barrier to final ratification of the agreement.

With respect to the United States, I think it's important to understand -- and I shared this with President Lee -- that American companies and workers are very confident in our ability to compete and we recognize that there's not only a economic but also a strategy interest in expanding our ties to South Korea.  There is obviously also a concern within the United States around the incredible trade imbalances that have grown over the last several decades.  Those imbalances are not as prominent with Korea, but there has been a tendency I think to lump all of Asia together when Congress looks at trade agreements and says it appears as if this is one-way street. 

And one of my goals is to make sure that as we work through these issues, that the American people, American businesses, American workers recognize that we have to look at each agreement and each country on its own merits, and make sure that we can create the kind of win-win situation that I know President Lee is interested in seeing, as well.

I think that we've got a question.  Julianna.

Q    Thank you, Mr. President, President Lee.  President Obama, it appears that Iran has rejected the international offer on its nuclear problem.  What are the severe consequences that you threaten, and when will we see them? 

And for President Lee, are you willing to open up your market to U.S. automobiles to get the Korean free trade agreement moving again?

PRESIDENT OBAMA:  With respect to Iran, at the beginning of my administration we put in place a policy that we have executed as drawn up over the last several months.  What we said was that we would take a new approach and say to Iran that we are willing to engage them directly; that we would organize the international community around a series of proposals that would permit Iran to show its intentions to give up any nuclear weapon programs and pursue peaceful nuclear energy under the framework of a nonproliferation regime; that even as we were organizing the international community to put forward a fair deal to the Iranians, that we would also move on a dual track and that we weren't going to duplicate what has happened with North Korea in which talks just continue forever without any actual resolution to the issue -- so that we indicated that our offer would be on the table for a certain period of time, and that when that time ran out, we would look at other approaches that would increase pressure on Iran to give up its nuclear weapons program.

Since that time, through the auspices of the International Atomic Energy Agency, as well as the P5-plus-1, we put forward such a proposal, one in which low-enriched uranium could be removed from Iran, processed outside of Iran, returned to them in a way that couldn't be weaponized and used for research purposes. 
The fairness of the deal I think is confirmed by the fact that Russia, China, the other members of the P5-plus-1, as well as Mohamed ElBaredei, the Secretary General of the IAEA, all confirmed that this was a smart, creative proposal that could lead to a path in which Iran was no longer in breach of its international agreements, and that Iran should accept them.

Iran has taken weeks now and has not shown its willingness to say yes to this proposal.  And I have not seen the report that you're referring to today, but we've seen indications that, whether it's for internal political reasons or because they are stuck in some of their own rhetoric, they have been unable to get to yes.

And so as a consequence, we have begun discussions with our international partners about the importance of having consequences; that the dual-track approach requires Iran to get a clear message that when it fails to take advantage of these opportunities, that in fact it is not making itself more secure, it's making itself less secure.  And our expectation is, is that over the next several weeks we will be developing a package of potential steps that we could take that will indicate our seriousness to Iran.

I continue to hold out the prospect that they may decide to walk through this door.  I hope they do.  But what I'm pleased about is the extraordinary international unity that we've seen.  If you think at the beginning of the year how disjointed international efforts were and how uneven perceptions were about Iran's nuclear program and where we are today, I think it's an indication that we've taken the right approach.

PRESIDENT LEE:  With regards to the automobile, in principle I believe in free trade and I believe that the international community must strengthen free trade.  The last two decades or so I think free trade and the movement of goods and services was the driving force behind the development and economic prosperity that we enjoy today. 

But at the same time, I also believe that the global economy should grow in a more sustained and balanced way, as well.  If there are any imbalances between two economies, it should be corrected.  And this is a topic and an agenda that is being discussed within the G20 forum, and this is something that President Obama and I talked about, as well.

For me, Korea and the United States, the facts are clear,
trade imbalances between our two countries is not great.  I think it is safe to say that we have almost a balanced account between Korea and the United States.  Of course, when Korea was a closed economy with protectionist measures, there were some trade imbalances.  But compared to countries like China and Japan, the trade imbalances between our two countries is very miniscule.

And President Obama, as he mentioned in his brief remarks just now, he said that all different economies should be judged on their own merits, and free trade agreements is not an exception.  And he and I had very candid and frank discussions and forward-looking discussions between us today during the meeting on how to move the KORUS FTA forward.  And I very much appreciate President Obama for engaging in such discussions.

In the United States I think there is a misperception that KORUS FTA, once it is passed, that it is somehow going to only benefit Korea and be detrimental to American consumers, which is not true.  Of course there are economic perspectives to take into consideration, but there are -- a much bigger strategic perspective to this.  And I believe overall this is beneficial for both Korea and the United States.

Of course each industry will be impacted differently.  Here in Korea the service sector, the agricultural sector, they are completely against the passage of the KORUS FTA because they lag far behind their American counterparts.  But for us, the Korean government, we view the KORUS FTA in a more comprehensive matter. Overall it is beneficial for us in the long term.

If there is any problems in the automobile sector, like you asked, then we are ready to resolve this issue.  There are other automobile manufacturers, like in the Europeans -- as we all know, they produce a tremendous number of automobiles, and we have a free trade agreement with the 27-member European Union, and we have an agreement which has been signed.  And we are engaging more and more with our European partners.

And so I think we should have more opportunities to talk about these issues with each other.  And on this issue, President Obama and I talked about in detail again how to move forward this agreement.  I believe that, again, this is beneficial for both Korea and the United States.

Thank you.  We will be now concluding the joint press availability between Korea and the U.S. 

END
1:00 P.M. KST

Source: The White House.

 

North and South Korean Ships Exchange Fire in Gunbattle
On November 10th, 2009

Sources: Yahoonews and CNN
CNN News: North and South Korea fired in Gunbattle
Joint Security Area North and South Korea
The Joint Security Area (JSA), often called the "Truce Village" in both the media[ and various military accounts, is the only portion of the Korean Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) where South and ...
North Korea's nervous neighbours - 29 May 09:North Korea's nuclear test has rattled the nerves of many of its neighbours, triggering fears of a regional arms race and the possibly that other countries, including Japan, might chose to develop . President Obama on North Korea:The President gives remarks on North Korea's nuclear weapons test. May 25, 2009. (Public Domain)
Defector warns of N Korea chemical threat - 24 Jul 09: While much of the world's attention has been on North Korea's nuclear weapons programme, a defector is warning of a more imminent threat. He says that Pyongyang has a sophisticated chemical and b... May 27, 2009 :North Korea Tests Nuclear Bomb: This one was much bigger than the last said Russian officials. They also noted that the bomb detonated underground Monday was comparable to those that obliterated Hiroshima and Nagasaki, raising fe... ...
SEOUL, South Korea - A badly damaged North Korean patrol ship retreated in flames Tuesday after a skirmish with a South Korean naval vessel along their disputed western coast, South Korean officials said.

The first naval clash in seven years broke out just a week before President Barack Obama is due to visit Seoul, raising suspicions the North's communist regime is trying to rachet up tensions to gain a negotiating advantage.

There were no South Korean casualties, the country's Joint Chiefs of Staff said in a statement, and it was not immediately clear if there were any casualties on the North Korean side. Each side blamed the other for violating the sea border.

The exchange of fire occurred as U.S. officials said Obama has decided to send a special envoy to Pyongyang for rare direct talks on the communist country's nuclear weapons program. No date has been set, but the talks would be the first one-on-one negotiations since Obama took office in January.

"It was an intentional provocation by North Korea to draw attention ahead of Obama's trip," said Shin Yul, a political science professor at Seoul's Myongji University.

He also said the North was sending a message to Obama that it wants to replace the armistice agreement that ended the Korean War in 1953 with a permanent peace treaty while keeping its nuclear weapons.

Washington has consistently said that Pyongyang must abandon its nuclear arsenal for any peace treaty to be concluded. North Korea has conducted two underground nuclear tests since 2006 and is believed to have enough weaponized plutonium for half a dozen atomic weapons.

"We are sternly protesting to North Korea and urging it to prevent the recurrence of similar incidents," South Korean Rear Adm. Lee Ki-sik told reporters in Seoul.

North Korea's military issued a statement blaming South Korea for the "grave armed provocation," saying its ships had crossed into North Korean territory.

The North claimed that a group of South Korean warships opened fire but fled after the North Korean patrol boat dealt "a prompt retaliatory blow." The statement, carried on the official Korean Central News Agency, said the South should apologize.

South Korean President Lee Myung-bak, who convened an emergency security meeting, ordered the South's defense minister to strengthen military readiness.

South Korea's Joint Chiefs of Staff said in a statement that a North Korean patrol boat crossed the disputed western sea border about 11:27 a.m. (0227 GMT), drawing warning shots from a South Korean navy vessel. The North Korean boat then opened fire and the South's ship returned fire before the North's vessel sailed back toward its waters, the statement said.

The clash occurred near the South Korean-held island of Daecheong, about 120 nautical miles (220 kilometers) off the port city of Incheon, west of Seoul, the statement said.

The North Korean ship was seriously damaged in the skirmish, a Joint Chiefs of Staff officer said on condition of anonymity, citing department policy. Prime Minister Chung Un-chan told lawmakers the ship was on fire when it fled north.

Lee, the rear admiral, said the shooting lasted for about two minutes, during which the North Korean ship fired about 50 rounds at the South Korean vessel, about two miles (3.2 kilometers) away. He said the South Korean ship was lightly damaged.

He said several Chinese fishing boats were operating in the area at the time of clash, but they were undamaged. Chung, the prime minister, described the clash as "accidental," telling lawmakers that two North Korean ships had crossed into South Korean waters in an attempt to clamp down on Chinese fishing.

Lee, however, said the South Korean military was investigating if the North's alleged violation was deliberate. The Koreas regularly accuse each other of straying into their respective territories. South Korea's military said that North Korean ships have already violated the sea border 22 times this year.

The two sides fought deadly skirmishes along the western sea border in 1999 and 2002.

No South Koreans were killed in 1999, but six South Korean sailors died in 2002, according to the South Korean navy. It said exact North Korean causalities remain unclear.

Baek Seung-joo, a North Korea expert at Seoul's state-run Korea Institute for Defense Analyses, said Tuesday's clash would not have a big impact on inter-Korean relations.

He said the Koreas held a landmark summit in 2000 and the North sent a cheering squad to the South for the Asian Games in 2002. Both events took place after the separate clashes in 1999 and 2002.

Baek, like fellow analyst Shin, said that North Korea caused the incident but that Pyongyang appears to want to create tensions and use them for domestic political consumption.

The two Koreas have yet to agree on their sea border more than 50 years after the end of their 1950-53 Korean War, which ended in an armistice and not a peace treaty. Instead, they rely on a line that the then-commander of U.N. forces, which fought for the South, drew unilaterally at the end of the conflict.

North Korea last month accused South Korean warships of broaching its territory in waters off the west coast and warned of a clash in the zone, which is a rich crab fishing area.

The latest conflict comes after North Korea has reached out to Seoul and Washington following months of tension over its nuclear and missile programs.

North Korea launched a long-range rocket in April and carried out its second underground nuclear test in May. But it subsequently released South Korean and U.S. detainees, agreed to resume joint projects with South Korea and offered direct talks with Washington.

Two administration officials said Monday in Washington that Obama has decided, after months of deliberation, to send a special envoy to Pyongyang for direct talks on nuclear issues.

Obama will send envoy Stephen Bosworth, although no date for his trip has been set, the officials said. The officials discussed the matter on condition of anonymity because the decision has not been publicly announced.

Hundreds of thousands of combat-ready troops on both sides face across the 155-mile-long (248-kilometers-long) land border that is also strewn with land mines and tank traps and laced with barbed wire. About 28,500 U.S. troops are stationed in South Korea to deter a potential North Korean aggression.

Associated Press Writer Kwang-tae Kim in Seoul and AP photographer Jin-man Lee in Panmunjom, Korea contributed to this report.
(This version CORRECTS that about 50 rounds were fired by the North Korean ship, not the South Korean.) .

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

According to the CNN news dated November 10th, 2009,
a patrol ship from the Communist North crossed the demarcation line late Tuesday morning, prompting the South's navy to fire warning shots, the South Korean official told Yonhap.

"The North Koreans then fired back," the official said.

CNN also reported that antoher defense official told the news agency that South Korea was not ruling out "the possibility that the clash may have been accidental."

Back in June 1999: A nine-day confrontation was sparked when several North Korean ships intruded into disputed waters near the Northern Limit Line on the Yellow Sea. A firefight erupted on 15 June 1999, sinking a North Korean torpedo boat and damaging five others. Two South Korean vessels were lightly damaged. North Korea issues a warning that violent exchanges would continue if the disputed waters were to continue being intruded by South Korea or the United States.

In January 5, 2002: North Korean patrol boats continue to infiltrate into South Korean waters, with another craft spotted off Yonpyong Island in the Yellow Sea.

Also in June 29, 2002: North Korean patrol boats crossed the Northern Limit Line and fired at a South Korean patrol boat, provoking a firefight which killed four South Korean military personnel and an unknown number of North Koreans.

There was an Air incidents in February 19, 2003: A North Korean fighter jet entered South Korean airspace over the Yellow Sea, the first since 1983. Six South Korean fighter planes responded, and the North Korean plane retreated after two minutes.

North and South Korea have been bitterly divided since the 1950-53 war between them ended without a peace treaty.

In August 1998, North Korea alarmed the world by successfully launching a multi-stage missile over Japan and into the Pacific Ocean. Nearly a year later, reports from the Korean peninsula indicated that North Korea was ready to launch an improved version of the missile, one capable of striking the continental United States. It became clear for the first time that North Korea could deliver a weapon of mass destruction not just to Seoul, but also to Seattle.

North Korea's WMD programs pose a major threat to the United States and its allies. This threat has advanced considerably since 1994, There is significant evidence that undeclared nuclear weapons development activity continues, including efforts to acquire uranium enrichment technologies and recent nuclear-related high explosive tests. It is not only the neighbor South Korea and Japan's concern but also it is concern for the world whcih could produce additional nuclear weapons outside of the constraints imposed by the 1994 Agreed Framework.

But, Now it is the biggist concern and major issue by the nations and around the world which causing the main environmental issues due to the - The North Korea total size 120,540 km2 (98th) 46,528 sq mi - Water (%) 4.87 small land producing the nuclear-related high explosive tests which the land testing does not have the nuclear waste management and also it will be hard to observe by the small land. However, the contaminated waste will hurt the neighbor South Korea worst by the air by water and for generation to generation like nuclear radiation creating the unexpected human can think of......include the eathquake....


This is one other major issue that the world should consider: Long-Range Missile Capabilities will hurt the worst in South Korea and Japan also affecting greater areas like Canada and United States according to the shown in 1999 Data shown by U.S. Congress, Geography and Map Division.

See the potential North Korean Long-Range Missile Capabilities which shown in 1999 by U.S. Congress data:


The U.S. and the world including Secretary-General, Ban Ki-moon would like to see free of nuclear and it is serious issues which the international efforts to prevent nuclear proliferation and achieve nuclear disarmament continue to face significant challenges. A nuclear weapon is an explosive device that derives its destructive force from nuclear reactions, either fission or a combination of fission and fusion.

U.S. President Barack Obama and South Korean President Lee Myung-bak Emphasised Denuclearization North Korea at The White House, Rose Garden (June 16, 2009): "We are more than willing to engage in negotiations to get North Korea on a path of peaceful coexistence with its neighbors, and we want to encourage their prosperity," President Obama said in the Rose Garden alongside South Korean President Lee Myung-bak. "But belligerent, provocative behavior that threatens neighbors will be met with significant and serious enforcement of sanctions that are in place.".

 

Source:

Yahoo News

CNN

Wikipedia

Global security .

National Earthquake Information

Secretary of General Ban Ki-Moon Says UN Needs Urgent
support by The Communities and 192 World Leaders

http://catch4all.com/positive/2009/NorthKoreaNukeAgain/NKwarnsNkwar/US_KoreaEmphasisDenukNorthKorea/

Reported by Catch4all.com, Sandra Englund, November 10th, 2009

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pyongyang fired seven short-range missiles in less than seven hours
Regardless diplomatic actions from UN security council and U.S. .


Sources: Yahoonews and foxnews

SEOUL, South Korea - North Korea launched seven ballistic missiles Saturday into waters off its east coast in a show of military firepower that defied U.N. resolutions and drew global expressions of condemnation and concern.

The salvo, confirmed by the South Korean government, also appeared to be a slap at the United States as Washington moves to enforce U.N. as well as its own sanctions against the isolated regime for its May 25 nuclear test.

The launches came on July 4, which is U.S. Independence Day. The display was similar to one that took place three years ago, also while Americans celebrated the Fourth of July during another period of tensions over Pyongyang's nuclear weapons program.

The number of missiles was the same, though in 2006 North Korea also launched a long-range rocket that broke apart and fell into the ocean less than a minute after liftoff.

South Korea said Saturday's missiles likely flew more than 250 miles (400 kilometers), apparently landing in waters between the Korean peninsula and Japan.

South Korea and Japan both condemned the launches, with Tokyo calling them a "serious act of provocation." Britain and France issued similar statements.

Russia and China, both close to North Korea, expressed concern over an "escalation of tension in the region," the Russian Foreign Ministry said in a statement after a meeting in Moscow.

In Washington, the White House had no immediate comment. But two senior officials in President Barack Obama's administration, speaking in advance of the launches, said any reaction was likely to be muted to avoid giving attention to Pyongyang or antagonize it. They spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly.

North Korea has engaged in a series of acts this year widely seen as provocative. It fired a long-range rocket it said was a satellite in early April, and in late May it carried out its second underground nuclear test following the first in late 2006.

The country has also stoked tensions with rival South Korea and last month threatened "thousand-fold" military retaliation against the U.S. and its allies if provoked.

In addition, North Korea convicted two American journalists last month and sentenced them to 12 years hard labor for illegally entering the country. It is also holding a South Korean worker for allegedly denouncing its political system.

The secretive communist country is believed undergoing a political transition in which 67-year-old leader Kim Jong Il appears to be laying the groundwork to transfer power to one of his sons. Kim himself took over from his late father, the country's founder.

South Korean officials said Saturday's launches came throughout the day and were part of military exercises. The North, which had warned ships to stay away from waters off the east coast through July 10, also fired what are believed to have been four short-range cruise missiles Thursday.

Speculation had been building for weeks that the launches were coming. The key question has been whether the North might fire an intercontinental ballistic missile, as it vowed to do in late April.

Despite a Japanese newspaper report last month that one might be launched toward Hawaii in early July, U.S. officials have noted no such preparations, which are complex, usually take days and are often observable by spy satellites. Still, that hasn't stopped Washington from boosting missile defenses as a precaution.

South Korea's Yonhap news agency suggested launch activity may be winding down, at least for now. It reported late Saturday, citing an unidentified military official, that the North was pulling personnel from its missile launch site and allowing ships to sail again off the coast. The Defense Ministry said it could not confirm the report.

North Korea's state news agency did not mention the launches, so it was hard to grasp Pyongyang's true intentions. Officials and analysts, however, said they showed the country remains happy to stand up to the international community and appears unwilling to give in to efforts to punish it.

"I think it's a demonstration of their defiance and rejection of the U.N. Security Council Resolution 1874, for one thing, and to demonstrate their military power capabilities to any potential adversaries" as well as potential customers for its weapons, said Daniel Pinkston, a Seoul-based analyst for the International Crisis Group think tank.

Pinkston also said that there was "certainly a political aspect connected" to the launches and that July 4 was perhaps a "symbolic date," suggesting the timing was not a coincidence.

Resolution 1874, which was approved last month and which condemned the North's nuclear test, was the third to be passed by the U.N. Security Council against the country since 2006. All three ban North Korea from launching ballistic missiles.

A senior official in South Korea's presidential office said that while the launches were part of military exercises, "North Korea also appeared to have sent a message to the U.S.," though he did not elaborate. Analysts have said North Korea's saber rattling is partially aimed at pressuring Washington to engage in direct negotiations. North Korea is believed to desire diplomatic relations and a peace treaty to formally end the 1950-53 Korean War.

Obama's administration has offered dialogue, but it says North Korea must return to stalled international talks on its denuclearization and stop engaging in what Washington sees as provocative behavior threatening allies South Korea and Japan.

Paik Hak-soon, an expert on North Korea at the Sejong Institute, a think tank near Seoul, rejected the idea that the North chose July 4 to confront or annoy the U.S. on its national day.

He said the launches were more likely a warning to the international community against enforcing U.N. sanctions, which call for searches of North Korean ships suspected of carrying banned items, such as nuclear or missile parts.

He said North Korea will continue to carry out more missile and nuclear tests in the future, as long as relations with the U.S. and South Korea remain tense.

"The structure of confrontation is there, intact," he said.

___

Associated Press writers Kwang-tae Kim, Jae-soon Chang in Seoul, Tomoko A. Hosaka in Tokyo, Jill Lawless in London, Elaine Ganley in Paris, Mansur Mirovalev in Moscow and Lara Jakes in Washington contributed to this report.

Source yahoonews.

Site provided by Catch4all.com, Sandra Englund, July 3rd, 2009



WASHINGTON - The U.S. military is tracking a ship from North Korea that may be carrying illicit weapons, the first vessel monitored under tougher new United Nations rules meant to rein in and punish the communist government following a nuclear test, officials said Thursday.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates said he has ordered additional protections for Hawaii just in case North Korea launches a long-range missile over the Pacific Ocean.

The suspect ship could become a test case for interception of the North's ships at sea, something the North has said it would consider an act of war.

Officials said the U.S. is monitoring the voyage of the North Korean-flagged Kang Nam, which left port in North Korea on Wednesday. On Thursday, it was traveling in the Pacific Ocean off the coast of China, two officials said on condition of anonymity to discuss intelligence.

What the Kang Nam was carrying was not known, but the ship has been involved in weapons proliferation, one of the officials said.

The ship is among a group that is watched regularly but is the only one believed to have cargo that could potentially violate the U.N. resolution, the official said.

Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen did not specifically confirm that the U.S. was monitoring the ship when he was asked about it at a Pentagon news conference Thursday.

"We intend to vigorously enforce the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1874 to include options, to include, certainly, hail and query," Mullen said. "If a vessel like this is queried and doesn't allow a permissive search," he noted, it can be directed into port.

The Security Council resolution calls on all 192 U.N. member states to inspect vessels on the high seas "if they have information that provides reasonable grounds to believe that the cargo" contains banned weapons or material to make them, and if approval is given by the country whose flag the ship sails under.

If the country refuses to give approval, it must direct the vessel "to an appropriate and convenient port for the required inspection by the local authorities."

The resolution does not authorize the use of force. But if a country refuses to order a vessel to a port for inspection, it would be in violation of the resolution and the country licensing the vessel would face possible sanctions by the Security Council.

Gates, speaking at the same news conference, said the Pentagon is concerned about the possibility of a North Korean missile launch "in the direction of Hawaii."

Gates told reporters at the Pentagon he has sent the military's ground-based mobile missile system to Hawaii, and positioned a radar system nearby. The Terminal High Altitude Area Defense system is designed to shoot down ballistic missiles in their last stage of flight.

"We are in a good position, should it become necessary, to protect Americans and American territory," Gates said.

A Japanese newspaper reported Thursday that North Korea might fire its most advanced ballistic missile toward Hawaii around the Fourth of July holiday.

A new missile launch - though not expected to reach U.S. territory - would be a brazen slap in the face of the international community, which punished North Korea with new U.N. sanctions for conducting a second nuclear test on May 25 in defiance of a U.N. ban.

North Korea spurned the U.N. Security Council resolution with threats of war and pledges to expand its nuclear bomb-making program.

The missile now being readied in the North is believed to be a Taepodong-2 with a range of up to 4,000 miles and would be launched from North Korea's Dongchang-ni site on the northwestern coast, the Yomiuri newspaper said. It cited an analysis by Japan's Defense Ministry and intelligence gathered by U.S. reconnaissance satellites.

-------------------------------------------

Also The Fox news has leaned that That The latest tension follows a Japanese news report that North Korea may fire a long-range ballistic missile toward Hawaii in early July.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Thursday the military is "watching" that situation "very closely," and would have "some concerns" if North Korea launched a missile in the direction of Hawaii. But he expressed confidence in U.S. ability to handle such a launch.

Gates said he's directed the deployment of the Theater High Altitude Area Defense, a mobile missile defense system used for knocking down long- and medium-range missiles.

"The ground-based interceptors are clearly in a position to take action. So, without telegraphing what we will do, I would just say ... I think we are in a good position, should it become necessary, to protect the American territory."

White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs stayed mum on the suspect ship at Thursday's press briefing, commenting generally on the nature of the U.N. resolution.

"There are some specific actions that have to be taken by countries who are near these ships, whose water these ships are in, ports that they might be destined for that are all part of this process," Gibbs said. "The White House feels comfortable and confident that we have an understanding of what this resolution does."

The United Nations Security Council The UN Security Council passed resolution 1874 regarding North Korea on June 12, 2009.

The Security Council, Recalling its previous relevant resolutions, including resolution 825 (1993), resolution 1540 (2004), resolution 1695 (2006), and, in particular, resolution 1718 (2006), as well as the statements of its President of 6 October 2006 (S/PRST/2006/41) and 13 April 2009 (S/PRST/2009/7),.

The following UN Security council Resolution 1874 shows the detail information click to see detail info: (UN Security council Resolution 1874).

Here is how the Global Governance Monitor works Global Governance Monitor.

Reported by catch4all.com, Sandra Englund, June 20, 2009

-----------------------

Fox News
CNN
Yahoo

UN Security council Resolution 1874

Global Governance Monitor

Youtube
Website provided Sandra Englund, June 20, 2009

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

U.S. President Barack Obama and South Korean President Lee Myung-bak Emphasis
Denuclearization North Korea
at The White House, Rose Garden
(June 16, 2009):
U.S., South Korea, Japan, China, Russia, and UN Security United Together
Nuclear Test will DAMAGE
THE SOUTH KOREA, JAPAN AND BEYOND THE GREEN WORLD"

 

A South Korean protester carries a mock North Korean missile with portraits of North Korean leader Kim Jong Il during a rally against the North's nuclear and missile programs in Seoul, South Korea, Monday, June 15, 2009. South Korean President Lee Myung-bak said Monday that the country's alliance with the United States is key to resolving North Korea's nuclear and missile threats, as a news report said the allies pinpointed 11 underground sites in the North for a possible third atomic test

Sources: Yahoo.com

WASHINGTON - Declaring North Korea a "grave threat" to the world, President Barack Obama on Tuesday pledged the U.S. and its allies will aggressively enforce fresh international penalties against the nuclear-armed nation and stop rewarding its leaders for repeated provocations.

In a display of unity with South Korea's leader, Obama said the world must break a pattern in which North Korea puts the globe on edge, only to put itself in line for concessions if it holds out long enough.

"We are more than willing to engage in negotiations to get North Korea on a path of peaceful coexistence with its neighbors, and we want to encourage their prosperity," Obama said in the Rose Garden alongside South Korean President Lee Myung-bak. "But belligerent, provocative behavior that threatens neighbors will be met with significant and serious enforcement of sanctions that are in place."

Obama's comments came at a time of intensifying concern, with the North stepping up its bomb-making activities and threatening war against any country that blockades its ships. Pentagon officials warned on Tuesday that North Korea's missiles could strike the U.S. within three years if its weapons growth goes unchecked.

Emboldened by fresh assurances of protection by the United States, Lee went even further in warning that North Korea's tactics will not be tolerated. Asked if he felt his country was under the threat of attack from the North, Lee said his country's alliance with the U.S. will "prevent anything from happening."

He said of the North Koreans, "They will think twice about taking any measures that they will regret."

Defiantly pursuing its nuclear ambitions, North Korea has posed a major foreign policy challenge for Obama. However, the new president has found support from the international community, including a swift resolution of sanctions imposed by the U.N. Security Council just last week.

The new punishments toughen an arms embargo against North Korea and authorize ship searches in an attempt to thwart the Koreans' nuclear and ballistic missile programs. The U.N., however, did not authorize military force to enforce the measures.

North Korea provoked that rebuke by conducting its second nuclear test on May 25, following recent missile launches that had already alarmed the world.

Beyond enforcement of the new U.N. penalties, Lee said he and Obama agreed on something more _ a push for other new policies that will "effectively persuade North Korea to irrevocably dismantle all their nuclear weapons programs." The South Korean leader said those measures will be discussed among the five nations that had been working with North Korea on disarmament until talks stalled: the U.S., South Korea, Japan, Russia and China.

He did not elaborate, and the White House had no comment on the matter.

North Korea has bargained with other countries for more than a decade about giving up its nuclear program, gaining such concessions as energy and economic aid, and then reneging.

The North is thought to have enough weaponized plutonium for at least half a dozen atomic bombs and is believed to be preparing for another nuclear test. Deepening the crisis, it responded to the new sanctions by promising to "weaponize" all its plutonium and step up its nuclear bomb-making by enriching uranium _ the first time it had acknowledged it had such a program. Both plutonium and uranium can be used to make atomic bombs.

With all that as a backdrop, Lee's treatment at the White House was meant to underscore solidarity at a perilous time.

The South Korean president was the first foreign leader in Obama's nearly five-month-old presidency to get the honor of a joint appearance in the Rose Garden. He spoke repeatedly of his nation's firm partnership with the United States and thanked the American people "for their selfless sacrifice in defending my country and its people." Obama said the friendship was anchored in democratic values, and then he turned his words on the country's northern neighbor.

"North Korea has abandoned its own commitments and violated international law," Obama said. "Its nuclear and ballistic missile programs post a grave threat to peace and security of Asia and to the world."

Obama said that North Korea's record of threatening other countries and spreading nuclear technology around the world means it should not be recognized as a legitimate nuclear power.

At a missile defense hearing on Capitol Hill, Deputy Defense Secretary William Lynn pointed to North Korea's recent steps to speed up its long-range weapons program and agreed with Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., that the U.S. should be prepared for a "worst-case scenario."

"We think it ultimately could _ if taken to its conclusion _ it could present a threat to the homeland," Lynn said at a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing.

At the Defense Department press secretary Geoff Morrell declined to say when interdiction operations might begin under the new U.N. sanctions, but he said the U.S. already has enough ships and other resources in the region to do the job. Morrell was asked what the point of the activity would be _ and whether it was only a half-measure _ as long as there was no authority to forcibly board Korean ships.

"I think if the world is in agreement that we are all going to monitor and then attempt to compliantly board and attempt to then direct those ships into a port where they can then be inspected, that is real progress," he said. "That is more than what we were doing before."

___

Associated Press writers Robert Burns, Pauline Jelinek, Lara Jakes and Jennifer Loven contributed to this report.

-------------------------------

According to the FAS report, there are reportedly as many as 22 nuclear facilities in 18 locations in North Korea. These include uranium mines, refinery plants, nuclear fuel plants, nuclear reactors, reprocessing facilities, and research facilities.

FAS statement shows that the North Korea has atomic energy research centers in Yongbyon and Sunchon and a atomic power plant in Sinpo. Nuclear weapons development organs include the Atomic Energy Department of Kim Il-song University; the Physics Department of Kanggye Defense College; the metal science department under the Chemical Department of and the physics Research Institute of Pyongsong College of Science; the college of physics in Yongbyon atomic research center; and uranium mines in Kusong in North Pyongan province, an unidentified place in North Hwanghae province, and Sunchon in South Pyongan province. Natural uranium has been processed near the cities of Sunchon and Pyongsan since the 1960's.

See the following locations for the Nuclear Facilities (Source: FAS):
FAS (Federation of American Scientists)


Recent IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) Press Release shows that International Nuclear Safety Experts Conclude IAEA Peer Review of Canada´s Regulatory System. An international team of nuclear safety experts today completed a two-week IAEA review of the regulatory framework and effectiveness of the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC). The team identified good practices within the system and gave advice on some areas for improvement. The IAEA has conveyed initial findings to Canadian authorities; the final report will be submitted by autumn.

The IAEA is the world´s center of cooperation in the nuclear field. It was set up as the world´s "Atoms for Peace" organization in 1957 within the United Nations family. The Agency works with its Member States and multiple partners worldwide to promote safe, secure and peaceful nuclear technologies.

The IAEA works for the safe, secure and peaceful uses of nuclear science and technology. Its key roles contribute to international peace and security, and to the World's Millennium Goals for social, economic and environmental development.

The IAEA is the world's nuclear inspectorate, with more than four decades of verification experience. Inspectors work to verify that safeguarded nuclear material and activities are not used for military purposes. The Agency is additionally responsible for the nuclear file in Iraq as mandated by the UN Security Council.

The IAEA helps countries to upgrade nuclear safety and security, and to prepare for and respond to emergencies. Work is keyed to international conventions, standards and expert guidance. The main aim is to protect people and the environment from harmful radiation exposure.

The IAEA also helps countries mobilize peaceful applications of nuclear science and technology. The work contributes to goals of sustainable development in fields of energy, environment, health, and agriculture, among others, and to cooperation in key areas of nuclear science and technology.

The IAEA's programmes encourage the development of the peaceful applications of nuclear technology, provide international safeguards against its misuse, and facilitate the application of safety measures in its use. The organization and its Director General, Mohamed ElBaradei, were jointly awarded the Nobel Peace Prize announced on 7 October 2005.

Although IAEA represents the International, it is our responsible to take care the nature resources and healthy environment, secure, clean energy economic development and make the green world. Here is a great example from King County , Washington for environmental support in order to preparing for climate change impacts.

Reported by catch4all.com, Sandra Englund, June 16, 2009.

Resources:

Yahoo.com

King County Solid Waste Division

IAEA.org

Wikipedia

 


 

North Korea warns of nuclear war amid rising tensions
Nuclear Test will DAMAGE
THE SOUTH KOREA, JAPAN AND BEYOND THE GREEN WORLD"


The vote on Resolution 1874, United States Ambassador Rosemary DiCarlo said that North Korea chose a path of provocation, and now they must face the consequences.
"United States welcomes the strong and united response to North Korea’s nuclear test, and is committed to implementing the provisions outlined by the Security Council"


According to SEOUL, South Korea - North Korea's communist regime has warned of a nuclear war on the Korean peninsula while vowing to step up its atomic bomb-making program in defiance of new U.N. sanctions.

The North's defiance presents a growing diplomatic headache for President Barack Obama as he prepares for talks Tuesday with his South Korean counterpart on the North's missile and nuclear programs.

A commentary Sunday in the North's the main state-run Rodong Sinmun newspaper, carried by the official Korean Central News Agency, claimed the U.S. has 1,000 nuclear weapons in South Korea. Another commentary published Saturday in the state-run Tongil Sinbo weekly claimed the U.S. has been deploying a vast amount of nuclear weapons in South Korea and Japan.

North Korea "is completely within the range of U.S. nuclear attack and the Korean peninsula is becoming an area where the chances of a nuclear war are the highest in the world," the Tongil Sinbo commentary said.

Kim Yong-kyu, a spokesman at the U.S. military command in Seoul, called the latest accusation "baseless," saying Washington has no nuclear bombs in South Korea. U.S. tactical nuclear weapons were removed from South Korea in 1991 as part of arms reductions following the Cold War.

On Saturday, North Korea's Foreign Ministry threatened war on any country that dared to stop its ships on the high seas under the new sanctions approved by the U.N. Security Council on Friday as punishment for the North's latest nuclear test.

It is not clear if the statements are simply rhetorical. Still, they are a huge setback for international attempts to rein in North Korea's nuclear ambitions following its second nuclear test on May 25. It first tested a nuclear device in 2006.

In its Saturday's statement, North Korea said it has been enriching uranium to provide fuel for its light-water reactor. It was the first public acknowledgment the North is running a uranium enrichment program in addition to its known plutonium-based program. The two radioactive materials are key ingredients in making atomic bombs.

On Sunday, Yonhap news agency reported South Korea and the U.S. have mobilized spy satellites, reconnaissance aircraft and human intelligence networks to obtain evidence that the North has been running a uranium enrichment program.

South Korea's Defense Ministry said it cannot confirm the report. The National Intelligence Service - South Korea's main spy agency - was not available for comment.

North Korea said more than one-third of 8,000 spent fuel rods in its possession has been reprocessed and all the plutonium extracted would be used to make atomic bombs. The country could harvest 13-18 pounds (6-8 kilograms) of plutonium - enough to make at least one nuclear bomb - if all the rods are reprocessed.

In addition, North Korea is believed to have enough plutonium for at least half a dozen atomic bombs.

North Korea says its nuclear program is a deterrent against the U.S., which it routinely accuses of plotting to topple its regime. Washington, which has 28,500 troops in South Korea, has repeatedly said it has no such intention.

The new U.N. sanctions are aimed at depriving the North of the financing used to build its rogue nuclear program. The resolution also authorized searches of North Korean ships suspected of transporting illicit ballistic missile and nuclear materials.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said the new U.N. penalties provide the necessary tools to help check North Korea's continued pursuit of nuclear weapons.

The sanctions show that "North Korea's pursuit of nuclear weapons and the capacity to deliver those weapons through missiles is not going to be accepted by the neighbors as well as the greater international community," Clinton said Saturday at a news conference in Canada.

The United Nations Security Council sent a clear and united message on June 12, 2009, when they voted unanimously to tighten sanctions on North Korea following the nation’s recent nuclear test and missile firings. The detonation on May 25 of the suspected nuclear device violated the 1953 armistice.

U.N. Resolution 1874 includes a number of measures aimed at stopping North Korea’s nuclear proliferation, including tougher inspections of cargo, an expanded arms embargo, and new financial restrictions on North Korea, curbing loans and money transfers that serve as funding for their nuclear program.

The vote on Resolution 1874, United States Ambassador Rosemary DiCarlo said that North Korea chose a path of provocation, and now they must face the consequences. "United States welcomes the strong and united response to North Korea’s nuclear test, and is committed to implementing the provisions outlined by the Security Council" said United States Ambassador Rosemary DiCarlo.

Sources:

Yahoo.com

The White House

Reported by catch4all.com, Sandra Englund

 


North Korea celebrates the Nuclear Tests
North Korea Nuclear Tests Reaction


THE WHITE HOUSE Office of the Press Secretary ________________________________________________________________

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
May 25, 2009

STATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT

Today, North Korea said that it has conducted a nuclear test in violation of international law. It appears to also have attempted a short range missile launch. These actions, while not a surprise given its statements and actions to date, are a matter of grave concern to all nations. North Korea's attempts to develop nuclear weapons, as well as its ballistic missile program, constitute a threat to international peace and security.

By acting in blatant defiance of the United Nations Security Council, North Korea is directly and recklessly challenging the international community. North Korea's behavior increases tensions and undermines stability in Northeast Asia. Such provocation will only serve to deepen North Korea's isolation. It will not find international acceptance unless it abandons its pursuit of weapons of mass destruction and their means of delivery.

The danger posed by North Korea's threatening activities warrants action by the international community. We have been and will continue working with our allies and partners in the Six-Party Talks as well as other members of the U.N. Security Council in the days ahead.

Source: The White House.


Click to see 787 Dreamliner

787 DREAMLINER Accomplishes Major Mileston : POWER ON

The Biggest
in the World
Boeing Airplane 747-8

You Will Never Forget Dreamliner 787

The Boeing Company Products


Boeing Outlook 2008 to 2027

Global Tanker Home Page


FUTURE OF FLIGHT


Positive 2003 || Positive 2004 || Positive 2005 |Positive 2006 |Positive 2007

Positive 2008
| Home


Catch4all.com is proud to provide positive websites for the communities and for
the positive viewers from all over the world.....

Thank you for visiting Catch4all.com. Please be sure bookmark our site.
Since 1999 ©Catch4all.com. All rights reserved.

 

Catch4all.com is proud to provide positive websites for the communities and for
the positive viewers from all over the world.....

Positive Viewers' Menu
2003 to 2008



Thank you for visiting Catch4all.com. Please be sure bookmark our site.
Since 1999 ©Catch4all.com. All rights reserved.